Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Efficacy of zoledronic acid 5 mg for chronic low back pain due to Modic changes

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2008-005351-14
    Trial protocol
    FI  
    Global end of trial date
    19 Mar 2012

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    04 Oct 2019
    First version publication date
    04 Oct 2019
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Efficacy of zoledronic acid for chronic low back pain associated with Modic changes in magnetic resonance imaging
    The Effect of zoledronic acid on type and volume of Modic changes among patients with low back pain

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    CZOL446HFI03
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01330238
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University of Oulu, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
    Sponsor organisation address
    PL 5000, Oulu, Finland, 90014
    Public contact
    Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 041 4462859, jaro.karppinen@ttl.fi
    Scientific contact
    Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 041 4462859, jaro.karppinen@ttl.fi
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    19 Mar 2012
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    19 Mar 2012
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    19 Mar 2012
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    Bisphosphonates could be effective in Modic changes causing low back pain through two mechanisms: 1.) they could consolidate the vertebral bodies thereby improving the tolerance to mechanical load and 2.) they could disminish inflammation as observed recently in case of ibandronate in an experimental inflammation model
    Protection of trial subjects
    Before administration of the infusion, all patients re- ceived oral ibuprofen 600 mg or paracetamol 1 g as prophylaxis for potential acute phase reactions such as flu-like symptoms, headache or fever. Patients were advised to use the same medication should post-dose symptoms appear. They all also received 100 000 units of Vitamin D (Vigantol®) orally to prevent hypocalcae- mia. Information on use of the concomitant medication and hospital admissions were recorded. Blood samples were taken for the assessment of safety, inflammatory mediators and markers of bone turnover at baseline, one month and one year.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    26 Nov 2008
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Safety, Efficacy, Ethical reason, Regulatory reason, Scientific research
    Long term follow-up duration
    1 Years
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 40
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    40
    EEA total number of subjects
    40
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    40
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Patients referred from primary health care units to Oulu University Hospital, where they were screened, between 11/2008 and 3/2011.Blood samples for the assessment of safety, inflammatory mediators and markers of bone turnover at bl, 1 m and 1 y.Clinical examination, MRI of lumbar spine, a signed informed, visual analog scale, Oswestry, RAND-36.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Inclusion criteria were low back symptoms for at least three months, an LBP intensity of at least six (6) on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of at least 30% [21], and an M1, mixed M1/2 or M2 in MRI performed within six months at most prior to enrolment.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator, Monitor, Subject, Data analyst, Carer
    Blinding implementation details
    A master randomization list was generated by a computer in blocks of eight, containing four placebo and four ZA allocations in random order. Patients were assigned a unique randomization number according to the order of inclusion. Patients, the principal investiga- tor performing the screening and follow-up assessments, the nurse, the radiologist evaluating the MRI scans, and the statistician were blinded to the treatment allocation. The ZA and placebo were supplied in in identical bottles.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Zoledronic acid
    Arm description
    Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline (n=20) or 100 ml saline as placebo (n = 20) over a 15-minute period.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Aclasta/zoledronic acid 5 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline (n=20) or 100 ml saline as placebo (n = 20) over a 15-minute period.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline (n=20) or 100 ml saline as placebo (n = 20) over a 15-minute period.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    100 ml saline as placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline (n=20) or 100 ml saline as placebo (n = 20) over a 15-minute period.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Zoledronic acid Placebo
    Started
    20
    20
    Completed
    20
    20

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Zoledronic acid
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline (n=20) or 100 ml saline as placebo (n = 20) over a 15-minute period.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline (n=20) or 100 ml saline as placebo (n = 20) over a 15-minute period.

    Reporting group values
    Zoledronic acid Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    20 20 40
    Age categorical
    The patients’ mean age was 50 years
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    20 20 40
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Gender categorical
    There were 26 men, 15 in zoledronic acid group and 11 in placebo group
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    5 9 14
        Male
    15 11 26

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Zoledronic acid
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline (n=20) or 100 ml saline as placebo (n = 20) over a 15-minute period.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline (n=20) or 100 ml saline as placebo (n = 20) over a 15-minute period.

    Subject analysis set title
    Treatment effect by comparing the change in the outcomes
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    independent samples t-test

    Primary: Change in intensity of low back pain

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change in intensity of low back pain
    End point description
    Primary endpoint was change in intensity of low back pain (10 cm VAS) form baseline to one year
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The mean difference (MD) between the treatment groups in the primary outcome, intensity of LBP
    End point values
    Zoledronic acid Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    20
    20
    Units: cm
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    2.8 (-1.0 to 2.8)
    2.2 (-1.0 to 2.4)
    Statistical analysis title
    Treatment effect by comparing change in outcome
    Statistical analysis description
    independent samples t-test
    Comparison groups
    Zoledronic acid v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    40
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    t-test, 2-sided
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Adverse events were asked at 1 month and 1 year follow-up.The occurrence of any adverse effects was observed during the infusion and inquired about at each of the follow-up visits.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Despite prophylaxis, acute post-infusion phase reactions (fever, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, pain, nau- sea and flu-like symptoms) were observed in 19/20 patients in the ZA vs. 7/20 patients in the placebo group
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    22.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Zoledronic acid group
    Reporting group description
    Patients received a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg ZA in 100 ml saline. Despite prophylaxis, acute post-infusion phase reactions (fever, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, pain, nau- sea and flu-like symptoms) were observed in 19/20 patients in the ZA vs. 7/20 patients in the placebo group. One event met the criteria for serious adverse effect (SAE) in the ZA group; sinusitis requiring temporary hospitalization after the infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo group
    Reporting group description
    Patients received a single intravenous infusion of 100 ml saline as placebo

    Serious adverse events
    Zoledronic acid group Placebo group
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Sinusitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 20 (5.00%)
    0 / 20 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Zoledronic acid group Placebo group
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    19 / 20 (95.00%)
    7 / 20 (35.00%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Myalgia
    Additional description: Myalgia, flu like symptoms
         subjects affected / exposed
    19 / 20 (95.00%)
    7 / 20 (35.00%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    7

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588905
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 03 01:35:28 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA