Clinical Trial Results:
Multicentre pilot-study for the therapy of medulloblastoma of adults (NOA-07) Phase II
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2007-002560-10 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
12 Oct 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
15 Dec 2022
|
First version publication date |
15 Dec 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
NOA 07 DSUR 2018_Last NOA 07 short synopsis (German) NOA 07_Publication of Results incl AE´s SAE |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
NOA-07
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01614132 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
University Hospital Regensburg
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, Germany, 93053
|
||
Public contact |
Prof. Peter Hau, University of Regensburg Department Neurology, +49 9419448083, peter.hau@ukr.de
|
||
Scientific contact |
Prof. Peter Hau, University of Regensburg Department Neurology, +49 9419448083, peter.hau@ukr.de
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
04 Oct 2019
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
18 Sep 2018
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
12 Oct 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The main objective is the feasibility of the adjuvant chemotherapy which has gained the best results when combined with radiotherapy so far. The present protocol is primarily to determine the number of interruptions of the maintenance chemotherapy due to toxicity. In addition, the maximum number of cycles that are feasible shall be determined.
Primary outcome measure:
Tolerability of additional maintenance chemotherapy, which in combination with radiation has achieved the best therapeutic results to date.
Secondary outcome measures:
Secondary outcome measures relate to additional safety and efficacy parameters as well as evaluation of imaging, histologic, and molecular parameters and assessment of cognitive performance, quality of life, and social outcome.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
not applicable
|
||
Background therapy |
not applicable | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Rationale of the study Primary aim of the NOA-07 study was to evaluate the toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, lomustine and vincristine in adults > 18 years of age with medulloblastoma in a controlled prospective setting. In children with medulloblastoma, the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, lomustine and vincristine led to a significant improvement of the overall survival to a 5-year OS rate of >80 % (Packer et al., 1994), (Packer et al., 1999). In adults, less and heterogeneous data existed, showing survival times varying between 26%-83% with various regimes in retrospective series. The only available prospective observation concerning adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, lomustine and vincristine derived from the HIT88/89/91 study: 46 adults (age 16-51 years, median 21 years) were treated within the protocol reaching overall a 5y-PFS of 63% (n=46) and a 5y-PFS of 71% in cases of M0-situation (n=18) - a result that appeared promising and required prospective randomised trials for further validation. However, toxicity concerns were raised when dealing with intensive adjuvant chemotherapy. In children, up to 60% of patients require dose modification. In adults, very little was known about the toxicity of the combination therapy. It was not possible to simply transfer the results from children to adults due to differing age-dependent chemotherapy sensitivities. Accordingly, the scope of the NOA-07 trial was to accurately evaluate toxicity of an adjuvant treatment with cisplatin, lomustine, vincristine in a phase II study before planning a phase III trial on the efficacy on adjuvant chemotherapy in adult medulloblastoma. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Jan 2009
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 30
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
30
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
30
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
30
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
First Patient in: 26.01.2009; Last Patient in: 29.04.2014-Germany | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Medulloblastoma (+/- postoperative residual tumor, M0) or Medulloblastoma (+/- postoperative residual tumor, M1-3). Age: completed 18 years of age The diagnosis for this is made by the local pathologist, it must be confirmed immediately at study inclusion by reference histology | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Period
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Single Arm | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
test | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Vincristine
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Injection
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1.5mg/m² weekly, cap at 2.0mg during radiation (6 week peroid). followed by a maximum of 8 six-weekly cycles of 1.5mg/m² cap at 2.0mg days 1,8 and 15
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Cisplatin
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
70.0mg/m² on Day 1 during a maximum of 8 six-weekly cycles
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Cecenu (Lomustin)
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
75.0mg/m² on Day 1 during a maximum of 8 six-weekly cycles
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Single Arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||
End point title |
rate of toxicity-related treatment terminations [1] | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
after 4 chemotherapy cycles
|
||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: In this single arm trial, no inferential statistics were done. The primary endpoint is solely descriptive regarding safety. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse Events were reported as soon as Patient signed informed consent.Adverse. During telefone calls. The first 10 weeks at least on a weekly basis after that Day 1, 8 and 15 on site in every cycle during entire tiral period until resolved or end of FU
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
See Table 4 on uploaded Publication.Adverse Events listed Grades 1-4. The main objective of the trial was to determine the number of interruptions due to toxicity.
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
CTCAE | ||
Dictionary version |
3
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: See attached document for results |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
Due to the small number of remaining evaluable patients, a meaningful evaluation of the PFS at the 5 year time point was no longer possible. The trial was terminated at the 3 year PFS time point instead. |