Clinical Trial Results:
The effectiveness and tolerability of GlobiFer Forte (haem iron) tablets compared to ferrous sulphate tablets in inflammatory bowel disease: a randomised-controlled trial.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2008-004277-17 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
06 May 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Feb 2020
|
First version publication date |
08 Feb 2020
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
End of Trial Report summary report |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2008/2
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
GlobiFer Intl.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Satenrozen 6A unit 002, Kontich/Antwerp, Belgium, 2550
|
||
Public contact |
General Manager, Patrick Swolfs, 38808772 38808772, ps@globiferintl.be
|
||
Scientific contact |
General Manager, Patrick Swolfs, 38808772 38808772, ps@globiferintl.be
|
||
Sponsor organisation name |
GlobiFer Intl
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Satenrozen 6A unit 002, Kontich/Antwerp, Belgium, 2550
|
||
Public contact |
Product Manager, Rabia Sarroukh
, 0032 38808772, rs@globiferintl.be
|
||
Scientific contact |
Product Manager, Rabia Sarroukh
, 0032 38808772, rs@globiferintl.be
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
13 Nov 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
06 May 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To investigate if oral haem iron supplementation is more effective and better tolerated than non-haem iron in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 12 weeks
The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of a new form of iron supplement GlobiFer (haem iron) against iron sulphate. GlobiFer Forte, the test preparation, is an iron supplement to offer both haem iron (protein-based iron) and non-haem iron (plant-based iron). Unlike other iron supplements, GlobiFer Forte provides two types of iron in one tablet for maximum absorption with virtually no gastric side effects. Iron can be enterically absorbed in haem or non-haem forms. Because haem iron uptake is thought to be less susceptible to inflammatory downregulation and less irritant to enterocytes, haem iron products are absorbed four times more efficiently and are better tolerated than non-haem preparations in healthy individuals.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
GlobiFer Forte (active ingredient: Iron integrated haemolysed haemoglobin powderequal to 18 mg Fe++/tablet) was supplied as 900 mg tablets for oral intake twice daily with sufficient liquid.
Batch Nos.: 911183, 102029, 320030, 320030, 420010
The main safety variables were the incidence and the severity of possible or probable adverse events and evaluation of laboratory tests.
The analysis considered all events as documented in the CRFs.
Symptoms and side effects are assessed using a weekly diary card for the duration of the active treatment and the number of serious side effects were recorded i.e. death, GI side effect, increased disease activity. Adverse events will be recorded form the first intake of the study drug and serious events will be followed up for 30 days after the last intake of study drug
|
||
Background therapy |
An alternative approach to correcting iron deficiency anaemia is by the intravenous route. Iron sucrose has been extensively studied in patients with IBD and this has been found to be both safe and efficacious both alone and in combination with EPO. However, the use of intravenous iron is inconvenient, involving extra hospitals visits and can be uncomfortable. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
This above mentioned study was designed to test an alternative therapy for a better tolerated, safe and more effective iron supplementation than that which is currently available for IBD patients. The standard treatment for this (iron sulphate tablets) is commonly associated with gastro-intestinal side effects such as nausea, pain, diarrhoea or constipation. Oral non-haem iron supplementation is difficult in the context of IBD because patients with colitis seem to suffer the common gastrointestinal side effects of this medicine (nausea, bloating, pain, diarrhoea) more than iron deficient subjects without GI disease. Ferrous sulphate was supplied as 200 mg tablets for oral intake twice daily with sufficient liquid. In addition. Batch Nos.: FL2061, FM28, FM66, FT6, FT30, FT25 | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
19 May 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 21
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
21
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
21
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
18
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
3
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The study was stopped due to unscheduled low recruitment. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Patients with established inactive or mild to moderately active IBD. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Patient have been provided with blister strips in numbered boxes by the manufacturer of GlobiFer forte who organized the randomization. Investigators and patient were not blinded to the treatment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
GlobiFer forte | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
active ingredient: Iron integrated haemolysed haemoglobin powder equal to 18 mg elemental iron per tablet | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
GlobiFer forte
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet and powder for oral solution
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
36 mg elemental iron was supplied as 900 mg tablets for oral intake twice daily with sufficient liquid.
Batch Nos.: 911183, 102029, 320030, 320030, 420010
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Ferrous Sulfate | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Ferrous iron equal to 65 mg elemental iron per tablet | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ferrous sulfate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet and powder for oral solution
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
130 mg of ferrous sulfate was supplied as 200 mg tablets for oral intake twice daily with sufficient liquid.
Batch Nos.: FL2061, FM28, FM66, FT6, FT30, FT25
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
GlobiFer forte
|
||
Reporting group description |
active ingredient: Iron integrated haemolysed haemoglobin powder equal to 18 mg elemental iron per tablet | ||
Reporting group title |
Ferrous Sulfate
|
||
Reporting group description |
Ferrous iron equal to 65 mg elemental iron per tablet | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Primary Efficacy criteria
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
GlobiFer arm :
Achievement a 1g/dl increase in haemoglobin over baseline at 12weeks 56%
no achievement a 1 g/dl increase in haemoglobin aver baseline at 12 weeks 44%
Ferrous sulphate arm :
Achievement a 1g/dl increase in haemoglobin over baseline at 12weeks 100%
no achievement a 1 g/dl increase in haemoglobin aver baseline at 12 weeks 0%
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Secondary efficacy criteria
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
GlobiFer arm :
Achievement a 1g/dl increase in haemoglobin over baseline at 24 weeks 100%
no achievement a 1 g/dl increase in haemoglobin aver baseline at 24 weeks 0%
Ferrous sulphate arm :
Achievement a 1g/dl increase in haemoglobin over baseline at 24 weeks 88%
no achievement a 1 g/dl increase in haemoglobin aver baseline at 24 week 13%
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Tolerance of study medication over baselines 24 weeks
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
GlobiFer arm :
Patient with AE - possible related 27.3%
Patient without AE-possible related 72.7%
Patient with AE - propable related 0%
Patient without AE-probalbe related 100%
Ferrous sulphate arm :
Patient with AE - possible related 0%
Patient without AE-possible related 100%
Patient with AE - propable related 30%
Patient without AE-probalbe related 100%
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Secondary efficacy criteria-AE over baselines at 24 weekds
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
GlobiFer arm :
Patient with AE 100%
Patient without AE 0%
Patient with AE - not related 100%
Patient without AE-not related 0%
Patient with AE - possible related 27.3%
Patient without AE-possible related 72.7%
Patient with AE - probable related 0%
Patient without AE-probable related 100%
Ferrous sulphate arm :
Patient with AE 80%
Patient without AE 20%
Patient with AE - not related 50%
Patient without AE-not related 50%
Patient with AE - possible related 0%
Patient without AE-possible related 100%
Patient with AE - probable related 30%
Patient without AE-probable related 70%
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Adherence over baseline at 12 weeks
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients n=21 97% SD 4%
GlobiFer n= 9 95%
Ferrous sulphate n=8 98%
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Resolution of anemia over baselines 12 weeks
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
all patients
increase of haemoglobine (g/dl) 2.3 SD 1.4
GlobiFer
increase of haemoglobine (g/dl) 1.5 SD 1.3
Ferrous sulphate
increase of haemoglobine (g/dl) 3.1 SD 0.9
|
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Proportion of patients in each of the patient groups whoachieveda 1g/dl increase in haemoglobin over baseline at 12 weeks | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
12weeks
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
No statistical analysis | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
due to the small number of patients and the inhomogeneous data situation does not allow a statement to compare the efficacy of the two drugs.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
GlobiFer forte v Ferrous Sulfate
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
17
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Post-hoc
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
other [1] | |||||||||
P-value |
≤ 0 [2] | |||||||||
Method |
not applicable | |||||||||
Parameter type |
not applicable | |||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||
lower limit |
0 | |||||||||
upper limit |
95 | |||||||||
Notes [1] - not applicable [2] - target not met, no statistical analysis done |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Sustainability of 1g/dl increase in haemoglobin (baseline to 12 weeks) at 24 weeks | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 weeks
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
weekly assessment
|
||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
no found
|
||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
All patients
|
||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||||||
Date |
Amendment |
||||||
24 Nov 2010 |
inclusion of colonic microbiota- stool sample added to study design
treatment 36 weeks to 24 weekds |
||||||
05 Aug 2011 |
Study design per PI request to increase recruitment |
||||||
09 Dec 2011 |
protocol to increase patient recruitment |
||||||
22 May 2013 |
Inclusion criteria changes |
||||||
26 Feb 2014 |
Sponsor contact changes |
||||||
01 Apr 2014 |
enrollment is very low; protocol amended to increase the enrolment rate
inclusion criteria
exclusion criteria
rescreening
Trial design |
||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
The study was stopped due to unscheduled low recruitment. Due to the inhomogeneity of the patient population and the very low number of patients no statistical analysis was performed. |