Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Evaluation of the effects of chronic treatment with venlafaxine (150 mg) and pregabalin (200 mg) on emotional indices of anxiety and panic induced by breathing carbon dioxide.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2008-000971-15
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    26 Aug 2009

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    21 Apr 2019
    First version publication date
    21 Apr 2019
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Publication

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    P1V-ANX-CT01-07
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    NHS REC reference: 08/H0308/298
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University of Bristol
    Sponsor organisation address
    One Cathedral Square, Bristol, United Kingdom, BS1 5DD
    Public contact
    Dr Alison Diaper, University of Bristol, alison_diaper@hotmail.com
    Scientific contact
    Dr Alison Diaper, University of Bristol, alison_diaper@hotmail.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    09 Sep 2009
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    26 Aug 2009
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    26 Aug 2009
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    • To determine whether chronic (3 week) venlafaxine dosing reduces the anxiety symptoms induced by breathing a mixture of air and 7.5% carbon dioxide (CO2). • To determine whether chronic (3 week) pregabalin dosing reduces the anxiety symptoms induced by breathing a mixture of air and 7.5% CO2.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The Psychopharmacology Unit is experienced in managing and conducting human research in patient and healthy volunteer populations. Experience with the effects of inhaling 7.5% CO2 has been obtained from research completed over the last 8 years, using the procedure on hundreds of subjects. The study was performed in accordance with ICH Good Clinical Practice, with approval from a Research Ethics Committee (Cambridge 2 Research Ethics Committee), relevant Health Service Trust regulatory approval (University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust), and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Approval in writing was received prior to starting the study. Aspects of the Data Protection Act were adhered to. The case report forms were completed and stored appropriately. Data held on the computer were anonymised. Volunteers were recruited using advertisements approved for that reason by the Ethics Committee. After initial contact, the subjects received the Participant Information Sheet and were given at least 48 hours to read it and consider the implications of their participation in the study. They were given the time to raise any questions with the investigators prior to making the decision to participate. Each subject was then asked to give their written informed consent after one of the investigators had explained the nature, purpose and risks of the study, by signing the Informed Consent Forms. A letter was sent to the subjects’ general practitioners informing them of their patients’ participation in the trial. The study was of no direct benefit to the participants involved. A medic was on call and available to all participants at all times, and two researchers administered the CO2 inhalations.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    In the present study we will investigate the effects of two drugs prescribed to treat GAD, venlafaxine (Effexor®) and pregabalin (Lyrica®), both of which have different mechanisms of actions to the drugs already tested using the CO2 challenge. As both drugs require several weeks of dosing to be effective in treating GAD, the participants in this study will be given a CO2 challenge after chronic dosing. Consequently, participants will be treated for 3 weeks with either venlafaxine or pregabalin prior to undertaking the CO2 challenge test. Venlafaxine is a bicyclic antidepressant, and is usually categorized as a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), however, it has also been referred to as a serotonin- noradrenaline- dopamine- reuptake inhibitor (Goeringer et al., 2001). It works by blocking the transporter "reuptake" proteins for key neurotransmitters affecting mood, thereby leaving more active neurotransmitter in the synapse. The neurotransmitters principally affected are serotonin and noradrenaline. Additionally, in high doses it weakly inhibits the reuptake of dopamine (Wellington and Perry, 2001). Venlafaxine is well absorbed with at least 92% of an oral dose being absorbed into the systemic circulation. The drug is extensively metabolized in the liver via the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) isoenzyme to O-desmethylvenlafaxine. This metabolite is equally potent as a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor as the parent compound, such that the differences in metabolism between extensive and poor metabolisers are not clinically important. Steady-state concentrations of venlafaxine and its metabolite are attained in the blood within three days and therapeutic effects are usually observed within 3-4 weeks. No accumulation of venlafaxine has been observed during chronic administration in healthy participants.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    03 Nov 2008
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 60
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    60
    EEA total number of subjects
    60
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    60
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    All respondents to the advertising underwent an initial telephone screening and sent a PIS. Those interested in participating attended for a screening visit to assess eligibility, and give informed to consent to participate if suitable. Participants then attended a baseline visit before for randomisation.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Physical examination, blood exam (biochemistry and haematology), height/weight/blood pressure, neuropsychiatric interview, ECG, alcohol breath test, pregnancy test, urinalysis and urine drugs of abuse test.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    79 [1]
    Intermediate milestone: Number of subjects
    Screening: 79
    Number of subjects completed
    60

    Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Not eligible: 19
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to have started the pre-assignment period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: Subjects were found not eligible for the study at screening period.
    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Randomisation (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst
    Blinding implementation details
    Participants were randomised to placebo (study arm A) or one of two active drugs (study arms B or C). Study drugs and randomisations were provided by Bilcare GCS (Europe) Ltd. Participants were allocated at random to one of the study arms below in the ratio 1:1:1, in blocks of 6. Both the venlafaxine and pregabalin tablets were over-encapsulated to give the same appearance as that of the red placebo capsule.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Placebo
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    DB size AA-el Swedish orange capsules
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Two capsules per day.

    Arm title
    Venlafaxine
    Arm description
    Venlafaxine
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Venlafaxine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Venlafaxine 37.5mg tablets (Efexor, Wyeth)
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    75mg on days 0-2, 112.5mg on days 3-6, 150mg on days 7-21, 75mg on days 22-24 and 37.5mg on days 25-26. Dose one capsule twice a day, morning and evening.

    Arm title
    Pregabalin
    Arm description
    Pregabalin
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Pregabalin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pregabalin 50mg capsules (Lyrica, Pfizer)
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    100mg on days 0-6, 200mg on days 7-21, 100mg on days 22-24 and 50mg on days 25-26. Dose one capsule taken twice a day, morning and evening.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Placebo Venlafaxine Pregabalin
    Started
    19
    23
    18
    Health and compliance check A
    19
    18
    18
    Health and compliance check B
    18
    18
    18
    CO2 challenge
    18
    18
    18
    Follow up visit
    19
    18
    18
    Completed
    18
    18
    18
    Not completed
    1
    5
    0
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    1
    5
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Randomisation
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    Randomisation Total
    Number of subjects
    60 60
    Age categorical
    Placebo mean age 22.0, sd 2.47, venlafaxine mean age 22.8, sd 2.85, pregabalin mean age 24.4, sd 7.11.
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    60 60
        From 65-84 years
    0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    23.1 ± 4.68 -
    Gender categorical
    Placebo males 50.0%, venlafaxine males 66.7%, pregabalin males 44.4%.
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    28 28
        Male
    32 32

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo

    Reporting group title
    Venlafaxine
    Reporting group description
    Venlafaxine

    Reporting group title
    Pregabalin
    Reporting group description
    Pregabalin

    Subject analysis set title
    All subjects
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    n=54 completers

    Primary: Panic Symptom Inventory

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Panic Symptom Inventory
    End point description
    The Panic Symptom Inventory (PSI) was used to rate panic anxiety and the associated symptoms of autonomic arousal, with the option of rating 0 = not at all, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3= severe, 4 = very severe. The PSI was adapted from Clark and Hemsley (1982), and lists 34 items and has been used in studies of panic provocation (Nutt et al., 1990; Bell et al., 2002) and previous CO2 studies (Argyropoulos et al., 2002, Bailey et al., 2005).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Measured before and after each CO2 inhalation
    End point values
    Placebo Venlafaxine Pregabalin
    Number of subjects analysed
    18 [1]
    18 [2]
    18
    Units: Score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    20.1 ± 13.0
    18.1 ± 10.0
    18.2 ± 13.7
    Notes
    [1] - 1 dropout replaced, therefore 18 in analysis.
    [2] - 5 drop outs replaced, therefore 18 in analysis.
    Statistical analysis title
    Paired t test
    Statistical analysis description
    Paired t tests for placebo and venlafaxine, placebo and pregabalin, and venlafaxine and pregabalin showed the following results. At the Peak-Air time point, PSI scores on venlafaxine were significantly higher than on pregabalin (t=2.549, df=34, p<0.05). At the Peak-35% CO2 time point, PSI scores on venlafaxine were significantly higher than on pregabalin (t=2.235, df=34, p<0.05).
    Comparison groups
    Venlafaxine v Placebo v Pregabalin
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    54
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    < 0.05 [3]
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [3] - At the Peak-35% CO2 time point, PSI scores on venlafaxine were significantly higher than on pregabalin (t=2.235, df=34, p<0.05).

    Primary: Generalised Anxiety Disorder Inventory (GAD-C)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Generalised Anxiety Disorder Inventory (GAD-C)
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Before and after each CO2 inhalation
    End point values
    Placebo Venlafaxine Pregabalin
    Number of subjects analysed
    18 [4]
    18 [5]
    18
    Units: Score
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    10.8 ± 7.9
    9.6 ± 5.0
    10.3 ± 7.8
    Notes
    [4] - 1 dropout replaced, therefore 18 included in final analysis
    [5] - 5 dropouts replaced, therefore 18 included in final analysis
    Statistical analysis title
    Paired t test
    Statistical analysis description
    At the Peak Air time point, GAD-C scores on placebo were significantly higher than on pregabalin (t=2.059, df=28.4, p<0.05, and scores on venlafaxine were also significantly higher than on pregabalin (t=2.230, df=26.9, p<0.05). At the Peak 35% CO2 time point, GAD-C scores on venlafaxine were significantly higher than on pregabalin (t=2.145, df=34, p<0.05).
    Comparison groups
    Venlafaxine v Pregabalin v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    54
    Analysis specification
    Post-hoc
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    < 0.05 [6]
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [6] - At the Peak 35% CO2 time point, GAD-C scores on venlafaxine were significantly higher than on pregabalin (t=2.145, df=34, p<0.05).

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From signing of informed consent form until last subject last visit (follow-up).
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    12.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo

    Reporting group title
    Venlafaxine
    Reporting group description
    Venlafaxine

    Reporting group title
    Pregabalin
    Reporting group description
    Pregabalin

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo Venlafaxine Pregabalin
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 19 (0.00%)
    0 / 23 (0.00%)
    0 / 18 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo Venlafaxine Pregabalin
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    16 / 19 (84.21%)
    17 / 23 (73.91%)
    14 / 18 (77.78%)
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 19 (57.89%)
    7 / 23 (30.43%)
    10 / 18 (55.56%)
         occurrences all number
    17
    13
    21
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 19 (26.32%)
    8 / 23 (34.78%)
    2 / 18 (11.11%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    14
    3
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 19 (15.79%)
    10 / 23 (43.48%)
    5 / 18 (27.78%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    14
    5
    Feeling abnormal
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 19 (10.53%)
    6 / 23 (26.09%)
    4 / 18 (22.22%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    6
    4
    Somnolence
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 19 (21.05%)
    3 / 23 (13.04%)
    4 / 18 (22.22%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    3
    4
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 19 (15.79%)
    6 / 23 (26.09%)
    6 / 18 (33.33%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    7
    15
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 19 (10.53%)
    10 / 23 (43.48%)
    3 / 18 (16.67%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    11
    3

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    24 Apr 2008
    Contact list - Changed Site Management Organisation to Funder Section 13.2.2 Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) - Removed the need to report SAEs to P1vital (funder) Section 18.2 On-Site Audits – Removed the need to inform P1vital (funder)
    28 Apr 2009
    • Change to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Currently the inclusion/exclusion criteria states that all resting blood pressure at screening should be between 100-140 mmHg systolic and 60-90 mmHg diastolic. Because of this tight range, we are excluding many fit participants with blood pressures outside of this range, when they are otherwise suitable for inclusion. We wish to add a statement to the inclusion/exclusion criteria which would mean that blood pressure results outside of this range should be subject to the judgment of the study physician as to the clinical significance of the results. If the study physician felt any out-of-range results were not clinically significant or relevant to the study, then s/he could then pass the participant fit to enter the study. As all participants will only be included on the study if deemed suitable by the study physician, there will be no additional risk to participants. The benefit of this amendment will be the inclusion of suitable participants who would otherwise fail screening unnecessarily. There will be no consequences to participants already on the trial, and no change to the evaluation of results.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22516666
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sun May 05 14:43:53 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA