E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
|
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 9.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | SOC |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10036585 |
E.1.2 | Term | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
- comparison of patient's satisfaction using pethidine/meperidine im and PCA remifentanil for pain relief during labour
- is remifentanil safe for paturient and fetus |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
is there a difference in the pain perception of prima para and multi para |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Pregnant and ASA1, women in labor in Westfries gasthuis, planned vaginal delivery, informed consent parturient, a term pregnancy (37+0 till 42+0 weeks), unborn lies in head-down-position, the unborn has no congenital abnormalities |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
Pregnant woman requesting epidural analgesia or undergoing epidural analgesia, pregnancy is not a term (<37+0 or >42+0 weeks), kwown allergie for remifentanil, paturient who feels she does not have right amount of time to consider enrolling in this study, other fetal positions than head down, fetal congenital abnormalities |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Patient satisfaction measured by the women's view of birth labor satisfaction questionnaire, painrelief measured by VAS-scores, parturient and fetal safety |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
if there is a measurable (power 90%, alpha 5%, variation 0,25) significant difference in paturient satisfaction with one of the methods for pain relief estimated difference of 10% leads to n is 260 paturients |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 2 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |