Clinical Trial Results:
A randomised controlled comparison of Campath−Tacrolimus vs IL2R MoAb −Tacrolimus / Mycophenolate as Induction−Maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2005-002856-17 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
01 Jun 2011
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Feb 2020
|
First version publication date |
08 Feb 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
SMHREN0501
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT00246129 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Pread Street, London, United Kingdom, W2 1NY
|
||
Public contact |
Adam McLean, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , adammclean@nhs.net
|
||
Scientific contact |
Adam McLean, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , adammclean@nhs.net
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
04 Jun 2012
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
01 Jun 2011
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
01 Jun 2011
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To determine which of two well established anti−rejection drug combinations has the best outcome in kidney transplantation.
The investigational regime (Regime 1: IL2RMoAb−Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate) uses a combination of a relatively mild intial treatment with more potent long−term therapy, the second (comparator) regime (Regime 2: Campath−Tacrolimus) uses potent inital treatment, with simpler, less potent long−term treatment; this is our current standard baseline immunotherapeutic regime.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
None
|
||
Background therapy |
All patients received 3 months of CMV prophylaxis with 450 mg once daily Valganciclovir initially, adjusted for estimated glomerular filtration rate, and 6 months Pneumocystis prophylaxis with Co-Trimoxazole 480 mg three times per week. Both groups received a rapid steroid withdrawal regimen (0.5 g IV methyl-prednisolone intra-operatively at the release of vascular clamps with oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg up to max 60 mg on postoperative days 1 to 3 then prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg up to max 30 mg on days 4 to 7 followed by steroid cessation, unless rejection had occurred during the week 1.) | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
11 Oct 2005
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 123
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
123
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
123
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
116
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
7
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Participants were recruited between 2005 and 2011. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
The kidney transplant participants were recruiting at the West London Renal and Transplant Centre. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Campath-Tacrolimus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received alemtuzumab induction as a single IV infusion of 30 mg alemtuzumab (MabCampath) on return from theaters with tacrolimus (Prograf, Astellas) monotherapy long-term maintenance. Tacrolimus initially was 0.1 mg/kg in two equally divided doses, adjusted to achieve target 12 hr trough levels of 5 to 8 ng/mL by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (equivalent to 6.5–10 ng/mL measured by immunoassay). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Campath
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Alemtuzumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received alemtuzumab induction as a single IV infusion of 30 mg on return from theatre
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tacrolimus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Prograf, Astellas
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, soft
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received on return from theaters and long-term monotherapy. Initially, 0.1 mg/kg in two equally divided doses, adjusted to achieve target 12 hr trough levels of 5 to 8 ng/mL by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (equivalent to 6.5–10 ng/mL measured by immunoassay).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Daclizumab-Tacrolimus-Mycophenolate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients received daclizumab (Zenapax) induction given as 2x2 mg/kg infusions on return from theaters and on day 14, with combined tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept) long-term maintenance. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tacrolimus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Prograf, Astellas
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, soft
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Initially, 0.15 mg/kg in two divided doses, adjusted to target trough levels of 8 to 12 ng/mL (equivalent to 10 –15 ng/mL).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Mycophenolate mofetil
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Cellcept
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Initially, 500 mg BD adjusted to achieve target 12 hr trough mycophenolic acid levels of 1.5 to 3.0 mg/L.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Daclizumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Zenapax
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Induction given as 2x2 mg/kg infusions on return from theaters and on day 14.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Campath-Tacrolimus
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received alemtuzumab induction as a single IV infusion of 30 mg alemtuzumab (MabCampath) on return from theaters with tacrolimus (Prograf, Astellas) monotherapy long-term maintenance. Tacrolimus initially was 0.1 mg/kg in two equally divided doses, adjusted to achieve target 12 hr trough levels of 5 to 8 ng/mL by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (equivalent to 6.5–10 ng/mL measured by immunoassay). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Daclizumab-Tacrolimus-Mycophenolate
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients received daclizumab (Zenapax) induction given as 2x2 mg/kg infusions on return from theaters and on day 14, with combined tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept) long-term maintenance. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Campath-Tacrolimus
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received alemtuzumab induction as a single IV infusion of 30 mg alemtuzumab (MabCampath) on return from theaters with tacrolimus (Prograf, Astellas) monotherapy long-term maintenance. Tacrolimus initially was 0.1 mg/kg in two equally divided doses, adjusted to achieve target 12 hr trough levels of 5 to 8 ng/mL by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (equivalent to 6.5–10 ng/mL measured by immunoassay). | ||
Reporting group title |
Daclizumab-Tacrolimus-Mycophenolate
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients received daclizumab (Zenapax) induction given as 2x2 mg/kg infusions on return from theaters and on day 14, with combined tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept) long-term maintenance. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
One Year Survival With a Functioning Graft | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
1 year
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Functioning graft | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Campath-Tacrolimus v Daclizumab-Tacrolimus-Mycophenolate
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
123
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.467 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Occurrence, Severity, and Type of Rejection Episodes | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
1 year
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Rejection free survival | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Campath-Tacrolimus v Daclizumab-Tacrolimus-Mycophenolate
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
123
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.138 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Logrank | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Occurrence, Severity, and Type of Infection Episodes | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
1 year
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Initial Length of Stay in Hospital | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
1 year
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Early Development of Scarring in the Grafts | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
1 year
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Graft Function, Creatinin level | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
2 years
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Patient Survival | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
2 years
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Graft Survival Censored for Death With Function | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
2 years
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
1 years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
10
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Campath-Tacrolimus
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Campath induction with 7-day short-course steroids followed by tacrolimus monotherapy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Daclizumab-Tacrolimus-Mycophenolate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Daclizumab induction with 7-day short-course steroids followed by Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate mofetil therapy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21836540 |