Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A phase III/IV, cluster-randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals’ 10-valent pneumococcal and non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine in reducing the incidence of invasive diseases.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2008-005149-48
    Trial protocol
    FI  
    Global end of trial date
    05 Oct 2013

    Results information
    Results version number
    v4(current)
    This version publication date
    02 Jan 2021
    First version publication date
    29 Jul 2015
    Other versions
    v1 , v2 , v3
    Version creation reason
    • Correction of full data set
    Results have been amended to account for consistency with other registries.

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    111442
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT00861380
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals
    Sponsor organisation address
    Rue de l’Institut 89, Rixensart, Belgium, B-1330
    Public contact
    Clinical Disclosure Advisor,, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals,, 044 2089904466, GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com
    Scientific contact
    GSK Response Center, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, 044 2089904466, GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    Yes
    EMA paediatric investigation plan number(s)
    EMEA-000673-PIP01-09
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    Yes
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    15 Jan 2019
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    05 Oct 2013
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To demonstrate the effectiveness of 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine in preventing culture-confirmed IPD due to vaccine pneumococcal serotypes in children vaccinated with at least one dose of 10Pn-PD-DiT within the first 7 months of life in clusters assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course. Criteria for effectiveness: Effectiveness (VE) in preventing culture-confirmed IPD due to the 10 vaccine serotypes will be demonstrated if the 2-sided p-value calculated for the null hypothesis H0 = {vaccine-type [VT] IPD VE = 0%} is lower than 5%.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The nurses administering vaccines were instructed to observe the vaccinees closely for at least 30 minutes following the administration of vaccines, with appropriate medical treatment readily available in case of a rare anaphylactic reaction. Vaccines/products were administered only to eligible subjects that had no contraindications to any components of the vaccines/products. Subjects were followed up for serious adverse events (SAEs) reported as occurring during the study up to study end. In addition, an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) was set up, of which responsibilities included the following: (1) Review of data collection methods, safety/effectiveness monitoring procedures and making recommendations for additions or adjustments, as applicable; (2) Recommendations for maintaining, or breaking the blind where necessary, in the course of reviewing safety results; (3) Recommendations for stopping the trial for effectiveness or safety reasons when appropriate.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    04 May 2009
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Efficacy, Safety
    Long term follow-up duration
    18 Months
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 87165
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    87165
    EEA total number of subjects
    87165
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    87165
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    This study also served as basis for conducting a long-term evaluation of the impact of vaccination with GSK Biologicals’ 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine. Subjects of the 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (112595) study (NCT00839254-EUDRACT:2008-006551-51) contributed to the objectives of this study.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    41188 subjects were enrolled in the study, 7 subjects didn't receive any vaccination, 41181 subjects started the study. Total population assessed for combined analyses performed on both studies included 45977 subjects, see details in groups description.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    87165
    Number of subjects completed
    41181

    Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
    Reason: Number of subjects
    10PN-043 Subjects not vaccinated: 7
    Reason: Number of subjects
    10PN043-053 subjects: 45977
    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group
    Arm description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    10-valent pneumococcal and non-typeable H. influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    10Pn-PD-DiT
    Other name
    10Pn, Synflorix
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    Intramuscularly administration by injection in the thigh.

    Arm title
    10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group
    Arm description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    10-valent pneumococcal and non-typeable H. influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    10Pn-PD-DiT
    Other name
    10Pn, Synflorix
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    Intramuscularly administration by injection in the thigh.

    Arm title
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group
    Arm description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B vaccine (called also HBV vaccine) according to either a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule), or according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Engerix B-thio free
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Engerix-B,HBV
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    Intramuscularly administration by injection in the thigh.

    Arm title
    10Pn7-11M/043 Group
    Arm description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    10-valent pneumococcal and non-typeable H. influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    10Pn-PD-DiT
    Other name
    10Pn, Synflorix
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    Intramuscularly administration by injection in the thigh.

    Arm title
    Ctrl7-11M/043 Group
    Arm description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B (called also HBV) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Engerix B-thio free
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Engerix-B,HBV
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    Intramuscularly administration by injection in the thigh.

    Arm title
    10Pn12-18M/043 Group
    Arm description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    10-valent pneumococcal and non-typeable H. influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    10Pn-PD-DiT
    Other name
    10Pn, Synflorix
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    Intramuscularly administration by injection in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Arm title
    Ctrl12-18M/043 Group
    Arm description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Havrix (called also HAV) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Havrix-preservative free
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    HAV, Havrix 720 Junior
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    Intramuscularly administration by injection in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Number of subjects in period 1 [1]
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn7-11M/043 Group Ctrl7-11M/043 Group 10Pn12-18M/043 Group Ctrl12-18M/043 Group
    Started
    8427
    9112
    8872
    3689
    1812
    6249
    3020
    Completed
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Not completed
    8427
    9112
    8872
    3689
    1812
    6249
    3020
         Withdrawal Information not recorded
    8427
    9112
    8872
    3689
    1812
    6249
    3020
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: Subjects from the 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (112595) study (NCT00839254-EUDRACT:2008-006551-51) contributed to objectives of this study i.e.: a total of 45977 subjects were part of objective analysis for both studies. 41188 subjects were enrolled in the study. 41181 of these were actually vaccinated and included in baseline period of the study.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B vaccine (called also HBV vaccine) according to either a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule), or according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn7-11M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl7-11M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B (called also HBV) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn12-18M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl12-18M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Havrix (called also HAV) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn7-11M/043 Group Ctrl7-11M/043 Group 10Pn12-18M/043 Group Ctrl12-18M/043 Group Total
    Number of subjects
    8427 9112 8872 3689 1812 6249 3020 41181
    Age Categorical
    Units: Participants
        28 days - 23 months
    8427 9112 8872 3689 1812 6249 3020 41181
    Sex: Female, Male
    Units: Participants
        Female
    4239 4399 4351 0 0 0 0 12989
        Male
    4188 4713 4521 0 0 0 0 13422
        Unknown
    0 0 0 3689 1812 6249 3020 14770

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B vaccine (called also HBV vaccine) according to either a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule), or according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn7-11M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl7-11M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B (called also HBV) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn12-18M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl12-18M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Havrix (called also HAV) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Subject analysis set title
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects analyzed among all subjects who were enrolled in this group in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (NCT00839254 - EUDRACT 2008-006551-51) (i.e. 1846 subjects) studies, pooled, and aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule). Refer to group description for 10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group for vaccine specifics and administration route in this group.

    Subject analysis set title
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects analyzed among all subjects who were enrolled in this group in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (NCT00839254 - EUDRACT 2008-006551-51) (i.e. 1329 subjects) studies, pooled, and aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B vaccine (called also HBV vaccine) according to either a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule), or according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). Refer to group description for Ctrl6W-6M/043 Group for vaccine specifics and administration route in this group.

    Subject analysis set title
    10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects analyzed among all subjects who were enrolled in this group in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (NCT00839254 - EUDRACT 2008-006551-51) (i.e. 942 subjects) studies, pooled, and aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). Refer to group description for 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group for vaccine specifics and administration route in this group.

    Subject analysis set title
    10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects analyzed among all subjects who were enrolled in this group in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (NCT00839254 - EUDRACT 2008-006551-51) (i.e. 191 subjects) studies, pooled, and aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). Refer to group description for 10Pn7-11M/043 Group for vaccine specifics and administration route in this group.

    Subject analysis set title
    Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects analyzed among all subjects who were enrolled in this group in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (NCT00839254 - EUDRACT 2008-006551-51) (i.e. 96 subjects) studies, pooled, and aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B (called also HBV) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). Refer to group description for Ctrl7-11M/043 Group for vaccine specifics and administration route in this group.

    Subject analysis set title
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects analyzed among all subjects who were enrolled in this group in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (NCT00839254 - EUDRACT 2008-006551-51) (i.e. 286 subjects) studies, pooled, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). Refer to group description for 10Pn12-18M/043 Group for vaccine specifics and administration route in this group.

    Subject analysis set title
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Per protocol
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects analyzed among all subjects who were enrolled in this group in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 (NCT00839254 - EUDRACT 2008-006551-51) (i.e. 106 subjects) studies, pooled, and aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Havrix (called also HAV) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). Refer to group description for Ctrl12-18M/043 Group for vaccine specifics and administration route in this group.

    Primary: Person Year Rate as regards subjects with culture-confirmed IPD due to any of the 10 pneumococcal vaccine serotypes. In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate as regards subjects with culture-confirmed IPD due to any of the 10 pneumococcal vaccine serotypes. In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) as regards subjects with culture-confirmed invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) due to any of the pneumococcal vaccine serotypes was tabulated (vaccine pneumococcal serotypes = serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F). PYAR was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10273
    10201
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.564 (0.291 to 0.984)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Analysis aimed at providing an estimate of vaccine effectiveness (VE) at preventing culture-confirmed IPD by comparing PYARs between groups taking into account the following parameters: T, n, n+ (number of clusters with at least one event culture-confirmed ID), and n/T. VE of the 10Pn vaccine in preventing culture-confirmed IPD due to the 10 vaccine serotypes was demonstrated if the 2-sided p-value calculated for the null hypothesis H0 =(vaccine-type [VT] IPD VE = 0%) was lower than (<) 5%.
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group v 10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20474
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [1]
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [2]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    VE (1-RR)
    Point estimate
    100
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    82.8
         upper limit
    100
    Notes
    [1] - VE (defined as 1 minus Relative Risk (RR)) was calculated by comparing numbers of culture-confirmed IPD. The number of subjects with IPD in each cluster was compared between groups (10PN3+1 vs Control). This comparison was done using a negative binomial log-linear model with correction for dispersion group- and cluster- related effect.
    [2] - P-value was calculated using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata, without taking into account the multiplicity of the endpoints.

    Primary: Person Year Rate as regards subjects with culture-confirmed IPD due to any of the 10 pneumococcal vaccine serotypes. In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate as regards subjects with culture-confirmed IPD due to any of the 10 pneumococcal vaccine serotypes. In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) as regards subjects with culture-confirmed invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) due to any of the pneumococcal vaccine serotypes was tabulated (vaccine pneumococcal serotypes = serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F). PYAR was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10201
    10054
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.564 (0.291 to 0.984)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    Analysis aimed at providing an estimate of vaccine effectiveness (VE) at preventing culture-confirmed IPD by comparing PYARs between groups taking into account the following parameters: T, n, n+ (number of clusters with at least one event culture-confirmed ID), and n/T. VE of the 10Pn vaccine in preventing culture-confirmed IPD due to the 10 vaccine serotypes was demonstrated if the 2-sided p-value calculated for the null hypothesis H0 = (vaccine-type [VT] IPD VE = 0%) was lower than (<) 5%.
    Comparison groups
    10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group v Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20255
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [3]
    P-value
    = 0.0009 [4]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    VE (1-RR)
    Point estimate
    91.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    58.3
         upper limit
    99.6
    Notes
    [3] - VE (defined as 1 minus Relative Risk (RR)) was calculated by comparing numbers of culture-confirmed IPD. The number of subjects with IPD in each cluster was compared between groups (10PN2+1vsControl). This comparison was done using a negative binomial log-linear model with correction for dispersion group- and cluster- related effect.
    [4] - p-value was calculated using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata, without taking into account the multiplicity of the endpoints.

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in the prevention of culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course (till end of blinded ID FU period)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in the prevention of culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course (till end of blinded ID FU period)
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log- likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10273
    10201
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Culture confirmed ID
    0.093 (0.011 to 0.336)
    0.845 (0.501 to 1.336)
        Pneumococcal invasive disease (IPD)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.657 (0.359 to 1.103)
        Serotype 4
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
        Serotype 6B
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.235 (0.076 to 0.548)
        Serotype 7F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
        Serotype 14
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.188 (0.051 to 0.481)
        Serotype 18C
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
        Serotype 19F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
        Serotype 23F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
        Cross-reactive serotypes
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.094 (0.011 to 0.339)
        Serotype 6A
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
        Serotype 19A
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
        Other pneumococcal serotypes
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
        Serotype 3
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
        Serotype 15C
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
        H. influenzae ID
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
        Non-typeable (NTHI)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
        Other bacteria
    0.093 (0.011 to 0.336)
    0.188 (0.051 to 0.481)
        Neisseria meningitidis
    0.093 (0.011 to 0.336)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
        Streptococcus pyogenes
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.094 (0.011 to 0.339)
        Moraxella catarrhalis
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in the prevention of culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course (till end of blinded ID FU period)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in the prevention of culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course (till end of blinded ID FU period)
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log- likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10201
    10054
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Culture confirmed ID
    0.845 (0.501 to 1.336)
    0.194 (0.053 to 0.496)
        Pneumococcal invasive disease (IPD)
    0.657 (0.359 to 1.103)
    0.097 (0.012 to 0.350)
        Vaccine serotypes (vaccine type-IPD)
    0.564 (0.291 to 0.984)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
        Serotype 4
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Serotype 6B
    0.235 (0.076 to 0.548)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Serotype 7F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
        Serotype 14
    0.188 (0.051 to 0.481)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Serotype 18C
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Serotype 19F
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Serotype 23F
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Cross-reactive serotypes
    0.094 (0.011 to 0.339)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Serotype 6A
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Serotype 19A
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Other pneumococcal serotypes
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
        Serotype 3
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
        Serotype 15C
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.173)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        H. influenzae ID
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
        Non-typeable (NTHI)
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
        Other bacteria
    0.188 (0.051 to 0.481)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
        Neisseria meningitidis
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.048 (0.001 to 0.270)
        Streptococcus pyogenes
    0.094 (0.001 to 0.339)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Moraxella catarrhalis
    0.047 (0.001 to 0.262)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in the prevention of culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in the prevention of culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log- likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    3880
    1908
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Culture confirmed ID
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.446 (0.054 to 1.612)
        Pneumococcal invasive disease (IPD)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.446 (0.054 to 1.612)
        Vaccine serotypes (vaccine type-IPD)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.446 (0.054 to 1.612)
        Serotype 4
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Serotype 6B
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Serotype 7F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.223 (0.006 to 1.243)
        Serotype 14
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.223 (0.006 to 1.243)
        Serotype 18C
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Serotype 19F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Serotype 23F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Cross-reactive serotypes
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Serotype 6A
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Serotype 19A
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Other pneumococcal serotypes
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Serotype 3
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Serotype 15C
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        H. influenzae ID
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Non-typeable (NTHI)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Other bacteria
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in the prevention of culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in the prevention of culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log- likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    6535
    3126
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Culture confirmed ID
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.674 (0.219 to 1.572)
        Pneumococcal invasive disease (IPD)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.674 (0.219 to 1.572)
        Vaccine serotypes (vaccine type-IPD)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.404 (0.083 to 1.181)
        Serotype 4
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.135 (0.003 to 0.751)
        Serotype 6B
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.135 (0.003 to 0.751)
        Serotype 7F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Serotype 14
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Serotype 18C
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Serotype 19F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.135 (0.0003 to 0.751)
        Serotype 23F
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Cross-reactive serotypes
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Serotype 6A
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Serotype 19A
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Other pneumococcal serotypes
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.269 (0.033 to 0.974)
        Serotype 3
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.135 (0.003 to 0.751)
        Serotype 15C
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.135 (0.003 to 0.751)
        H. influenzae ID
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Non-typeable (NTHI)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Other bacteria
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (any serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [5]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    14.657
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    13.229
         upper limit
    16.197
    Notes
    [5] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons = 2626735.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (any serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [6]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    13.582
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    11.691
         upper limit
    15.693
    Notes
    [6] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons = 1354702.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [7]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    8.452
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    7.376
         upper limit
    9.639
    Notes
    [7] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons = 2626735.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 4
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [8]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    7.603
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    6.206
         upper limit
    9.221
    Notes
    [8] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons = 1354702.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 5
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [9]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    1.637
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.185
         upper limit
    2.205
    Notes
    [9] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons = 2626735.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 6
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [10]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    1.845
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.194
         upper limit
    2.724
    Notes
    [10] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons = 1354702.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 7
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (non-vaccine & non-vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [11]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    3.997
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.269
         upper limit
    4.839
    Notes
    [11] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as . 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons = 2626735.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 8
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (non-vaccine & non-vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [12]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    3.322
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.423
         upper limit
    4.445
    Notes
    [12] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons = 1354702.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 9
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (any serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [13]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    14.487
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    13.071
         upper limit
    16.015
    Notes
    [13] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2636783.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 10
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (any serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [14]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    13.74
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    11.841
         upper limit
    15.857
    Notes
    [14] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1360966.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 11
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [15]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    7.813
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    6.782
         upper limit
    8.955
    Notes
    [15] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2636783.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 12
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [16]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    7.789
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    6.377
         upper limit
    9.42
    Notes
    [16] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1360966.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 13
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [17]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    2.313
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.77
         upper limit
    2.972
    Notes
    [17] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2636783.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 14
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [18]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    1.984
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.307
         upper limit
    2.886
    Notes
    [18] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1360966.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 15
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (non-vaccine & non-vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [19]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model without strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    4.172
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.429
         upper limit
    5.028
    Notes
    [19] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model without strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2636783.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 16
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (non-vaccine & non-vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [20]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model without strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    3.968
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.981
         upper limit
    5.177
    Notes
    [20] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model without strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1360966.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 17
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (any serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [21]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    14.017
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    12.628
         upper limit
    15.516
    Notes
    [21] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2654010.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 18
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (any serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [22]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    15.066
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    13.079
         upper limit
    17.269
    Notes
    [22] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1367343.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 19
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [23]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    5.916
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    5.026
         upper limit
    6.917
    Notes
    [23] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2654010.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 20
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine serotype), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [24]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    8.557
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    7.077
         upper limit
    10.255
    Notes
    [24] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1367343.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 21
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [25]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    2.977
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    2.357
         upper limit
    3.71
    Notes
    [25] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2654010.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 22
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [26]
    Method
    Regression, Linear
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    2.048
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.361
         upper limit
    2.96
    Notes
    [26] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1367343.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 23
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (non-vaccine & non-vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [27]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    5.011
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    4.196
         upper limit
    5.939
    Notes
    [27] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2654010.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 24
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Culture-confirmed IPD (non-vaccine & non-vaccine related), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9661
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [28]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    4.315
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    3.285
         upper limit
    5.566
    Notes
    [28] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 100000), as well as the 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1367343.

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in the prevention of probable culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in the prevention of probable culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a probable or culture confirmed ID) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10273
    10201
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Probable cases of IPD
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.141 (0.029 to 0.412)
        Confirmed or probable cases of IPD
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.172)
    0.798 (0.465 to 1.278)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in the prevention of probable or culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in the prevention of probable or culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a probable or culture confirmed ID) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10201
    10054
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Probable cases of IPD
    0.141 (0.029 to 0.412)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.179)
        Confirmed or probable cases of IPD
    0.798 (0.465 to 1.278)
    0.097 (0.012 to 0.350)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in the prevention of probable or culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in the prevention of probable or culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a probable or culture confirmed ID) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    3880
    1908
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Probable cases of IPD
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.823)
        Confirmed or probable cases of IPD
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.410)
    0.446 (0.054 to 1.612)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in the prevention of probable or culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in the prevention of probable or culture-confirmed invasive disease (ID)- In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a probable or culture confirmed ID) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata. Data were not collected regarding indirect effects.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (The blinded ID Follow-up period lasted at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    6535
    3126
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Probable cases of IPD
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.497)
        Confirmed or probable cases of IPD
    0.000 (0.000 to 0.240)
    0.674 (0.219 to 1.572)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (=number of subjects with hospital-diagnosed pneumonia) divided by T (=sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. Hospital-diagnosed pneumonia (HDP) cases identified based on hospital discharge diagnosis using international Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes: J10.0 (Influenza with HDP, other influenza virus identified), J11.0 (Influenza with HDP, virus not identified), J12 (Viral HDP, not elsewhere classified), J13 (HDP due to Sp.), J14 (for HDP due to Hi.), J15 (all HDP, not elsewhere classified), J16 (HDP due to other infectious organisms, not elsewhere classified), J17 (HDP in diseases classified elsewhere), J18 (HDP organism unspecified), J85.1 (Abscess of lung with HDP), and J86 (Pyothorax including empyema).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=24 months
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10273
    10200
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    10.131 (8.804 to 11.601)
    13.854 (12.287 to 15.566)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with hospital-diagnosed pneumonia) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. Hospital-diagnosed pneumonia (HDP) cases identified based on hospital discharge diagnosis using international Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes: J10.0 (Influenza with HDP, other influenza virus identified), J11.0 (Influenza with HDP, virus not identified), J12 (Viral HDP, not elsewhere classified), J13 (HDP due to Sp.), J14 (for HDP due to Hi.), J15 (all HDP, not elsewhere classified), J16 (HDP due to other infectious organisms, not elsewhere classified), J17 (HDP in diseases classified elsewhere), J18 (HDP organism unspecified), J85.1 (Abscess of lung with HDP), and J86 (Pyothorax including empyema).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=24 months
    End point values
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10200
    10054
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    13.854 (12.287 to 15.566)
    10.155 (8.800 to 11.660)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia- In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia- In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with hospital-diagnosed pneumonia) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. Hospital-diagnosed pneumonia (HDP) cases identified based on hospital discharge diagnosis using international Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes: J10.0 (Influenza with HDP, other influenza virus identified), J11.0 (Influenza with HDP, virus not identified), J12 (Viral HDP, not elsewhere classified), J13 (HDP due to Sp.), J14 (for HDP due to Hi.), J15 (all HDP, not elsewhere classified), J16 (HDP due to other infectious organisms, not elsewhere classified), J17 (HDP in diseases classified elsewhere), J18 (HDP organism unspecified), J85.1 (Abscess of lung with HDP), and J86 (Pyothorax including empyema).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=27 months
    End point values
    10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    3880
    1907
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    10.263 (8.242 to 12.630)
    15.572 (12.232 to 19.970)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia - In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia - In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with hospital-diagnosed pneumonia) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. Hospital-diagnosed pneumonia (HDP) cases identified based on hospital discharge diagnosis using international Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes: J10.0 (Influenza with HDP, other influenza virus identified), J11.0 (Influenza with HDP, virus not identified), J12 (Viral HDP, not elsewhere classified), J13 (HDP due to Sp.), J14 (for HDP due to Hi.), J15 (all HDP, not elsewhere classified), J16 (HDP due to other infectious organisms, not elsewhere classified), J17 (HDP in diseases classified elsewhere), J18 (HDP organism unspecified), J85.1 (Abscess of lung with HDP), and J86 (Pyothorax including empyema).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=27 months
    End point values
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    6534
    3126
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    9.322 (7.832 to 11.013)
    11.739 (9.363 to 14.533)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [29]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    9.218
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    9.103
         upper limit
    9.335
    Notes
    [29] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2626735.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [30]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    9.212
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    9.052
         upper limit
    9.375
    Notes
    [30] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1354702.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [31]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    10.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    10.378
         upper limit
    10.624
    Notes
    [31] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2636783.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 4
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [32]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    10.429
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    10.259
         upper limit
    10.601
    Notes
    [32] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1360966.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 5
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [33]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    10.118
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    9.997
         upper limit
    10.239
    Notes
    [33] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =2654010.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 6
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [34]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    9.921
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    9.755
         upper limit
    10.088
    Notes
    [34] - In 5 to 99+ Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with a Hospital-diagnosed Pneumonia divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =1367343.

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia with Chest X-ray (CXR) reading according to WHO criteria- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia with Chest X-ray (CXR) reading according to WHO criteria- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with hospital-diagnosed pneumonia [HDP]) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata for non-consolidated HDP and without strata for consolidated HDP). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. CXR HDP was defined as a HDP case with the presence of abnormal pulmonary infiltrates on the CXR as per independent review panel judgement using WHO methodology. Abnormal pulmonary infiltrates could be either with (Consolidated HDP) or without (Non-consolidated HDP) alveolar consolidation/pleural effusion. New cases of HDP and CXR HDP were based on a 30-day rule, i.e. a new episode was considered if at least a 30-day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=24 months
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10273
    10200
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Consolidated pneumonia
    2.181 (1.591 to 2.919)
    3.965 (3.149 to 4.929)
        Non-consolidated pneumonia
    2.908 (2.219 to 3.744)
    2.937 (2.241 to 3.781)
        Consolidated or non- consolidated pneumonia
    5.090 (4.163 to 6.161)
    6.903 (5.810 to 8.141)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia with CXR reading according to WHO criteria - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia with CXR reading according to WHO criteria - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with hospital-diagnosed pneumonia [HDP]) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata for non-consolidated HDP and without strata for consolidated HDP). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. CXR HDP was defined as a HDP case with the presence of abnormal pulmonary infiltrates on the CXR as per independent review panel judgement using WHO methodology. Abnormal pulmonary infiltrates could be either with (Consolidated HDP) or without (Non-consolidated HDP) alveolar consolidation/pleural effusion. New cases of HDP and CXR HDP were based on a 30-day rule, i.e. a new episode was considered if at least a 30-day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=24 months
    End point values
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10200
    10054
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Consolidated pneumonia
    3.965 (3.149 to 4.929)
    2.273 (1.658 to 3.042)
        Non-consolidated pneumonia
    2.937 (2.241 to 3.781)
    2.627 (1.962 to 3.445)
        Consolidated or non- consolidated pneumonia
    6.903 (5.810 to 8.141)
    4.901 (3.974 to 5.978)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia with CXR reading according to WHO criteria - In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia with CXR reading according to WHO criteria - In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with hospital-diagnosed pneumonia [HDP]) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata for non-consolidated HDP and without strata for consolidated HDP). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. CXR HDP was defined as a HDP case with the presence of abnormal pulmonary infiltrates on the CXR as per independent review panel judgement using WHO methodology. Abnormal pulmonary infiltrates could be either with (Consolidated HDP) or without (Non-consolidated HDP) alveolar consolidation/pleural effusion. New cases of HDP and CXR HDP were based on a 30-day rule, i.e. a new episode was considered if at least a 30-day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=27 months
    End point values
    10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    3880
    1907
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Consolidated pneumonia
    1.960 (1.142 to 3.139)
    4.401 (2.650 to 6.873)
        Non-consolidated pneumonia
    3.344 (2.240 to 4.803)
    4.865 (3.011 to 7.436)
        Consolidated or non- consolidated pneumonia
    5.305 (3.884 to 7.076)
    9.266 (6.620 to 12.618)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia with CXR reading according to WHO criteria - In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in reducing hospital-diagnosed pneumonia with CXR reading according to WHO criteria - In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with hospital-diagnosed pneumonia [HDP]) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata for non-consolidated HDP and without strata for consolidated HDP). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. CXR HDP was defined as a HDP case with the presence of abnormal pulmonary infiltrates on the CXR as per independent review panel judgement using WHO methodology. Abnormal pulmonary infiltrates could be either with (Consolidated HDP) or without (Non-consolidated HDP) alveolar consolidation/pleural effusion. New cases of HDP and CXR HDP were based on a 30-day rule, i.e. a new episode was considered if at least a 30-day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=27 months
    End point values
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    6534
    3126
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Consolidated pneumonia
    1.824 (1.202 to 2.654)
    3.494 (2.261 to 5.157)
        Non-consolidated pneumonia
    2.837 (2.045 to 3.835)
    2.935 (1.817 to 4.486)
        Consolidated or non- consolidated pneumonia
    4.661 (3.626 to 5.899)
    6.428 (4.706 to 8.574)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in prevention of all tympanostomy tube placements- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in prevention of all tympanostomy tube placements- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with tympanostomy tube placement[TTP]) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. A TTP episode was defined as a TTP episode classified under the DCA 20 code in the Finnish National Institute of Health and Welfare (THL) and Social Insurance Institution of Finland (KELA) registers, using the Nordic Centre for Classifications in Health Care (NOMESCO) Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), version 1.12 from January 2008, and could refer to either an unilateral or a bilateral TTP procedure. New episodes of TTP defined according to a 30-day rule meaning that a new episode was considered if at least 30-day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=24 months
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10273
    10200
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    68.735 (65.203 to 72.408)
    79.504 (75.683 to 83.467)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in prevention of all tympanostomy tube placements - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in prevention of all tympanostomy tube placements - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with tympanostomy tube placement[TTP]) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. A TTP episode was defined as a TTP episode classified under the DCA 20 code in the Finnish National Institute of Health and Welfare (THL) and Social Insurance Institution of Finland (KELA) registers, using the Nordic Centre for Classifications in Health Care (NOMESCO) Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), version 1.12 from January 2008, and could refer to either an unilateral or a bilateral TTP procedure. New episodes of TTP defined according to a 30-day rule meaning that a new episode was considered if at least 30-day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=24 months
    End point values
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10200
    10054
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    79.504 (75.683 to 83.467)
    66.083 (62.550 to 69.764)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in prevention of all tympanostomy tube placements - In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in prevention of all tympanostomy tube placements - In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with tympanostomy tube placement[TTP]) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. A TTP episode was defined as a TTP episode classified under the DCA 20 code in the Finnish National Institute of Health and Welfare (THL) and Social Insurance Institution of Finland (KELA) registers, using the Nordic Centre for Classifications in Health Care (NOMESCO) Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), version 1.12 from January 2008, and could refer to either an unilateral or a bilateral TTP procedure. New episodes of TTP defined according to a 30-day rule meaning that a new episode was considered if at least 30-day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=27 months
    End point values
    10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    3880
    1907
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    68.153 (62.769 to 73.876)
    79.920 (71.708 to 88.814)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in prevention of all tympanostomy tube placements - In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in prevention of all tympanostomy tube placements - In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with tympanostomy tube placement[TTP]) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. A TTP episode was defined as a TTP episode classified under the DCA 20 code in the Finnish National Institute of Health and Welfare (THL) and Social Insurance Institution of Finland (KELA) registers, using the Nordic Centre for Classifications in Health Care (NOMESCO) Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), version 1.12 from January 2008, and could refer to either an unilateral or a bilateral TTP procedure. New episodes of TTP defined according to a 30-day rule meaning that a new episode was considered if at least 30-day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=27 months
    End point values
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    6534
    3126
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    56.809 (53.034 to 60.782)
    58.973 (53.480 to 64.877)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Tympanostomy Tube Placements, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [35]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    22.624
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    22.02
         upper limit
    23.24
    Notes
    [35] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2009, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Tympanostomy Tube Placement divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =229978.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Tympanostomy Tube Placements, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [36]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    22.747
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    21.912
         upper limit
    23.606
    Notes
    [36] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2009, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Tympanostomy Tube Placement divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =120190.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Tympanostomy Tube Placements, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [37]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    24.503
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    23.852
         upper limit
    25.166
    Notes
    [37] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Tympanostomy Tube Placement divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =214181.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 4
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Tympanostomy Tube Placements, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [38]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    26.236
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    25.308
         upper limit
    27.189
    Notes
    [38] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Tympanostomy Tube Placement divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =112060.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 5
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Tympanostomy Tube Placements, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [39]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    27.502
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    26.81
         upper limit
    28.207
    Notes
    [39] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Tympanostomy Tube Placement divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =211914.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 6
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Tympanostomy Tube Placements, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [40]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    26.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    25.171
         upper limit
    27.055
    Notes
    [40] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Tympanostomy Tube Placement divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =111071.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 7
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Tympanostomy Tube Placements, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [41]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    28.661
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    27.958
         upper limit
    29.377
    Notes
    [41] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Tympanostomy Tube Placement divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =213913.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 8
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Tympanostomy Tube Placements, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [42]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    29.835
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    28.843
         upper limit
    30.85
    Notes
    [42] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Tympanostomy Tube Placement divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =111414.

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in prevention of all antimicrobial prescriptions- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in prevention of all antimicrobial prescriptions- In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with antimicrobial prescriptions (APs)) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. An APs episode was an episode of APs to an infant/child falling under following Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] codes: J01 (APs) and following codes for AP usually recommended for otitis media (OM) and respiratory tract infections (RTI). “For OM and RTI” category corresponds to following definition: APs for antibacterial usually recommended for OM and RTI (ATC codes: J01CA04, J01CR02, J01CE02, J01DC02, J01DC04, J01EE02, J01FA09 and J01FA10). New episodes of APs were analyzed according to a 2-day rule meaning new episode considered if at least 2 day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=24 months
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10273
    10200
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Antimicrobial prescriptions (ATC code J01)
    1592.585 (1575.411 to 1609.901)
    1706.194 (1688.328 to 1724.202)
        For otitis media and respiratory infections
    1451.141 (1434.749 to 1467.674)
    1565.692 (1548.579 to 1582.947)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in prevention of all antimicrobial prescriptions - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in prevention of all antimicrobial prescriptions - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with antimicrobial prescriptions (APs)) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. An APs episode was an episode of APs to an infant/child falling under following Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] codes: J01 (APs) and following codes for AP usually recommended for otitis media (OM) and respiratory tract infections (RTI). “For OM and RTI” category corresponds to following definition: APs for antibacterial usually recommended for OM and RTI (ATC codes: J01CA04, J01CR02, J01CE02, J01DC02, J01DC04, J01EE02, J01FA09 and J01FA10). New episodes of APs were analyzed according to a 2-day rule meaning new episode considered if at least 2 day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=24 months
    End point values
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10200
    10054
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Antimicrobial prescriptions (ATC code J01)
    1706.194 (1688.328 to 1724.202)
    1552.493 (1535.183 to 1569.950)
        For otitis media and respiratory infections
    1565.692 (1548.579 to 1582.947)
    1415.983 (1399.453 to 1432.659)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in prevention of all antimicrobial prescriptions - In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in prevention of all antimicrobial prescriptions - In children starting vaccination in the 7-11 months schedule
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with antimicrobial prescriptions (APs)) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. An APs episode was an episode of APs to an infant/child falling under following Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] codes: J01 (APs) and following codes for AP usually recommended for otitis media (OM) and respiratory tract infections (RTI). “For OM and RTI” category corresponds to following definition: APs for antibacterial usually recommended for OM and RTI (ATC codes: J01CA04, J01CR02, J01CE02, J01DC02, J01DC04, J01EE02, J01FA09 and J01FA10). New episodes of APs were analyzed according to a 2-day rule meaning new episode considered if at least 2 day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=27 months
    End point values
    10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    3880
    1907
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Antimicrobial prescriptions (ATC code J01)
    1536.618 (1510.637 to 1562.934)
    1649.360 (1611.269 to 1688.124)
        For otitis media and respiratory infections
    1390.856 (1366.143 to 1415.903)
    1499.713 (1463.401 to 1536.698)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Person Year Rate in prevention of all antimicrobial prescriptions - In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Person Year Rate in prevention of all antimicrobial prescriptions - In children starting vaccination in the 12-18 months schedule (+ indirect effects on the unvaccinated population)
    End point description
    PYAR was calculated: n (= number of subjects with antimicrobial prescriptions (APs)) divided by T (= sum of follow-up (FU) period expressed in years) (per 1000) with 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI-classical log linear Poisson regression with strata). FU period considered as period between Dose 1 administration and cut-off date of 31 December 2011. An APs episode was an episode of APs to an infant/child falling under following Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] codes: J01 (APs) and following codes for AP usually recommended for otitis media (OM) and respiratory tract infections (RTI). “For OM and RTI” category corresponds to following definition: APs for antibacterial usually recommended for OM and RTI (ATC codes: J01CA04, J01CR02, J01CE02, J01DC02, J01DC04, J01EE02, J01FA09 and J01FA10). New episodes of APs were analyzed according to a 2-day rule meaning new episode considered if at least 2 day interval elapsed from the onset of the previous episode.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – FU mean time=27 months
    End point values
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    6534
    3126
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Antimicrobial prescriptions (ATC code J01)
    1315.936 (1297.521 to 1334.547)
    1421.774 (1394.280 to 1449.675)
        For otitis media and respiratory infections
    1177.729 (1160.312 to 1195.343)
    1271.268 (1245.277 to 1297.665)
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 1
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [43]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    816.813
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    815.226
         upper limit
    818.392
    Notes
    [43] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2009, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =229978.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 2
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [44]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    841.176
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    839.098
         upper limit
    843.239
    Notes
    [44] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2009, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =120190.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 3
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions recommended for Acute Otitis Media (AOM)/Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI), number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [45]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    702.245
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    700.372
         upper limit
    704.114
    Notes
    [45] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2009, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with recommended Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =229978.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 4
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions recommended for AOM/RTI, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [46]
    Method
    negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    720.9
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    718.355
         upper limit
    723.435
    Notes
    [46] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2009, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with recommended Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =120190.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 5
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [47]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    929.844
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    928.755
         upper limit
    930.923
    Notes
    [47] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =214181.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 6
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [48]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    953.025
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    951.77
         upper limit
    954.257
    Notes
    [48] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =112060.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 7
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions recommended for AOM/RTI, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [49]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    804.703
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    803.017
         upper limit
    806.38
    Notes
    [49] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with recommended Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =214181.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 8
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions recommended for AOM/RTI, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [50]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    818.66
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    816.391
         upper limit
    820.912
    Notes
    [50] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2010, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with recommended Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =112060.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 9
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [51]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    916.079
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    914.891
         upper limit
    917.256
    Notes
    [51] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =211914.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 10
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [52]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    928.568
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    927.038
         upper limit
    930.076
    Notes
    [52] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =111071.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 11
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions recommended for AOM/RTI, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [53]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    796.894
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    795.175
         upper limit
    798.605
    Notes
    [53] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with recommended Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =211914.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 12
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions recommended for AOM/RTI, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [54]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    803.918
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    801.571
         upper limit
    806.25
    Notes
    [54] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2011, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with recommended Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =111071.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 13
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [55]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    865.679
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    864.227
         upper limit
    867.121
    Notes
    [55] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =213913.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 14
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [56]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    871.749
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    869.771
         upper limit
    873.707
    Notes
    [56] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =111414.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 15
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions recommended for AOM/RTI, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any 10PN-PD-DIT vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group v Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [57]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    753.423
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    751.591
         upper limit
    755.249
    Notes
    [57] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with recommended Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =213913.
    Statistical analysis title
    Statistical analysis 16
    Statistical analysis description
    For indirect effectiveness analysis at preventing Antimicrobial Prescriptions recommended for AOM/RTI, number of events in the unvaccinated cohort, which occurred around 6 months or more after study start was compared with treated group numbers (applicable to any control (HAV or HBV) vaccine - age stratum schedules).
    Comparison groups
    Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group v 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    9660
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    [58]
    Method
    Negative Binomial model with strata
    Parameter type
    PYAR
    Point estimate
    755.542
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    753.008
         upper limit
    758.064
    Notes
    [58] - In 0 to 7 Years Old Population, in Year 2012, for Non-vaccinated persons living in study cluster areas, in which study participants received control vaccine, PYAR was calculated (= number of subjects reported with recommended Antimicrobial Prescriptions divided by sum of follow-up period expressed in years (per 1000), as well as 95% CI (2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a Negative Binomial regression model with strata). Total number of non-vaccinated persons =111414.

    Secondary: Number of subjects classified by antimicrobial susceptiblity of IPD isolates in children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2 or 3-dose primary vaccination course

