Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43870   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7289   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NKTR-102 (PEG-Irinotecan) When Given on a Q14 Day or a Q21 Day Schedule in Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Locally Advanced Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2008-005576-26
    Trial protocol
    BE   GB  
    Global end of trial date
    30 Oct 2012

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    05 Aug 2017
    First version publication date
    05 Aug 2017
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    08-PIR-04
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT00806156
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Nektar Therapeutics
    Sponsor organisation address
    455 Mission Bay Boulevard South, San Francisco, United States, CA 94158
    Public contact
    Nektar Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, 001 415.482.5300, StudyInquiry@nektar.com
    Scientific contact
    Nektar Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, 001 415.482.5300, StudyInquiry@nektar.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    05 May 2015
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    30 Oct 2012
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    For the Primary Efficacy Population: •To determine the objective response rate (ORR) with NKTR-102 given on a once every 21 days (q21d) treatment schedule in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and who have received prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) therapy in a platinum-resistant setting or who were otherwise unable to receive further PLD therapy.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was carried out in compliance with the International Conference on Harmonisation harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice 1996, the United States (US) 21 Code of Federal Regulations dealing with clinical studies (including Parts 50 and 56 concerning informed consent and IRB regulations) and the Declaration of Helsinki, concerning medical research in humans (Recommendations Guiding Physicians in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Helsinki 1964, amended Tokyo 1975, Venice 1983, Hong Kong 1989, Somerset West, South Africa, 1996, Edinburgh 2000, Washington 2002, Tokyo 2004, and Seoul 2008). Before implementing this study, the protocol, the proposed Informed Consent Form, and other information to patients were reviewed by a properly constituted Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) for each study site.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    08 Dec 2008
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 43
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 52
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 83
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    178
    EEA total number of subjects
    95
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    126
    From 65 to 84 years
    52
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Before any protocol-specific procedures are initiated, each patient and the Investigator were to sign and date an IRB or IEC-approved informed consent form. All patients considered for this study had to satisfy all eligibility criteria.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    NKTR-102 q14d
    Arm description
    NKTR-102 was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 2-week [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170 mg/m^2 for the first 4 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    NKTR-102
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    NKTR-102 was reconstituted in 5% dextrose and was administered as an IV infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 14-day [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170mg/m^2 for the first 4 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients. Body surface area was determined based on baseline height and current weight before the start of each cycle. The NKTR-102 drug product was formulated as a sterile lyophilized powder of NKTR-102 in lactate buffer at pH 3.5 supplied in 25 mL type-I amber-coloured glass vials. Specific NKTR-102 dose modifications could be made for drug-related neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia, diarrhoea, and other drug-related, non-haematological adverse events. Study drug was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, withdrawal by patient, Principal Investigator decision, lost to follow-up, protocol violation, or study termination by Sponsor.

    Arm title
    NKTR-102 q21d
    Arm description
    NKTR-102 was administered as an IV infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 3-week [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170 mg/m^2 for the first 6 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    NKTR-102
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    NKTR-102 was reconstituted in 5% dextrose and was administered as an IV infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 21-day [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170mg/m^2 for the first 6 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients. Body surface area was determined based on baseline height and current weight before the start of each cycle. The NKTR-102 drug product was formulated as a sterile lyophilized powder of NKTR-102 in lactate buffer at pH 3.5 supplied in 25 mL type-I amber-coloured glass vials. Specific NKTR-102 dose modifications could be made for drug-related neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia, diarrhoea, and other drug-related, non-haematological adverse events. Study drug was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, withdrawal by patient, Principal Investigator decision, lost to follow-up, protocol violation, or study termination by Sponsor.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d
    Started
    39
    139
    Completed
    0
    0
    Not completed
    39
    139
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    1
    3
         Study terminated by Sponsor
    2
    40
         Death
    35
    95
         Other
    1
    -
         Lost to follow-up
    -
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    NKTR-102 q14d
    Reporting group description
    NKTR-102 was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 2-week [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170 mg/m^2 for the first 4 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients.

    Reporting group title
    NKTR-102 q21d
    Reporting group description
    NKTR-102 was administered as an IV infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 3-week [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170 mg/m^2 for the first 6 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients.

    Reporting group values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Total
    Number of subjects
    39 139 178
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        18 to 64 years
    27 99 126
        65 to 84 years
    12 40 52
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    58.5 ( 12.14 ) 58.3 ( 11.49 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    39 139 178

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    NKTR-102 q14d
    Reporting group description
    NKTR-102 was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 2-week [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170 mg/m^2 for the first 4 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients.

    Reporting group title
    NKTR-102 q21d
    Reporting group description
    NKTR-102 was administered as an IV infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 3-week [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170 mg/m^2 for the first 6 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients.

    Subject analysis set title
    MITT Population
    Subject analysis set type
    Modified intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) Population for the q14d Arm included all platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients who were enrolled to the q14d treatment regimen. The MITT Population for the q21d Arm included all platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients who were enrolled to the q21d treatment regimen. The MITT Population included those patients who had undergone radiographic tumor measurement evaluation at Baseline with measurable tumors, and were enrolled and received at least one dose (or partial dose) of study drug. Platinum-resistant patients had a platinum-free interval (PFI) ≤ 6 months. PFI was defined as the time to recurrence/progression from last dose of the prior platinum-based therapy.

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety Population
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The safety population consisted of all patients who received at least one dose (or partial dose) of the study drug.

    Subject analysis set title
    Prior PLD Population
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients in the MITT Population treated in q14d and q21d treatment schedules, who subsequently progressed after receiving PLD therapy or who were otherwise unable to receive PLD therapy.

    Subject analysis set title
    Primary Efficacy Population
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients in the MITT Population treated in q21d treatment schedule with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, had received prior PLD therapy in a platinum-resistant setting or who were otherwise unable to receive further PLD therapy.

    Subject analysis set title
    Platinum-Refractory Population
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients in the MITT Population with a PFI ≤ 6 weeks.

    Primary: Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): Primary Efficacy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): Primary Efficacy Population [1] [2]
    End point description
    The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator. The analysis was performed for patients in the Primary Efficacy Population.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Per the protocol, the planned analysis was descriptive only.
    [2] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary efficacy population only included subjects treated in the NKTR-102 q21d treatment arm.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q21d Primary Efficacy Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    104
    104
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    14.4 (8.3 to 22.7)
    14.4 (8.3 to 22.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Best Overall Response by Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria: MITT Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Best Overall Response by Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria: MITT Population
    End point description
    Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR as assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) criteria. “A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment.” Analysis was performed in MITT Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d MITT Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    37
    132
    169
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    29.7 (15.9 to 47)
    25 (17.9 to 33.3)
    26 (19.6 to 33.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Primary Efficacy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Primary Efficacy Population [3]
    End point description
    Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. “A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment.” Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    Notes
    [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary efficacy population only included subjects treated in the NKTR-102 q21d treatment arm.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q21d Primary Efficacy Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    104
    104
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    25 (17 to 34.4)
    25 (17 to 34.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Platinum-Refractory Population
    End point description
    Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. “A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment.” Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Platinum-Refractory Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    52
    65
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    23.1 (5 to 53.8)
    17.3 (8.2 to 30.3)
    18.5 (9.9 to 30)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Prior PLD Therapy Population
    End point description
    Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. “A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment.” Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Prior PLD Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    114
    130
    Units: Percentage of patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    25 (7.3 to 52.4)
    24.6 (17 to 33.5)
    24.6 (17.5 to 32.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS): MITT Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS): MITT Population
    End point description
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in MITT Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d MITT Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    37
    132
    169
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    4.1 (2.6 to 6.7)
    4.4 (2.9 to 5)
    4.4 (3.1 to 5.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Primary Efficacy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Primary Efficacy Population [4]
    End point description
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    Notes
    [4] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary efficacy population only included subjects treated in the NKTR-102 q21d treatment arm.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q21d Primary Efficacy Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    104
    104
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    4.4 (2.9 to 5)
    4.4 (2.9 to 5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Platinum-Refractory Population
    End point description
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Platinum-Refractory Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    52
    65
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    11.9 (2 to 15)
    2.7 (1.7 to 4.6)
    3 (2 to 5.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Prior PLD Therapy Population
    End point description
    PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Prior PLD Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    114
    130
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    5.5 (2.2 to 11.4)
    4.4 (2.9 to 5)
    4.5 (3.1 to 5.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Duration of Overall Response (DoR): MITT Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Duration of Overall Response (DoR): MITT Population
    End point description
    DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From the time measurement criteria for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) were first met until the first date that recurrent disease or PD or death was objectively documented.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d MITT Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    37
    132
    169
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    4.1 (2.8 to 8)
    6.6 (3.6 to 10.9)
    5.7 (4 to 10.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Primary Efficacy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Primary Efficacy Population [5]
    End point description
    DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From the time measurement criteria for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) were first met until the first date that recurrent disease or PD or death was objectively documented.
    Notes
    [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary efficacy population only included subjects treated in the NKTR-102 q21d treatment arm.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q21d Primary Efficacy Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    104
    104
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    7.4 (3.6 to 13.2)
    7.4 (3.6 to 13.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Platinum-Refractory Population
    End point description
    DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From the time measurement criteria for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) were first met until the first date that recurrent disease or PD or death was objectively documented.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Platinum-Refractory Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    52
    65
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    10.8 (7.1 to 14.4)
    7.4 (2.9 to 12.6)
    7.4 (2.9 to 12.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Prior PLD Therapy Population
    End point description
    DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From the time measurement criteria for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) were first met until the first date that recurrent disease or PD or death was objectively documented.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Prior PLD Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    114
    130
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    4.2 (4.1 to 14.4)
    7.4 (3.6 to 10.9)
    6.6 (4 to 10.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CA-125 Response Rate: MITT Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CA-125 Response Rate: MITT Population
    End point description
    CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 4 weeks from Cycle 1, Day 1 until end-of-treatment (EOT) visit.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d MITT Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    32
    109
    141
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    43.8 (26.4 to 62.3)
    34.9 (26 to 44.6)
    36.9 (28.9 to 45.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CA-125 Response Rate: Primary Efficacy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CA-125 Response Rate: Primary Efficacy Population [6]
    End point description
    CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 4 weeks from Cycle 1, Day 1 until EOT visit.
    Notes
    [6] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary efficacy population only included subjects treated in the NKTR-102 q21d treatment arm.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q21d Primary Efficacy Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    88
    88
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    33 (23.3 to 43.8)
    33 (23.3 to 43.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CA-125 Response Rate: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CA-125 Response Rate: Platinum-Refractory Population
    End point description
    CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 4 weeks from Cycle 1, Day 1 until EOT visit.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Platinum-Refractory Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    40
    51
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    36.4 (10.9 to 69.2)
    20 (9.1 to 35.6)
    23.5 (12.8 to 37.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CA-125 Response Rate: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CA-125 Response Rate: Prior PLD Therapy Population
    End point description
    CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 4 weeks from Cycle 1, Day 1 until EOT visit.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Prior PLD Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    15
    95
    110
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    40 (16.3 to 67.7)
    33.7 (24.3 to 44.1)
    34.5 (25.7 to 44.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinical Benefit Rate: MITT Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinical Benefit Rate: MITT Population
    End point description
    Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d MITT Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    37
    132
    169
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    56.8 (39.5 to 72.9)
    50.8 (41.9 to 59.6)
    52.1 (44.3 to 59.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinical Benefit Rate: Primary Efficacy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinical Benefit Rate: Primary Efficacy Population [7]
    End point description
    Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    Notes
    [7] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary efficacy population only included subjects treated in the NKTR-102 q21d treatment arm.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q21d Primary Efficacy Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    104
    104
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    51 (41 to 60.9)
    51 (41 to 60.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinical Benefit Rate: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinical Benefit Rate: Platinum-Refractory Population
    End point description
    Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Platinum-Refractory Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    52
    65
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    61.5 (31.6 to 86.1)
    38.5 (25.3 to 53)
    43.1 (30.8 to 56)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Clinical Benefit Rate: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinical Benefit Rate: Prior PLD Therapy Population
    End point description
    Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Prior PLD Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    114
    130
    Units: Percentage of Patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    56.3 (29.9 to 80.2)
    50.9 (41.3 to 60.4)
    51.5 (42.6 to 60.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Overall Survival (OS): MITT Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Overall Survival (OS): MITT Population
    End point description
    Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization to death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d MITT Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    37
    132
    169
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    11.1 (8.8 to 16.7)
    10.2 (8.2 to 12.2)
    10.6 (9.4 to 12.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Primary Efficacy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Primary Efficacy Population [8]
    End point description
    Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization to death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure.
    Notes
    [8] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The primary efficacy population only included subjects treated in the NKTR-102 q21d treatment arm.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q21d Primary Efficacy Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    104
    104
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    10.9 (8.2 to 13.1)
    10.9 (8.2 to 13.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Platinum-Refractory Population
    End point description
    Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization to death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Platinum-Refractory Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    52
    65
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    11.1 (6.1 to 21.6)
    8 (5 to 12.2)
    9.4 (5.8 to 12.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Prior PLD Therapy Population
    End point description
    Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization to death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Prior PLD Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    114
    130
    Units: Months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    12.2 (8.8 to 16.7)
    11 (8.9 to 13.1)
    11 (9.5 to 12.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: ORR by RECIST: MITT Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ORR by RECIST: MITT Population
    End point description
    The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the MITT Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d MITT Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    37
    132
    169
    Units: Percentage of patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    21.6 (9.8 to 38.2)
    15.2 (9.5 to 22.4)
    16.6 (11.3 to 23)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: ORR by RECIST: Prior PLD Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ORR by RECIST: Prior PLD Population
    End point description
    The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the PLD Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Prior PLD Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    114
    130
    Units: Percentage of patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    18.8 (4 to 45.6)
    14.9 (8.9 to 22.8)
    15.4 (9.7 to 22.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: ORR by RECIST: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ORR by RECIST: Platinum-Refractory Population
    End point description
    The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the Platinum-Refractory Population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study.
    End point values
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d Platinum-Refractory Population
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    52
    65
    Units: Percentage of patients
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    15.4 (1.9 to 45.4)
    15.4 (6.9 to 28.1)
    15.4 (7.6 to 26.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported from the time the patient received the first dose of study drug through the End-of-Treatment Visit (30 ± 3 days after the last dose of study drug).
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    12.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    NKTR-102 q14d
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    NKTR-102 q21d
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 38 (60.53%)
    78 / 139 (56.12%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    35
    95
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    1
    1
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Malignant pleural effusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Deep vein thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Venous thrombosis limb
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Death
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Disease progression
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    11 / 139 (7.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 11
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 8
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General physical health deterioration
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    4 / 139 (2.88%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    1 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Immune system disorders
    Contrast media allergy
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypersensitivity
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lung infiltration
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pleural effusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    4 / 139 (2.88%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 3
    0 / 4
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Investigations
    Blood potassium decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Body temperature increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatic enzyme increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lipase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Overdose
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Cardiac disorders
    Angina pectoris
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Supraventricular tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebrovascular accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholinergic syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Complex partial seizures
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemorrhage intracranial
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Speech disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    3 / 139 (2.16%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    3 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Febrile neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Leukopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    3 / 139 (2.16%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    3 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 3
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thrombocytopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    2 / 8
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ascites
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colonic obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 38 (23.68%)
    21 / 139 (15.11%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    10 / 10
    24 / 24
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ileus
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 7
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Intestinal perforation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    Large intestinal obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    7 / 8
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Oesophagitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pancreatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Small intestinal obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    11 / 139 (7.91%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 19
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    9 / 139 (6.47%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    3 / 3
    8 / 10
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Bile duct obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholestasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    Renal impairment
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fistula
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Muscle twitching
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Clostridial infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fungal oesophagitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Herpes oesophagitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lobar pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neutropenic sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 2
    Respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    Staphylococcal sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dehydration
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 38 (18.42%)
    13 / 139 (9.35%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    6 / 7
    9 / 15
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyperglycaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypokalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyponatraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    NKTR-102 q14d NKTR-102 q21d
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    38 / 38 (100.00%)
    139 / 139 (100.00%)
    Vascular disorders
    Flushing
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    9 / 139 (6.47%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    13
    Hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    6 / 139 (4.32%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    6
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Asthenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    12 / 139 (8.63%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    16
    Chills
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    11
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    20 / 38 (52.63%)
    81 / 139 (58.27%)
         occurrences all number
    38
    198
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 38 (18.42%)
    15 / 139 (10.79%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    20
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 38 (28.95%)
    23 / 139 (16.55%)
         occurrences all number
    15
    33
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 38 (18.42%)
    13 / 139 (9.35%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    14
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 38 (15.79%)
    28 / 139 (20.14%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    39
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    6 / 139 (4.32%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    7
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 38 (18.42%)
    12 / 139 (8.63%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    12
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    11 / 139 (7.91%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    13
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 38 (18.42%)
    15 / 139 (10.79%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    20
    Investigations
    Blood creatinine increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    10 / 139 (7.19%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    14
    Haemoglobin decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    8 / 139 (5.76%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    16
    Weight decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    18 / 38 (47.37%)
    42 / 139 (30.22%)
         occurrences all number
    31
    51
    Cardiac disorders
    Tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    7
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 38 (28.95%)
    25 / 139 (17.99%)
         occurrences all number
    17
    36
    Dysgeusia
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 38 (21.05%)
    17 / 139 (12.23%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    24
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 38 (15.79%)
    23 / 139 (16.55%)
         occurrences all number
    13
    42
    Lethargy
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    8 / 139 (5.76%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    13
    Neuropathy peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 38 (10.53%)
    6 / 139 (4.32%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    8
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 38 (26.32%)
    38 / 139 (27.34%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    65
    Leukopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    13 / 139 (9.35%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    43
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 38 (23.68%)
    27 / 139 (19.42%)
         occurrences all number
    22
    74
    Thrombocytopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    8 / 139 (5.76%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    14
    Eye disorders
    Vision blurred
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 38 (23.68%)
    26 / 139 (18.71%)
         occurrences all number
    14
    41
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal distension
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 38 (18.42%)
    17 / 139 (12.23%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    19
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    16 / 38 (42.11%)
    74 / 139 (53.24%)
         occurrences all number
    21
    128
    Abdominal pain lower
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 38 (0.00%)
    10 / 139 (7.19%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    11
    Abdominal pain upper
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    15 / 139 (10.79%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    22
    Ascites
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    8 / 139 (5.76%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    12
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 38 (23.68%)
    51 / 139 (36.69%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    87
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    34 / 38 (89.47%)
    103 / 139 (74.10%)
         occurrences all number
    230
    376
    Dry mouth
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 38 (10.53%)
    5 / 139 (3.60%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    6
    Dyspepsia
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 38 (21.05%)
    17 / 139 (12.23%)
         occurrences all number
    14
    30
    Flatulence
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 38 (21.05%)
    16 / 139 (11.51%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    19
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    27 / 38 (71.05%)
    107 / 139 (76.98%)
         occurrences all number
    70
    250
    Stomatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    17 / 139 (12.23%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    20
    Vomiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 38 (60.53%)
    76 / 139 (54.68%)
         occurrences all number
    54
    176
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Alopecia
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 38 (31.58%)
    29 / 139 (20.86%)
         occurrences all number
    16
    35
    Dry skin
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    11 / 139 (7.91%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    12
    Rash
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 38 (18.42%)
    17 / 139 (12.23%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    23
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 38 (13.16%)
    8 / 139 (5.76%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    11
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 38 (10.53%)
    15 / 139 (10.79%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    16
    Muscle spasms
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    16 / 139 (11.51%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    25
    Muscular weakness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 38 (2.63%)
    10 / 139 (7.19%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    16
    Myalgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 38 (10.53%)
    8 / 139 (5.76%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    15
    Pain in extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    11 / 139 (7.91%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    13
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 38 (13.16%)
    6 / 139 (4.32%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    7
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 38 (7.89%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    8
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 38 (15.79%)
    11 / 139 (7.91%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    22
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    20 / 38 (52.63%)
    69 / 139 (49.64%)
         occurrences all number
    35
    135
    Dehydration
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 38 (28.95%)
    22 / 139 (15.83%)
         occurrences all number
    20
    23
    Hypocalcaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 38 (5.26%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    10
    Hypokalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    18 / 38 (47.37%)
    28 / 139 (20.14%)
         occurrences all number
    24
    61
    Hypomagnesaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 38 (10.53%)
    8 / 139 (5.76%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    16
    Hyponatraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 38 (15.79%)
    15 / 139 (10.79%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    28

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    26 Mar 2009
    1. Lowered the starting dose of NKTR-102 to 145 mg/m^2 from 170 mg/m^2. 2. Eligibility criteria changed to clarify that patients were to have metastatic or “unresectable” locally advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and met eligibility criteria previously used in the Sponsor’s Phase 1 study with NKTR-102 (Study 06-IN-IR001). 3. Non-treatment day study visits were removed based upon safety data obtained in Protocol 06-IN-IR001 and based upon the recommended monitoring for patients receiving Camptosar®. 4. Removed PK sampling throughout the protocol. No PK samples were collected during the study, including prior to this amendment. 5. Period of birth control changed to at least 8 months after the last dose of study drug per request from Health Canada.
    30 Oct 2009
    1. Changed the study design to include enrollment of a sub-population of patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. Study enrollment was to occur in 2 parts: Part 1 would enroll patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in 2 arms and 2 stages as originally intended; after Part 1 enrollment was complete, Part 2 would enroll 21 patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer on a q14d treatment schedule at a dose level of 145 mg/m^2. These patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer must have had progression by radiographic assessment on first or second line treatment with platinum-based therapy within 3 weeks of the last platinum treatment. Progression could not be determined for the platinum-refractory population by only CA-125 assessments. 2. The AE reporting and follow-up requirements were revised to require the collection and reporting of new SUSARs that are experienced by patients in the follow-up period. In addition, it also provided clarification on data entry regarding outcome of unrelated AEs that were ongoing at the time of EoT visit. 3. Clarified the language on the screening tests for hematology, chemistry, and coagulation such that screening laboratories would be performed within 28 days of the first dose of NKTR-102. 4. Increased the pretreatment interval for clinical laboratory tests from 1 day to 3 days. 5. Updated the language concerning antidiarrheal therapy. 6. Updated the pH of the formulation of NKTR-102 and the storage duration of reconstituted NKTR-102. 7. The infusion time for NKTR-102 included a window of plus or minus ten minutes. 8. Added language defining adequate forms of birth control. 9. Deleted requirement for reporting AEs using synonyms in NCI-CTCAE.
    03 Mar 2010
    1. The dosing schedule for patients in the enrollment expansion part of the study changed from q14d to q21d. 2. The eligibility criteria for defining the platinum-refractory patient population enrolled into the expansion part of the study was modified to allow a longer interval from last platinum based treatment to progression (i.e., increased from 21 days to 30 days) and removed the requirement for a minimum number of 2 cycles of platinum-based therapy prior to documented progression. 3. Clarified that only patients enrolled during the randomized part of the study (initial 2 stages of the study) could have been eligible if they had non-measurable disease and a serum CA-125 level that was at least twice the ULN within 4 weeks prior to starting study drug treatment. Patients enrolled in the expansion part of the study must have had measurable disease by radiographic assessment.
    22 Jun 2010
    1. Updated the study design and primary efficacy objective by clarifying that this is a two-stage study with two treatment arms (Arm A at 145 mg/m^2 q14d; Arm B at 145 mg/m^2 q21d); and that Arm B would enroll an additional 50 platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients (120 patients total; 35 in Treatment Arm A and 85 in Treatment Arm B). 2. Clarified the secondary endpoints as best overall response as determined by GCIG criteria, CA-125 response rate as determined by having achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in serum CA-125 levels according to GCIG criteria, PFS by RECIST (version 1.0), and OS. 3. Clarified the eligibility criteria to include platinum-resistant patient population by removing the specifications provided for Part 2 of the study. 4. Added patients having received prior PLD therapy to the inclusion criteria. 5. Updated the justifications used to determine the sample size for Stages 1 and 2 of the study, as well as the justification used to determine the additional 50 patients who will be enrolled into Arm B of the study. 6. Clarified the primary efficacy endpoint as ORR determined by RECIST (version 1.0). 7. Added the requirement that radiographic imaging will be assessed by central independent radiologist. 8. Added a new section Evaluation of Response by RECIST (version 1.0) and corresponding table. 9. Added analysis for clinical benefit rate. 10. Added analysis for PFS relative to PFI. 11. Provided additional guidance on anti-diarrheal therapy 12. Added antiemetic therapy guidance. 13. Prospectively identified sub-populations (MITT Population, Primary Efficacy Population, Platinum-Refractory Population, and Prior PLD Therapy Population) for efficacy analyses. 14. Redefined “platinum refractory” as having a PFI ≤6 weeks.
    25 Mar 2011
    1. Updated the study design and primary efficacy objective by clarifying that Arm B of the two treatment arm, two-stage study (Arm A at 145 mg/m^2 q14d; Arm B at 145 mg/m^2 q21d) would enroll approximately 110 additional platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients who have received prior PLD therapy in a platinum-resistant setting or who are otherwise unable to receive further PLD therapy on the q21d dosing schedule. 2. Clarified inclusion criterion #6 for patients enrolled in the study. 3. Clarified text for dose modification and dose delay scenarios. 4. Updated inclusion criterion #5 to indicate platinum-resistant ovarian cancer for this study is defined by RECIST within 6 months of last dose of most recent platinum drug. 5. Updated exclusion criterion #2 to clarify that minor surgery does not include simple ascites drains. 6. Updated the secondary objectives and endpoints to include DoR. 7. Updated the secondary endpoints by removing PFS relative to PFI. 8. Updated the justifications used to determine the sample size for Stages 1 and 2 of the study, as well as the justification used to determine the additional 110 patients who will be enrolled into Arm B. 9. Removed the 12 month of therapy measured from Cycle 1, Day 1 restriction for stopping a patient from receiving further treatment on the study. 10. Clarified the language for progression follow-up after the EOT Visit. 11. Clarified the text for radiographic scans that may be collected after the EOT Visit. 12. Updated the antidiarrheal therapy text to indicate that prophylactic antidiarrheal medications should not be used in the treatment of diarrhea AEs. 13. Provided the primary modalities for measuring response for the study. 14. Updated exploratory analyses to also include one additional possible analysis. 15. Updated Sponsor address. and the address, main fax number, and backup fax number for the Sponsor’s Pharmacovigilance Designee. 16. Updated the date of the US Camptosar® Package Insert.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Tue Apr 30 23:09:39 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA