Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2006-000674-73
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:LJP 394-90-14
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Ongoing
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2007-12-03
    Trial results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2006-000674-73
    A.3Full title of the trial
    ESTUDIO ALEATORIZADO, A DOBLE CIEGO, CONTROLADO CON PLACEBO, DE TRES BRAZOS, GRUPOS PARALELOS, MULTICÉNTRICO Y MULTINACIONAL SOBRE LA SEGURIDAD Y EFICACIA DE 300 MG Y 900 MG DE ABETIMUS SÓDICO EN PACIENTES CON LUPUS ERITEMATOSO SISTÉMICO (LES) CON ANTECEDENTES DE NEFROPATÍA
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberLJP 394-90-14
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan Information not present in EudraCT
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorLa Jolla Pharmaceutical Company
    B.1.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
    B.4.2Country
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisation
    B.5.2Functional name of contact point
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community Yes
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation numberEU/3/01/064
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameAbetimus sodium
    D.3.2Product code LJP 394
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNAbetimus Sodium
    D.3.9.1CAS number 167362-48-3
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeLJP 394
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number50
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.13.1Other medicinal product typeB lymphocyte toleragen
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSolution for infusion
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboIntravenous use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Systemic lupus erythematosus patients with a history of renal disease
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 9.1
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10042945
    E.1.2Term Systemic lupus erythematosus
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease Yes
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether abetimus
    sodium is more effective than placebo in delaying the time to renal flare in SLE
    patients with a history of SLE renal disease. The safety and efficacy of abetimus
    sodium in SLE patients will be evaluated at weekly doses of 300 and 900 mg
    over the intended 52-week exposure period.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    The secondary objectives of the trial are to determine whether treatment with
    abetimus sodium is more effective than placebo
    --in reducing proteinuria
    --in delaying time to all major SLE flares
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    Each patient must meet all the following criteria in order to participate in
    this trial:

    2.1.1 Males or females between 12 and 70 years old, inclusive.
    2.1.2 Female patients must be non-pregnant and non-lactating and have a negative serum pregnancy test result prior to enrollment in the study. Female patients of childbearing potential (including peri-menopausal women who have had a menstrual period within 1 year) must be using appropriate birth control (defined as a method which results in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year, when used consistently and correctly, for example oral contraceptives, contraceptive patch, implants,
    injectables, some intrauterine contraceptive devices [IUDs], or sexual abstinence) during the entire duration of the study. Males enrolled in the trial must have no plans to father a child during the course of the trial and agree to use adequate birth control methods.
    2.1.3. Diagnosis of SLE for purposes of this trial utilize the 1996 Revised Criteria for the Classification of SLE as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) where a diagnosis of SLE is established when ≥ 4 of the 11 criteria are met (refer to Section 8.2 of protocol).
    2.1.4 At least one documented episode of active SLE renal disease within 4 years prior to randomization at study Visit 3 as defined by at least one of the following:
    - A renal biopsy showing active lesions of SLE, Morphologic Classification of Lupus Nephritis defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) Class III, IV or V (refer to Section 8.3 of protocol)
    - Increase in serum creatinine:
    • by greater than 0.3 mg/dL if previous value was less than 2.0 mg/dL
    • by greater than 0.4 mg/dL if previous value was 2.0 mg/dL to 5.0 mg/dL
    • AND either hematuria OR a C3, C4 or CH50 below lower limits of normal or at least 25% lower than a previous value.
    Patients with hereditary C4 deficiency cannot qualify on the C4 or CH50 criterion alone.
    -Increase in proteinuria:
    • to greater than 1000 mg/24 hr if the previous value was < 200 mg/24 hr
    • to greater than 2000 mg/24 hr if the previous value was ≥ 200 mg/24 hr and ≤ 1000 mg/24 hr
    • to greater than 2 times the previous value if that value was > 1000 mg/24 hr
    - Use of cyclophosphamide to treat lupus nephritis that is documented in clinical or hospital records.
    2.1.5 Elevated anti-dsDNA antibody concentration at pre-screening Visit 0 (≥ 10 IU/mL) as measured by the Farr assay at the regional central laboratory.
    2.1.6. Ability to communicate meaningfully with the investigational staff, competence to give written informed consent, and ability to comply with the entire study procedure.
    2.1.7 Duly executed, written, informed consent obtained from the patient, next of kin, or other legal representative.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Any of the following will exclude a patient from this trial:

    2.2.1 Active SLE renal disease in the 3 months prior to Visit 3 as evidenced by:
    - Increase in serum creatinine:
    • by greater than 0.3 mg/dL if previous value was less than 2.0 mg/dL
    • by greater than 0.4 mg/dL if previous value was 2.0 mg/dL to 5.0 mg/dL
    • AND either hematuria OR a C3, C4 or CH50 below lower limits of normal or at least 25% lower than a previous value.
    - Reproducible increase in proteinuria:
    • to greater than 1000 mg/24 hr if the previous value was < 200 mg/24 hr
    • to greater than 2000 mg/24 hr if the previous value was ≥ 200 mg/24 hr and ≤ 1000 mg/24 hr
    • to greater than 2 times the previous value if that value was > 1000 mg/24 hr
    2.2.2 An increase in the anti-dsDNA antibody concentration of more than 50% with an incremental increase of at least 50 units in anti-dsDNA antibody concentration by Farr assay between the samples taken at Visit 0 and Visit 1 during the screening period.
    2.2.3 Use of the following therapeutics:
    - Prednisone > 20 mg/day within 1 month prior to Visit 1
    - Any use of the following therapies or therapeutics within 2 months prior to randomization or 1 month prior to Visit 1:
    • alkylating agents (e.g., cyclophosphamide)
    • TNF inhibitors (e.g., etanercept, infliximab)
    • cyclosporine
    • plasmapheresis
    • intravenous immunoglobulin
    • prosorba column
    - Any use of mycophenolate mofetil that exceeds 1000 mg/day 1 month prior to Visit 1
    - Any use of azathioprine that exceeds 100 mg/day within 1 month prior to Visit 1
    - Any use of methotrexate that exceeds 10 mg/week within 1 month prior to Visit 1
    - Any use of leflunomide that exceeds 10 mg/day within 1 month prior to Visit 1
    - Any use of rituximab within 5 months prior to Visit 1
    - Previous or concurrent medications and other therapies or devices that in the judgment of the Investigator are likely to confound the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of abetimus sodium. Examples include:
    - immunosuppressants or immunomodulatory drugs other than those therapies specifically noted above to include new immunomodulatory agents that may become commercially available during the course of the study
    - drugs that have the potential to induce SLE (e.g., isoniazid, phenytoin, hydralazine, procainamide, etc.)
    - radiation therapy within 1 year.
    - If the Investigator has any question concerning a particular medication, he/she should discuss this with the Medical Monitor prior to enrollment.
    - Patient has received any investigational new drug or device within 30 days prior to screening or 5 half-lives of the agent (whichever is longer), or any investigational new drug with a long-term effect.
    - Prior participation in study LJP 394-90-14
    2.2.4 Exclusionary laboratory values:
    • leukocyte count < 2,000 cells/mm3
    • platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3
    • hemoglobin < 8.5 gm/dL
    • serum hepatic transaminases ≥ 3X the upper limit of normal
    • serum creatinine > 3.5 mg/dL within the 2 months prior to randomization
    2.2.5 Malignant disease or immunodeficiency syndrome within 5 years, excepting patients with basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin with complete excision and clean borders.
    2.2.6 Evidence of current abuse of drugs or alcohol.
    2.2.7 History of poor procedural compliance in previous investigational studies.
    2.2.8 History of serious cardiac disease or functional classification New York Heart Association Class III or IV.
    2.2.9 Patient has previously undergone organ transplantation.
    2.2.10 Other medical conditions, including but not limited to diabetic nephropathy, uncontrolled hypertension, history of patient being HIV positive, that are considered by the Investigator to preclude adequate evaluation of drug safety or efficacy.
    2.2.11 Patient has known hypersensitivity to the class of medications under study or any of the constituents of abetimus.
    2.2.12 Patients who have any other acute or chronic disease which in the opinion of the Investigator may influence the outcome of the study should be discussed with the Medical Monitor prior to enrollment
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    4.13.1. The primary efficacy endpoint, time to first renal flare, will be based on laboratory data from the central laboratory and confirmed by supporting data as stipulated in section 4.13.2. and other relevant sections.
    For renal flare, laboratory data leading to the primary endpoint will be considered valid for defining the endpoint only after causes other than increased activity of SLE renal disease have been excluded and the Principal Investigator, with concurrence of the Medical Monitor, has attributed the changes in laboratory values to an SLE-related renal flare. An independent Renal Events Committee will review renal flare data to adjudicate the attribution of renal flares to SLE prior to the data from the trial being unblinded.
    Patients reaching a renal flare endpoint are encouraged to stay in the study and receive weekly administration of study drug until they complete the one-year evaluation period. Patients experiencing a renal flare may be treated with prednisone, cyclophosphamide, and//or other immunosuppressive agents as needed.

