Clinical Trial Results:
Immunogenicity and safety of a tetanus, diphtheria and mono component acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine in comparison to a tetanus and diphtheria (Td) vaccine when given as a booster vaccination to adults
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2009-013411-36 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
03 Aug 2010
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
15 Sep 2016
|
First version publication date |
15 Sep 2016
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
VTdaP-01
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01033877 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Statens Serum Institut
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Artillerivej 5, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2300
|
||
Public contact |
Toxicology and Clinical Development Unit, Statens Serum Institut, btc@ssi.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Toxicology and Clinical Development Unit, Statens Serum Institut, btc@ssi.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
02 May 2011
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
03 Aug 2010
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
03 Aug 2010
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
-To demonstrate anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PTx) booster responses in at least 60 % of TdaP booster vaccinated adults, defined from pre- and post-vaccination anti-PTx antibody concentrations.
-To demonstrate the non-inferiority of TdaP compared to Td when given as a booster vaccination to adults, defined from the percentage of subjects with post-vaccination anti-diphtheria antibody concentrations and anti-tetanus antibody concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The investigational TdaP Vaccine SSI and the comparative Td Vaccine SSI had both been registered medicinal products in Denmark for several years at the time of conducting the present clinical trial. TdaP indicated for use in children and Td for children (≥ 5 years of age) and adults.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
13 Jan 2010
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 802
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
802
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
802
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
802
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
At Visit 1 the subject’s eligibility was assessed according to the pre-defined in/exclusion criteria, demography, medical history data, oral temperature and vital signs were recorded, and a pregnancy test was performed for females. If the subject was eligible for inclusion and vaccination, a pre-vaccination blood sample was drawn | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
It was not possible to identify the type of vaccine (TdaP or Td) by visual inspection of the suspension for injection in the pre-filled syringe, the inner- or outer packaging materials or inner- or outer labels.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
TdaP Vaccine SSI | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
TdaP Vaccine SSI
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Diphtheria toxoid, SSI.....≥ 2 I.U. (6.25 Lf)
Tetanus toxoid, SSI........≥ 20 I.U. (6.25 Lf)
Pertussis toxoid...................................20 μg
Aluminium hydroxide corr. to al.......0.5 mg
Sodium hydroxide.....................q.s. ad pH 7
Sodium chloride................................4.0 mg
Water for injections.......................to 0.5 ml
All vaccinations were administered intramuscularly, perpendicular to the skin in the LEFT deltoid muscle. A 23 gauge, 25 mm, blue Terumo needle was used for the injection.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Td Vaccine SSI | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Td Vaccine SSI
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Diphtheria toxoid, SSI.....≥ 2 I.U. (6.25 Lf)
Tetanus toxoid, SSI....... ≥ 20 I.U. (6.25 Lf)
Aluminium hydroxide corr. to al.......0.5 mg
Sodium hydroxide.....................q.s. ad pH 7
Sodium chloride................................4.0 mg
Water for injections........................to 0.5 ml
All vaccinations were administered intramuscularly, perpendicular to the skin in the LEFT deltoid muscle. A 23 gauge, 25 mm, blue Terumo needle was used for the injection.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
TdaP Vaccine SSI
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Td Vaccine SSI
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
All subjects
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects randomised were included in this analysis set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
TdaP Vaccine SSI
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Td Vaccine SSI
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
All subjects
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects randomised were included in this analysis set
|
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT) booster response in the TdaP group [1] [2] | ||||||||
End point description |
Demonstrate that at least 60% of the subjects in the TdaP group have an anti-PT booster response, defined as an at least a 4-fold increase in the anti-PT antibody level, if the pre-vaccination antibody level is low (< 20 IU/mL ), and by at least a 2-fold increase in the anti-PTx antibody level if the pre-vaccination antibody level is high (≥ 20 IU/mL).
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
The booster response was assessed one month (28-35 days) after the administration of the booster vaccination from pre-vaccination and post-vaccination anti-pertussis toxin levels in the TdaP group
|
||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The relative frequency of vaccinees with an adequate booster response was estimated via the normal approximation to the binomial distribution with corresponding approximate 95% confidence intervals. The objective was considered proved as the lower limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval was above 0.60. [2] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: The primary objective was only to demonstrate anti-pertussis antibody booster responses in TdaP booster vaccinated adults. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Non-inferiority of TdaP compared to Td: Tetanus protection [3] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The non-inferiority of the investigational TdaP vaccine to the comparative Td vaccine as regards protection against tetanus (defined as post-vaccination anti-tetanus antibody concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL), when given as a booster vaccination to adults. The non-inferiority limit was 10%.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
The proportion of subjects with protection against tetanus was assessed one month (28-35 days) after the administration of the booster vaccination from post-vaccination tetanus antibody levels
|
||||||||||||
Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The non-inferiority of the protection rate against tetanus after TdaP-vaccination compared to that after Td-vaccination is tested with the 2-sided Wilson method. The non-inferiority limit of 10%. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Non-inferiority of TdaP compared to Td: Diphtheria protection [4] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The non-inferiority of the investigational TdaP vaccine to the comparative Td vaccine as regards protection against diphtheria (defined as post-vaccination and anti-diphtheria antibody concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL), when given as a booster vaccination to adults. The non-inferiority limit was 10%
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
The proportion of subjects with protection against diphtheria was assessed one month (28-35 days) after the administration of the booster vaccination from post-vaccination diphtheria antibody levels
|
||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The non-inferiority of the protection rate against diphtheria after TdaP-vaccination compared to that after Td-vaccination is tested with the 2-sided Wilson method. The non-inferiority limit of 10%. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
A thermometer, ruler and diary with instructions for use were given to the subjects on the day of the vaccination. At the follow-up visit 28-35 days later, adverse events and concomitant medications were assessed and recorded.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
10.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Safety set
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22776216 |