Clinical Trial Results:
Clinical phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of clofarabine and treosulfan conditioning prior to peripheral blood stem cells transplantation in paediatric and adult patients with advanced haematological malignancies
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2008-006972-31 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
19 Feb 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
07 May 2021
|
First version publication date |
07 May 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
Clo3o
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Via Olgettina, 60, Milano, Italy, 20132
|
||
Public contact |
Dept. of Haematology/Transplant Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 0039 0226434289, ciceri.clinicaltrials@hsr.it
|
||
Scientific contact |
Dept. of Haematology/Transplant Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 0039 0226434289, ciceri.clinicaltrials@hsr.it
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
19 Feb 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
19 Feb 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Safety: Evaluation of cumulative incidence non-relapse mortality (NRM); Evaluation of cumulative incidence and severity of acute and chronic graft
vs. host disease (GvHD).
Efficacy: Engraftment; Evaluation of progression free survival (PFS); Evaluation of overall survival (OS); Evaluation of relapse incidence (RI).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
N.A.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
23 Nov 2009
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 44
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
44
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
44
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
2
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
40
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
2
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
From November 2009 to November 2013, we enrolled 44 patients (median age 47 yers old), 36 affected by acute myeloid leukemia, 5 by acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 3 by myelodisplastic syndrome. The study was conducted in 4 Italian Bone Marrow Transplant Centers. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Both pediatric and adult patients were included (age range, 13-69 years), each with an available HLA-matched related or unrelated donor. HLA compatibility among donor-recipient pairs was assessed by 10-loci molecular typing (HLAA,-B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1), with no more than a 2-allele disparity allowed. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Clo-Treo HSCT | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Clofarabine
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
40 mg/mq within 60-120minutes i.v. (from day -6 to day -2)
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Treosulfan
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
14 g/mq within 120 minutes i.v. (from day -6 to day -4)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall Trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
MRD Transplant
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Allogenic haematopietic stem cells were derived from a sibling
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
MUD Transplant
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cells were derived from a well-matched unrelated donor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Clo-Treo HSCT
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
MRD Transplant
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Allogenic haematopietic stem cells were derived from a sibling
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
MUD Transplant
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cells were derived from a well-matched unrelated donor
|
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Cumulatve Incidence of Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) [1] | ||||||||
End point description |
NRM was defined as death without evidence of disease progression or relapse. Disease progressione or relapse was treated as competing event in the NRM analyses
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Evaluation of the cumulative incidence of NRM on day +100
|
||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This study is a non-controlled phase II study. For efficacy comparison, mainly EBMT registry data or published papers will be used. According to Simon's two-stage design method the total number of patients needed to asses an expected NRM of 20% was 45. The cumulative incidence method with competing risk was used for NRM. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||
End point title |
Cumulative incidence and severity of acute and chronic graft vs. host disease (GvHD) | |||||||
End point description |
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||
End point timeframe |
Evaluation of cumulative incidence and severity of aGvHD until day 100 and cGvHD during total follow-up.
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Primary Engrafment | ||||||
End point description |
|||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
Neutrophil engraftment was defined as a neutrophil count >= 5 x 109/L for more than 3 consecutive days; platelet engraftment was defined as a platelet count >= 20 x 109/L for more than 3 consecutive days in the absence of transfusions.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||
End point title |
Overall survival (OS) | |||||||
End point description |
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||
End point timeframe |
1 year
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||
End point title |
Progression-free survival (PFS) | |||||||
End point description |
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||
End point timeframe |
1 year
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||
End point title |
Relapse incidence | |||||||
End point description |
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||
End point timeframe |
1 year
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Between day -6 and day +28 the patient will be asked and examined by the investigator for the occurrence of AEs. This time period is assumed to be appropriate for the evaluation of adverse events directly related to the conditioning regimen.
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
- patients’ charts
- laboratory reports
- doctor’s letters
- nurses documentation
|
||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
CTCAE | ||
Dictionary version |
3.0
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Non-serious adverse events were not collected. Please see the publication for futher information. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
30 Jul 2009 |
Review of the study design with definition of endpoints. |
||
14 Nov 2011 |
Inclusion criteria modification: extension to patients with high-risk hematological malignancies; possibility of using for transplantation stem cells from bone marrow and not only PBSC (as standard for pediatric patients) |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31605823 |