E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) |
|
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The objectives of this trial will be to confirm the safety and compare the efficacy of pegaptanib sodium when given as intravitreous injections of 0.3 mg/eye, 0.03 mg/eye or 0.003 mg/eye versus sham injections in a 2:2:1:2 ratio, respectively, as often as every 6 weeks for 3 years, in subjects with diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula associated with vision loss not due to ischemia.
|
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Secondary (at 1, 2 and 3 years unless specified):·
The proportion of subjects with a ≥15 letter improvement at 1 year and 2 years. The proportion of eyes experiencing a change in the degree of retinopathy by 2 or more steps. Changes in mean visual acuity over time. The proportion of subjects with a ≥10 letter improvement. The proportion of subjects requiring focal or grid laser
Other: Additional efficacy, safety and health related outcomes endpoints will be included. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
OPHTHALMIC CRITERIA
1. Subjects must have macular edema that involves the center of the macula with corresponding leakage on fluorescein angiogram. Leakage will be confirmed retrospectively by the IRC. 2. Foveal thickness of at least 300 microns (OCT center point thickness), with a standard deviation of the center point of <10%, an OCT signal strength of ≥5, and properly drawn ILM and RPE borders. As well, the initial OCT must be confirmed by repeat measurement on the same day, with the center point thicknesses being within 10% of each other. In cases that the OCT image software fails to properly draw ILM and RPE borders, if the IRC obtains a manual estimate of OCT center point thickness of at least 300 microns, then the patient will be considered eligible. 3. Best corrected distance visual acuity in the study eye must be a letter score between 65 and 35 inclusive (20/50 to 20/200 Snellen equivalents). 4.Clear ocular media and adequate pupillary dilatation to permit good quality stereoscopic fundus photography. 5.Intraocular pressure of 21 mmHg, or less. 6.The treating ophthalmologist should be comfortable that focal laser (direct and grid as needed) can be deferred for at least 18 weeks in the study eye, even though focal or grid laser is indicated.
GENERAL CRITERIA
1. Type I, or Type II diabetic subjects as defined by the WHO criteria, of either gender, and aged ≥18 years 2. Performance Status ≤2 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) / World Health Organization (WHO) scale. 3. Normal electrocardiogram (ECG), or clinically non-significant changes as determined by an internist. 4. Women must be using effective contraception, be post-menopausal for at least 12 months prior to trial entry, or surgically sterile. All women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at baseline and negative urine pregnancy tests immediately prior to each injection and use two effective forms of contraception during the trial and for at least 60 days following the last dose of pegaptanib sodium. 5. Adequate hematological function: hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL; platelet count ≥130 x 109/l; WBC ≥3.8 x 109/l. 6. Adequate liver function: serum bilirubin ≤1.5 mg/dL; SGOT/ALT, SGPT/AST, GGT and alkaline phosphatase within 2 x ULN. 7. Adequate renal function: serum creatinine ≤ 2.5 mg/dL and BUN within 2.5 x ULN. 8. Ability to provide written informed consent. 9. Ability to return for all trial visits.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Subjects will not be eligible for the trial if any of the following criteria are present systemically, or in the study eye:
1. Eyes with prior scatter (panretinal) photocoagulation or eyes in which scatter (panretinal) photocoagulation is needed now or is likely to be needed within the next 9 months (e.g. eyes with DRS high risk PDR not already adequately treated with photocoagulation). 2. Presence of any abnormality that is likely to confound assessment of visual acuity improvement in eyes in which macular edema resolves, or improves, such as non-perfusion for >1 disc area involving the foveal avascular zone (FAZ - involving 2 or more quadrants centered around the foveal avascular zone), epiretinal membrane associated with signs of contraction and/or significant opacification (i.e. striae within 1 disc diameter of the foveal center), or presence of chorioretinal atrophy involving the center of the macula. 3. Vitreomacular traction determined clinically and/or by OCT, which, in the investigator’s opinion, contributes to the macular edema (or causes associated foveal detachment), and would preclude improvement with pegaptanib sodium or sham treatment. 4. Any other cause of macular edema such as vitreous extension, or entrapment to anterior segment wound, or any retinal vein occlusion involving the macula. 5. Atrophy/scarring/fibrosis involving the center of the macula, including evidence of laser treated atrophy within 200 microns of FAZ. 6. Any subfoveal hard exudates, or RPE atrophy; or any present evidence, or past documentation of a foveal cyst (by fundus examination, FA or OCT). 7. Subjects who have received panretinal photocoagulation, YAG laser, or peripheral retinal cryoablation (for retinal tears only), or focal or grid photocoagulation, within the previous 16 weeks, or more than one prior focal or grid laser. 8. Significant media opacities, including cataract, which might interfere with visual acuity, assessment of toxicity or fundus photography. Subjects should not be entered if there is likelihood that they will require cataract surgery within the following 1 year. 9. Any intraocular surgery within 6 months of trial entry. 10. Previous vitrectomy. 11. HbA1C level ≥10% or recent signs of uncontrolled diabetes (3 or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia by DCCT (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial) definition [10] within 3 months of baseline, or 2 or more episodes of ketoacidosis within 1 year of baseline, or an episode of ketoacidosis within 3 months of baseline). 12. Any of the following underlying systemic diseases including: History or evidence of severe cardiac disease, e.g. NYHA Functional Class III or IV, clinical or medical history of unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, or revascularization procedure within 6 months prior to baseline, or ventricular tachyarrythmias requiring ongoing treatment. History (previous surgery or amputation), or evidence (symptoms of claudication) of clinically significant peripheral vascular disease. Clinically significant impaired renal function (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL or s/p renal transplant or receiving dialysis). Clinically significant impaired hepatic function. Stroke (within 12 months of trial entry). Any major surgical procedure within one month of trial entry 13. Previous radiation to the head in the region of the study eye. 14. Any prior treatment with an investigational agent for DME (including intravitreal, subconjunctival or subtenons corticosteroids) at any time, or during the past 90 days for any other condition. 15. Known serious allergies to the fluorescein dye used in angiography, or to the components of pegaptanib sodium formulation. 16. Systolic BP >160 (2 different readings) or diastolic BP >100 (2 different readings). 17. Acute ocular or periocular infection.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary efficacy endpoint will be the proportion of subjects who experience a ≥ 15 letter (or 3-line) improvement in vision (ETDRS) from baseline. This endpoint will be assessed at 3 years to test the significance of the comparison of the proportions of 3-line improvement in each dose group versus sham. The 3 year endpoint is the primary endpoint, while the 1 and 2 year endpoints will be secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint will be tested in a stepwise fashion . An interim analysis (IA) will be performed by the Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee (IDMC) in consultation with the independent holder of the database on all subjects who have completed the one year time point or have dropped out . The purpose of this IA is to determine if pegaptanib sodium is efficacious for subjects with DME after one year of therapy. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 3 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 3 |