Clinical Trial Results:
A prospective randomized study comparing rapamune and tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine and methotrexate as immune prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, using HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 identical related or unrelated donors. A Nordic multicenter study.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2006-006577-25 |
Trial protocol |
SE FI |
Global end of trial date |
19 Feb 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
26 Feb 2023
|
First version publication date |
26 Feb 2023
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
070101
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT00993343 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Karolinska Institutet
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Nobels väg 6, Solna, Sweden,
|
||
Public contact |
Olle Ringdén, Karolinska Institutet, olle.ringden@ki.se
|
||
Scientific contact |
Olle Ringdén, Karolinska Institutet, olle.ringden@ki.se
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
19 Feb 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
19 Feb 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
19 Feb 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate if the immunosuppressive prophylaxis with tacrolimus and sirolimus is better than the established therapy using cyclosporine and methotrexate in preventing graft versus host disease
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Boards in Stockholm (DNR 2006/1430-31/3) and Helsinki (#541/2007, DNR 360/E5/07), and the Swedish and Finnish Medical Products Agencies (DNR 151:2007/38987 and KLNR 57/2008, respectively). The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, or from parents/guardians of patients who were under 18 years of age, before the start of HSCT conditioning treatment.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
12 Sep 2007
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Sweden: 200
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Finland: 15
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
215
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
215
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
2
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
14
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
9
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
169
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
21
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Patients were enrolled at two participating centers (Stockholm and Turku) between September 2007 and January 2014. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Six patients were excluded from the trial after randomization but before administration of their assigned GvHD prophylaxis. These 6 patients were considered as protocol violations, and they were excluded from further analysis. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
CsA/Mtx | |||||||||
Arm description |
graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen using cyclosporine/methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
CICLOSPORIN
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
Sandimmun Neoral, CsA
|
|||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, soft
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients in the standard arm started CsA on day −1 (the day before graft infusion). CsA was given twice a day (mainly orally).
During the first two months, monitored plasma concentration levels were kept between 80-100 ng/mL in patients who received grafts from HLA-identical siblings, and between 150-250 ng/mL in MUD transplants. CsA was discontinued after tapering 3-4 months after HSCT in recipients of HLA-identical sibling grafts, and after six months in recipients of MUD transplants, in the absence of GvHD.
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Methotrexate
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
Mtx
|
|||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients in the standard arm: Mtx 15 mg/m2 was given on day +1, with consecutive doses of 10 mg/m2 given on days +3, +6, and +11 for all diagnoses.
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Tac/Sir | |||||||||
Arm description |
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen using tacrolimus/sirolimus (Tac/Sir). | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
SIROLIMUS
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
Rapamune, Rapamycin
|
|||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients in the experimental arm started Tac/Sir in combination on day −3 before graft infusion. Sirolimus was given orally once daily, starting with a bolus dose of 6 mg in adults and 0.1 mg/kg in children, followed by continuous individual adjustment with monitored plasma target levels of 3-12 ng/mL.
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
TACROLIMUS
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
Prograf, FK-506
|
|||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients in the experimental arm started Tac/Sir in combination on day −3 before graft infusion. Tacrolimus was given orally twice a day, starting at 0.15 mg/kg/day, with a target plasma concentration of 5-15 ng/mL.
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: Six patients were excluded from the trial after randomization but before administration of their assigned GvHD prophylaxis. These 6 patients were considered as protocol violations, and they were excluded from further analysis. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
CsA/Mtx
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen using cyclosporine/methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tac/Sir
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen using tacrolimus/sirolimus (Tac/Sir). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
CsA/Mtx
|
||
Reporting group description |
graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen using cyclosporine/methotrexate (CsA/Mtx) | ||
Reporting group title |
Tac/Sir
|
||
Reporting group description |
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen using tacrolimus/sirolimus (Tac/Sir). |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Acute GVHD of grades II-IV | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
within 200 days post allogeneic HSCT
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD of grades II-IV | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD of grades II-IV in the two treatment arms within 200 days post allogeneic HSCT
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CsA/Mtx v Tac/Sir
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [1] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.19 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Estimator of cumulative incidence curves | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Intention-to-treat analysis |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to neutrophil engraftment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From start to end of the study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in time to neutrophil engraftment | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CsA/Mtx v Tac/Sir
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [2] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.24 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Intention-to-treat analysis |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to platelets engraftment | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From start to end of the study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in time to platelet engraftment | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tac/Sir v CsA/Mtx
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [3] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.008 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Intent-to-treat analysis |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of aGVHD (gr. III-IV) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From start to end of study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in incidence of aGvHD (gr. III-IV) | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CsA/Mtx v Tac/Sir
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [4] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.09 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Estimator of cumulative incidence curves | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [4] - Intent-to-treat analysis |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of cGVHD (gr. III-IV) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From start to end of study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in incidence of cGvHD (gr. III-IV) | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Tac/Sir v CsA/Mtx
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [5] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.51 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Estimator of cumulative incidence curves | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Intent-to-treat analysis |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of transplant-related mortality | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Three years after HSCT
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in transplant-related mortality | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CsA/Mtx v Tac/Sir
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [6] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Estimator of cumulative incidence curves | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Intent-to-treat analysis |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Relapse-free survival | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Five years after HSCT
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in Relapse-free survival | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CsA/Mtx v Tac/Sir
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [7] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.73 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Kaplan-Meier method | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Intent-to-treat analysis |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Overall survival | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Five years after transplantation
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Difference in Overall survival | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CsA/Mtx v Tac/Sir
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
209
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [8] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.71 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Kaplan-Meier method | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [8] - Intent-to-treat analysis |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of oral mucositis | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed three times a week until day +24 or until hospital discharge.
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of infections | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Once a week for three months after HSCT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
2007-2015
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Adverse events were reported to study sponsor (Nordic Safety Unit at Wyeth Nordic) by fax, transmittal forms (1747B, 7443)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
Free text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
n/a
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
All study subjects
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: There were no non-serious adverse events in this study. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27662016 |