Clinical Trial Results:
Randomized comparison of adjuvant Docetaxel / Cyclophosphamide with sequential adjuvant EC / Docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with HER2/neu negative early breast cancer –
6 x TC vs. 4 x EC -> 4 x Doc
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2008-004263-19 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
01 Mar 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
22 Mar 2020
|
First version publication date |
22 Mar 2020
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
PlanB - Clinical Study Report |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
WSGAM04
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01049425 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Westdeutsche Studiengruppe
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Wallstraße 10, Mönchengladbach, Germany,
|
||
Public contact |
Studienzentrale, Westdeutsche Studiengruppe, 0049 2161566230, wsg@wsg-online.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Studienzentrale, Westdeutsche Studiengruppe, 0049 2161566230, wsg@wsg-online.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
15 May 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
01 Mar 2017
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
01 Mar 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Compare event-free survival in patients treated with either 6 cycles of Docetaxel / Cyclophosphamide chemotherapy or 4 cycles of EC followed by 4 cycles of Docetaxel as adjuvant treatment.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Dose delay and dose adjustment in case of severe or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients with hormone sensitive disease (estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive) will receive antihormonal therapy according to national standards as defined by AGO guidelines.
Supportive Treatment: Dexamethasone according to SmPC docetaxel
G-CSF according to AGO guidelines to avoid dose delay and dose adjustment due to febrile neutropenia and infection. It is highly recommended to use Neulasta® as G-CSF treatment.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
05 Feb 2009
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 2449
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
2449
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
2449
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
1850
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
599
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
From 2009 to 2011, 3198 patients were registered in 90 German sites. The intent-to-treat population included 2,449 patients (EC-T/TC). | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
HER2/neu negative eartly breast cancer; The following patients will be randomised to receive chemotherapy within the planB trial: • Patients with HR positive disease and either RS>11 and 0-3 positive nodes • Patients with HR positive disease and 4 or more positive nodes regardless of RS • Patients with HR negative disease | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
2449 | |||||||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
2449 | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Docetaxel - Cyclophosphamide TC) | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
TC Treatment will consist of 6 cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamid. Docetaxel will be given first 75 mg/m² at day 1 q3w. Followed by Cyclophosphamid 600 mg/m² at day 1 q3w. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Docetaxel
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for solution for injection/infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
75 mg/m² on day 1 q3w for 6 cycles
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Cyclophosphamid
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for concentrate and solution for solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
600 mg/m² on day 1 q3w for 6 cycles
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
EC --> DOC (EC-DOC) | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
EC treatment will consist of 4 cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Patients will receive 4 cycles of adjuvant therapy; each cycle will last for 3 weeks. The duration of the study treatment during adjuvant therapy is 12 weeks from cycle 1 to 4. Following completion of 4 cycles, the patient will enter the docetaxel segment for this arm of treatment. Patients will receive 4 cycles of adjuvant therapy; each cycle will last for 3 weeks. The duration of the study treatment during adjuvant therapy is 12 weeks from cycle 1 to 4. | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Epirubicin
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
90 mg/m² on day 1 q3w for 4 cycles
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Cyclophosphamide
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
600 mg/m² on day 1 q3w for 4 cycles
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Docetaxel
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for concentrate for solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Three weeks after the last cycle of Epirubicine/Cyclophosphamide, Docetaxel will be given 100 mg/m² on day 1 q3w for additional 4 cycles.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall Trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
IIT population
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Among patients treated with ECDoc in the NSABP B27 trial, 71.1 % of patients were disease-free at 5 years. In this study, an accrual period of 3 years and an additionally follow up of 5 years will be planed. The one–sided equivalence test will be done at the significance levels of false positive outcome = 5 % and false negative outcome = 20 % i.e. the power of the trial is set to 80 % for the difference of clinical interest. The study treatment will be regarded as equivalent to the reference treatment, if the difference in the 5 years disease-free survival between both study arms will not be greater as 4.4 %.
A total of 2x1224 = 2448 patients are necessary to have sufficient power to show equivalence between ECDoc and TC for all randomised patients, assuming an anticipated drop-out rate of 10 %.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Docetaxel - Cyclophosphamide TC)
|
||
Reporting group description |
TC Treatment will consist of 6 cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamid. Docetaxel will be given first 75 mg/m² at day 1 q3w. Followed by Cyclophosphamid 600 mg/m² at day 1 q3w. | ||
Reporting group title |
EC --> DOC (EC-DOC)
|
||
Reporting group description |
EC treatment will consist of 4 cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Patients will receive 4 cycles of adjuvant therapy; each cycle will last for 3 weeks. The duration of the study treatment during adjuvant therapy is 12 weeks from cycle 1 to 4. Following completion of 4 cycles, the patient will enter the docetaxel segment for this arm of treatment. Patients will receive 4 cycles of adjuvant therapy; each cycle will last for 3 weeks. The duration of the study treatment during adjuvant therapy is 12 weeks from cycle 1 to 4. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
IIT population
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Among patients treated with ECDoc in the NSABP B27 trial, 71.1 % of patients were disease-free at 5 years. In this study, an accrual period of 3 years and an additionally follow up of 5 years will be planed. The one–sided equivalence test will be done at the significance levels of false positive outcome = 5 % and false negative outcome = 20 % i.e. the power of the trial is set to 80 % for the difference of clinical interest. The study treatment will be regarded as equivalent to the reference treatment, if the difference in the 5 years disease-free survival between both study arms will not be greater as 4.4 %.
A total of 2x1224 = 2448 patients are necessary to have sufficient power to show equivalence between ECDoc and TC for all randomised patients, assuming an anticipated drop-out rate of 10 %.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
5 year disease-free survival | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
date of randomization to the date of local, regional or metastaic relapse or the date of second Primary Cancer or death
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistics PlanB | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Docetaxel - Cyclophosphamide TC) v EC --> DOC (EC-DOC)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
2449
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [1] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.8
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
1-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.044 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
- | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
0.1
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - one-size equivalence test |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Overall Survival | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
time from randomization until survial after 5 year follow-up
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Safety - Dose reduction | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
number of Patient with dose reduction during chemotherapy
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Safety - Dose delay | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
dose delay more than 7 days during chemotherapy
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
from time of ranomization until end of 5 year follow-up
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
18
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Such a detailed statistical evaluation of AE results was not done. For further AE evaluation please refer to the attached Clinical Study Report. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
22 Jun 2009 |
new protocol Version V2.0 |
||
24 May 2011 |
new protocol Version 3.0 and Patient Information sheet Version 3.0 |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |