Clinical Trial Results:
Profile of soluble and cellular biomarkers and of functional imaging during antiangiogenic therapies in cancer patients
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2008-008852-18 |
Trial protocol |
AT |
Global end of trial date |
04 Oct 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
17 Oct 2020
|
First version publication date |
17 Oct 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
PRAEMARKERAAT08
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01507740 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Medical University Innsbruck
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Christoph-Probst-Platz 1, Innrain 52 A, Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
|
||
Public contact |
Priv.Doz. Dr. Andreas Pircher, Medical University Innsbruck, University Hospital for Internal Medicine V, +43 (0)512/ 504-24003,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Priv.Doz. Dr. Andreas Pircher, Medical University Innsbruck, University Hospital for Internal Medicine V, +43 (0)512/ 504-24003,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
04 Oct 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
04 Oct 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
04 Oct 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Biomarker evaluation under antiannagiogenic therapy with Nexavar, Sutent and Avastin. Eligible patients are suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma, non small cell lung cancer, renal cell cancer and colorectal cancer routinely treated with the abov mentioned antiangiogenic agents.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Laboratory examinations were part of the routine blood sampling and CT scans were performed as depended by clinical requirements. Functional imaging with dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was preplanned at study inclusion and at the time point of disease progression.
|
||
Background therapy |
NSCLC patients were treated with bevacizumab monotherapy (maintenance therapy), RCC patients were treated either with sorafenib or sunitinib monotherapy, HCC patients were treated with sorafenib monotherapy. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
No comparators have been used in this trial. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
26 Oct 2009
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Austria: 22
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
22
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
22
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
9
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
13
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Between November 2009 and July 2012 22 patients were included in this academic non-interventional pilot study. Patients with HCC (hepatocellular cancer), RCC (renal cell cancer) and NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) treated either with sorafenib, sunitinib or bevacizumab were eligible. | ||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||
Screening details |
An already ongoing antiangiogenic therapy was required for study inclusion (baseline analysis). Only patients with confirmed benefit (disease stabilization) from antiangiogenic could be included, while primary resistant patients were not part of the study. | ||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Baseline
|
||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment group | ||||||||||
Arm description |
2 NSCLC patients were treated with bevacizumab monotherapy (maintenance therapy), RCC patients were treated either with sorafenib (1 patient) or sunitinib (6 patients) monotherapy,13 HCC patients were treated with sorafenib monotherapy. | ||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Sunitinib
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
H-C-687
|
||||||||||
Other name |
Sutent
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Gastroenteral use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Tablets of 50mg were given daily for 4 weeks followed by an intervall of 2 weeks with no therapy.
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Sorafenib
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Nexavar
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Gastroenteral use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
2x 400mg daily
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Bevacizumab
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Avastin
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for injection
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
15mg/ kg every 3 weeks.
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Follow-up
|
||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment goup | ||||||||||
Arm description |
During the response interval under monotherapy with antiangiogenic drugs periodical measurements at intervals of 3-7 weeks (according to local standards) were performed. | ||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Sunitinib
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Sutent
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Gastroenteral use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Tablets of 50mg were given daily for 4 weeks followed by an intervall of 2 weeks with no therapy.
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Sorafenib
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Nexavar
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Gastroenteral use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
2x 400mg daily.
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Bevacizumab
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Avastin
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for injection
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
15mg/ kg every 3 weeks.
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Period 3
|
|||||||||||
Period 3 title |
Progression
|
||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment group | ||||||||||
Arm description |
NSCLC patients were treated with bevacizumab monotherapy (maintenance therapy), RCC patients were treated either with sorafenib or sunitinib monotherapy, HCC patients were treated with sorafenib monotherapy. | ||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Sunitinib
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Sutent
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Gastroenteral use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Tablets of 50mg were given daily for 4 weeks followed by an intervall of 2 weeks with no therapy.
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Sorafenib
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Nexavar
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Gastroenteral use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
2x 400mg daily
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Bevacizumab
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Avastin
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for injection
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
15mg/ kg every 3 weeks.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Baseline
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Treatment group
|
||
Reporting group description |
2 NSCLC patients were treated with bevacizumab monotherapy (maintenance therapy), RCC patients were treated either with sorafenib (1 patient) or sunitinib (6 patients) monotherapy,13 HCC patients were treated with sorafenib monotherapy. | ||
Reporting group title |
Treatment goup
|
||
Reporting group description |
During the response interval under monotherapy with antiangiogenic drugs periodical measurements at intervals of 3-7 weeks (according to local standards) were performed. | ||
Reporting group title |
Treatment group
|
||
Reporting group description |
NSCLC patients were treated with bevacizumab monotherapy (maintenance therapy), RCC patients were treated either with sorafenib or sunitinib monotherapy, HCC patients were treated with sorafenib monotherapy. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
TEM | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The aim of the present study was to generate a profile of possible mechanisms of resistance in patients with renal cell cancer (RCC), hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with sunitinib, sorafenib or bevacizumab thereby comparing and correlating changes in tumor endothelial markers (TEM) to disease progression. TEM have been shown to be selectively expressed
by tumor endothelial cells and to have important biological functions (e.g. Robo4 inhibits VEGFR2 signaling). Therefore, we analyzed Robo4, Clec14 and ECSCR expression levels in PBMC, which decreased significantly at disease progression
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline- Progression
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Robo4 expression | |||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Robo4 expression decreased significantly from baseline to disease progression.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
38
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.04 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Clec14 expression | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
38
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.09 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ECSCR expression | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
38
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Circulating cell populations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The aim of the present study was to generate a profile of possible mechanisms of resistance in patients with renal cell cancer (RCC), hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with sunitinib, sorafenib or bevacizumab thereby comparing and correlating changes in circulating cell populations to disease progression.
Levels of CECs (circulating endothelial cells) and CEPs (circulating progenitor cells) are indicative of high vascular turnover and potential candidates for monitoring antiangiogenic therapies.
Additionally CD45-CD31+ and VEGFR2+CEC cell populations were measured.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline- Progression
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CEC level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
34
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CD45-CD31+ level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
34
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.07 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CEP level | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
34
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
VEGFR2+CEC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
34
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Cytokine levels | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The aim of the present study was to generate a profile of possible mechanisms of resistance in patients with renal cell cancer
(RCC), hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with sunitinib, sorafenib or bevacizumab thereby comparing and correlating changes in angiogenic growth factors to disease progression. We measured serum levels of proangiogenic
cytokines at baseline and disease progression and found that VEGF, PDGF, PlGF and HGF increased during the course of therapy. In contrast, we observed that cytokines like sVEGFR2, DKK3, MIG and ICAM decreased during the course of therapy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline- Progression
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - For PIGF 17 subjects and for PDGF 19 subjects were analysed. [2] - For PIGF 17 subjects and for PDGF 19 subjects were analysed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Serum concentration of VEGF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Serum concentration of sVEGFR2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Serum concentration of PIGF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Serum concentration of PDGF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Serum concentration of DKK3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Treatment group v Treatment group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
36
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Baseline- Progression
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
CTCAE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
4.03
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Treatment group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26956051 |