Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A phase III trials program exploring the integration of Bevacizumab, Everolimus (RAD001), and Lapatinib into current neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimes for primary breast cancer

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2006-005834-19
    Trial protocol
    DE  
    Global end of trial date
    26 Feb 2016

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    16 Sep 2021
    First version publication date
    16 Sep 2021
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    GeparQuinto CSR Synopsis

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    GBG44
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT00567554
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    GBG Forschungs GmbH
    Sponsor organisation address
    Martin Behaim Str. 12, Neu-Isenburg, Germany, 63263
    Public contact
    Medicine and Research, GBG Forschungs GmbH, publications@gbg.de
    Scientific contact
    Medicine and Research, GBG Forschungs GmbH, publications@gbg.de
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    26 Feb 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    26 Feb 2016
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To compare the pCR rates of neoadjuvant treatment of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T) with or without bevacizumab (EC-T vs ECB-TB) in patients with HER2-negative primary breast cancer (Setting I). To compare the pCR rates of neoadjuvant treatment with weekly paclitaxel with or without Everolimus (RAD001) (Pw vs PwR) in patients with HER2-negative primary breast cancer showing no sonographic response to 4 cycles of EC+/-B (Setting II). To compare the pCR rates of neoadjuvant treatment with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel with either trastuzumab or lapatinib (ECH-TH vs ECL-TL) in patients with HER2-positive primary breast cancer (Setting III).
    Protection of trial subjects
    The trial protocol including amendments, the patient information and the informed consent were reviewed and approved from a properly constituted IRB/IEC for each site prior to the study start. The trial was in compliance with the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) - Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) (E6), and the Commission Directives in the European Community as well as with the applicable German national laws and regulations, and with Declaration of Helsinki and its revisions in all aspects of preparation, monitoring, reporting, auditing, and archiving.
    Background therapy
    cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, epirubicin, paclitaxel
    Evidence for comparator
    Standard of Care (SoC)
    Actual start date of recruitment
    07 Nov 2007
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Scientific research
    Long term follow-up duration
    10 Years
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 2600
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    2600
    EEA total number of subjects
    2600
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    2341
    From 65 to 84 years
    259
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Between November 2007 and August 2015, 2600 patients with breast cancer (BC) were randomised: Setting I (HER2- BC): 1948 randomised, 1925 started treatment Setting II (HER2- BC, non responder): 403 (371 from Setting I +32 after additional recruitment) randomised, 395 started treatment Setting III (HER2+ BC): 620 randomised, 615 started treatment

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Patients with unilateral or bilateral primary carcinoma of the breast confirmed histologically by core biopsy; locally advanced tumors with cT3 or cT4 or HR-negative tumours or HR-positive with cN+ (for cT2) or pN SLN+ (for cT1) tumours; known HER2 status; age >= 18 years; Karnofsky index >=80%, normal cardiac function.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    ECB-TB (Setting I)
    Arm description
    HER2-negative disease (Setting I) All enrolled HER2-negative patients were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel with Bevacizumab (ECB-TB) or wthout Bevacizumab (EC-T). After 4 cycles of EC +/-B the sonographic evaluation of response was performed. Patients with complete or partial response continued with the assigned treatment. Patients with disease progression went off-study. Patients without response went off setting I (N=371) and were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either Pw or PwR (Setting II); these patients were considered as treatment failures (no pCR) for setting I regardless of their actual outcome after setting II and surgery. Additional 32 were randomised in setting II. Here setting II is presented as subject analysis set 1 and 2. A total of 974 patients were randomised to receive ECB-TB, and 956 patients started treatment (18 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    AVASTIN® (Bevacizumab)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Dosage: 15 mg/kg BW i.v. Duration of tretament: 12 weeks (4 cycles 1 q22) with EC, if response than 12 weeks (4 cycles 1 q 22) with T.

    Arm title
    EC-T (Setting I)
    Arm description
    Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel (EC-T) (Setting I), for more information see arm ECB-TB A total of 974 patients were randomised to receive EC-T and 969 started treatment (5 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).
    Arm type
    control arm without bevacizumab

    Investigational medicinal product name
    n.a.
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    reference therapy: cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, docetaxel
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Dosage: cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m2, epirubicin (E) 90 mg/m2, docetaxel (T) 100 mg/m2 Duration of tretament: 12 weeks (4 cycles 1 q22) EC, if response than 12 weeks (4 cycles 1 q22) with T.

    Arm title
    ECH-TH (Setting III)
    Arm description
    HER2-positive disease (Setting III) Patients with HER2-positive tumours received chemotherapy with EC followed by T and were randomised to anti-HER2 treatment either with trastuzumab (ECH-TH) or with lapatinib (ECL-TL). The dose of docetaxel was increased from 75 mg/m2 to 100 mg/m2 (Amendment 1). The dose of lapatinib was reduced from 1250 mg daily to 1000 mg daily (Amendment 2). A total of 309 patients were randomised to receive ECH-TH and 307 started treatment (2 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Dosage: loading dose: 8 mg/kg BW i.v., thereafter maintenance dose: 6 mg/kg BW i.v. Duration of treatment: 24 weeks preoperative (8 cycles 1 q 22)

    Arm title
    ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Arm description
    HER2-positive disease (Setting III) Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel + Lapatinib (ECL-TL), for more details see arm ECH-TH. A total of 311 patients were randomszed to receive ECL-TL and 308 started treatment (3 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    TYVERB® (Lapatinib)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Oral drops
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Dosage: 1250 mg orally, since Amendment 2: 1000 mg orally Duration of treatment: 24 weeks (daily)

    Number of subjects in period 1 [1]
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Started
    956
    969
    307
    308
    Completed
    633
    637
    264
    206
    Not completed
    323
    332
    43
    102
         Adverse event, serious fatal
    -
    1
    -
    -
         missing
    -
    -
    5
    1
         Physician decision
    21
    36
    9
    17
         unknown
    5
    1
    1
    21
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    94
    32
    13
    39
         patient wish
    38
    18
    10
    22
         other
    4
    -
    2
    -
         disease progression
    11
    23
    3
    2
         switch to setting II
    150
    221
    -
    -
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: The worldwide number of patinets (pts) enrolled in the trial icluded all settings (2600 patients). In setting I, 1948 pts were randomised, of whom 371 pts (nonresponder) were further randomised in setting II plus 32 additionally recruited pts (total 403 pts)=subject analysis set 1 and 2. In setting III, 620 pts were randomised. A total of 2540 pts (1925 in settings I+II and 615 in setting III) who started treatment were included in the analyses (efficacy and safety analysis set).

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    ECB-TB (Setting I)
    Reporting group description
    HER2-negative disease (Setting I) All enrolled HER2-negative patients were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel with Bevacizumab (ECB-TB) or wthout Bevacizumab (EC-T). After 4 cycles of EC +/-B the sonographic evaluation of response was performed. Patients with complete or partial response continued with the assigned treatment. Patients with disease progression went off-study. Patients without response went off setting I (N=371) and were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either Pw or PwR (Setting II); these patients were considered as treatment failures (no pCR) for setting I regardless of their actual outcome after setting II and surgery. Additional 32 were randomised in setting II. Here setting II is presented as subject analysis set 1 and 2. A total of 974 patients were randomised to receive ECB-TB, and 956 patients started treatment (18 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Reporting group title
    EC-T (Setting I)
    Reporting group description
    Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel (EC-T) (Setting I), for more information see arm ECB-TB A total of 974 patients were randomised to receive EC-T and 969 started treatment (5 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Reporting group title
    ECH-TH (Setting III)
    Reporting group description
    HER2-positive disease (Setting III) Patients with HER2-positive tumours received chemotherapy with EC followed by T and were randomised to anti-HER2 treatment either with trastuzumab (ECH-TH) or with lapatinib (ECL-TL). The dose of docetaxel was increased from 75 mg/m2 to 100 mg/m2 (Amendment 1). The dose of lapatinib was reduced from 1250 mg daily to 1000 mg daily (Amendment 2). A total of 309 patients were randomised to receive ECH-TH and 307 started treatment (2 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Reporting group title
    ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Reporting group description
    HER2-positive disease (Setting III) Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel + Lapatinib (ECL-TL), for more details see arm ECH-TH. A total of 311 patients were randomszed to receive ECL-TL and 308 started treatment (3 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Reporting group values
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III) Total
    Number of subjects
    956 969 307 308 2540
    Age categorical
    age in years at baseline (Setting I)
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    857 871 281 277 2286
        From 65-84 years
    97 98 26 30 251
        85 years and over
    0 0 0 0 0
        missing
    2 0 0 1 3
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (full range (min-max))
    49 (21 to 75) 48 (24 to 78) 50 (25 to 74) 50 (21 to 73) -
    Gender categorical
    Only female patients were randomised
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    956 969 307 308 2540
        Male
    0 0 0 0 0
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    PwR (Setting II)
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    HER2-negative disease without response after 4 cycles of treatment (Setting II) Patients were randomised to weekly paclitaxel plus everolimus (RAD001, PwR) or weekly paclitaxel alone (Pw). Treatment with paclitaxel started within 7-14 days after the start of RAD001. Additionally, patients with treatment of four cycles of epirubicin-cyclophopshamide outside the study were randomised into Setting II after Amendment 2 in order to fill-in this setting. A total of 202 patients were randomised to receive PwR and 197 started treatment (5 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Subject analysis set title
    Pw (Setting II)
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Paclitaxel weekly (Setting II), for mor details see subject analysis set PwR. A total of 201 patients were randomised to receive Pw and 198 started treatment (3 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Subject analysis sets values
    PwR (Setting II) Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects
    197
    198
    Age categorical
    age in years at baseline (Setting I)
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    169
    171
        From 65-84 years
    26
    25
        85 years and over
    0
    0
        missing
    2
    2
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (full range (min-max))
    50 (28 to 76)
    51 (27 to 75)
    Gender categorical
    Only female patients were randomised
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    197
    198
        Male
    0
    0

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    ECB-TB (Setting I)
    Reporting group description
    HER2-negative disease (Setting I) All enrolled HER2-negative patients were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel with Bevacizumab (ECB-TB) or wthout Bevacizumab (EC-T). After 4 cycles of EC +/-B the sonographic evaluation of response was performed. Patients with complete or partial response continued with the assigned treatment. Patients with disease progression went off-study. Patients without response went off setting I (N=371) and were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either Pw or PwR (Setting II); these patients were considered as treatment failures (no pCR) for setting I regardless of their actual outcome after setting II and surgery. Additional 32 were randomised in setting II. Here setting II is presented as subject analysis set 1 and 2. A total of 974 patients were randomised to receive ECB-TB, and 956 patients started treatment (18 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Reporting group title
    EC-T (Setting I)
    Reporting group description
    Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel (EC-T) (Setting I), for more information see arm ECB-TB A total of 974 patients were randomised to receive EC-T and 969 started treatment (5 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Reporting group title
    ECH-TH (Setting III)
    Reporting group description
    HER2-positive disease (Setting III) Patients with HER2-positive tumours received chemotherapy with EC followed by T and were randomised to anti-HER2 treatment either with trastuzumab (ECH-TH) or with lapatinib (ECL-TL). The dose of docetaxel was increased from 75 mg/m2 to 100 mg/m2 (Amendment 1). The dose of lapatinib was reduced from 1250 mg daily to 1000 mg daily (Amendment 2). A total of 309 patients were randomised to receive ECH-TH and 307 started treatment (2 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Reporting group title
    ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Reporting group description
    HER2-positive disease (Setting III) Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel + Lapatinib (ECL-TL), for more details see arm ECH-TH. A total of 311 patients were randomszed to receive ECL-TL and 308 started treatment (3 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Subject analysis set title
    PwR (Setting II)
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    HER2-negative disease without response after 4 cycles of treatment (Setting II) Patients were randomised to weekly paclitaxel plus everolimus (RAD001, PwR) or weekly paclitaxel alone (Pw). Treatment with paclitaxel started within 7-14 days after the start of RAD001. Additionally, patients with treatment of four cycles of epirubicin-cyclophopshamide outside the study were randomised into Setting II after Amendment 2 in order to fill-in this setting. A total of 202 patients were randomised to receive PwR and 197 started treatment (5 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Subject analysis set title
    Pw (Setting II)
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    Paclitaxel weekly (Setting II), for mor details see subject analysis set PwR. A total of 201 patients were randomised to receive Pw and 198 started treatment (3 patient did not start treatment due to withdrawal of informed consent).

    Primary: pathological complete response (pCR=ypT0 ypN0) all settings

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    pathological complete response (pCR=ypT0 ypN0) all settings
    End point description
    A pathological complete response was defined as pathological stage T0 and N0 (ypT0 ypN0) after neoadjuvant therapy for all settings. Treatment groups in each setting were compared with the use of a continuity-corrected two-sided Pearson’s chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test, and 95% confidence intervals were provided for the efficacy end points.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Setting I: 24 weeks; Setting II: 12 weeks; Setting III: 24 weeks
    End point values
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III) PwR (Setting II) Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects analysed
    956
    969
    307
    308
    197
    198
    Units: percent
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        pCR
    18.4 (16.0 to 21.0)
    14.9 (12.7 to 17.3)
    30.3 (25.2 to 35.8)
    22.7 (18.2 to 27.8)
    3.6 (1.4 to 7.2)
    5.6 (2.8 to 9.7)
    Statistical analysis title
    pCR -odds ratio (Setting I)
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary efficacy endpoint pCR (ypT0 ypN0) was based on the mITT set.
    Comparison groups
    EC-T (Setting I) v ECB-TB (Setting I)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1925
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [1]
    P-value
    = 0.037
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.29
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.02
         upper limit
    1.65
    Notes
    [1] - The difference in the pCR rates between the two treatment arms was evaluated as odds ratio (ECB-TB to EC-T) and its 95% CI.
    Statistical analysis title
    pCR - odds ratio (Setting II)
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary endpoint pCR was based on the mITT set
    Comparison groups
    PwR (Setting II) v Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    395
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [2]
    P-value
    = 0.368
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.63
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.24
         upper limit
    1.64
    Notes
    [2] - pCR comparison between treatment arms - regression analysis with odds ration (PwR vs Pw) and 95%CI
    Statistical analysis title
    pCR - odds ratio (Setting III)
    Statistical analysis description
    Primary endpoint was based on the mITT set
    Comparison groups
    ECH-TH (Setting III) v ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    615
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [3]
    P-value
    = 0.034
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.68
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.47
         upper limit
    0.97
    Notes
    [3] - pCR comparison between treatment arms - regression analysis with odds ratio (ECH-TH vs ECL-TL) and 95%CI
    Statistical analysis title
    pCR rates - comparison (Setting I)
    Statistical analysis description
    pCR rates between treatment groups were compared by a continuity-corrected chi-square test with 95% confidence intervals
    Comparison groups
    ECB-TB (Setting I) v EC-T (Setting I)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1925
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.042
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    pCR rates - comparison (Setting II)
    Statistical analysis description
    pCR rates between treatment groups were compared by a continuity-corrected chi-square test with 95% confidence intervals
    Comparison groups
    PwR (Setting II) v Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    395
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.476
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    pCR rates - comparison (Setting III)
    Statistical analysis description
    pCR rates between treatment groups were compared by a continuity-corrected two-sided chi-square test with 95% confidence intervals
    Comparison groups
    ECH-TH (Setting III) v ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    615
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.042
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Breast conservation rates between treatment arms, all settings

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Breast conservation rates between treatment arms, all settings
    End point description
    Breast conservation rates (Breast conserving surgery, BCS) between treatment arms in each setting were compared by a continuity-corrected two-sided chi-square test and 95% confidence intervals were provided for the BCS. For setting I BCS was not performed in 9 (2 in ECB-TB arm and 7 in EC-T arm) and for setting II in 3 (2 in PwR arm and 1 in Pw arm) patients. Data were not available (missings) in 128 patients in setting I, 32 in settings II and 57 in setting III.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Setting I: 24 weeks; Setting II: 12 weeks; Setting III: 24 weeks
    End point values
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III) PwR (Setting II) Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects analysed
    956
    969
    307
    308
    197
    198
    Units: percent
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        BCS
    66.6 (63.4 to 69.7)
    66.6 (63.4 to 69.7)
    63.6 (57.6 to 69.2)
    58.6 (52.6 to 64.5)
    54.5 (46.9 to 62.1)
    62.0 (54.7 to 69.0)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: clinical/ imaging response rates between treatment arms after EC, settings I and III

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    clinical/ imaging response rates between treatment arms after EC, settings I and III
    End point description
    Clinical/ imaging response rates between treatment arms in each setting were compared by a continuity-corrected two-sided chi-square test and 95% confidence intervals were provided. Clinical /imaging response included 1) Complete response (CR), 2) Partial response (PR), 3) Stable disease (SD) and 4) Progressive disease (PD). ORR (overall response rate) was defined as complete or partial response of the breast. Clinical/ imaging response rates were assessed after EC treatment and before surgery. The analyses were based on the mITT set. Here are reported clinical/ imaging response rates between treatment arms in settings I and III after EC treatment.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    after EC treatment
    End point values
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Number of subjects analysed
    956
    969
    307
    308
    Units: percent
    number (not applicable)
        CR
    7.1
    5.6
    11.2
    7.2
        PR
    74.0
    65.7
    70.5
    76.4
        ORR
    81.1
    71.3
    81.7
    83.6
        SD
    18.1
    26.0
    17.6
    15.1
        PD
    0.8
    2.7
    0.7
    1.4
        missing
    11
    11
    12
    16
    Statistical analysis title
    ORR rate after EC (setting I)
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison of ORR rate after EC between treatment arms was based on the mITT set
    Comparison groups
    ECB-TB (Setting I) v EC-T (Setting I)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1925
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [4]
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [4] - Continuity-corrected chi-square test
    Statistical analysis title
    ORR rate after EC (setting IIII)
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison of ORR rate after EC between treatment arms was based on the mITT set
    Comparison groups
    ECH-TH (Setting III) v ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    615
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [5]
    P-value
    = 0.587
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [5] - Continuity-corrected chi-square test

    Secondary: clinical/ imaging response rates between treatment arms before surgery, all settings

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    clinical/ imaging response rates between treatment arms before surgery, all settings
    End point description
    Here are reported clinical/ imaging response rates between treatment arms in each setting before surgery (for more details see clinical/ imaging response rates between treatment arms after EC treatment).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    before surgery
    End point values
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III) PwR (Setting II) Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects analysed
    956
    969
    307
    308
    197
    198
    Units: percent
    number (not applicable)
        CR
    22.1
    20.1
    33.0
    28.5
    8.2
    9.2
        PR
    65.3
    59.5
    57.1
    61.7
    44.0
    52.0
        ORR
    87.4
    79.6
    90.1
    90.2
    52.2
    61.2
        SD
    10.8
    15.7
    7.9
    7.8
    41.3
    33.7
        PD
    1.8
    4.7
    2.0
    2.0
    6.5
    5.1
        missings
    6
    6
    4
    13
    13
    2
    Statistical analysis title
    ORR rate before surgery (setting I)
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison of ORR rate before surgery between treatment armswas based on the mITT set.
    Comparison groups
    ECB-TB (Setting I) v EC-T (Setting I)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1925
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [6]
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [6] - Continuity-corrected two-sided chi-square test
    Statistical analysis title
    ORR rate before surgery (setting II)
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison of ORR rate before surgery between treatment arms was based on the mITT set
    Comparison groups
    PwR (Setting II) v Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    395
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [7]
    P-value
    = 0.079
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [7] - Continuity-corrected chi-square test
    Statistical analysis title
    ORR rate before surgery (setting III)
    Statistical analysis description
    Comparison of ORR rate before surgery between treatment arms was based on the mITT set
    Comparison groups
    ECH-TH (Setting III) v ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    615
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [8]
    P-value
    = 1
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [8] - Continuity-corrected chi-square test

    Secondary: Time-to-event endpoint, DFS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time-to-event endpoint, DFS
    End point description
    Long-term (time-to-event) edpoint disease-free survival (DFS) is reported between treatment arms in each setting. The settings were analysed separately. DFS was defined as time in months from randomisation until any invasive loco-regional (ipsilateral breast, local/regional lymph nodes) recurrence of disease, any invasive contralateral breast cancer, any distant recurrence of disease, any secondary malignancy or death due to any cause whichever occurs first. Progression under therapy was not an event for DFS. Patients without event were censored at the date of the last contact. For patients of setting II treated with EC outside GeparQuinto before randomisation in setting II (“setting II fill-in patients”) date of diagnosis was taken instead of the randomisation date; for all other setting II patients date of randomisation into GeparQuinto study (randomisation into setting I) was taken. Analysis was performed on mITT set.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    follow-up; median follow-up was 46.5 months (0.8-71.4) for setting I, 46.0 months (4.0-71.4) for setting II and 55.0 months (0.2-79.9) for setting III. 3 year-DFS rates are reported.
    End point values
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III) PwR (Setting II) Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects analysed
    956
    969
    307
    308
    197
    198
    Units: percent
    number (not applicable)
        DFS (3 years)
    81.5
    80.0
    84.8
    83.7
    69.3
    71.3
    Statistical analysis title
    DFS, setting I
    Statistical analysis description
    DFS rates and hazard ratio (HR) between teratment arms in setting I
    Comparison groups
    ECB-TB (Setting I) v EC-T (Setting I)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1925
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [9]
    P-value
    = 0.78 [10]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Cox proportional hazard
    Point estimate
    1.03
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.84
         upper limit
    1.25
    Notes
    [9] - Cox regression and logrank tests
    [10] - log-rank p-value
    Statistical analysis title
    DFS, setting II
    Statistical analysis description
    DFS rates and hazard ratio (HR) between teratment arms in setting II
    Comparison groups
    PwR (Setting II) v Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    395
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [11]
    P-value
    = 0.987 [12]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Cox proportional hazard
    Point estimate
    0.997
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.69
         upper limit
    1.44
    Notes
    [11] - Cox regression and logrank tests
    [12] - log-rank p-value
    Statistical analysis title
    DFS, setting III
    Statistical analysis description
    DFS rates and hazard ratio (HR) between teratment arms in setting III
    Comparison groups
    ECH-TH (Setting III) v ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    615
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [13]
    P-value
    = 0.808 [14]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Cox proportional hazard
    Point estimate
    1.04
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.73
         upper limit
    1.49
    Notes
    [13] - Cox regression and logrank tests
    [14] - log-rank p-value

    Secondary: Time-to-event endpoint, OS

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time-to-event endpoint, OS
    End point description
    Long-term (time-to-event) edpoint overall survival (OS) is reported between treatment arms in each setting. The settings were analysed separately. OS was defined as time in months from randomisation until death due to any cause. Patients alive were censored at the date of the last contact. For patients of setting II treated with EC outside GeparQuinto before randomisation in setting II (“setting II fill-in patients”) date of diagnosis was taken instead of the randomisation date; for all other setting II patients date of randomisation into GeparQuinto study (randomisation into setting I) was taken. Analysis was performed on the mITT set.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    follow-up, 3 years OS rates are reported
    End point values
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III) PwR (Setting II) Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects analysed
    956
    969
    307
    308
    197
    198
    Units: percent
    number (not applicable)
        OS (3 years)
    92.0
    90.6
    91.7
    93.6
    81.4
    83.4
    Statistical analysis title
    OS, setting I
    Statistical analysis description
    OS rates and hazard ration (HR) between treatment arms in setting I
    Comparison groups
    ECB-TB (Setting I) v EC-T (Setting I)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1925
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [15]
    P-value
    = 0.836 [16]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Cox proportional hazard
    Point estimate
    0.97
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.75
         upper limit
    1.26
    Notes
    [15] - Cox regression and longrank tests
    [16] - log-rank p-value
    Statistical analysis title
    OS, setting II
    Statistical analysis description
    OS rates and hazard ration (HR) between treatment arms in setting II
    Comparison groups
    PwR (Setting II) v Pw (Setting II)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    395
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [17]
    P-value
    = 0.658 [18]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Cox proportional hazard
    Point estimate
    1.11
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.7
         upper limit
    1.74
    Notes
    [17] - Cox regression and logrank tests
    [18] - log-rank p-value
    Statistical analysis title
    OS, setting III
    Statistical analysis description
    OS rates and hazard ration (HR) between treatment arms in setting I
    Comparison groups
    ECH-TH (Setting III) v ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    615
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [19]
    P-value
    = 0.297 [20]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Cox proportional hazard
    Point estimate
    0.76
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.45
         upper limit
    1.28
    Notes
    [19] - Cox regression and logrank tests
    [20] - log-rank p-value

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    All adverse events occurring during the study treatment period were reported.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    AEs are reported per patient during the complete treatment duration for the overall safety population. Non-serious AEs any grade per patient occurring more frequently (> 20%) in the three settings are reported. Of note, overall number of single AE occurrences per term was not assessed, only per patient; SAEs are reported regardless of causality.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    n.a.
    Dictionary version
    n.a.
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    ECB-TB (Setting I)
    Reporting group description
    Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel in combination with bevacizumab (ECB-TB)

    Reporting group title
    EC-T (Setting I)
    Reporting group description
    Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel (EC-T) (Setting I)

    Reporting group title
    Pw (Setting II)
    Reporting group description
    HER2-negative disease without response after 4 cycles of treatment (Setting II) Patients received weekly paclitaxel alone (Pw)

    Reporting group title
    PwR (Setting II)
    Reporting group description
    HER2-negative disease without response after 4 cycles of treatment (Setting II) Patients received weekly paclitaxel plus everolimus (RAD001, PwR)

    Reporting group title
    ECH-TH (Setting III)
    Reporting group description
    Patients with HER2-positive tumors received chemotherapy with EC followed by T in combination with trastuzumab (ECH-TH, Setting III)

    Reporting group title
    ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Reporting group description
    Patients with HER2-positive tumors received chemotherapy with EC followed by T in combination with lapatinib (ECL-TL, Setting III)

    Serious adverse events
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) Pw (Setting II) PwR (Setting II) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    274 / 956 (28.66%)
    179 / 969 (18.47%)
    14 / 198 (7.07%)
    22 / 197 (11.17%)
    63 / 307 (20.52%)
    78 / 308 (25.32%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    1
    1
    0
    1
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Vascular disorders
    Thromboembolic event
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 956 (1.05%)
    13 / 969 (1.34%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    6 / 307 (1.95%)
    6 / 308 (1.95%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 10
    0 / 13
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 6
    0 / 6
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lymphatic disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 956 (0.00%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    3 / 969 (0.31%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    21 / 956 (2.20%)
    15 / 969 (1.55%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    2 / 197 (1.02%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    9 / 308 (2.92%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 21
    0 / 15
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 9
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 956 (0.84%)
    10 / 969 (1.03%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    4 / 307 (1.30%)
    2 / 308 (0.65%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 8
    0 / 10
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 4
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Edema
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 956 (0.00%)
    5 / 969 (0.52%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 5
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fever
    Additional description: Fever (without grade 3-4 neutropenia)
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 956 (1.78%)
    11 / 969 (1.14%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    5 / 197 (2.54%)
    5 / 307 (1.63%)
    4 / 308 (1.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 17
    0 / 11
    0 / 1
    0 / 5
    0 / 5
    0 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    1 / 308 (0.32%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Other general disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 956 (0.31%)
    2 / 969 (0.21%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Immune system disorders
    Allergic reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    0 / 969 (0.00%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    2 / 307 (0.65%)
    2 / 308 (0.65%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Reproductive disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    4 / 969 (0.41%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    1 / 308 (0.32%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 956 (0.10%)
    4 / 969 (0.41%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    1 / 197 (0.51%)
    2 / 307 (0.65%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 4
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Other respiratory disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 956 (0.63%)
    2 / 969 (0.21%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    4 / 197 (2.03%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 6
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 4
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Psychiatric disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 956 (0.10%)
    4 / 969 (0.41%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    3 / 308 (0.97%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 956 (1.36%)
    2 / 969 (0.21%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    1 / 308 (0.32%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 13
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 956 (0.63%)
    2 / 969 (0.21%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    1 / 308 (0.32%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 6
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac except conjestive heart failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 956 (0.10%)
    5 / 969 (0.52%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    1 / 197 (0.51%)
    4 / 307 (1.30%)
    2 / 308 (0.65%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 5
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 4
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Heart failure
    Additional description: Conjestive heart failure NYHA
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    0 / 969 (0.00%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    1 / 197 (0.51%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    1 / 308 (0.32%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Peripheral sensory neuropathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Other neurological disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 956 (1.05%)
    4 / 969 (0.41%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    4 / 307 (1.30%)
    3 / 308 (0.97%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 10
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 4
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    1 / 308 (0.32%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Leukopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    29 / 956 (3.03%)
    13 / 969 (1.34%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    2 / 307 (0.65%)
    5 / 308 (1.62%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 29
    0 / 13
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 5
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    94 / 956 (9.83%)
    52 / 969 (5.37%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    2 / 197 (1.02%)
    16 / 307 (5.21%)
    20 / 308 (6.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 94
    0 / 52
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 16
    0 / 20
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Febrile neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    74 / 956 (7.74%)
    36 / 969 (3.72%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    2 / 197 (1.02%)
    11 / 307 (3.58%)
    17 / 308 (5.52%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 74
    0 / 36
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 11
    0 / 17
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thrombocytopenia
    Additional description: Thrombopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 956 (0.31%)
    0 / 969 (0.00%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Anemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 956 (0.31%)
    4 / 969 (0.41%)
    3 / 198 (1.52%)
    1 / 197 (0.51%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    2 / 308 (0.65%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 4
    0 / 3
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Other hematological
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    2 / 969 (0.21%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    2 / 308 (0.65%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 956 (0.10%)
    0 / 969 (0.00%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    1 / 197 (0.51%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 956 (0.10%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    Eye disordes
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 956 (0.00%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 956 (0.52%)
    4 / 969 (0.41%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    2 / 307 (0.65%)
    1 / 308 (0.32%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Other gastrointestinal disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 956 (1.26%)
    6 / 969 (0.62%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    4 / 197 (2.03%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 12
    0 / 6
    0 / 0
    0 / 4
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    ASAT
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 956 (0.00%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 956 (0.21%)
    1 / 969 (0.10%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
    Additional description: Hand-foot syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 956 (0.42%)
    3 / 969 (0.31%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    1 / 308 (0.32%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    othe skin disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 956 (0.31%)
    3 / 969 (0.31%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    4 / 308 (1.30%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal and urinary disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 956 (0.00%)
    2 / 969 (0.21%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    0 / 197 (0.00%)
    0 / 307 (0.00%)
    0 / 308 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Musculoskeletal disorders
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 956 (0.73%)
    7 / 969 (0.72%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    1 / 197 (0.51%)
    2 / 307 (0.65%)
    7 / 308 (2.27%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 7
    0 / 7
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 7
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    40 / 956 (4.18%)
    32 / 969 (3.30%)
    2 / 198 (1.01%)
    7 / 197 (3.55%)
    12 / 307 (3.91%)
    11 / 308 (3.57%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 40
    0 / 32
    0 / 2
    0 / 7
    0 / 12
    0 / 11
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 956 (0.73%)
    4 / 969 (0.41%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    1 / 197 (0.51%)
    4 / 307 (1.30%)
    7 / 308 (2.27%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 7
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 4
    0 / 7
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Stomatitis
    Additional description: Stomatitis/mucositis/esophagitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    40 / 956 (4.18%)
    3 / 969 (0.31%)
    1 / 198 (0.51%)
    1 / 197 (0.51%)
    1 / 307 (0.33%)
    2 / 308 (0.65%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 40
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    ECB-TB (Setting I) EC-T (Setting I) Pw (Setting II) PwR (Setting II) ECH-TH (Setting III) ECL-TL (Setting III)
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    952 / 956 (99.58%)
    966 / 969 (99.69%)
    195 / 198 (98.48%)
    196 / 197 (99.49%)
    303 / 307 (98.70%)
    308 / 308 (100.00%)
    Investigations
    Aspartate aminotransferase
         subjects affected / exposed
    336 / 956 (35.15%)
    340 / 969 (35.09%)
    59 / 198 (29.80%)
    88 / 197 (44.67%)
    138 / 307 (44.95%)
    138 / 308 (44.81%)
         occurrences all number
    336
    340
    59
    88
    138
    138
    Alanine aminotransferase
         subjects affected / exposed
    456 / 956 (47.70%)
    453 / 969 (46.75%)
    94 / 198 (47.47%)
    105 / 197 (53.30%)
    178 / 307 (57.98%)
    173 / 308 (56.17%)
         occurrences all number
    456
    453
    94
    105
    178
    173
    Vascular disorders
    Hot flashes
         subjects affected / exposed
    328 / 956 (34.31%)
    332 / 969 (34.26%)
    61 / 198 (30.81%)
    61 / 197 (30.96%)
    105 / 307 (34.20%)
    92 / 308 (29.87%)
         occurrences all number
    328
    332
    61
    61
    105
    92
    Nervous system disorders
    Peripheral sensory neuropathy
    Additional description: Sensory neuropathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    499 / 956 (52.20%)
    485 / 969 (50.05%)
    114 / 198 (57.58%)
    106 / 197 (53.81%)
    175 / 307 (57.00%)
    155 / 308 (50.32%)
         occurrences all number
    499
    485
    114
    106
    175
    155
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Leukopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    914 / 956 (95.61%)
    924 / 969 (95.36%)
    149 / 198 (75.25%)
    178 / 197 (90.36%)
    288 / 307 (93.81%)
    286 / 308 (92.86%)
         occurrences all number
    914
    924
    149
    178
    288
    286
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    842 / 956 (88.08%)
    841 / 969 (86.79%)
    73 / 198 (36.87%)
    113 / 197 (57.36%)
    269 / 307 (87.62%)
    250 / 308 (81.17%)
         occurrences all number
    842
    841
    73
    113
    269
    250
    Febrile neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    130 / 956 (13.60%)
    69 / 969 (7.12%)
    0 / 198 (0.00%)
    3 / 197 (1.52%)
    22 / 307 (7.17%)
    30 / 308 (9.74%)
         occurrences all number
    130
    69
    0
    3
    22
    30
    Thrombocytopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    353 / 956 (36.92%)
    271 / 969 (27.97%)
    10 / 198 (5.05%)
    31 / 197 (15.74%)
    91 / 307 (29.64%)
    101 / 308 (32.79%)
         occurrences all number
    353
    271
    10
    31
    91
    101
    Anemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    783 / 956 (81.90%)
    855 / 969 (88.24%)
    166 / 198 (83.84%)
    172 / 197 (87.31%)
    292 / 307 (95.11%)
    288 / 308 (93.51%)
         occurrences all number
    783
    855
    166
    172
    292
    288
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    771 / 956 (80.65%)
    763 / 969 (78.74%)
    130 / 198 (65.66%)
    134 / 197 (68.02%)
    244 / 307 (79.48%)
    244 / 308 (79.22%)
         occurrences all number
    771
    763
    130
    134
    244
    244
    Edema
         subjects affected / exposed
    199 / 956 (20.82%)
    290 / 969 (29.93%)
    41 / 198 (20.71%)
    51 / 197 (25.89%)
    119 / 307 (38.76%)
    88 / 308 (28.57%)
         occurrences all number
    199
    290
    41
    51
    119
    88
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    725 / 956 (75.84%)
    706 / 969 (72.86%)
    43 / 198 (21.72%)
    48 / 197 (24.37%)
    221 / 307 (71.99%)
    221 / 308 (71.75%)
         occurrences all number
    725
    706
    43
    48
    221
    221
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    346 / 956 (36.19%)
    332 / 969 (34.26%)
    14 / 198 (7.07%)
    17 / 197 (8.63%)
    104 / 307 (33.88%)
    125 / 308 (40.58%)
         occurrences all number
    346
    332
    14
    17
    104
    125
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    383 / 956 (40.06%)
    347 / 969 (35.81%)
    32 / 198 (16.16%)
    64 / 197 (32.49%)
    144 / 307 (46.91%)
    231 / 308 (75.00%)
         occurrences all number
    383
    347
    32
    64
    144
    231
    Stomatitis
    Additional description: Stomatitis/mucositis/esophagitis any grade
         subjects affected / exposed
    814 / 956 (85.15%)
    652 / 969 (67.29%)
    106 / 198 (53.54%)
    131 / 197 (66.50%)
    221 / 307 (71.99%)
    230 / 308 (74.68%)
         occurrences all number
    814
    652
    106
    131
    221
    230
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnea
         subjects affected / exposed
    214 / 956 (22.38%)
    208 / 969 (21.47%)
    36 / 198 (18.18%)
    48 / 197 (24.37%)
    90 / 307 (29.32%)
    66 / 308 (21.43%)
         occurrences all number
    214
    208
    36
    48
    90
    66
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Alopecia
         subjects affected / exposed
    909 / 956 (95.08%)
    913 / 969 (94.22%)
    169 / 198 (85.35%)
    163 / 197 (82.74%)
    290 / 307 (94.46%)
    284 / 308 (92.21%)
         occurrences all number
    909
    913
    169
    163
    290
    284
    Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia
    Additional description: Hand-foot syndrome any grade
         subjects affected / exposed
    438 / 956 (45.82%)
    300 / 969 (30.96%)
    45 / 198 (22.73%)
    44 / 197 (22.34%)
    117 / 307 (38.11%)
    134 / 308 (43.51%)
         occurrences all number
    438
    300
    45
    44
    117
    134
    Rash acneiform
         subjects affected / exposed
    273 / 956 (28.56%)
    257 / 969 (26.52%)
    36 / 198 (18.18%)
    73 / 197 (37.06%)
    97 / 307 (31.60%)
    169 / 308 (54.87%)
         occurrences all number
    273
    257
    36
    73
    97
    169
    Nail changes
         subjects affected / exposed
    418 / 956 (43.72%)
    347 / 969 (35.81%)
    69 / 198 (34.85%)
    57 / 197 (28.93%)
    147 / 307 (47.88%)
    128 / 308 (41.56%)
         occurrences all number
    418
    347
    69
    57
    147
    128
    Infections and infestations
    Conjunctivitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    347 / 956 (36.30%)
    278 / 969 (28.69%)
    23 / 198 (11.62%)
    22 / 197 (11.17%)
    108 / 307 (35.18%)
    111 / 308 (36.04%)
         occurrences all number
    347
    278
    23
    22
    108
    111
    Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    449 / 956 (46.97%)
    343 / 969 (35.40%)
    45 / 198 (22.73%)
    75 / 197 (38.07%)
    123 / 307 (40.07%)
    111 / 308 (36.04%)
         occurrences all number
    449
    343
    45
    75
    123
    111

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    29 Jan 2008
    Protocol amendment 1 included the following changes: • General abolition of capecitabine for all study patients and all corresponding chapters and mentions were removed • The dose of docetaxel was increased from 75 mg/m2 to 100 mg/m2: Patients with a HER2-positive or a HER2-negative tumors and a partial or complete remission will receive thereafter 4 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m², day 1 q day 21 (as part of setting I or III) • Supportive treatment for lapatinib was updated • Definition of pathological response: No microscopic evidence of residual viable invasive tumor cells in all resected specimens of the breast and no microscopic evidence of residual viable tumor cells in axillary nodes
    26 Feb 2010
    Protocol amendment 2 included the following changes: • Information on Anthracycline combined with Taxanes, Trastuzumab, Bevacizumab and Taxanes, and RAD001 and Paclitaxel treatments were updated • Information on expected toxicities for RAD001 and lapatinib was updated. The dose of lapatinib was reduced from 1250 mg daily to 1000 mg daily • Rationale of the GeparQuinto Trial was updated: The MRT-PREDICT substudy will compare the molecular changes with changes revealed by MR imaging • To examine and compare pre-specified molecular markers such as Ki-67, phospho-mTOR, YB-1, COX-2, HuR, phospho-p70 S6K, p65 NF kappa B, PTEN, PI3-K, Akt, SOX-10 (a marker for stem cell like breast cancers), and biomarkers from the GeparQuattro Herceptin resistance project, Neo-PREDICT, and other ongoing translational research projects on core biopsy before and after end of chemotherapy • Biomaterial collection: Patient has consented to the biomaterial collection and the paraffin-embedded tumor tissue block of diagnostic core has been sent to central biomaterial banks • Text editing of inclusion criteria No 7 and exclusion criteria No 9 • Update of exclusion criteria No 22: Concurrent treatment with: a) oral chronic corticosteroids unless initiated > 6 months prior to study entry and at low dose (<=10 mg methylprednisolone or equivalent) were not allowed; b) oral contraception and hormone replacement therapy prior treatment had to be stopped before study entry • Supportive treatment with pegfilgrastim and loperamide was updated • Toxicities (Clinically relevant cardiac events) at Follow-up evaluation had to be reported • Sample Size Determination: settings will be completed independently from each other. If setting I is completed before setting II then patients pretreated with EC outside of this trial and without interim response can be randomized
    13 Feb 2013
    Protocol amendment 3 included the following changes: • Follow-up evaluation: After chemotherapy, all patients will be followed up until end of study for the occurrence of local or distant recurrence and death. Every 6 months a visit at the trial site should be performed and documented. The site of recurrence as well as the cause of death should be documented. After the end of study no study specific treatment or investigation is planned. However information on health status of the patients might be collected either based on yearly chart reviews at the sites or based on information deriving from the GBG registry of previous study participants • End of study definition and analysis after breast surgery: End of study (EOS) will be when 379 events occurred in setting I and 120 events occoured in setting III, resp. The log-rank test will then have 80% power to detect the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 for disease-free survival to the significance level of α=0.05. The analysis in setting II will be performed at the same time (HR=0.6).

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    n.a.

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22257523
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20624784
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23541564
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136883
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25223482
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon Apr 29 09:46:15 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA