Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

    • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).

    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43845   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7282   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2008-002693-35
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:B3D-EW-GHDK
    National Competent Authority:Austria - BASG
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Completed
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2010-08-06
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedAustria - BASG
    A.2EudraCT number2008-002693-35
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Comparison of the Effects of Teriparatide with those of Risedronate on Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density in Men and Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass and a Recent Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Comparison of Teriparatide with Risedronate on Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density in Men and Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass and a Recent Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    MOVE
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberB3D-EW-GHDK
    A.5.2US NCT (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) numberNCT00887354
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorEli Lilly and Company Ltd
    B.1.3.4CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing support
    B.4.2Country
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationEli Lilly
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointClinical Trial Registry Office
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressLilly Corporate Center, DC 1526
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityIndianapolis
    B.5.3.3Post code46285
    B.5.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.5.6E-mailEU_Lilly_Clinical_Trials@lilly.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Forsteo
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderEli Lilly Nederland BV
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameteriparatide
    D.3.2Product code LY333334
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Solution for injection in pre-filled pen
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Actonel
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderProcter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals Ltd
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFrance
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameActonel
    D.3.2Product code risendronate
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Film-coated tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSolution for injection in pre-filled pen
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSubcutaneous use
    D.8 Placebo: 2
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboFilm-coated tablet
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboOral use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Postmenopausal Women and Men with Low Bone Mass and a Recent Pertrochanteric Fracture
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Postmenopausal Women and Men with Low Bone Mass and a Recent Hip Fracture
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 14.1
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10031288
    E.1.2Term Osteoporosis with fracture
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004859
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that teriparatide 20 μg subcutaneously once daily is superior to risedronate 35 mg orally once weekly in the change from baseline to 18 months of lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women and men with low bone mass and a recent pertrochanteric hip fracture, as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Superiority to risedronate in the change from baseline in lumbar spine areal BMD measured by areal DXA, at 26 weeks and 12 months of treatment. Effects of teriparatide with those of risedronate on patient self-reported physical function and health status. Effects of teriparatide with those of risedronate on patient functional activities. Evaluate safety.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    Men and postmenopausal women aged 50 years old or more at the time of entry into the trial. In women, last menstrual period or bilateral oophorectomy has to occur at least 2 years prior to entry into the trial. Patients must be ambulatory prior to the fracture, and free of severe or chronically disabling conditions, including dementia and gait problems and have a life expectancy of at least 3 years.
    Patient has sustained a unilateral, fracture of the trochanteric region caused by a low-energy injury. Fracture is treated with an intramedular hip nail or a sliding compression hip screw with or without a trochanteric stabilizing plate. Able to satisfactorily use a pen-type injection delivery system in the opinion of the investigator and willing to be trained on use of the pen-injector and willing to use the pen-injector on a daily basis, or is willing to receive daily subcutaneous injections from a care partner who has been trained to use the pen injector.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Clinically significant abnormal laboratory values (as defined by the investigator) of total alkaline phosphatase and/or abnormally elevated serum total calcium levels at the screening visit. Abnormally elevated values of serum intact PTH(1 84) at the screening visit. Severe vitamin D deficiency. Abnormally elevated values of fT4 at the screening visit. History of unresolved skeletal diseases that affect bone metabolism including renal osteodystrophy, osteomalacia, any secondary causes of osteoporosis, hyperparathyroidism (uncorrected), and intestinal malabsorption. Increased baseline risk of osteosarcoma. As elevation of serum skeletal alkaline phosphatase activity may indicate the presence of Paget’s disease, an unexplained elevation of this enzyme activity will also be exclusionary. History of a malignant neoplasm in the 5 years prior to Visit 1, with the exception of superficial basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitively treated. Patients with carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated definitively more than 1 year prior to entry into the study may enter the study. History of symptomatic nephro- or urolithiasis in the year prior to Visit 1. Active liver disease or clinical jaundice. Significantly impaired renal function. History of bone marrow or solid organ transplantation. Bilateral hip fractures. Previous fracture(s) or bone surgery in the currently fractured hip. Soft tissue infection at the operation site. Patient treated with hip prosthetic replacement techniques. Patient treated with external fixation of the petrochantic fracture. Patient treated with bone grafting or osteotomies. Treatment with augmentation using any type of degradable cement, hydroxyapatite-coated implants or with non-invasive interventiones with ultrasound, magnetic field/electrical stimulation. Treatment with IV/oral bisphosphonats, SERM, calcitonin, estrogen antagonists, tibolone, denosumab. Prior treatment with PTH, teriparatide or risedronate or excipients of teriparatide or to any other form of PTH or PTH analogue. Presence of any condition which contraindicates risedronate therapy
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Change in lumbar spine BMD
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    From baseline to 18 months of treatment
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    •Change in lumbar spine areal BMD [Time Frame: From baseline to 26 weeks and 12 months of treatment]
    •Change in areal BMD measured at the femoral neck and total hip of the non-fractured limb [Time Frame: From baseline to 26 weeks, 12 months and 18 months of treatment]
    •of teriparatide with those of risedronate on patient self-reported physical function and health status [Time Frame: From baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 26 weeks of treatment]
    •To compare the effects of teriparatide with those of risedronate on patient self-reported pain at the hip [Time Frame: From baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 26 weeks of treatment]
    •To compare the effects of teriparatide with those of risedronate on patient functional activities [Time Frame: From baseline to 6, 12, 18, and 26 weeks of treatment]
    •To evaluate safety [Time Frame: At all timepoints]
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    See above, for each secondary endpoint
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) Yes
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open Yes
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other Yes
    E.8.1.7.1Other trial design description
    6 months, double dummy, 6 to 18 months open label
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) Yes
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial4
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned2
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA43
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Austria
    Canada
    Czech Republic
    Denmark
    Finland
    France
    Germany
    Ireland
    Italy
    Mexico
    Norway
    Spain
    Sweden
    United Kingdom
    United States
    Croatia
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years6
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months3
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years6
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months3
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations No
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state14
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 285
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Standard for osteoporosis
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2010-10-06
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2010-08-31
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
    P.Date of the global end of the trial2015-08-20
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 18 17:52:48 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA