Clinical Trial Results:
PROTOCOLE D’ANALGESIE POST OPERATOIRE PAR INFILTRATION CONTINUE DE ROPIVACAINE DANS LES ARTHRODESES DU RACHIS LOMBAIRE
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2008-004705-34 |
Trial protocol |
FR |
Global end of trial date |
17 Dec 2010
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
29 Jun 2022
|
First version publication date |
29 Jun 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Final Rapport |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
08-CIR-03
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
chu de nice
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
DRCI-Hôpital de Cimiez - 4 avenue reine victoria, Nice, France, 06003
|
||
Public contact |
Direction de la Recherche clinique, DRCI, +33 492034589, caillon.c@chu-nice.fr
|
||
Scientific contact |
Investigateur , Pr Litrico, +33 492036217 , caillon.c@chu-nice.fr
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
17 Dec 2010
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Jul 2010
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
17 Dec 2010
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Compare the evolution of the postoperative levels of pain until J2, in the scheduled lumbar surgery between 2 groups of patients, one receiving a single bolus of analgesic, one receiving a single bolus of analgesic and an infiltration of Ropivacaine during 48 hours.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The patients signed consent
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
17 Dec 2008
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 58
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
58
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
58
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
58
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
After we obtained approval from the ethics committee and informed, written consent from patients, patients older than 18 years old , heavier than 50 kg, without psychological disorders, benefiting from of arthrodesis scheduled by a rachis lumbar posterior way were enrolled. Patients were randomized to one of the two following postoperative analg | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Inclusion Period (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Ropivacaine or serum | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ropivacaine
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for intravesical solution
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular and intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
200mg of ropivacaïne 0,5 %
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Inclusion Period
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Ropivacaine or serum
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Levels of pain [1] | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
2 days
|
||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The statiscal analyses have been specified for this primary end point in the document attached. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
At 2 days
|
||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17
|
||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ropivacaine
|
||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Any adverse events |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |