E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Patients with UA or NSTEMI or STEMI managed with an early PCI. |
|
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 8.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10064347 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To determine whether a high dose regimen of clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose [LD] followed by 150 mg once daily (o.d) from Day 2 to 7, then 75 mg o.d from Day 8 to 30 on the high dose arm) is superior to a standard dose of clopidogrel (300 mg LD followed by low dose 75 mg o.d form Day 2 to 30) in preventing the composite of cardiovascular death, MI or stroke acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients with unstable angina (UA) or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or ST segment myocardial infarction (STEMI), who are treated with an early invasive strategy with an intent to perform PCI as early as possible and no later than 72 hours of randomization. Also to determine, in a factorial design, whether a high dose of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is superior to a low dose of ASA in preventing the composite of cardiovascular death, MI or stroke in ACS patients. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
To evaluate the safety of the clopidogrel high dose regimen compared to the standard dose regimen in terms of major bleeding (i.e. severe bleeding and other major bleeding).To evaluate the safety of the ASA high dose regimen (300-325 mg) compared to the low dose (75-100mg) regimen in terms of major bleeding (i.e. severe bleeding and other major bleeding) and the net efficacy to safety balance of death or MI or stoke to major bleeding. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | Yes |
E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives |
Full title: Effect of type of access for PCI (Radial or Femoral) on bleeding rate-substudy. Date: 2006-11-21 Version: 2.0 Related objectives: - To determine if a trans-radial access approach is superior to a trans-femoral access site approach in terms of reducing major bleeding, need for blood transfusion and vascular access site complications. - To compare ischemic complications, including death, MI and stroke between a trans-radial versus a trans-femoral approach. - To compare each strategy in terms of duration of the procedure, amount of contrast dye used, proportion of patients developing contrast induced nephropathy, need for conversion to an alternative access route and costs incurred - To determine if radial artery access site procedures lead to shorter hospital stays compared with femoral access site procedures. |
|
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. ACS patients. 1.1 UA/NSTEMI patients. Ischemic symptoms suspected to represent a non-ST segment elevation ACS (unstable angina [UA] or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]) defined as: Clinical history consistent with new onset, or a worsening pattern, of characteristic ischemic chest pain occurring at rest or with minimal exertion (lasting longer than 10minutes) and planned to be managed with an early invasive strategy with intent to perform a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as early as possible and no later than 72 hours of randomization. AND at least one of the following a) Electrocardiogram (ECG) changes compatible with new ischemia [ST depression of at least 1mm or transient ST elevation or ST elevation of less than or equal to 1 mm or T wave inversion greater than 3 mm in at least 2 contiguous leads]. or b) Already elevated cardiac enzymes (e.g. CKMB) or biomarkers (troponin I or T) above the upper limit of normal. OR 1.2. STEMI patients. a) Presenting with signs or syptoms of acute myocardial infarction lasting at least 20 minutes and planned to be managed with an early invasive strategy, i.e. with intent to perform a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as early as possible and no later than 72 hours of randomisation (this may include either primary PCI or initial management with medical therapy). b) Definite ECG changes compatible with STEMI persistent ST-elevation (≥2 mm in two contiguous precordial leads, or >1mm in at least two limb leads) new left bundle branch block Q wave in 2 contiguous leads. 2. Randomized within 24 hours of onset of the most recent episode of chest pain or symptoms consistent with ischemia/infarction. 3. Written informed consent.
EFFECT OF TYPE OF ACCESS FOR PCI (RADIAL or FEMORAL) ON BLEEDING RATE-SUBSTUDY: 1. Patient must meet all of the eligibility criteria and be randomized into the CURRENT/OASIS 7 trial. 2. Suitable candidate for either radial or femoral artery PCI. 3. Intent to perform same-sitting angiography and PCI. 4. Palpable radial artery with a documented normal Allen’s Test. 5. Acceptance by operator to use whichever route is assigned by the randomization process. 6. Previous experience of the operator with at least 50 cases of radial artery access within past year.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Age < 18 years 2. Use of oral anticoagulants within the last 10 days with an INR > 1.5 or planned use during the hospitalization period 3. Administration of clopidogrel > 75 mg within 24 hours prior to randomization 4. Contraindication to the use of clopidogrel and/or ASA: • History of drug allergy to thienopyridine derivatives or ASA • History of clinically significant or persistent thrombocytopenia or neutropenia 5. Active bleeding or significant increased risk of bleeding, such as elderly patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy and other potent antithrombotic agents, severe hepatic insufficiency, current peptic ulceration, proliferative diabetic retinophaty. 6. History of severe systematic bleeding (e.g. gastrointestinal bleeding, gross hematuria, intraocular bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, or intracranial hemorrhage), or other history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy. 7. Previously entered in the study 8. Investigational treatment (drug or device) within the previous 30 days 9. Medical, geographic, or social factors making study participation impractical, or inability to provide written informed consent and to understand the full meaning of the informed consent.
EFFECT OF TYPE OF ACCESS FOR PCI (RADIAL or FEMORAL) ON BLEEDING RATE-SUBSTUDY: 1. As per CURRENT/OASIS 7 main study criteria. 2. Cardiogenic Shock. 3. Prior CABG surgery with use of more than one internal mammary artery. 4. Documented severe peripheral vascular disease precluding a femoral approach.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
FOR CLOPIDOGREL DOSE COMPARISON(S) First efficacy endpoint: First occurrence of any component of the composite cluster of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke at 30 Days. Primary safety endpoint: Major bleeding (i.e. severe bleeding and other major bleeding) at 30 Days.
FOR ASA DOSE COMPARISON(S) Primary efficacy endpoint: First occurrence of any component of the composite cluster of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke at 30 Days. Safety endpoint: Major bleeding (i.e. severe bleeding and other major bleeding) at 30 days. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7.1.3 | Other | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
|
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 2 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 237 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
| |
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 7 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 3 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 1 |