E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Evaluate the effects of ESL oncognition in comparison with placebo as adjunctive therapy in children aged 6 to 16 years old with refractory partial-onset seizures over a 12-week double blind period. |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 14.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10065336 |
E.1.2 | Term | Partial epilepsy |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029205 - Nervous system disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The primary study objective is to evaluate the effects of ESL on cognition in comparison with placebo as adjunctive therapy in children aged 6 to 16 years old with refractory partial-onset seizures over a 12-week double blind period. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
•To evaluate the safety and tolerability of ESL in comparison with placebo, over an 8-week maintenance period preceded by a 4 week titration period and followed by a tapering-off period.
•To evaluate the efficacy of ESL compared with placebo as adjunctive therapy in children with refractory partial epilepsy over an 8 week maintenance period.
•To evaluate the effect of ESL on global cognitive skills, social competence and quality of life in comparison with placebo over a 12-week double-blind period.
•To evaluate the effects of long term treatment with ESL as adjunctive therapy on global cognitive skills, social competence and quality of life over a 1-year open label period.
•To evaluate the safety, tolerability and sustainability of the therapeutic effect of ESL during a 1-year open label period, and (6) To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and sustainability of the therapeutic effect of ESL during a 2-year, open-label extension. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
At Visit1 (screening), patient must be / have:
1.Written informed consent signed by parent or legal representative and, where applicable, the patient.
2.Aged 6 to 16 years, inclusive.
3.A documented diagnosis of epilepsy for at least 12 months prior to screening.
4.At least 2 partial onset seizures during the 4 weeks prior to screening despite treatment with 1 to 2 AEDs in a stable dose regimen.
5.An IQ of at least 70 within the 1 year prior to screening.
6.A parent or legal representative able to understand and willing to complete the CBCL and CHQ throughout the study.
7.Current treatment with 1 to 2 AEDs (any except oxcarbazepine).
8.Excepting epilepsy, judged to be in general good health based on medical history, physical examination and clinical laboratory tests.
9.In the opinion of the investigator, able to complete the CDR test battery.
10.In case of a girl of childbearing potential, patient presents a serum ß-hCG test consistent with a non gravid state and agrees to remain abstinent or use reliable contraception (if used, hormonal contraception must be combined with a barrier method) starting at screening and continuing until at least the PSV.
At Visit 2 (randomisation), patient must have:
11.At least 2 partial-onset seizures during the 4-week baseline period prior to randomisation (documented in a diary).
12.In case of a girl of childbearing potential, patient presents a urine ß-hCG test consistent with a non-gravid state.
13.Stable dose regimen of concomitant AEDs during the 4 week baseline period.
14.Diaries satisfactorily completed by the patient or his/her caregiver during the baseline period.
15.Satisfactory compliance with the study requirements during the baseline period.
At OL7, the patient will be evaluated for eligibility into the Part III additional 2-year open-label extension. Assessments at this visit will be considered baseline values for Part III |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
At Visit1 (screening), patients must not be / have:
1. Only simple partial seizures with no motor symptomatology (classified as A2 4 according to the International Classification of Epileptic Seizures).
2. Primarily generalised seizures.
3. Known rapidly progressive neurological disorders (progressive brain disease; epilepsy secondary to progressive cerebral lesion).
4. Occurrence of seizures too close together to count accurately.
5. History of status epilepticus or cluster seizures (i.e., 3 or more seizures within 30 minutes) within the 3 months prior to screening.
6. Seizures of non-epileptic origin.
7. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
8. West syndrome.
9. Major psychiatric disorders.
10. Seizures of psychogenic origin within the last 2 years.
11. History of schizophrenia or suicide attempt.
12. Documented and established diagnosis of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) currently treated with stimulants or history of other diseases adversely affecting cognitive abilities (if stable ADHD and not treated with stimulants patients can be included).
13. Currently treated with oxcarbazepine.
14. Occasional use of benzodiazepines for any reason other than epilepsy.
15. On ketogenic diet.
16. Receiving VNS
17. Known hypersensitivity to carboxamide derivatives (oxcarbazepine or carbamazepine).
18. Uncontrolled cardiac, renal, hepatic, endocrine, gastrointestinal, metabolic, haematological or oncology disorder.
19. Second or third degree atrioventricular blockade.
20. Relevant clinical laboratory abnormalities.
21. Estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR) <60 mL/min.
22. Pregnancy or nursing.
23. Treatment with ESL in any previous study.
24. Participation in other drug clinical trial within the last 2 months.
25. Not ensured capability to perform the trial.
26. Any other condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the patient’s ability to comply with the study protocol.
At Visit 2 (randomisation), patients must not be / have:
27. Any condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the patient’s ability to comply with the study protocol. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Change from baseline to the end ot the evaluation period in the composite power of attention measure in order to assess information processing speed and attention / psychomotor speed. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Global Cognitive Skills/Social Competence/Quality of Life:
During Part I:
Change from baseline to the end of the double blind period in scores derived from results of the UBC neurocognitive test battery that are related to evaluation of different aspects of attention and memory.
In addition, change from baseline to the end of the double-blind period in 1) number of correct answers on the Raven’s SPM test; 2) competence summary score from the CBCL; 3) physical and psychosocial functioning summary scores from the CHQ.
During Part II:
Change from baseline to the end of the open-label period in scores derived from results of the UBC neurocognitive test battery that are related to evaluation of different aspects of attention and memory. Also, 1) number of correct answers on the Raven’s SPM test; 2) competence summary score from the CBCL; 3) physical and psychosocial functioning summary scores from the CHQ.
Efficacy:
Part I: Relative reduction from baseline in seizure frequency during the double blind period as compared with placebo; proportion of patients with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency from the baseline period to the 8-week maintenance period (responders); proportion of seizure free patients (100% seizure reduction) over the 8 week maintenance period; proportion of patients with a 25% or greater exacerbation in seizure frequency versus baseline.
Part II: Relative reduction from baseline in seizure frequency over the 1-year, open label period; proportion of patients with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency from the baseline period (responders); proportion of seizure free patients (100% seizure reduction); proportion of patients with a 25% or greater exacerbation in seizure frequency versus baseline.
Part III: Treatment retention time as actual time treated; CGI-S change from baseline.
Safety: Part I and Part II: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); change from baseline in clinical laboratory tests (haematology, biochemistry, thyroid function and urinalysis); vital signs, body weight, height and head circumference; ECG.
Part III: TEAEs, vital signs, body weight, height and head circumference, and ECG.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 5 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 17 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
Russian Federation |
Ukraine |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 3 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 6 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 3 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 6 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |