E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Smouldering Systemic, Indolent Systemic or Cutaneous Mastocytosis with handicaps |
Tünetekkel járó lappangó szisztémás, indolens szisztémás vagy cutan mastocytosis |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Indolent Mastocytosis |
Lappangó Mastocytosis |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 16.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10026891 |
E.1.2 | Term | Mastocytosis |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10005329 - Blood and lymphatic system disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | Yes |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of masitinib at 6 mg/kg/day to
placebo in the treatment of patients with documented Smouldering or Indolent Systemic mastocytosis
with severe handicap based on treatment effect on the pruritus score, the number of flushes per week,
the HAMD-17 score, and the Fatigue Impact Scale score.
Primary endpoint:
- Cumulative response by patient*handicap |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Secondary endpoints:
- Cumulative response on pruritus among patients with the handicap at Baseline
- Cumulative response on OPA score among patients with “severe” or “intolerable”
handicap at Baseline
- Quality of Life (QoL) : QLQ-C30 global score, functional scores and symptom scores at
each visit
- AFIRMM questionnaire :
· global score
· for each of the 52 items : cumulative response among patients with “severe” or
“intolerable” handicap at Baseline
- Cumulative response on micturitions among patients with the handicap at Baseline
- Cumulative response on stools among patients with the handicap at Baseline
- Urticaria Pigmentosa (UP) evaluation at week 12, 24 and then every 12 weeks |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Patient with one of the following documented mastocytosis as per WHO classification:
Smouldering Systemic Mastocytosis
Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis
2. Patient with documented mastocytosis and evaluable disease based upon histological criteria:
typical infiltrates of mast cells in a multifocal or diffuse pattern in skin and/or bone marrow biopsy
3. Patient with documented treatment failure of his/her handicap(s) with at least one of the following
therapy used at optimized dose (refer to table 2):
Anti H1
Anti H2
Proton pump inhibitor
Osteoclast inhibitor
Cromoglycate Sodium
Antileukotriene
4. Handicapped status defined as at least two of the following handicaps, including at least one
among pruritus, flushes, depression and fatigue:
Pruritus score ≥ 9
Number of flushes per week ≥ 8
Hamilton rating scale for depression(HAMD-17) score ≥ 19
Number of stools per day ≥ 4
Number of micturition per day ≥ 8
Fatigue Impact Scale total score (asthenia) ≥ 75
5. Patients with OPA > 2 (moderate to intolerable general handicap)
6. ECOG ≤ 2
7. Patient with adequate organ function :
Absolute neutrophils count (ANC) ≥ 2.0 x 109/L,
Haemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
Platelets (PTL) ≥ 100 x 109/L
AST/ALT ≤ 3x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN in case of liver mast cell involvement),
Bilirubin ≤ 1.5x ULN
Creatinine clearance >60mL/min (Cockcroft and Gault formula)
Albumin >1 x LLN
Proteinuria < 30mg/dL on the dipstick; in case of proteinuria ≥ 1+ on dipstick, 24 hours
proteinuria should be <1.5g/24 hours
8. Male or female patient aged 18 to 75 years, weight > 50 kg, BMI between 18 and 35 kg/m²
9. Male or female patient of child bearing potential ust agree to use two methods (one for the patient
and one for the partner) of medically acceptable forms of contraception during the study and for
three months after the last treatment intake. Female patients must have a negative result in the
pregnancy tests at screening and baseline.
10. Patient must be able and willing to comply with study visits and procedures per protocol
11. Patient must understand, sign, and date the written voluntary informed consent form at the
screening visit prior to any protocol-specific procedures performed
12. Patient must understand the patient card and follow the patient card procedures in case of signs or
symptoms of severe neutropenia or severe cutaneous toxicity during the first 2 months of
treatment
13. Patient affiliated to a social security regimen |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Patient with one of the following mastocytosis:
Cutaneous Mastocytosis
Not documented Smouldering Systemic Mastocytosis or Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis
Systemic Mastocytosis with an Associated clonal Hematologic Non Mast cell lineage
Disease (SM-AHNMD)
Mast cell leukaemia (MCL)
Aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM)
2. Previous treatment with any Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor
3. Patient presenting with cardiac disorders defined by at least one of the following conditions:
Patient with recent cardiac history (within 6 months) of:
- Acute coronary syndrome
- Acute heart failure (class III or IV of the NYHA classification)
- Significant ventricular arrhythmia (persistent ventricular tachycardia, ventricular
fibrillation, resuscitated sudden death)
Patient with cardiac failure class III or IV of the NYHA classification
Patient with severe conduction disorders which are not prevented by permanent pacing
(atrio-ventricular block 2 and 3, sino-atrial block)
Syncope without known aetiology within 3 months
Uncontrolled severe hypertension, according to the judgment of the investigator, or
symptomatic hypertension
4. Patient who had major surgery within 2 weeks prior to screening visit
5. Vulnerable population defined as:
Life expectancy < 6 months
Patient with < 5 years free of malignancy, except treated basal cell skin cancer or cervical
carcinoma in situ
Patient with any severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition
Patient with known diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
6. Patient with history of poor compliance or history of drug/alcohol abuse, or excessive alcohol
beverage consumption that would interfere with the ability to comply with the study protocol, or
current or past psychiatric disease that might interfere with the ability to comply with the study
protocol or give informed consent, or institutionalized by court decision
7. Patient with any condition that the physician judges could be detrimental to subjects participating
in this study; including any clinically important deviations from normal clinical laboratory values
or concurrent medical events
8. Change in the symptomatic treatment of mastocytosis or administration of any new treatment of
mastocytosis within 4 weeks prior to baseline
9. Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to baseline |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Primary endpoint:
- Cumulative response by patient*handicap |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Secondary endpoints:
- Cumulative response on pruritus among patients with the handicap at Baseline
- Cumulative response on OPA score among patients with “severe” or “intolerable” handicap at
Baseline
- Quality of Life (QoL) : QLQ-C30 global score, functional scores and symptom scores at each
visit
- AFIRMM questionnaire :
· global score
· for each of the 52 items : cumulative response among patients with “severe” or “intolerable”
handicap at Baseline
- Cumulative response on micturitions among patients with the handicap at Baseline
- Cumulative response on stools among patients with the handicap at Baseline
- Urticaria Pigmentosa (UP) evaluation at week 12, 24 and then every 12 weeks |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Response on at least one handicap out of 4 among pruritus, flushes, depression and fatigue
- Overall cumulative response
- Sustained response rate (two consecutive response)
- Responder rate at week 12
- Confirmed responder rate (response at week 20 then week 24)
Response on at least one handicap out of 3 among pruritus, flushes and depression/fatigue (for depression/fatigue, a patient will be considered as responder if response on both depression and fatigue as those variables are partially overlapping)
Responder rate at week 24
- Overall cumulative response
- Sustained response rate (two consecutive response)
- Responder rate at week 12
- Confirmed responder rate (response at week 20 then week 24)
Response on at least 2 handicaps out of 4 among pruritus, flushes, depression and fatigue (among patients with at least 2 handicaps at baseline) |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 100 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 160 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
Bulgaria |
Czech Republic |
France |
Germany |
India |
Italy |
Latvia |
Poland |
Russian Federation |
Serbia |
Slovakia |
Ukraine |
United Kingdom |
United States |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
End of the trial is defined as last visit of the last patient at week 24.
Possible extension visits will not be taken in consideration for end of trial definition. |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 4 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 6 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |