Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that are conducted in the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA);
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU / EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development.
  • Learn   more about the EU Clinical Trials Register   including the source of the information and the legal basis.


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   37220   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   6123   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.
    The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2004-000675-34
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:EU 101
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2005-11-02
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2004-000675-34
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center, (Pilot) Study of Osigraft® in Instrumented Posterolateral Fusions
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberEU 101
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan Information not present in EudraCT
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorUniversity Medical Center Utrecht
    B.1.3.4CountryNetherlands
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
    B.4.2Country
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisation
    B.5.2Functional name of contact point
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Information not present in EudraCT
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Osigraft
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderStryker Howmedica International S. de. R.L.
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationSpain
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Powder and solvent for solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPTopical use (Noncurrent)
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNEPTOTERMIN ALFA
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number3.5
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.13.1Other medicinal product typeOsigraft contains recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 7. This is a growth factor which is member of the TGF-B superfamily.
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Subjects qualifying for decompression and fusion of one spinal level (L3-S1) with the use of autograft will be recruited through the medical institutions of participating investigators. All subjects will have undergone non-operative treatment for at least six months prior to study enrollment.
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The objectives of this pilot study are to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of Osigraft® treatment as a replacement for autograft as measured by:
    1. (efficacy) comparison of overall fusion success and time to fusion considering radiographic evidence along with pain/function outcomes between the treatment and control groups;
    2. (safety) comparison of the complications between the treatment group and the control group.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study Information not present in EudraCT
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1) Diagnosis of Degenerative and/or Isthmic Spondylolisthesis and/or Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at the levels of L3-S1 with (a) Lumbar instability of at least 2 to 3 mm translation in standing standard radiographs or (b) at least 2 to 3 mm translation in flexion extension radiograms29,30 and/or angulation motion defined as >15° at L3-L4 level, >18° at L4-L5 level, and >17° at L5-S1 spine level.
    2) Leg and/or back pain with one or more of the following phenomena: radiculopathy, sensory deficit, motor weakness, reflex pathology, neurogenic claudication;
    3) The subject has been non-responsive to at least 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to study enrollment;
    4) The subject has a preoperative Oswestry Disability Index of 30-100;
    5) Fusion of only one lumbar level in the L-3 to S-1 region is indicated;
    6) The subject has no history of previous fusion attempt(s) to the affected spinal level;
    7) The subject is willing and able to understand, sign and date the study specific Patient Informed Consent, which has been approved by the Institutional Review Board;
    8) The subject agrees to comply with post-operative clinical and radiographic evaluations and required rehabilitation regimen;
    9) Age: the subject is skeletally mature between 18 and 80 years of age;
    10) Gender: both males and females can be included in the study.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1) The subject has gross instability as a result of Degenerative and/or Isthmic Spondylolisthesis and/or DDD that requires multiple levels fusion (an example would be exclusion of Grade IV Spondylolisthesis);
    2) The subject is severely osteoporotic/osteopenic as manifested by the presence of a history of osteoporotic spine fractures and/or medical treatment for osteoporosis and/or such changes on the AP/lateral radiographs that will make the surgeon decide to exclude this patient from any form of pedicle fixation;
    3) The subject has an active spinal and/or systemic infection;
    4) The subject has a systemic disease or condition, which would affect his/her ability to participate in the study requirements or the ability to evaluate the efficacy of the investigational product (i.e., active malignancy, neuropathy);
    5) The subject is a prisoner, a transient or has been treated for alcohol and/or drug abuse in an inpatient substance abuse program within six months prior to proposed study enrollment;
    6) The subject has participated in clinical trials evaluating investigational devices, pharmaceuticals or biologics within 3 months of enrollment in the study;
    7) The subject is a woman who intends to bear children within 1 year of enrolling in the study (e.g. is not post-menopausal, has not had a hysterectomy, is not on long term oral contraception);
    8) The subject is morbidly obese (defined as weight >60 percent over the recommended ideal weight as described in the 1996 Metropolitan Height and Weight Tables for Men and Women;
    9)The subject has a known sensitivity to any component of Osigraft®;
    10) The subject is known to require at the time of treatment, additional surgery to the lumbar spinal region within the next six months;
    11) Patients who have in the last year been prescribed systemic corticosteroids.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    The primary end point of this study is the 12 (+/- 45 days) months follow-up overall success rate. The success criteria are defined below. If the patient fails to achieve any of the succes criteria mentioned below, the patients will be classified as a failure.

    1. Radiographic demonstration of spinal fusion:
    - CT-scans indicating fusion defined as continuous intertransverse bony bridges at one of the two sides indicated the presence of fusion at that location.
    2. Oswestry Disability Index improvement of at least 20% from the pre-treatment visit.
    3. No revisions, removals or supplemental fixations. All re-operations that are intended to promote fusion at the treated level result in the patient being considered failure. Re-operations that are not intended to promote fusion, such as drain removal will not be considered failures. Revision, removals, supplemental fixations and re-operations are defined:
    - A revision is a procedure that adjusts or in any way modifies or removes part of the original implant configuration (hardware and/or bone graft procedure), with or without replacement of a component. A revision may also include adjusting the position of the original configuration;
    - A removal is a procedure where the entire original system configuration is removed with or without replacement;
    - A reoperation is any surgical procedure at the involved level(s) that does not remove, modify or add any components to the system;
    - A supplemental fixation is a procedure in which additional instrumentation not under study in the protocol is implanted (e.g., supplemental placement of a rod/screw system or a plate/screw system).
    4. Absence of a serious investigational-product -related adverse event during the course of the study.
    5. No unresolved neurological deficits at the final examination that were not present prior to study treatment, unless the deficit is due to a concurrent medical condition. Unresolved neurological deficits due to a concurrent medical condition will not be considered failures.
    6. No decreases in neurological status at the final examination from the preoperative evaluation, unless the decrease is due to a concurrent medical condition. Decreases in neurological status due to a concurrent medical condition will not be considered failures.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic Information not present in EudraCT
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group No
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other Yes
    E.8.1.7.1Other trial design description
    Double blind until the surgery.
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other Yes
    E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
    Comparison with autogenous bone from the own iliac crest of the patient.
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA Information not present in EudraCT
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Information not present in EudraCT
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months6
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years3
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero Information not present in EudraCT
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) Information not present in EudraCT
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) Information not present in EudraCT
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) Information not present in EudraCT
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) Information not present in EudraCT
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Information not present in EudraCT
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Information not present in EudraCT
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Information not present in EudraCT
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state10
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 150
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 150
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Not different from the normal treatment.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2004-12-21
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2004-05-27
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    As of 1.2.2020, the UK is no longer an EU Member State. However, EU law still applies to the UK during the transition period
    EU Clinical Trials Register Service Desk: https://servicedesk.ema.europa.eu
    European Medicines Agency © 1995-2020 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Legal notice
    EMA HMA