    4.13.2. .... A renal flare endpoint will have been reached if one or the other of the following criteria, or both, are met following a renal flare signal as outlined in the protocol.
    Either:
    A reproducible increase in serum creatinine of > 20% OR at least 0.3
    mg/dL, whichever is greater. This endpoint cannot be met using this
    criterion unless this increase is documented by two consecutive tests
    from two different days and each consecutive test continues to meet the
    endpoint increase in serum creatinine and each of the consecutive tests
    is accompanied by the presence of clinically significant proteinuria
    (> 1000 mg/24 h) and/or red cell casts.
    Or:
    A reproducible increase in 24-hr urine protein:
    • to greater than 1000 mg/24 hr if the screening value was
    < 200 mg/24 hr
    • to greater than 2000 mg/24 hr if the screening value was
    ≥ 200 mg/24 hr and ≤ 1000 mg/24 hr
    • to greater than 2 times the screening value if that value was
    > 1000 mg/24 hr
    AND the documentation of increased urinary protein is reproducible and
    is based on specimens from 2 different days. This will require at least two
    24-hr urine collections.

    4.13.3 Subsequent Flares
    A subsequent flare (second flare, third flare, etc.) will be considered to have occured if the first flare has resolved, i.e., the parameters responsible for the first flare have returned to baseline and remain at baseline for at least 3 months. The primary endpoint, time to renal flare, will be based exclusively on the occurence of the first on-study renal flare.

    Safety and tolerability Endpoints:
    Adverse experiences, laboratory parameters, reasons for premature
    study termination, and cause(s) of death will be collected and assessed
    as measures of safety and tolerability.
    All patients who receive at least one dose of study drug will be included in
    analyses of safety and tolerability.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic Yes
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response Yes
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned3
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA23
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA Information not present in EudraCT
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    All clinical trial patients must be followed at 30, 60, and 90 days following the last dose of the study drug in order to report SAEs occuring within that timeframe. Follow up of all SAEs will be continued until the overall clinical outcome has been ascertained, the event has resolved or stabilized, or the event has been diagnosed as chronic.
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months10
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years1
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months10
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 Yes
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Yes
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally Yes
    F.3.3.6.1Details of subjects incapable of giving consent
    Adolescents can be included in this trial with consent from parent or legal guardian
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state15
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 105
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 730
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Patient will receive normal treatment of the condition.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2008-02-21
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2007-12-03
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusOngoing
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun May 05 21:20:12 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA