Clinical Trial Results:
Trial SAKK 56/07 Dasatinib first-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. A multicenter phase II trial.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2007-002047-24 |
Trial protocol |
FR DE |
Global end of trial date |
16 May 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Sep 2022
|
First version publication date |
28 Sep 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
SAKK56/07
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT00568750 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Effingerstrasse 33, Bern, Switzerland, 3008
|
||
Public contact |
Head Regulatory Affairs, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer, +41 31389 91 91, sakkcc@sakk.ch
|
||
Scientific contact |
Head Regulatory Affairs, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer, +41 31389 91 91, sakkcc@sakk.ch
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 May 2019
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
16 May 2018
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
16 May 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Efficacy of dasatinib treatment as assessed by fusion PET/CT-scan
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Protection of trial subjects was ensured by Safety Monitoring, i.e. assessment of adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse drug reactions, and the continous assessment of laboratory values and vital signs.
|
||
Background therapy |
none | ||
Evidence for comparator |
not applicable. This was a single arm study. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
17 Jan 2008
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Efficacy, Safety | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
5 Years | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Switzerland: 18
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 7
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 19
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 1
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
45
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
27
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
26
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
19
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
47 of planned 52 patients at ten sites in France (3 sites, 21 patients), Germany (1 site, 1 patient), Poland (1 site, 7 patients) and Switzerland (8 sites, 18 patients) have been enrolled from January 2008 to November 2011. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Eligibility criteria of a patient were checked by the investigator. Once a patient fullfils all inclusion criteria and not any of the exclusion criteria, he/she was enrolled. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
47 [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
No baseline CT (violation eligibility criteria): 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
PET negative (violation eligibility criteria): 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to have started the pre-assignment period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: In total, 47 patients were screened for eligibility. Of these patients, five were deemed ineligible. However, for three of these patients failure of eligibility was noticed as late as after receipt of first study treatment. Thus, these three patients were included in the safety analysis set but rejected from the efficacy analysis set. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Baseline
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Dasatinib treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dasatinib
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Sprycel®
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Film-coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
70 mg twice daily
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Treatment/FU Phase
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Dasatinib treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Dasatinib 70 mg BID per os for two years (26 cycles) or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Elective surgery was allowed after at least six completed cycles in responding and stabilized patients. At time of progression, the patient was transferred to the follow-up phase and was proposed the standard treatment for GIST (i.e. imatinib 400 mg /day per os). Patients were followed up for up to five years after study treatment discontinuation or completing study treatment, respectively. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dasatinib
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Sprycel®
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Film-coated tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
70 mg twice daily
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Dasatinib treatment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Dasatinib treatment
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Dasatinib treatment
|
||
Reporting group description |
Dasatinib 70 mg BID per os for two years (26 cycles) or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Elective surgery was allowed after at least six completed cycles in responding and stabilized patients. At time of progression, the patient was transferred to the follow-up phase and was proposed the standard treatment for GIST (i.e. imatinib 400 mg /day per os). Patients were followed up for up to five years after study treatment discontinuation or completing study treatment, respectively. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Full Analysis Set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Analysis set including all eligible patients receiving at least one dose of the study drug.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
KIT - Exon 11
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Subgroup of patients with mutational status of KIT = Exon 11.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
KIT - WT
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Subgroup of patients with mutational status of KIT = Wildtype.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
KIT - NA / Exon 9
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Subgroup of patients with mutational status of KIT = Exon 9 or N/A.
|
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Primary Endpoint | PET response at 4 weeks [1] | ||||||||
End point description |
Efficacy of dasatinib treatment as assessed by fusion PET/CT-scan. EORTC PET Study Group criteria were assessed by a central review board. [mCR: metabolic complete response, mPR: metabolic partial response, mSD: metabolic stable disease, mPD: metabolic progressive disease). Response defined as mCR+ mPR. Response rate presented with the corresponding 95% Clopper Pearson confidence interval.
[mCR: 33%, mPR: 40%, mSD: 14%, mPD: 7%; n/a: 5%]
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
4 weeks
|
||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This was a single arm study. No comparative statistical analyses were performed. However, with an exact two stage binomial test with N1=17, R1=9 and N= 42 a decision limit R=26 was calculated to decide if treatment was promising. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Best response according to RECIST as measured on CT scan/MRI | ||||||||
End point description |
Best response according to RECIST. Best response defined as CR+ PR. Response rate presented with the corresponding 95% Clopper Pearson confidence interval.
[CR: 5%, PR: 38%, SD: 31%, PD: 19%; n/a: 7%]
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until end of treatment.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Clinical benefit | ||||||||
End point description |
Clinical benefit was defined as CR, PR, or as SD lasting at least 12 weeks, determined according to RECIST. PET evaluation was not used for clinical benefit analysis as no comparative data exist. Rate presented with the corresponding 95% Clopper Pearson confidence interval.
[CR:2 patients, PR: 16 patients, SD: 9 patients]
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until end of treatment.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Best response as measured by fusion PET/CT | ||||||||
End point description |
The best response (mCR+mPR) rate as measur measured by fusion PET/CT scan. The centralized review board had to confirm the mCR.
[mCR/mPR: 76%, mSD: 12%, mPD: 7%; n/a: 5%]
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until end of treatment
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Response Duration | ||||||||
End point description |
Response duration for 32 patients with mPR/mCR.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until end of treatment.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Notes [2] - 32 patients with mPR/mCR |
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Time to progression | ||||||||
End point description |
Time to progression was calculated from registration until progression or death due to tumor.
Kaplan Meier analysis. At the time of the analysis 22 patients had experienced disease progression. A mong the others one patient died due to GIST.
There were 23 events for the time to progression analysis.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until progression or death due to tumor.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Progression free survival (PFS) | ||||||||
End point description |
Time to progression was calculated from registration until progression or death.
Kaplan-Meier Analysis. At the time of the analysis 22 patients had experienced disease progression. A mong the others one patient died due to GIST.
There were 24 events for the progression free survival analysis.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until progression or death.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Time to treatment failure | ||||||||
End point description |
Time to treatment failure will be calculated from registration until premature trial treatment termination due to any reason. After treatment completion, it is defined as time to progression, time to death if no progression, or change of anti-tumor treatment in absence of progression.
Kaplan-Meier Analysis. At the time of the analysis 41 patients had treatment failure: 37 patients stopped before 26 cycles, and four patients completed 26 cycles and had disease progression later on. One patient completed 26 cycles and had no progression so far.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until end of treatment.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Overall survival | ||||||||
End point description |
Overall survival will be calculated from registration until death or last follow-up, up to 5 years.
Kaplan-Meier Analysis. Seventeen patients had died at the time of the analysis. Two deaths occurred during treatment. Fifteen deaths occurred in the follow up phase. The median follow up time based on the reverse Kaplan Meier method was 6.2 years the range in surviving patients 3.4 to 7.6 years.
NOTE: UPPER LIMIT OF 95% CI NOT REACHED. DUMMY DATA ("999") ENTERED DUE TO DATABASE RESTRICTIONS.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until death or last follow-up, up to 5 years.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Best response of 2nd-line treatment with another TK-inhibitor | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
37 patients had started a 2nd-line treatment but 15 of them had elective surgery or started 2nd-line treatment before progression under 1st-line treatment. Thus for the analysis of 2nd-line treatment 22 patients were remaining.
Best response according to RECIST.
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From second-line treatment with another TK-inhibitor until end of study.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - See description for endpoint. |
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Time to progression (TTP) of 2nd-line treatment with another TK-inhibitor | ||||||||
End point description |
Time to progression (TTP) of 2nd-line treatment with another TK-inhibitor.
37 patients had started a 2nd-line treatment but 15 of them had elective surgery or started 2nd-line treatment before progression under 1st-line treatment. 17 of the 22 patients had a progression under 2nd-line treatment.
Note: This TTP analysis is descriptive only and for the moment non informative as some of these patient had been disease free after surgery.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From start of 2nd-line treatment until progression or death.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Notes [4] - See endpoint desciption. |
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | PET response by mutational status of KIT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
PET response at 4 weeks by mutational status of KIT.
The mutational status of the most common KIT mutations (exons 9, 11, 13 and 17 of KIT) was assessed using standard PCR techniques and/or DHPLC.
Mutational status of PDGFR was not available.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At 4 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Time to progression (KIT Exon 11) | ||||||||
End point description |
Time to progression (TTP) was calculated from registration until progression or death due to tumor.
Kaplan Meier analysis of TTP for subgroup of patients with KIT = Exon 11.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until progression or death due to tumor.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Secondary Endpoint | Time to progression (KIT WT) | ||||||||
End point description |
Time to progression (TTP) was calculated from registration until progression or death due to tumor.
Kaplan Meier analysis of TTP for subgroup of patients with KIT = WT.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
From registration until progression or death due to tumor.
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From registration up to 30 days after last dose of trial treatment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
SAEs were recorded from registration up to 30 days after last dose of trial treatment. After this period the following events were recorded: (i) fatalities and severe events possibly, probably or definitely related to late effects of therapy, (ii) disabling events, (iii) second primary cancer, (iv) congenital anomaly
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
25.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Safety Analysis Set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The Safety Analysis Set (n=45) includes 42 patients of the FAS and three additional patients initiating study treatment but who were deemed screening failures later on. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
This study was terminated by the sponsor due to low accrual after about 90% of patients had been enrolled. |