Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained Release (DVS SR) in the Treatment of Children and Adolescent Outpatients With Major Depressive Disorder

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2008-001875-32
    Trial protocol
    Outside EU/EEA  
    Global end of trial date
    04 Sep 2015

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    13 May 2016
    First version publication date
    13 May 2016
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    B2061032
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01371734
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Pfizer Inc.
    Sponsor organisation address
    235 E 42nd Street, New York, United States, NY 10017
    Public contact
    Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center, Pfizer Inc., 001 800-718-1021, ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
    Scientific contact
    Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center, Pfizer Inc., 001 800-718-1021, ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    04 Sep 2015
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    04 Sep 2015
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    This was a Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of DVS SR in the treatment of child (7 to 11 years of age) and adolescent (12 to 17 years of age) outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The study was planned to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DVS SR in the treatment of child and adolescent outpatients with MDD. Participants who completed the 8 week, double-blind treatment phase of this study were eligible to participate in a 6 month, open label extension study of DVS SR (B2061030).
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles originating in or derived from the Declaration of Helsinki and in compliance with all International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. In addition, all local regulatory requirements were followed, in particular, those affording greater protection to the safety of trial participants. The final protocol and any amendments were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board(s) and/or Independent Ethics Committee(s) at each of the investigational centres participating in the study.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    03 Aug 2011
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Chile: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 362
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    363
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    109
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    254
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Participants underwent a comprehensive diagnostic psychiatric evaluation. Criteria for MDD were evaluated by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision, as assessed by the KIDDIE Schedule for Affective Disorder & Schizophrenia – Present & Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL).

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Matched placebo tablets administered once daily for 8 weeks (treatment phase), followed by placebo tablets administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo for DVS SR
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo tablets to match the 10 and 25 mg DVS SR pyramid shaped tablets for oral administration once daily for 8 weeks (treatment phase), followed by placebo tablets administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Arm title
    DVS SR Low Dose
    Arm description
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 20, 25 or 35 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    DVS SR
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 20, 25 or 35 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Arm title
    DVS SR High Dose
    Arm description
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 25, 35 or 50 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    DVS SR
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 25, 35 or 50 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Placebo DVS SR Low Dose DVS SR High Dose
    Started
    120
    122
    121
    Completed
    97
    103
    104
    Not completed
    23
    19
    17
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    3
    4
    9
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    8
    8
    3
         Not specified
    2
    1
    2
         Lost to follow-up
    5
    3
    1
         Lack of efficacy
    2
    2
    -
         Protocol deviation
    3
    1
    2

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Matched placebo tablets administered once daily for 8 weeks (treatment phase), followed by placebo tablets administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Reporting group title
    DVS SR Low Dose
    Reporting group description
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 20, 25 or 35 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Reporting group title
    DVS SR High Dose
    Reporting group description
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 25, 35 or 50 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Reporting group values
    Placebo DVS SR Low Dose DVS SR High Dose Total
    Number of subjects
    120 122 121 363
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    36 37 36 109
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    84 85 85 254
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0 0 0 0
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0 0
    Age Continuous |
    Units: Years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    13.2 ( 2.68 ) 13.1 ( 2.8 ) 12.9 ( 3.01 ) -
    Gender, Male/Female
    Units: Participants
        Female
    60 69 76 205
        Male
    60 53 45 158

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Matched placebo tablets administered once daily for 8 weeks (treatment phase), followed by placebo tablets administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Reporting group title
    DVS SR Low Dose
    Reporting group description
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 20, 25 or 35 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Reporting group title
    DVS SR High Dose
    Reporting group description
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 25, 35 or 50 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Primary: Change from Baseline to Week 8 in the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline to Week 8 in the Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score
    End point description
    Clinician-rated interview-based scale (with both child and parent or guardian) to assess 17 distinct symptom areas to derive an index of depression severity. Discrepancies between informants' responses were resolved by using most impaired rating given by valid informant. Rated on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (no impairment) to 7 (indicates greater impairment). Total score calculated as sum of the 17 items (range 1 to 119); higher score indicates greater impairment. Adjusted mean (common baseline average + adjusted mean change from baseline) presented.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 8
    End point values
    Placebo DVS SR Low Dose DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects analysed
    102
    104
    106
    Units: Score on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -22.85 ( 1.13 )
    -23.7 ( 1.12 )
    -24.37 ( 1.12 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CDRS-R at Week 8
    Statistical analysis description
    Adjusted mean difference = Placebo - DVS SR Low Dose
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    206
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [1]
    P-value
    = 0.587
    Method
    Mixed-effects model for repeated measure
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.85
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.23
         upper limit
    3.94
    Notes
    [1] - Hochberg procedure was used to control for multiplicity
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CDRS-R at Week 8
    Statistical analysis description
    Adjusted mean difference = Placebo - DVS SR High Dose
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    208
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [2]
    P-value
    = 0.333
    Method
    Mixed-effects model for repeated measure
    Parameter type
    Median difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.52
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.56
         upper limit
    4.61
    Notes
    [2] - Hochberg procedure was used to control for multiplicity

    Secondary: Change from Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline to Week 8 in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score
    End point description
    A 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score = more affected. Change: score at observation minus score at baseline. Adjusted mean (common baseline average + adjusted mean change from baseline) presented.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 8
    End point values
    Placebo DVS SR Low Dose DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects analysed
    102
    105
    106
    Units: Score on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -1.49 ( 0.11 )
    -1.51 ( 0.11 )
    -1.65 ( 0.11 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-S at Week 8
    Statistical analysis description
    Adjusted mean difference = Placebo - DVS SR Low Dose
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    207
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [3]
    P-value
    = 0.923
    Method
    Mixed-effects model for repeated measure
    Parameter type
    Median difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.015
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.29
         upper limit
    0.32
    Notes
    [3] - Hochberg procedure was used to control for multiplicity
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-S at Week 8
    Statistical analysis description
    Adjusted mean difference = Placebo - DVS SR High Dose
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    208
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [4]
    P-value
    = 0.302
    Method
    Mixed-effects model for repeated measure
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.161
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.14
         upper limit
    0.47
    Notes
    [4] - Hochberg procedure was used to control for multiplicity

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants by Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants by Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
    End point description
    A 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score equals (=) more affected.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
    End point values
    Placebo DVS SR Low Dose DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects analysed
    114
    115
    115
    Units: Percentage of Participants
    number (not applicable)
        Week 1, Very Much Improved (n=113, 112,115)
    2.7
    0.9
    2.6
        Week 1, Much Improved (n=113, 112, 115)
    6.2
    9.8
    12.2
        Week 1, Minimally Improved (n=113, 112, 115)
    38.9
    37.5
    33.9
        Week 1, No Change (n=113, 112, 115)
    49.6
    51.8
    46.1
        Week 1, Minimally Worse (n=113, 112, 115)
    2.7
    0
    5.2
        Week 1, Much Worse (n=113, 112, 115)
    0
    0
    0
        Week 1, Very Much Worse (n=113, 112, 115)
    0
    0
    0
        Week 2, Very Much Improved (n=114, 115, 109)
    4.4
    6.1
    10.1
        Week 2, Much Improved (n=114, 115, 109)
    26.3
    26.1
    23.9
        Week 2, Minimally Improved (n=114, 115, 109)
    36.8
    38.3
    35.8
        Week 2, No Change (n=114, 115, 109)
    31.6
    25.2
    29.4
        Week 2, Minimally Worse (n=114, 115, 109)
    0
    4.3
    0
        Week 2, Much Worse (n=114, 115, 109)
    0.9
    0
    0.9
        Week 2, Very Much Worse (n=114, 115, 109)
    0
    0
    0
        Week 3, Very Much Improved (n=108, 110, 110)
    10.2
    10.9
    18.2
        Week 3, Much Improved (n=108, 110, 110)
    20.4
    26.4
    24.5
        Week 3, Minimally Improved (n=108, 110, 110)
    47.2
    44.5
    35.5
        Week 3, No Change (n=108, 110, 110)
    20.4
    15.5
    21.8
        Week 3, Minimally Worse (n=108, 110, 110)
    1.9
    1.8
    0
        Week 3, Much Worse (n=108, 110, 110)
    0
    0
    0
        Week 3, Very Much Worse (n=108, 110, 110)
    0
    0.9
    0
        Week 4, Very Much Improved (n=104,108,113)
    14.4
    17.6
    15
        Week 4, Much Improved (n=104,108,113)
    30.8
    36.1
    31
        Week 4, Minimally Improved (n=104,108,113)
    35.6
    30.6
    35.4
        Week 4, No Change (n=104,108,113)
    19.2
    14.8
    17.7
        Week 4, Minimally Worse (n=104,108,113)
    0
    0.9
    0.9
        Week 4, Much Worse (n=104,108,113)
    0
    0
    0
        Week 4, Very Much Worse (n=104,108,113)
    0
    0
    0
        Week 6, Very Much Improved (n=106,104,104)
    19.8
    20.2
    26.9
        Week 6, Much Improved (n=106,104,104)
    29.2
    36.5
    24
        Week 6, Minimally Improved (n=106,104,104)
    31.1
    24
    31.7
        Week 6, No Change (n=106,104,104)
    16
    14.4
    14.4
        Week 6, Minimally Worse (n=106,104,104)
    2.8
    2.9
    1.9
        Week 6, Much Worse (n=106,104,104)
    0
    1.9
    1
        Week 6, Very Much Worse (n=106,104,104)
    0.9
    0
    0
        Week 8, Very Much Improved (n=102,105,106)
    21.6
    19
    25.5
        Week 8, Much Improved (n=102,105,106)
    34.3
    37.1
    36.8
        Week 8, Minimally Improved (n=102,105,106)
    28.4
    24.8
    21.7
        Week 8, No Change (n=102,105,106)
    15.7
    18.1
    15.1
        Week 8, Minimally Worse (n=102,105,106)
    0
    1
    0.9
        Week 8, Much Worse (n=102,105,106)
    0
    0
    0
        Week 8, Very Much Worse (n=102,105,106)
    0
    0
    0
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.729
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.756
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 2
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.765
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 2
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.475
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 3
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.31
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 3
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.105
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 4
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 4
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.254
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 4
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 4
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.887
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 6
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 6
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.475
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 6
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 6
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.407
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 8
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 8
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.696
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Score at Week 8
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 8
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.462
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants with a CGI-I Response Defined as a Score of 'Very Much Improved' or 'Much Improved'

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants with a CGI-I Response Defined as a Score of 'Very Much Improved' or 'Much Improved'
    End point description
    A 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
    End point values
    Placebo DVS SR Low Dose DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects analysed
    114
    115
    115
    Units: Percentage of Participants
    number (not applicable)
        Week 1 (n=113, 112, 115)
    8.85
    10.71
    14.78
        Week 2 (n=114, 115, 109)
    30.7
    32.17
    33.94
        Week 3 (n=108, 110, 110)
    30.56
    37.27
    42.73
        Week 4 (n=104, 108, 113)
    45.19
    53.7
    46.02
        Week 6 (n=106, 104, 104)
    49.06
    56.73
    50.96
        Week 8 (n=102, 105, 106)
    55.88
    56.19
    62.26
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.633
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.806
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.333
         upper limit
    1.951
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 1
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.172
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.561
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.245
         upper limit
    1.285
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 2
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.826
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.939
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.536
         upper limit
    1.644
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 2
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 2
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.599
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.86
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.489
         upper limit
    1.511
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 3
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.248
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.713
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.402
         upper limit
    1.265
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 3
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 3
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.048
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.564
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.32
         upper limit
    0.995
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 4
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 4
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.21
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.708
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.412
         upper limit
    1.216
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 4
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 4
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.893
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.964
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.564
         upper limit
    1.646
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 6
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 6
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.228
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.714
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.413
         upper limit
    1.235
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 6
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 6
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.751
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.916
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.531
         upper limit
    1.579
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 8
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 8
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR Low Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.925
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.974
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.561
         upper limit
    1.689
    Statistical analysis title
    Analysis of CGI-I Response at Week 8
    Statistical analysis description
    Week 8
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v DVS SR High Dose
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    229
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.342
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.764
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.438
         upper limit
    1.331

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from informed consent and assent through the first follow up visit (Week 11) for non-serious AEs; the second follow up visit (Week 13) for serious AEs (SAEs); or at Week 8 for participants entering the extension study.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorised as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant, or 1 participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    18.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Matched placebo tablets administered once daily for 8 weeks (treatment phase), followed by placebo tablets administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Reporting group title
    DVS SR Low Dose
    Reporting group description
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 20, 25 or 35 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Reporting group title
    DVS SR High Dose
    Reporting group description
    DVS SR tablets 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the first week of treatment (titration phase) then 25, 35 or 50 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for the next 7 weeks of treatment, followed by 10 or 20 mg (based on weight at the baseline visit) administered once daily for 1 week (taper phase) only for those participants not entering the extension study.

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo DVS SR Low Dose DVS SR High Dose
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 120 (1.67%)
    2 / 122 (1.64%)
    1 / 121 (0.83%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dermatomyositis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 120 (0.83%)
    0 / 122 (0.00%)
    0 / 121 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Aggression
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 120 (0.00%)
    1 / 122 (0.82%)
    0 / 121 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Suicide attempt
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 120 (0.83%)
    1 / 122 (0.82%)
    0 / 121 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 120 (0.00%)
    0 / 122 (0.00%)
    1 / 121 (0.83%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Appendicitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 120 (0.00%)
    0 / 122 (0.00%)
    1 / 121 (0.83%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo DVS SR Low Dose DVS SR High Dose
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    34 / 120 (28.33%)
    46 / 122 (37.70%)
    53 / 121 (43.80%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    15 / 120 (12.50%)
    22 / 122 (18.03%)
    25 / 121 (20.66%)
         occurrences all number
    23
    29
    44
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 120 (1.67%)
    4 / 122 (3.28%)
    9 / 121 (7.44%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    4
    9
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain upper
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 120 (7.50%)
    7 / 122 (5.74%)
    11 / 121 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    7
    14
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 120 (5.83%)
    12 / 122 (9.84%)
    14 / 121 (11.57%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    13
    15
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 120 (3.33%)
    1 / 122 (0.82%)
    9 / 121 (7.44%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    1
    10
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 120 (0.83%)
    7 / 122 (5.74%)
    4 / 121 (3.31%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    8
    4
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 120 (1.67%)
    8 / 122 (6.56%)
    7 / 121 (5.79%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    8
    8

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    23 Mar 2011
    The key secondary endpoint was changed from CGI-I to CGI-S. The physical examination assessment performed at the early termination before Week 8 visit was revised for consistency with those performed at other visits. Blood and ketones were added to the urinalysis laboratory assessment and urinalysis microanalysis was deleted.
    14 Apr 2011
    Updated stratification factors to indicate that participants would be stratified by both age and country. Exclusion criterion 27 for the screening visit was corrected to reflect that participants who were dependents of investigational site staff members to participants who were dependents of Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the study were not eligible for the study. The tests/procedures/assessments listed for the unscheduled visit were corrected to reflect that vital sign measurements included collection of temperature and respiratory rate and to reflect that concomitant treatment information was collected. Additional details were added to describe the planned interim analysis.
    13 Jul 2011
    The schedule of activities was updated to reflect clearly that blood chemistry laboratory assessments completed at screening and Week 8 visits included liver function tests, serum lipids, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen or urea. Inclusion criterion 1 was modified to require participants to be a minimum of 7 years of age at the screening visit. Exclusion criterion 22 for the screening visit was clarified regarding first degree relative with bipolar disorder. Text was clarified to reflect that no repackaging or labelling of study drug containers was done at the site that would obscure the Pfizer label. Text was revised to reflect that participants who reached the age of majority, as recognised by local law, during study participation signed the informed consent document. Text specific to urine drug screen information was updated. Text was corrected to clarify that the efficacy assessments (CDRS-R, CGI-S, and CGI-I) were not completed at the Week 9 visit. Repetitive information describing the interim analysis was removed.
    22 May 2013
    Revised Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria at Screening & Exclusion Criteria at baseline. Additional instruction regarding contraception requirements, increased post-study contraception requirements & changed “medically approved contraception” to “highly effective contraception” for male & female sexually active participants. Removed text relating to clinical studies in adults with MDD & deleted historical numbers of adult studies. Separated secondary objectives into key & other; clarified other objectives. Revised term “final on-therapy” to “Week 8”. Revised text to add storage requirements. Clarified collection requirements for prior psychiatric treatments & added examples of permitted concomitant treatments. Added linezolid, methylene blue & selegiline to monoamine oxidase inhibitor category in prohibited concomitant medications. Added provision for consideration of occasional use of prohibited treatments. Clarified assignment of participant numbers via Impala & clarified sections of K-SADS-PL to be completed. Clarified definition of screen failure. Added requirement for investigator review of baseline echocardiogram; revised a requirement to a recommendation that the first dose should be taken on-site. Clarified study visit schedule for participants who do not taper, & that the taper phase may not have been extended. Clarified several study assessments: general corrections to study visit names, collection timeframes & added rater requirement reference; vital signs, pregnancy test, laboratory, pharmacokinetic sampling (fasting requirements), psychiatric evaluation, various scales, K-SADS-PL, Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), & risk assessment was added. Clarified AE/SAE classification, reporting period, causality assessment, Hy’s Law criteria, exposure in utero, & overdose: specified the case report forms to be completed. Clarified the timing/population of the interim analysis, the IDMC study responsibilities & the Pfizer record retention policy.
    13 Jun 2014
    Grammatical revisions & typographical error corrections: “legal guardian”, “legally acceptable guardian” &“legally acceptable representative” revised to “parent(s)/legal guardian(s)”throughout; “clinical trial” revised to “clinical study” throughout & “study medication” & “investigational product” revised to “study drug” throughout where appropriate. Added specific studies “(B2061030 & B2061031)” to follow “extension study” for clarification. Clarified timing of CGI-I endpoint. Clarified requirements for roll-over to extension study. Deleted requirement to enrol approximately the same number of children & adolescents & deleted requirement for an approximate 40-60 gender ratio within each age group. Clarified contraception requirements; clarified the following exclusion criteria: allergy to study drugs, contraception requirements & familial exclusions. Clarified drug storage requirements. Clarified the Medication Error case report form page to be a type of AE case report form page. Specified the placebo swallow test was conducted at the study site. Permitted as-needed use of over-the-counter sleeping preparations & temporary use of a sedative-hypnotic for insomnia. Clarified that informed consent/assent was obtained at the screening visit; clarified that screening tests, assessments & procedures did not need to be completed in a single visit; clarified that where possible the same rater was used for the Tanner, clarified pregnancy tests were for all female participants regardless of age, sexual activity or menstrual status, clarified lifestyle discussion & clarified use of age-appropriate C-SSRS version. Clarified screen failure criteria. Clarified definitions for liver injury, hospitalisation, exposure during pregnancy, occupational exposure definition, and withdrawal for AE. Revised planned interim analysis for when at least 75% of total participants had completed or had the opportunity to complete the 8-week double-blind treatment phase.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes
    Date
    Interruption
    Restart date
    03 Aug 2011
    The first study interruption was initiated in Aug 2011 when enrolment was open and the first participant screened on 03 Aug 2011. On 03 Aug 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested information regarding bioanalytical data generated at Cetero Research, Houston (Cetero) from 01 Apr 2005 to 15 Jun 2010; this request resulted in Pfizer’s voluntary suspension of the Phase 3 paediatric program until further information was obtained regarding Study 3151A6-2000-US (Study 2000). Study 2000, a DVS SR Phase 2a Paediatric MDD study, utilised Cetero to generate pharmacokinetic data that informed the dosing design of the Phase 3 program during the time period of concern. Pfizer notified the US FDA of the voluntary suspension of this study on 23 Sep 2011. It was determined that changes to results for desvenlafaxine concentrations in urine did not affect the dosing recommendations for the Phase 3 paediatric MDD program.
    02 Nov 2011
    26 Nov 2014
    As described in a letter to the FDA, dated 26 Nov 2014, Pfizer temporarily suspended screening and randomisation activities for studies B2061014 and B2061032 as a result of a blister card packaging quality issue identified in study B2061031. Pfizer completed on-site sponsor review of the deactivated blister card inventory and determined that there was no impact to participant safety. On 02 Dec 2014, the sites were notified that a temporary, 14-day extension to the 28-day Screening Period had been granted for participants who entered the screening phase on or before 21 Nov 2014 and who were currently participating in the screening phase of the study. This temporary extension to the Screening Period was provided to accommodate a delay in study drug availability. On 18 Dec 2014, Pfizer notified investigators that the DVS SR Phase 3 Paediatric MDD study B2061032 was restored to the status of actively recruiting and investigators were informed that they could proceed with screening and randomisation activities for participants currently in the screening phase and for new participants.
    18 Dec 2014

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 02:23:40 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA