Clinical Trial Results:
Open-label, Multicenter Phase I/II Study: Salvage Therapy of Progressive and Relapsed Aggressive Non-Hodgkin-Lymphoma by Combination of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) with Rituximab, Dexamethason, High-dose ARA-C and Cisplatinum
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2009-010824-25 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
08 Apr 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
15 Dec 2022
|
First version publication date |
15 Dec 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
34 DSHNHL 2008-R6
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02983097 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
GMIHO Gesellschaft für Medizinische Innovation – Hämatologie und Onkologie mbH
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Almstadtstraße 7, Berlin, Germany, 10119
|
||
Public contact |
Medical Consulting, GMIHO Gesellschaft für Medizinische Innovation – Hämatologie und Onkologie mbH, 0049 35125933100, info@gmiho.de
|
||
Scientific contact |
Medical Consulting, GMIHO Gesellschaft für Medizinische Innovation – Hämatologie und Onkologie mbH, 0049 35125933100, info@gmiho.de
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
31 Dec 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
19 Dec 2013
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
08 Apr 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To provide efficient remission induction in second line treatment of aggressive NHL giving a higher fraction of patients the chance to achieve remission and subsequently to receive salvage therapy (autologous or allogeneic SCT)
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The conduct of this study was in compliance with the Good Clinical Praactice Guidelines and under the guiding principles detailed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was also carried out in keeping with applicable local law(s) and regulation(s).
Patients were closely evaluated for toxicity.
In patients with significant neurotoxicity from first line treatment or other neurologic impairment, vincristine should be omitted and may be replaced by a single dose cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m^2. The purpose of the prephase treatment was to prevent tumour lysis syndrome in patients with extensive tumors, to improve the performance status of the patient and to reduce the toxicity of the first chemotherapy cycle.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
10 Nov 2010
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 35
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
35
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
35
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
29
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
6
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment details |
From 11th November 2010 through 30th October 2013 a total of 35 patients were enrolled in phase I of the study at 6 of 13 participating centers in Germany. Thereof, 34 patients were dosed in 5 cohorts. | ||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||
Screening details |
Six cohorts of minimum 6 patients each to be treated at maximal 5 dose levels (0-4) were planned. In cohorts 3 to 6, additional patients were to be recruited to ensure at least 18 eligible therapy cycles. | ||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment period | ||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Lenalidomide
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Revlimid®
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule, hard
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
At dose level 0 three cycles of R2-DHAP were to be given, the first cycle was R- DHAP alone followed by cycle 2 and 3 supplemented with lenalidomide 5 mg/d at days 1 to 7. Mobilization of stem cells was done after cycle one or two of R²-DHAP. Therapy was repeated every 21 days.
At dose levels 1 to 2 lenalidomide was given at days 1 to 7 at a dose of 5 mg/d or 15 mg/d, respectively. At dose level 4, 15 mg of lenalidomide was to be given from day -6 to day 7. At dose level 5 20 mg of lenalidomide was to be given from day -6 to day 7.
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Rituximab
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for infusion
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Rituximab plus DHAP was given as usual: Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on day 1. Therapy was repeated every 21 days.
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Cisplatin
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for infusion
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Cisplatinum 100 mg/m^2 on day 2. Therapy was repeated every 21 days.
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Cytarabine
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
ARA-C
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Infusion
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
ARA-C 2 x 2000 mg/m^2 on day 3. Therapy was repeated every 21 days.
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dexamethasone
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
Cytarabine
|
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dexamethasone 40 mg on days 2 to 5. Therapy was repeated every 21 days.
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overall trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Treatment period
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximal tolerable dose [1] | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The following algorithm was used to establish the MTD: At least six patients were planned to be treated in each of 6 cohorts.
a. If no serious toxicity (see below) occurred, the next cohort was treated at the next higher dose level.
b. If one case of serious toxicity occurred, the next cohort of patients was treated at the same dose level.
c. If two or more cases of serious toxicity occurred, the next cohort was treated at the next lower dose level; if this would have occurred at dose level 0, the study was to be terminated.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
18 cycles at every dose level
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The phase I part of the study was conducted to determine the dose of lenalidomide given together with R-DHAP. Data from dose escalation of the study showed evidence for the feasibility and safety of adding lenalidomide to a combination of standard R-DHAP. Dose level 2 (15 mg lenalidomide on days 1 to 7) was assessed as the maximum tolerable dose of lenalidomide given in combination with standard R-DHAP. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
from day 1 to day 85
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
13.1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: In total, 51 AEs were documented for 22 out of 34 patients included in the safety analysis set (64.7%). Most frequently reported AEs were hypokalemia (5 events), leukopenia (3 events), thrombocytopenia (3 events). Among the AEs, 14 were serious (SAEs) and occurred in 10 patients. For 3 of them a relationship to treatment with lenalidomide was assessed as at least possible and unexpected (SUSAR) including the dose-limiting toxicity of one patient. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
15 May 2012 |
Version 9.0 dated 23 Jul 2012 (Amendment 1)
Changes:
- Revise of exclusion criteria bone marrow involvement > 25%. CNS involvement has become exclusion criteria instead.
- Disruption of treatment due to lymphoma progress was excluded as a toxicity event
- With regards to published data of other trials biometry of the trial has been revised in due consideration of interpretability. The mode of analysis has been changed. Analysis will be performed on a per-therapy-cycle instead of a per-patient basis. At least 18 evaluable cycles have to be available for analysis to complete a patient cohort; therefore at least 6 patients have to be recruited in each cohort. If patients drop out of the study prematurely, or if any therapy cycle is deemed not evaluable, additional patients will be recruited as to fulfill the criterion of having a minimum of 18 evaluable therapy cycles. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
The study was terminated by 8 April 2015 after successfully completing and analyzing part I of the study due to emerging, more promising treatment options apart from R-DHAP. |