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects classified by antimicrobial susceptiblity of IPD isolates in children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2 or 3-dose primary vaccination course
    End point description
    Antimicrobial susceptibility classification of IPD isolates reported during IPD follow-up with percentages for each serotype for the following categories: S= susceptible; I = intermediate ; R = resistant; N = not available.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end date of the follow-up (31 December 2011) – mean FU time=24 months
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    0 [59]
    24
    2
    Units: Participants
        Serotype-4 -Pencillin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6A -Pencillin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6B -Pencillin-I
    3
    0
        Serotype-6B -Pencillin-R
    1
    0
        Serotype-6B -Pencillin-S
    2
    0
        Serotype-7F -Pencillin-S
    1
    1
        Serotype-14 -Pencillin-I
    2
    0
        Serotype-14 -Pencillin-R
    1
    0
        Serotype-14 -Pencillin-S
    2
    0
        Serotype-15C -Pencillin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-18C -Pencillin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19A -Pencillin-I
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Pencillin-I
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Pencillin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-23F -Pencillin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-N -Pencillin-N
    4
    1
        Serotype-4 -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6A -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6B -Erythromycin-R
    5
    0
        Serotype-6B -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-7F -Erythromycin-S
    1
    1
        Serotype-14 -Erythromycin-R
    4
    0
        Serotype-14 -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-15C -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-18C -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19A -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Erythromycin-R
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-23F -Erythromycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-N -Erythromycin-N
    4
    1
        Serotype-4 -Tetracyclin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6A -Tetracyclin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6B -Tetracyclin-R
    4
    0
        Serotype-6B -Tetracyclin-S
    2
    0
        Serotype-7F -Tetracyclin-S
    1
    1
        Serotype-14 -Tetracyclin-S
    5
    0
        Serotype-15C -Tetracyclin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-18C -Tetracyclin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19A -Tetracyclin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Tetracyclin-R
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Tetracyclin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-23F -Tetracyclin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-N -Tetracyclin-N
    4
    1
        Serotype-4 -Levoffloxacin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6A -Levoffloxacin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6B -Levoffloxacin-S
    6
    0
        Serotype-7F -Levoffloxacin-S
    1
    1
        Serotype-14 -Levoffloxacin-S
    5
    0
        Serotype-15C -Levoffloxacin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-18C -Levoffloxacin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19A -Levoffloxacin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Levoffloxacin-S
    2
    0
        Serotype-23F -Levoffloxacin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-N -Levoffloxacin-N
    4
    1
        Serotype-4 -Ceftriaxone-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6A -Ceftriaxone-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6B -Ceftriaxone-S
    6
    0
        Serotype-7F -Ceftriaxone-S
    1
    1
        Serotype-14 -Ceftriaxone-I
    1
    0
        Serotype-14 -Ceftriaxone-S
    4
    0
        Serotype-15C -Ceftriaxone-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-18C -Ceftriaxone-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19A -Ceftriaxone-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Ceftriaxone-S
    2
    0
        Serotype-23F -Ceftriaxone-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-N -Ceftriaxone-N
    4
    1
        Serotype-4 -Clindamycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6A -Clindamycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-6B -Clindamycin-R
    4
    0
        Serotype-6B -Clindamycin-S
    2
    0
        Serotype-7F -Clindamycin-S
    1
    1
        Serotype-14 -Clindamycin-N
    1
    0
        Serotype-14 -Clindamycin-S
    4
    0
        Serotype-15C -Clindamycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-18C -Clindamycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19A -Clindamycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Clindamycin-R
    1
    0
        Serotype-19F -Clindamycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-23F -Clindamycin-S
    1
    0
        Serotype-N -Clindamycin-N
    4
    1
    Notes
    [59] - No participants with results in this group
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) (in a subset of subjects in Turku area)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) (in a subset of subjects in Turku area)
    End point description
    Analysis of this outcome was performed in the Turku area. The number of subjects reporting at least one LRTI any time after the administration of the first vaccine dose was tabulated. The analysis was performed in a subset of vaccinated subjects including all vaccinated subjects enrolled in the 10PNPD- DIT-053 study in the Turku area and those vaccinated subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 study in the Turku area who agreed to take part in this assessment.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From the administration of the first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    243
    171
    190
    31
    22
    62
    48
    Units: Participants
    19
    19
    19
    3
    1
    5
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) (in a subset of subjects in Turku area)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) (in a subset of subjects in Turku area)
    End point description
    Analysis of this outcome was performed in the Turku area. The number of subjects reporting at least one URTI any time after the administration of the first vaccine dose was tabulated. The analysis was performed in a subset of vaccinated subjects including all vaccinated subjects enrolled in the 10PNPD-DIT-053 study in the Turku area and those vaccinated subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 study in the Turku area who agreed to take part in this assessment.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From the administration of the first vaccine dose till the end of the blinded invasive disease (ID) Follow-up period (at least 30 months)
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    243
    171
    190
    31
    22
    62
    48
    Units: Participants
    158
    94
    124
    14
    15
    27
    19
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with SAEs reported during the blinded invasive disease phase, of the study

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with SAEs reported during the blinded invasive disease phase, of the study
    End point description
    An event is defined as ‘serious’ when it meets one of the pre-defined outcomes described below: results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation; results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study subject. Medical or scientific judgement should be exercised in deciding whether reporting is appropriate in other situations, such as important medical events that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalisation but may jeopardize the subject or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition. These should also be considered serious.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    For Month 0 till the end of the blinded ID Follow-Up, (at least 30 months from study start)
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn7-11M/043 Group Ctrl7-11M/043 Group 10Pn12-18M/043 Group Ctrl12-18M/043 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    8427
    9112
    8872
    3689
    1812
    6249
    3020
    Units: Participants
    6
    7
    8
    3
    2
    2
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects enrolled and vaccinated in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 study with post-study SAEs reported via passive surveillance– Subjects enrolled aged 6 weeks to 6 months and 7 to 18 months

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects enrolled and vaccinated in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 and 10PN-PD-DIT-053 study with post-study SAEs reported via passive surveillance– Subjects enrolled aged 6 weeks to 6 months and 7 to 18 months
    End point description
    An event is defined as ‘serious’ when it meets one of the pre-defined outcomes described below: results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation; results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study subject. Medical or scientific judgement should be exercised in deciding whether reporting is appropriate in other situations, such as important medical events that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalisation but may jeopardize the subject or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition. These should also be considered serious.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From the end of the blinded ID Follow-Up period(at least 30 months from study start) up to the end of 18-month period after study unblinding
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn7-11M/043+053 Group Ctrl7-11M/043+053 Group 10Pn12-18M/043+053 Group Ctrl12-18M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10273
    10201
    10054
    3880
    1908
    6535
    3126
    Units: Participants
    1
    0
    2
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Culture-confirmed Invasive Disease (ID) Person Year Rate - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course till end of LT FU period

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Culture-confirmed Invasive Disease (ID) Person Year Rate - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 3-dose primary vaccination course till end of LT FU period
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the long-term Follow-up period (The Follow-up period lasted at least 77 months)
    End point values
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10272
    10201
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Culture confirmed ID
    0.046 (0.013 to 0.118)
    0.268 (0.170 to 0.402)
        Pneumococcal invasive disease (IPD)
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
    0.210 (0.124 to 0.331)
        Vaccine serotypes (vaccine type-IPD)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.140 (0.072 to 0.244)
        Serotype 4
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
        Serotype 6B
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.058 (0.019 to 0.136)
        Serotype 7F
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
        Serotype 14
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.047 (0.013 to 0.119)
        Serotype 18C
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
        Serotype 19F
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
        Serotype 23F
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
        Cross-reactive serotypes
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.064)
    0.047 (0.013 to 0.119)
        Serotype 6A
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
        Serotype 19A
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.064)
    0.035 (0.007 to 0.102)
        Other pneumococcal serotypes
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.064)
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
        Serotype 3
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.064)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
        Serotype 12F
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
        Serotype 15C
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
        H. influenzae ID
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
        Non-typeable (NTHI)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
        Other bacteria
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
    0.058 (0.019 to 0.136)
        Neisseria meningitidis
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
        Streptococcus pyogenes
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
        Moraxella catarrhalis
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Culture-confirmed Invasive Disease (ID) Person Year Rate - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course till end of LT FU period

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Culture-confirmed Invasive Disease (ID) Person Year Rate - In children starting vaccination within 7 months of life and assigned to a 2-dose primary vaccination course till end of LT FU period
    End point description
    The PYAR (Person-Year Rate) was calculated as follows n (= number of subjects reported with a culture confirmed IPD) divided by T (= sum of follow-up period expressed in years) (per 1000) as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated as a 2-sided profile log-likelihood ratio 95% CI using a classical log linear Poisson regression with strata.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Period of follow-up was any time after the administration of first vaccine dose till the end of the long-term Follow-up period (The Follow-up period lasted at least 77 months)
    End point values
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043+053 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043+053 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    10201
    10053
    Units: Participants per 1000 person-years
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Culture confirmed ID
    0.268 (0.170 to 0.402)
    0.047 (0.013 to 0.122)
        Pneumococcal invasive disease (IPD)
    0.21 (0.124 to 0.331)
    0.024 (0.003 to 0.086)
        Vaccine serotypes (vaccine type-IPD)
    0.140 (0.072 to 0.244)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.066)
        Serotype 4
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Serotype 6B
    0.058 (0.019 to 0.136)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Serotype 7F
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.066)
        Serotype 14
    0.047 (0.013 to 0.119)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Serotype 18C
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Serotype 19F
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Serotype 23F
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Cross-reactive serotypes
    0.047 (0.013 to 0.119)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Serotype 6A
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Serotype 19A
    0.035 (0.007 to 0.102)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Other pneumococcal serotypes
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.066)
        Serotype 3
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.066)
        Serotype 12F
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Serotype 15C
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.043)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        H. influenzae ID
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.066)
        Non-typeable (NTHI)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.066)
        Other bacteria
    0.058 (0.019 to 0.136)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.066)
        Neisseria meningitidis
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.066)
        Streptococcus pyogenes
    0.023 (0.003 to 0.084)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
        Moraxella catarrhalis
    0.012 (0.0 to 0.065)
    0.0 (0.0 to 0.044)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    SAEs were reported from Month 0 to end of blinded invasive disease (ID) phase (at least 30 months from study start), in 10PN-PD-DIT-043 subjects.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Solicited and unsolicited AEs were not collected in this study.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    16.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks, followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl12-18M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Havrix (called also HAV) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl7-11M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B (called also HBV) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn12-18M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 12 to 18 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose vaccination with an interval of at least and preferably 6 months between doses (12-18M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Reporting group title
    Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 6 weeks to 6 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Engerix B vaccine (called also HBV vaccine) according to either a 3-dose primary vaccination schedule with an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (3+1 Infant Schedule), or according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (2+1 Infant Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh.

    Reporting group title
    10Pn7-11M/043 Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects in this group were subjects enrolled in the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (NCT00861380 - EUDRACT 2008-005149-48) study, aged 7 to 11 months at enrolment. Subjects received the Synflorix (called also 10Pn-PD-DiT, 10Pn or GSK1024850A) vaccine according to a 2-dose primary vaccination with an interval of at least 8 weeks followed by a booster dose of the same vaccine with an interval of preferably 6 months since the previous vaccine dose (minimum 4 months) (11-17M Schedule). The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the thigh or in the deltoid region of upper arm, provided the muscle size was adequate.

    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: Only SAEs events were collected as part of this study.
    Serious adverse events
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group Ctrl12-18M/043 Group Ctrl7-11M/043 Group 10Pn12-18M/043 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn7-11M/043 Group
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 8427 (0.07%)
    7 / 9112 (0.08%)
    2 / 3020 (0.07%)
    2 / 1812 (0.11%)
    2 / 6249 (0.03%)
    8 / 8872 (0.09%)
    3 / 3689 (0.08%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    4
    4
    1
    0
    0
    3
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Foreign body
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Road traffic accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Kawasaki’s disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    1 / 6249 (0.02%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    1 / 3689 (0.03%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
    Gaucher’s disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Krabbe’s disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 8427 (0.01%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Myocarditis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Convulsion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    1 / 1812 (0.06%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Febrile convulsion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    1 / 3020 (0.03%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    1 / 3689 (0.03%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Syncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    1 / 1812 (0.06%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Accidental death
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Death
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 8427 (0.01%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injection site reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Irritability
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 8427 (0.02%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sudden death
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sudden infant death syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 8427 (0.01%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 8427 (0.01%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diarrhoea haemorrhagic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    1 / 6249 (0.02%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 8427 (0.01%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Asphyxia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    1 / 3020 (0.03%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Reye’s syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Eczema
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 8427 (0.01%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Cystitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Laryngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Parotitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    1 / 9112 (0.01%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumococcal sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    1 / 1812 (0.06%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    1 / 8872 (0.01%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 8427 (0.01%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tonsillitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    1 / 3689 (0.03%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    10Pn3+1-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn2+1-6W-6M/043 Group Ctrl12-18M/043 Group Ctrl7-11M/043 Group 10Pn12-18M/043 Group Ctrl-6W-6M/043 Group 10Pn7-11M/043 Group
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 8427 (0.00%)
    0 / 9112 (0.00%)
    0 / 3020 (0.00%)
    0 / 1812 (0.00%)
    0 / 6249 (0.00%)
    0 / 8872 (0.00%)
    0 / 3689 (0.00%)

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    04 Feb 2009
    Amendment 1 of the 10PN-PD-DIT-043 (111442) study protocol was developed for the following reasons: (1) Addition of collection of data on respiratory tract infections (RTIs), including acute otitis media (AOM) in a subset of subjects in Turku area; (2) Addition of 6 clusters located in some selected municipalities where no collaboration with health care centres had been set up but where there was opportunity for parent(s) to let their child participate in nested study 10PNPD-DIT-053 (112595) and to receive the same vaccination as in the current study (i.e. Espoo, Vantaa and surroundings municipalities and municipalities surrounding Oulu); and (3) The National Public Health Institute (KTL) and the National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES) were merged into the National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).
    22 Aug 2011
    Amendment 2 was developed for the following reasons: (1) The study enrolment reached only 50% of the initial recruitment plan; therefore, there was a need to redefine the conditions for triggering IPD effectiveness analysis: (a) the study follow-up period for primary analysis on invasive disease (ID) cases was to end on 31 January 2012 (data lock point for ID cases), i.e. at least 30 months after study start. This would allow inclusion of an age-related IPD peak at 1119 months of age in the youngest enrolled subjects and an expected seasonal invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) peak in the fall of 2011, thereby increasing the potential to accrue additional IPD cases; (b) Reaching a minimum number of 21 culture-confirmed vaccine-type IPD cases in the infant group was no longer a condition for triggering IPD effectiveness analysis because that minimum number was most probably not met due to the lower enrolment numbers. The estimated target number of vaccine-type IPD cases was adjusted accordingly, based on an assumed vaccine efficacy estimate and the currently available information on the total number of IPD cases by age cohort. Taking into account the lower than expected number of enrolled subjects, associated number of overall IPD cases reported so far and impact on power when considering 80% vaccine efficacy for the 2+1 vaccination schedule, it was decided to evaluate the effectiveness of the 10Pn-PD-DiT vaccine to prevent vaccine-type IPD in the infants assigned to a 2+1 vaccination course as a first secondary objective instead of the second primary objective (sequential) but to keep the predefined statistical criteria for success. (2) Following IDMC recommendation, it was decided to have the chest X-rays from the hospital-diagnosed pneumonia cases in the vaccinated population evaluated by an independent review panel according to World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines for study purposes. The appropriate sections of the protocol were adjusted to reflect this.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 13:59:11 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA