Clinical Trial Results:
Randomized parallel-group, multicentre study to evaluate the after-use sensation and safety of carteolol LA 2% versus timolol LA 0.5% in simple intra-ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2007-001680-30 |
Trial protocol |
FR PT BE CZ |
Global end of trial date |
05 May 2009
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
27 Aug 2020
|
First version publication date |
27 Aug 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
529
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Bausch and Lomb
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Brunsbütteler Damm 165-173, Berlin, Germany,
|
||
Public contact |
Manager Clinical Science, Bausch&Lomb Dr Gerhard Mann chem.-Fabrik GmbH, natasa.orlic-pleyer@bausch.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Manager Clinical Science, Bausch&Lomb Dr Gerhard Mann chem.-Fabrik GmbH, Raphaele.SiouMermet@bausch.com
|
||
Sponsor organisation name |
Bausch and Lomb
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Brunsbütteler Damm 165-173, Berlin, Germany, 13581
|
||
Public contact |
Manager Clinical Science, Bausch and Lomb, 331 60795083,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Manager Clinical Science, Bausch and Lomb, 331 60795083,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
05 May 2009
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
05 May 2009
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
05 May 2009
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Primary objective: To evaluate the subjective tolerance upon instillation (rate of patients experiencing symptoms of ocular discomfort ) of carteolol LA compared to timolol LA in patients with simple ocular hypertension or POAG (superiority design)
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was conducted in compliance with the protocol and in accordance with Good Clinical Practices (GCPs), as described in the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice 1996, applicable local regulations, and the Declaration of Helsinki (2004).
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
08 Feb 2008
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 9
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Portugal: 21
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 16
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Czech Republic: 123
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 30
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
199
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
199
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
111
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
83
|
||
85 years and over |
5
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
After providing informed consent, subjects were screened for inclusion. Subjects with unilateral or bilateral OHT or POAG and whose IOP was being controlled by beta-blocker monotherapy were enrolled in this study. If both eyes were diagnosed with OHT or POAG, both eyes were treated. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Treatment (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Carteolol LA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Carteolol LA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Eye drops
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Ocular use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects were instructed to instill one drop daily into the conjunctival sac at 8:00 AM.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Timolol LA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Timolol LA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Eye drops
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Ocular use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subjects were instructed to instill one drop daily into the conjunctival sac at 8:00 AM.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Treatment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Carteolol LA
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Timolol LA
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of subjects who felt discomfort upon instillation at 90 days | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Comparison of treatment arms | |||||||||
Comparison groups |
Carteolol LA v Timolol LA
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1354 | |||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of subjects who felt discomfort upon instillation at 30 days | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
30 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Global subjective tolerance upon instillation at 90 days | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Global subjective tolerance upon instillation at 30 days | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
30 days
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Blurry/Dim Vision According to the Glaucoma Symptom Scale at 90 days | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Blurry/Dim Vision According to the Glaucoma Symptom Scale at 30 days | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
30 days
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
''Inflammation of eyelids" at external eye examination at 90 days | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
"Bulbar motility" at external eye examination at 90 days | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Severe 'Lens' abnormality by slit lamp examination by 90 days | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Tear film break-up time at 90 days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Tear film break-up time at 30 days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
30 days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Fluorescein staining at 90 days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Fluorescein staining at 30 days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
30 days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Overall lissamine test result at 90 days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Overall lissamine test result at 30 days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
30 days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Result of examination of the macula by fundoscopy at 90 days | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
"Lid Closure" at external eye examination at 90 days | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
"Lid motility" at external eye examination at 90 days | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
"Conjunctival injection" at external eye examination at 90 days | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
90 days
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
90 days
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
NA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Carteolol LA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Timolol LA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
19 Nov 2007 |
Czech Republic only:
• the Exclusion Criterion for pregnant or lactating women was changed so that a urine pregnancy test was required for women of childbearing potential
• in the Withdrawal of Subjects from Therapy or Assessment section (Section 6.3), a sentence was added stating that women that become pregnant during the study would be discontinued from treatment but would continue to be followed for safety evaluation per the protocol defined visits
• in the Baseline Visit section, that a urine pregnancy test must be administered if applicable |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |