Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43857   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL-GROUP EFFICACY AND SAFETY TRIAL OF BAPINEUZUMAB (AAB-001, ELN115727) IN SUBJECTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ALZHEIMER DISEASE WHO ARE APOLIPOPROTEIN E ε4 NON-CARRIERS.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2007-005994-79
    Trial protocol
    ES   IE   GB   BE   DE   FR   FI   SE   IT   SK   PT   AT   NL   DK  
    Global end of trial date
    27 Nov 2012

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    10 Jun 2016
    First version publication date
    10 Jun 2016
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    3133K1-3000-WW
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT00667810
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Pfizer, Inc.
    Sponsor organisation address
    235 East 42nd Street,, New York, United States, 10017
    Public contact
    Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center, Pfizer, Inc., +1 800 718 1021, ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
    Scientific contact
    Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center, Pfizer, Inc., +1 800 718 1021, ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    31 Jul 2013
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    23 Oct 2012
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    27 Nov 2012
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate an advantage of the efficacy of multiple doses of intravenous administered bapineuzumab (0.5 mg/kg or 1.0 mg/kg) compared to placebo in participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease as measured by both the following: 1. The change from baseline to Week 78 for the Alzheimer's Disease assessment scale - cognitive subscale, 11-item (ADAS-Cog/11) total score; 2. The change from baseline to Week 78 for the disability assessment for dementia (DAD) total score. The safety objective of this study was to assess the safety of multiple doses of intravenous administered bapineuzumab in participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease versus placebo, including; • The incidence and severity of TEAEs; • Clinically important changes in safety assessment results (including, as appropriate, vital signs, weight, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), brain MRI scans, and physical and neurologic examinations).
    Protection of trial subjects
    The study was conducted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the International Conference on Harmonization Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the ethical principles that have their origins in the Declaration of Helsinki. All regulatory requirements were followed; in particular, those affording greater protection to the safety of study participants.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    25 Jun 2008
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Argentina: 2
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Croatia: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    New Zealand: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 5
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Switzerland: 6
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Serbia: 8
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 9
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Mexico: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Slovakia: 11
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 14
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    South Africa: 14
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 15
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 16
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Australia: 18
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 20
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Portugal: 23
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 42
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Chile: 48
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 57
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 91
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 93
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Japan: 140
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 213
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    885
    EEA total number of subjects
    371
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    275
    From 65 to 84 years
    566
    85 years and over
    44

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    The study was terminated on 06 August 2012 due to lack of clinical efficacy observed in completed studies ELN115727-301 (ApoE4 non-carriers) and ELN115727-302. A total of 329 participants had completed the study up to and including Week 78 before the decision was taken to terminate the study.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    The study originally included bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg dose level, which was discontinued on 02 April 2009 based on input from independent safety monitoring committee. It was estimated at the time that about 10 participants received 2.0mg/kg. These participants are not included in the efficacy analyses.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator
    Blinding implementation details
    This study was blinded to participants, investigators and sponsors. The responsibility of the unblinded dispenser had to be assigned to a person who did not participate in the evaluation of any study participant. Contact between the unblinded dispenser and study participants was to be avoided. Psychometric and global raters were to be blinded not only to treatment assignment but also to adverse events experienced by the participants.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Arm description
    Participants received 0.5 mg/kg bapineuzumab by intravenous (IV) infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants received 0.5 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Arm title
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg
    Arm description
    Participants received 1.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants received 1.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Arm title
    Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg
    Arm description
    Participants received 2.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants received 2.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Participants received placebo by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants received placebo by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Started
    267
    263
    11
    344
    Completed
    102
    94
    9
    124
    Not completed
    165
    169
    2
    220
         Adverse event, serious fatal
    1
    1
    -
    3
         Physician decision
    1
    1
    -
    1
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    14
    20
    1
    28
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    13
    13
    1
    19
         Not specified
    5
    6
    -
    5
         Discontinuation of Study by Sponsor
    129
    118
    -
    155
         Loss of Caregiver
    -
    1
    -
    3
         Vasogenic Edema Recurrence
    -
    3
    -
    -
         Failed to Return
    -
    -
    -
    2
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    4
    -
    2
         Lack of efficacy
    1
    -
    -
    2
         Protocol deviation
    -
    2
    -
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 0.5 mg/kg bapineuzumab by intravenous (IV) infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 1.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 2.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Participants received placebo by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    267 263 11 344
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
    Age Continuous |
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    71.4 ± 9.38 70.8 ± 9.73 66.5 ± 7.94 69.9 ± 9.76 -
    Gender, Male/Female
    Units: Number of participants
        Female
    151 150 4 199 504
        Male
    116 113 7 145 381

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 0.5 mg/kg bapineuzumab by intravenous (IV) infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 1.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 2.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Participants received placebo by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Primary: The change from baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)/11 total score at Week 78

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    The change from baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)/11 total score at Week 78 [1]
    End point description
    This scale evaluates memory, language, praxis with items such as orientation, word recall, word recognition, object-identification, comprehension, completion of simple tasks. The analysis was based upon 11 item score from the items; word recall task, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, remembering instructions, spoken language ability, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, and comprehension. Scale was administered by a psychometric rater who did not have access to information of adverse events experienced. The scale ranged from 0 to 70 points, with higher score indicating a greater degree of impairment. Analysis population is modified intent-to-treat(mITT) population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    78 weeks
    Notes
    [1] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Units on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    6.05 ± 0.71
    8.07 ± 0.73
    7.88 ± 0.64
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Change from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based mixed model for repeated-measures (MMRM). The number of participants in each group provided approximately 90% power to detect a 2.65 point advantage at Week 78. This calculation was based on a 2-sided test with alpha set at 0.05, the use of the Hochberg procedure to control for multiplicity.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.057 [2]
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -1.83
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.71
         upper limit
    0.05
    Notes
    [2] - The p-value is not adjusted for multiple comparison. The Hochberg approach is used to control for multiplicity between the two dose levels (0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg) ofbapineuzumab.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Change from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score was analyzed using a REML based MMRM. The number of participants in each group provided approximately 90% power to detect a 2.65 point advantage at Week 78. This calculation was based on a 2-sided test with alpha set at 0.05, the use of the Hochberg procedure to control for multiplicity.
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.848 [3]
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.19
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.73
         upper limit
    2.1
    Notes
    [3] - The p-value is not adjusted for multiple comparison. The Hochberg approach is used to control for multiplicity between the two dose levels (0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg) ofbapineuzumab.

    Primary: The change from baseline in the Disability Assessment for Demential (DAD) total score at Week 78

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    The change from baseline in the Disability Assessment for Demential (DAD) total score at Week 78 [4]
    End point description
    The DAD is administered to the participant caregiver in the form of an interview. Scale was administered by a certified global rater who did not have access to any information of adverse events experienced. This scale assesses a participant’s ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item can be scored as 1=yes, 0=no, non-applicable=NA. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this total score out of 100. Higher scores indicate better function. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    78 weeks
    Notes
    [4] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Units on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -14.58 ± 1.5
    -15.07 ± 1.55
    -16.08 ± 1.36
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Change from baseline in DAD total score was analyzed using a REML based MMRM. The number of participants in each group provided approximately 90% power to detect a 6.56 point advantage at Week 78. This calculation was based on a 2-sided test with alpha set at 0.05, the use of the Hochberg procedure to control for multiplicity.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.459 [5]
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.51
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.48
         upper limit
    5.49
    Notes
    [5] - The p-value is not adjusted for multiple comparison. The Hochberg approach is used to control for multiplicity between the two dose levels (0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg) ofbapineuzumab.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Change from baseline in DAD total score was analyzed using a REML based MMRM. The number of participants in each group provided approximately 90% power to detect a 6.56 point advantage at Week 78. This calculation was based on a 2-sided test with alpha set at 0.05, the use of the Hochberg procedure to control for multiplicity.
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.623 [6]
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.04
         upper limit
    5.07
    Notes
    [6] - The p-value is not adjusted for multiple comparison. The Hochberg approach is used to control for multiplicity between the two dose levels (0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg) ofbapineuzumab.

    Secondary: The change from baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71.

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    The change from baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71. [7]
    End point description
    Brain amyloid burden as imaged by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET). The latter is a semiquantitative measure of the extent of fibrillar amyloid in the brain. PIB PET measurements were made in cortical regions found to have the highest burden of fibrillar amyloid at autopsy in participants diagnosed as having Alzheimer’s pathology, and also regions reported to have the highest average retention of PIB signal in previous PET studies enrolling participants with probable AD. This parameter reflects overall brain amyloid deposition as indexed by imaging. The change from baseline was measured as average standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) in prespecified regions of interest (ROI) assessed by PIB PET imaging in a subset of participants.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    71 Weeks
    Notes
    [7] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    6
    11
    13
    Units: Units on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -0.04 ± 0.08
    0 ± 0.05
    0.02 ± 0.04
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis is based on the pooled bapineuzumab (with subjects in the bapineuzumab 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg groups combined) treatment difference estimated at Week 71. The number of participants gave 90% power to detect a 0.186 unit advantage for a bapineuzumab dose group over placebo for PiB PET binding at Week 71. The calculations were based on 2-sided tests with alpha set at 0.05 and the use of the Hochberg procedure to control for multiplicity for 2 individual doses.
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    30
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.654
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.03
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.15
         upper limit
    0.09

    Secondary: The change from baseline in phospho-tau levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at Week 71.

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    The change from baseline in phospho-tau levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at Week 71. [8]
    End point description
    Biomarkers CSF phospho-tau (p-tau) is an indicator of neuronal injury and neurodegeneration. An elevation in levels of tau, as well as specific p-tau species, is thought to be a marker for progressive cellular degeneration in AD. Accordingly, a reduction from baseline in levels of CSF tau in participants who received bapineuzumab compared with participants who received placebo may be indicative of a reduction in neuronal loss in participants treated with bapineuzumab.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    71 Weeks
    Notes
    [8] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    21
    22
    33
    Units: pg/mL
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -6.62 ± 3.9
    -6.35 ± 3.73
    0.7 ± 3.03
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis is based on the pooled bapineuzumab (with participants in the bapineuzumab 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg groups combined) treatment difference estimated at Week 71. The number of participants gave 90% power to detect a 15 ng/L advantage in p-tau for a bapineuzumab dose group over placebo at Week 71. The calculations were based on 2-sided tests with alpha set at 0.05 and the use of the Hochberg procedure to control for multiplicity for 2 individual doses.
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    76
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.085
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -7.18
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -15.38
         upper limit
    1.02

    Secondary: The change from baseline in brain volume at Week 71

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    The change from baseline in brain volume at Week 71 [9]
    End point description
    Brain volume was examined in a subset of participants by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI). Cerebral atrophy correlates closely with the gradual cognitive decline in AD and can be visualized by MRI. The BBSI technique involves positional matching of serial 3-dimensional MRI brain images, such that brain MRI-image volumes were first registered and then subtracted from each other. Atrophy rates would generally be expected to be lower if the underlying disease was attenuated by effective treatment.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    71 Weeks
    Notes
    [9] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    122
    121
    153
    Units: mL/year
        least squares mean (standard error)
    18.55 ± 0.97
    18.6 ± 1
    17.54 ± 0.86
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Change in MRI BBSI was analyzed using a REML based MMRM. The number of participants gave 90% power to detect a 5.05-cm3 advantage for a bapineuzumab dose group over placebo on reduction in brain volume as measured by the BBSI at Week 71. The calculations were based on 2-sided tests with alpha set at 0.05 and the use of the Hochberg procedure to control for multiplicity for 2 individual doses.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    275
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.437
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.55
         upper limit
    3.57
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Change in MRI BBSI was analyzed using a REML based MMRM. The number of participants gave 90% power to detect a 5.05-cm3 advantage for a bapineuzumab dose group over placebo on reduction in brain volume as measured by the BBSI at Week 71. The calculations were based on 2-sided tests with alpha set at 0.05 and the use of the Hochberg procedure to control for multiplicity for 2 individual doses.
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    274
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.423
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.06
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.54
         upper limit
    3.66

    Secondary: Divergence of effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 total scores from Week 39 to Week 78

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Divergence of effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 total scores from Week 39 to Week 78 [10]
    End point description
    The MMRM estimated slope (based on linear contrasts) of the differences between bapineuzumab and placebo for the ADAS-Cog/11 total scores from Week 39 to Week 78 was presented. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 39 to Week 78
    Notes
    [10] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Units/Year
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Week 39
    2.59 ± 0.41
    3.41 ± 0.42
    3.37 ± 0.37
        Week 52
    3.08 ± 0.5
    4.3 ± 0.51
    4.38 ± 0.45
        Week 65
    4.56 ± 0.6
    6.46 ± 0.62
    6.02 ± 0.54
        Week 78
    6.05 ± 0.71
    8.07 ± 0.73
    7.88 ± 0.64
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.212
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -1.32
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.4
         upper limit
    0.76
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.725
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.38
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.76
         upper limit
    2.52

    Secondary: Divergence of effect on the DAD total scores from Week 39 to Week 78

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Divergence of effect on the DAD total scores from Week 39 to Week 78 [11]
    End point description
    The MMRM estimated slope (based on linear contrasts)of the differences between bapineuzumab and placebo for the DAD total scores from Week 39 to Week 78 was presented. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 39 to Week 78
    Notes
    [11] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Units/Years
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Week 39
    -7.24 ± 0.87
    -6.44 ± 0.89
    -6.31 ± 0.78
        Week 52
    -8.82 ± 1.07
    -11.09 ± 1.1
    -9.16 ± 0.96
        Week 65
    -11.57 ± 1.3
    -12.93 ± 1.35
    -12.61 ± 1.17
        Week 78
    -14.58 ± 1.5
    -15.07 ± 1.55
    -16.08 ± 1.36
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.375
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    2.01
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.44
         upper limit
    6.46
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    = 0.149
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    3.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.15
         upper limit
    7.56

    Secondary: Time to median placebo deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 total score (European Union [EU] analysis plan)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to median placebo deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 total score (European Union [EU] analysis plan) [12]
    End point description
    The time to first median placebo deterioration (for the EU) was defined as the first time a subject experienced an increase from baseline (worsening) in ADAS Cog/11 total score greater than or equal to the median worsening observed at Week 78 in the placebo group. The Kaplan Meier estimate of the median time to first median placebo deterioration in ADAS Cog/11 total score was presented. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 Weeks
    Notes
    [12] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Days
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    546 (546 to 9999)
    462 (455 to 546)
    540 (462 to 546)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.03
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.567
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 total score (United States [US] analysis plan)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 total score (United States [US] analysis plan) [13]
    End point description
    The time to first clinically meaningful deterioration (for the US) was defined as the first time a participant experienced an increase (worsening) from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score of >=7. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 weeks
    Notes
    [13] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Days
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    546 (546 to 9999)
    546 (455 to 546)
    546 (476 to 546)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.079
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.675
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Time to median placebo deterioration on DAD total score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to median placebo deterioration on DAD total score [14]
    End point description
    The time to first median placebo deterioration (for the EU) was defined as the first time a participant experienced a decrease (worsening) in DAD total score greater than or equal to the median worsening at Week 78 in the placebo group. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 Weeks
    Notes
    [14] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Days
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    541 (455 to 546)
    534 (372 to 9999)
    463 (453 to 546)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.846
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.797
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on DAD total score (US analysis plan)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on DAD total score (US analysis plan) [15]
    End point description
    The time to first clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced a decrease (worsening)from baseline in DAD total score of >=12. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 Weeks
    Notes
    [15] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Days
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    542 (456 to 546)
    539 (450 to 9999)
    540 (453 to 546)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.933
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.714
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score at Week 78 (European Union analysis plan)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score at Week 78 (European Union analysis plan) [16]
    End point description
    Percentage of participants whose increase (worsening) in ADAS-Cog/11 total score from baseline to Week 78 was at most 0, 3, 7 points. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 Weeks
    Notes
    [16] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Number of participants
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Worsening of 0 points
    10.6 (7.1 to 15)
    8.7 (5.5 to 12.9)
    7.3 (4.7 to 10.7)
        Worsening of 3 points
    16.1 (11.8 to 21.2)
    13.4 (9.5 to 18.3)
    10.1 (7 to 13.8)
        Worsening of 7 points
    23.1 (18.1 to 28.8)
    19 (14.3 to 24.4)
    19.2 (15.1 to 23.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score at Week 78 (US analysis plan)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score at Week 78 (US analysis plan) [17]
    End point description
    Percentage of participants whose increase (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in ADAS-Cog/11 total score is <7. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 Weeks
    Notes
    [17] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    22.4
    18.6
    18.6
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.996
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.277
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline in DAD total score at Week 78 (European Union analysis plan)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline in DAD total score at Week 78 (European Union analysis plan) [18]
    End point description
    Percentage of participants whose decrease (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in DAD total score was at most 0, 6, 12 points. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 Weeks
    Notes
    [18] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Percentage of participants
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Worsening of 0 points
    10.2 (6.8 to 14.6)
    11.9 (8.1 to 16.5)
    9.1 (6.3 to 12.8)
        Worsening of 6 points
    15.7 (11.4 to 20.7)
    16.6 (12.2 to 21.8)
    14.3 (10.7 to 18.6)
        Worsening of 12 points
    20 (15.3 to 25.4)
    22.1 (17.2 to 27.8)
    19.5 (15.4 to 24.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline in DAD total score at Week 78 (US analysis plan)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline in DAD total score at Week 78 (US analysis plan) [19]
    End point description
    Percentage of participants whose decrease (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in DAD total score was <12. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 weeks
    Notes
    [19] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    20
    22.1
    19.5
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.855
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.423
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Dependence Scale Total Score at Week 78

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Dependence Scale Total Score at Week 78 [20]
    End point description
    The Dependence Scale (DS) is a 13-item, caregiver-rated instrument for determining the amount of support required by a participant with AD. The DS total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more need for assistance. The DS was administered as an interview to the caregiver at scheduled study visits. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 Weeks
    Notes
    [20] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Units on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    1.29 ± 0.19
    1.16 ± 0.19
    1.45 ± 0.17
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Change in DS score was analyzed using a REML based MMRM.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.516
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.16
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.65
         upper limit
    0.33
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Change in DS score was analyzed using a REML based MMRM.
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.257
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.29
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.79
         upper limit
    0.21

    Secondary: Change from baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) total score at Week 78

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) total score at Week 78 [21]
    End point description
    The CDR-SOB is a global clinical staging instrument that sums 6 clinical ratings: 1) memory, 2) orientation, 3) judgment and problem solving, 4) involvement in community affairs, 5) home and hobbies, and 6) personal care based on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) interview. The CDR includes discussions with the participant and caregiver using a structured format. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified global rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced by the participant. CDR-SOB total score range is 0 (least impairment) to 18 (most impairment); a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. The analysis population is the mITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    78 Weeks
    Notes
    [21] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Data for the reporting arm Placebo was not available
    End point values
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    255
    253
    328
    Units: Units on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    2.23 ± 0.23
    2.41 ± 0.23
    2.59 ± 0.2
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Change in CDR-SOB total score was analyzed using a REML based MMRM.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    583
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.238
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.36
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.96
         upper limit
    0.24
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Change in CDR-SOB total score was analyzed using a REML based MMRM.
    Comparison groups
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    581
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.564
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.18
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.78
         upper limit
    0.43

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    4 years
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    15.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 0.5 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received 1.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Participants received placebo by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg
    Reporting group description
    Participants received placebo by IV infusion every 13 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions over the course of the study. A final follow-up visit was performed at Week 78, 13 weeks after the last infusion.

    Serious adverse events
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    32 / 267 (11.99%)
    34 / 263 (12.93%)
    53 / 344 (15.41%)
    2 / 11 (18.18%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    3
    1
    5
    1
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Acute myeloid leukaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Adenocarcinoma pancreas
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Basal cell carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Breast cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colorectal cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastric cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Glioblastoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Keratoacanthoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lung neoplasm malignant
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Malignant melanoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to central nervous system
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to liver
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to lung
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostate cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rectal cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Squamous cell carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Aortic stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Aortic thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Deep vein thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peripheral artery stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Death
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General physical health deterioration
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Granuloma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Prostatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Asthma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nasal polyps
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Organising pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumothorax
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Abnormal behaviour
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Aggression
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Agitation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Alcohol abuse
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Alcoholic psychosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Confusional state
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    3 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Delirium
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hallucination
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Impulsive behaviour
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Jealous delusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicide attempt
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Investigations
    ECG signs of myocardial ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Liver function test abnormal
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Weight decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Clavicle fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fall
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Femoral neck fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Femur fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Heat illness
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hip fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Humerus fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Jaw fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Joint dislocation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Multiple injuries
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 267 (0.75%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Overdose
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Radius fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rib fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skull fractured base
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal compression fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subdural haematoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subdural haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tendon rupture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Upper limb fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute left ventricular failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Acute myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Adams-Stokes syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Angina pectoris
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Atrial fibrillation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bradycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac failure congestive
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Coronary artery disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Aphasia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebral infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebral microhaemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    3 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebrovascular accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Convulsion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dementia Alzheimer's type
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Epilepsy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 267 (0.75%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intracranial hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ischaemic stroke
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Loss of consciousness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Perineurial cyst
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Presyncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Quadriparesis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Radiculopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Senile dementia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Status epilepticus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subarachnoid haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subdural hygroma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Syncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vasogenic cerebral oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 267 (2.25%)
    12 / 263 (4.56%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    2 / 11 (18.18%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    8 / 8
    20 / 20
    0 / 0
    7 / 7
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Iron deficiency anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    Cataract
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Faecal incontinence
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Erythema
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    5 / 5
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    4 / 4
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urticaria
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal failure acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Intervertebral disc protrusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Osteoarthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal osteoarthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Anal abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Appendicitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bacteraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchopneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Clostridium difficile colitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Escherichia bacteraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Herpes zoster oticus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Meningitis viral
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Otitis media
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Periorbital cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Pyelonephritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urosepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dehydration
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Hypokalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg Bapineuzumab 1.0 mg/kg Placebo Bapineuzumab 2.0 mg/kg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    109 / 267 (40.82%)
    123 / 263 (46.77%)
    124 / 344 (36.05%)
    9 / 11 (81.82%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 267 (3.00%)
    10 / 263 (3.80%)
    9 / 344 (2.62%)
    2 / 11 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    12
    16
    9
    Hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    0
    1
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Catheter site haematoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    0
    2
    Psychiatric disorders
    Confusional state
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 267 (1.50%)
    3 / 263 (1.14%)
    6 / 344 (1.74%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    5
    6
    3
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 267 (4.87%)
    11 / 263 (4.18%)
    9 / 344 (2.62%)
    2 / 11 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    25
    21
    24
    9
    Hallucination
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 267 (0.75%)
    2 / 263 (0.76%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    2
    2
    1
    Psychotic disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    2
    Investigations
    Blood pressure increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 267 (1.87%)
    5 / 263 (1.90%)
    6 / 344 (1.74%)
    2 / 11 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    9
    7
    3
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 267 (2.25%)
    8 / 263 (3.04%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    2 / 11 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    10
    1
    3
    Fall
         subjects affected / exposed
    18 / 267 (6.74%)
    16 / 263 (6.08%)
    18 / 344 (5.23%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    25
    18
    26
    1
    Cardiac disorders
    Tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    2
    1
    Nervous system disorders
    Aphasia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    2 / 263 (0.76%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    4
    6
    1
    Ataxia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 267 (0.75%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    0
    1
    Balance disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    1
    Cerebral microhaemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 267 (4.12%)
    22 / 263 (8.37%)
    9 / 344 (2.62%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    13
    41
    21
    9
    Disturbance in attention
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 267 (3.00%)
    7 / 263 (2.66%)
    16 / 344 (4.65%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    20
    17
    5
    Dizziness postural
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    2
    1
    Exertional headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 267 (6.37%)
    15 / 263 (5.70%)
    29 / 344 (8.43%)
    2 / 11 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    36
    36
    9
    Hyporeflexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Mental impairment
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    5
    Paraesthesia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    Parkinson's disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    5
    Vasogenic cerebral oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 267 (2.62%)
    20 / 263 (7.60%)
    2 / 344 (0.58%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    43
    7
    0
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Hypoacusis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Eye disorders
    Vision blurred
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    1 / 263 (0.38%)
    1 / 344 (0.29%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    4
    1
    1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 267 (2.25%)
    6 / 263 (2.28%)
    9 / 344 (2.62%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    6
    10
    1
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 267 (3.00%)
    7 / 263 (2.66%)
    11 / 344 (3.20%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    7
    15
    1
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 267 (3.37%)
    9 / 263 (3.42%)
    10 / 344 (2.91%)
    3 / 11 (27.27%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    11
    12
    3
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Petechiae
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 267 (2.25%)
    5 / 263 (1.90%)
    6 / 344 (1.74%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    15
    17
    9
    5
    Musculoskeletal stiffness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 267 (0.37%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 267 (6.37%)
    18 / 263 (6.84%)
    28 / 344 (8.14%)
    2 / 11 (18.18%)
         occurrences all number
    23
    24
    44
    2
    Sinusitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 267 (1.87%)
    3 / 263 (1.14%)
    3 / 344 (0.87%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    3
    5
    12
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    15 / 267 (5.62%)
    13 / 263 (4.94%)
    9 / 344 (2.62%)
    0 / 11 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    17
    17
    13
    0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hypophagia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 267 (0.00%)
    0 / 263 (0.00%)
    0 / 344 (0.00%)
    1 / 11 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    4

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    24 Sep 2008
    In global protocol amendment 1, the following changes such as interim analysis was removed; all screening MRI scans to be reviewed by a central radiologist; timing of caregiver instruction was changed; NPI administration expanded to include the principal investigator, a sub-investigator, the psychometric rater (not the global rater), or the study coordinator. Thus the NPI rater need not have been blinded to AEs. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), Pulmonary embolism (PE) and seizure/convulsion were added as new events of special circumstance.
    16 Apr 2009
    In global protocol amendment 2, the following changes such as 2.0 mg/kg dose group was discontinued as a treatment arm on 02 April 2009; intracranial hemorrhage was added as an AE of special circumstance; Evidence of subdural hematoma on the screening MRI scan was added as an exclusion criteria; Central radiology review (in addition to the local radiology review) added for all scheduled MRI scans through Week 32 inclusive. All unscheduled MRI scans required a central radiology review in addition to local review; Weight at Day 1 collected as part of vital sign data; the ICRS component of the RUD-Lite v2.4 was removed; The QOL AD to be completed by both the caregiver and the participant; the number of participants increased to include US sites; Infusion details updated; IRB/IEC and health authority approval required to resume test article administration following vasogenic edema (VE); sampling blood volumes refined for sub-studies; cholesterol and triglycerides added as laboratory test and personnel changes.
    16 Oct 2009
    In global protocol amendment 3, the following changes were included; AE of special circumstance language for cerebral hemorrhage was modified to indicate that HD was not included as an AE of special circumstance; MRI scan central reading added at Week 71; Immune complement and complex sampling removed; 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET removed as a substudy; Week 78 visit defined as the screening visit for extension study 3133K1-3002; Pre-Day 1 serum and CSF bapineuzumab sampling removed for participants in the CSF sub study; Clinical experience with PiB section added to the protocol; VE section updated; “Amyloid” PET changed to “PiB” PET; PET imaging hypotheses added; Preferably obtain the Apo E genotype prior to obtaining the screening MRI if scheduling allowed; Frequency of anti bapineuzumab antibody testing decreased to collection at Day 1, Week 26 and Week 78/early withdrawal; Vital signs added at Week 71; PET scanning time and schedule clarified; Reporting of medication errors was clarified; Definition of rating scale and health outcome assessment workbooks as source documents; Resumption of test article administration following VE to occur following VE resolution; PET radiation exposure updated; ECG frequency decreased to collection at screening, Week 45 and Week 78/early withdrawal; Fluorodeoxyglucose PET was removed as a substudy to this protocol; Prior medication section modified to remove language that requires prior approval of the sponsor for irregular use of medication for non-excluded conditions.
    17 Feb 2011
    In global protocol amendment 4, the following changes were made; Duration of study increased to 6 years (72 months); Participants with hemosiderin deposit (HD) greater than 10 mm in any direction to receive no further IP infusion; reporting of potential cases of drug-induced liver injury (potential Hy's Law cases) added; Inclusion criterion 8 updated to allow native languages under certain circumstances; All study MRI scans required to be read by a local and central radiologist and the investigator to review and sign off both the local and central radiology report prior to each next test article infusion; Added central MRI reading at Weeks 45 and 78; Timing window added for collection of the post-infusion vital sign measurements, infusion site assessments and blood collection; Pre-Day 1 CSF and associated blood samples collectable at any point in the screening period; Pre-Day 1 PiB PET scan at any point in the screening period; VE section updated; Cerebral hemorrhage specified as an adverse drug reaction for bapineuzumab; Information on seizure/convulsion and venous thrombotic events (DVT and PE) added; Week 78 visit defined as the screening visit for extension study; Due to recruitment issues, participation in 1 or more substudies may have been required rather than optional; Addition of recommendation added to contact the sponsor for new medications initiated where there may have been questions regarding safety or impact on efficacy assessment; and Information regarding concomitant treatment with anticoagulants added.
    20 Jul 2011
    In global protocol amendment 5, the following changes were made; Revisions to the protocol objectives were made in accordance with regulatory/scientific advice obtained in consultation with regulatory authorities. Analyses and methods to address the additional protocol objectives were elaborated in the Statistical analysis plan. An assessment of suicidality was incorporated with associated revision to exclusion criteria; Expansion of window for scheduling PET scans at Week 45 and Week 71; Clarification of use of medications with potential to affect cognition; Infusion duration/window clarified; Investigator’s responsibilities regarding local and central radiology reports clarified; Expectations for the conduct of full examinations or targeted examinations clarified; An alternative or additional exploratory PiB PET scan to be obtained from participants in the PiB PET substudy who experienced VE; Change in sponsor SAE collection policy, including sponsor requests for additional information of events reported as non-serious by the investigator and investigator recording of awareness of an SAE occurrence; Reportable dosing error definition clarified.
    15 Dec 2011
    In global protocol amendment 6, the following updates included; Definitions of AEs and SAEs updated in accordance with regulatory requirements; Safety sections updated to meet Pfizer standards; Medication errors were reportable events regardless of whether or not they were accompanied by an AE and had to be documented accordingly. Overdose no longer needed to be reported on an SAE form if not associated with a SAE; Criteria for laboratory abnormalities for further evaluation in the context of potential cases of drug-induced liver injury clarified and updated to include prothrombin time; Clarification of SAE reporting requirements added, including those in the post active reporting period and also to clarify the clock start for reportable events; Management of allergic or immune mediated reaction related to IP infusion were clarified; Storage conditions of placebo were changed; CSF volume to be collected was clarified.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes
    Date
    Interruption
    Restart date
    06 Aug 2012
    The sponsor made the decision to terminate all ongoing bapineuzumab IV studies in participants with mild to moderate AD mainly due to the lack of clinical benefit seen in the completed bapineuzumab phase 3 studies, Study ELN115727-301 (ApoE4 allele non-carriers) and Study ELN115727-302 (ApoE4 allele carriers) conducted by Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy. Therefore, both 3133K1-3000-WW and 3133K1-3000-US were terminated earlier than planned. A total of 335 participants had completed the study up to and including Week 78 before the decision was taken to end the study prematurely. Participants who had not completed the final follow-up visit in either study prior to 06 August 2012 were asked to complete an early withdrawal/termination visit to perform the protocol-defined procedures.
    -

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    The impact of study termination, the shorter observational periods and the resulting small sample size coupled with not having enough participants with post baseline assessments for various reasons were limiting factors for data interpretation.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 25 00:38:13 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA