Clinical Trial Results:
Multiple site, randomized, prospective, open comparison of new locally used benzydamine product efficacy with reference product in adult patients with acute pharyngitis or tonsillitis which do not require antibiotic therapy
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2008-002042-38 |
Trial protocol |
PL |
Global end of trial date |
04 Mar 2010
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
05 May 2021
|
First version publication date |
05 May 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
AAR1/1
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Zakłady Farmaceutyczne „UNIA” Sp. Pracy
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Chłodna 56/60, Warsaw, Poland, 00-872
|
||
Public contact |
Ewa Golańska-Dutka, Zakłady Farmaceutyczne „UNIA” Sp. Pracy, 48 693400000, ewa.golanska@uniapharm.pl
|
||
Scientific contact |
Ewa Golańska-Dutka, Zakłady Farmaceutyczne „UNIA” Sp. Pracy, 48 693400000, ewa.golanska@uniapharm.pl
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
04 Mar 2010
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
04 Mar 2010
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
04 Mar 2010
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To indicate that new benzydamine hydrochloride product used locally 4 to 6 times daily is equally effective as reference product in acute pharyngitis or tonsillitis in adult patients
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Treated in routine care
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
16 Oct 2008
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 109
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
109
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
109
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
109
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Patients age 18-70 years old from Poland with acute pharyngitis with no need of using antibiotics, lasts form maximum 72 hours. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
- | ||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||
Number of subjects started |
109 | ||||||
Number of subjects completed |
109 | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
overal trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Patients with pharyngitis | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Uniben
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Oromucosal spray, solution
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Oromucosal use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
5 days, 4-6 times a day
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overal trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Patients with pharyngitis
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
intensification of symptoms according to indications [1] | ||||||||
End point description |
The severity of the indications was assessed on a five-point symptom severity scale. The sum of the points obtained was defined as the total symptom index and subjected to statistical analysis. The absolute value of this parameter was assessed, as well as its changes in the time of consecutive visits of controls compared to visit 1.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
from first to last visit
|
||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No control group. Statistical analysic was performed on 1 group: Statistical methods: • set significance level p ≤ 0.05 • the normality of the distribution of the assessed parameters was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test • statistical inference and comparison of clinical efficacy parameters were performed at p <0.05 using the Wilcoxon and Kolmogorow-Smirnov tests • the comparison of clinical efficacy parameters was carried out using the Wilcoxon and t- Student test |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
During whole trial
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
20.0
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: No non-serious adverse drug reaction reported during the time of trial |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |