Clinical Trial Results:
Bronkial respons på inhaleret Mannitol
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2007-003765-40 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
01 Jul 2008
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
17 Aug 2022
|
First version publication date |
17 Aug 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2007-003765-40
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Bispebjerg Hospital
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Bispebjerg Bakke 23, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2400
|
||
Public contact |
Asger Sverrild, Bispebjerg Hospital
Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, 45 26259961, asger.sverrild@regionh.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Asger Sverrild, Bispebjerg Hospital
Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, 45 26259961, asger.sverrild@regionh.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
08 Aug 2009
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
01 Jul 2008
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
01 Jul 2008
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
1. Frequency of asthma
2. Frequency of AHR to mannitol and methacholine
3. Association between AHR to mannitol and methacholine
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Subjects were examined in a hospital setting following international clinical practices for all investigations
|
||
Background therapy |
None specific required | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
05 Feb 2007
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 238
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
238
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
238
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
91
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
147
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
This was a population study - An unselected sample of 1000 young adults between the ages of 14 and 24 years was randomly drawn from the civil registration list | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
This was a population study - An unselected sample of 1000 young adults between the ages of 14 and 24 years was randomly drawn from the civil registration list | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
full population | ||||||
Arm description |
all participants in the trial had the same investigations perfomred studying the performance of inhaled mannitol as a diagnostic tool for astma | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
mannitol
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Inhalation powder, hard capsule
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Inhalation use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
FEV1 recorded after inhalation of a 0-mg placebo capsule constituted baseline lung function. The challenge was stopped at a decrease in FEV1 of 15% or greater from baseline values or when the maximum cumulative dose of 635 mg had been administered
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
full population
|
||
Reporting group description |
all participants in the trial had the same investigations perfomred studying the performance of inhaled mannitol as a diagnostic tool for astma | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Diagnostic properties of inhaled mannitol and methacholine
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Diagnostic properties of AHR to inhaled mannitol and methacholine in the assessment of asthma in an unselected sample of young adults
|
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Asthma prevalence [1] | ||||||||
End point description |
Asthma prevalence in an unselected samples of Danish young adults
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
5th of Feb 2007 to 5th of April 2008
|
||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: patients with a diagnosis of asthma out of the whole study population |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Sensitivity - inhaled mannitol [2] | ||||||||
End point description |
Sensitivity and Specificity of inhaled mannitol in diagnosing asthma in a random population sample
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
5th of Feb 2007 to 5th of April 2008
|
||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, plotting RDRs to mannitol and methacholine against the diagnosis of asthma. The overall accuracy of the test was measured as the area under the ROC curve. Sensitivity and Specificity were calculated |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Sensitivity - methacholine [3] | ||||||||
End point description |
Sensitivity and Specificity of inhaled methacholine in an unselected sample of Danish young adults
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
5th of Feb 2007 to 5th of April 2008
|
||||||||
Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, plotting RDRs to mannitol and methacholine against the diagnosis of asthma. The overall accuracy of the test was measured as the area under the ROC curve. Sensitivity and Specificity were calculated |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Specificity - inhaled mannitol [4] | ||||||||
End point description |
Specificity of inhaled mannitol in diagnosing asthma in a random population sample of young adults
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
5th of Feb 2007 to 5th of April 2008
|
||||||||
Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, plotting RDRs to mannitol and methacholine against the diagnosis of asthma. The overall accuracy of the test was measured as the area under the ROC curve. Sensitivity and Specificity were calculated |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Specificity - methacholine [5] | ||||||||
End point description |
Specificity of methacholine in diagnosing asthma in a random population sample of young adults
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
5th of Feb 2007 to April 2008
|
||||||||
Notes [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, plotting RDRs to mannitol and methacholine against the diagnosis of asthma. The overall accuracy of the test was measured as the area under the ROC curve. Sensitivity and Specificity were calculated. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
5th of Feb 2007 to 4th of April 2008
|
||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
9.1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Cough was repored as an expected non-serious adverse event in the majority |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |