E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
polymyositis and dermatomyositis |
|
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 12.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10036102 |
E.1.2 | Term | Polymyositis |
|
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 12.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10012503 |
E.1.2 | Term | Dermatomyositis |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To investigate the clinical efficacy of abatacept on disease activity in polymyositis, and dermatomyositis patients as defined by the International Myositis Outcome Assessment Collaborative Study (IMACS) group. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
The secondary objectives: • The number of responders in the delayed onset arm compared with active treatment arm at 3 and 6 months • The change in the individual components of the IMACS core set measures for disease activity in the delayed onset arm compared with active treatment arm at 3 and 6 months • The change in the muscle endurance as tested by the myositis functional index (FI-2) in the delayed onset arm compared with active treatment arm at 3 and 6 months • Time to improvement
To investigate the efficacy after 6 months with active treatment on the following variables: • The individual components of the IMACS core set measures for disease activity • Muscle endurance as tested by the myositis functional index (FI-2) • Health related quality of life assessed by SF-36 • On signs of inflammation in muscle tissue (repeated muscle biopsies)
Explorative objective: To investigate the role of T cells in disease mechanisms of polymyositis and dermatomyositis.
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Patients with definite or probable polymyositis or dermatomyositis diagnosed according to the diagnostic criteria by Bohan and Peter (30,31). 2. For polymyositis a muscle biopsy is required that confirmed this disease (performed at any time before the start of the study) and to exclude other conditions unless a patient is positive for myositis specific or myositis associated autoantibodies. 3. Polymyositis will be included after a judicial process by the three PIs. 4. Inflammatory active disease based on persisting or worsening muscle weakness, MMT < 150 or low endurance, FI -2 < 20% of upper value together with at least one other sign of active disease: elevated serum levels of muscle enzymes (CK, LD, ASAT, ALAT, above upper limit and being explained by muscle involvement and not eg liver disease), inflammation in recent muscle biopsy (< 3 months) or on MRI scans or active extramuscular disease: skin rash, arthritis or interstitial lung disease (ILD) (as suggested by chest X-ray, high resolution computerized tomography (HRCT), or pulmonary function test).
5. Persisting disease activity after a minimum of 3 months treatment with prednisolone or equal drug. The treatment with prednisolone (or equal) should include the dose of at least 0.5 mg/kg/day for at least 1 month in the history and should be stable 1 month prior the baseline visit. Maximum dose of glucocorticoids should not exceed the equivalent of Prednisone 30 mg per day at the time of randomisation. 6. Combination with at least one other immunosuppressive drug, which includes methotrexate (minimum dose 15 mg/week) or azathioprine (minimum dose 100 mg/day) for at least 3 months. The dose of methotrexate or azathioprine should be stable for at least 1 month before the first administration of abatacept. 7. If methotrexate or azathioprine has had to be stopped or the dose decreased due to documented intolerance, lower dose or absence of these drugs is accepted provided this situation is stable for 1 month before the baseline. 8. Age between 18 - 80 years. 9. Signed informed consent.
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Patients with other types of inflammatory myopathies including - Drug induced myositis. - Inclusion body myositis - Malignancy associated myositis. 2. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. 3. Women with a positive pregnancy test on enrolment or prior to start of study drug administration. 4. Women of Child Bearing age who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period and for 10 weeks after the last infusion of study medication. 5. Current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, ophthalmologic or cerebral disease with the exception of those symptoms that are a manifestation of polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Concomitant medical conditions that in the opinion of the investigator might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study. 6. Subjects with a history of cancer within the last five years (other than non-melanoma skin cell cancers cured by local resection). Existing non-melanoma skin cell cancers must be removed prior to dosing. Patients with dermatomyositis need to be screened for malignancies according to routine procedures. 7. Subjects who have a history of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse. Subjects currently taking methotrexate who admit to consumption of more than an average of 1 alcoholic drink per day. 8. Subjects with any serious bacterial infection (such as pneumonia, other renal infection and sinusitis), unless treated and resolved with antibiotics or chronic bacterial infection (such as pyelonephritis and chest infection with bronchiectasis) in the previous 3 months. 9. Subjects with active tuberculosis requiring treatment within the previous 3 years. Subjects with a positive PPD at screening will not be eligible for the study unless they completed treatment for latent TB and have a negative chest x-ray at enrolment. A PPD response that is equal to or greater than 10 mm should be considered a positive test, although more conservative criteria may be applied as determined by the clinical circumstance and investigator according to published guidelines and/or local standards endorsed by the medical society. Quantiferon assay may replace PPD testing and patients are excluded from the study if the test is positive. Quantiferon positive patients who completed treatment for latent tuberculosis according to the local guidelines may be considered for enrolment. 10. Subjects with herpes zoster that resolved less than 2 months prior to enrolment. 11. Subjects with evidence (as assessed by the Investigator) of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrolment, including subjects with evidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. 12. Significant toxicities associated with concomitant or previous immunosuppressive Therapy and anti-TNF therapy that would preclude subjects from participating and completing the study 13. Patients with clinically apparent immunodeficiency syndrome, (IgA deficiency alone is not an exclusion criterion) 14. Subjects with any of the following laboratory values: • Hgb < 8.5 g/dL. • WBC < 3,000/mm3 (3 x 109/L). • Platelets < 100,000/mm3 (100 x 109/L). • Serum creatinine > 2 times upper limit of normal. • Any other laboratory test results that, in the opinion of the investigator, might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study. 15. Subjects previously treated with rituximab: B cell levels are less than lower limit of normal as measured by Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) analysis. 16. For all patients who have received prior rituximab, a normal CD19 B cell count must be documented at the time of screening for this study. 17. Patients with Large granular lymphocyte (LGL) syndrome (to minimize the risk of including patients with high frequency of CD28 null T cells) that may not benefit from treatment.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The number of responders, defined as improved according the IMACS criteria, after treatment with abatacept for six months.
Preliminary Definition of improvement (DOI) The definition of improvement is based on a core set of clinical and laboratory variables to assess disease activity, an outcome measure developed in an international consensus, recommended for use in clinical trials by the IMACS group. Any 3 of 6 core set measures improved ≥ 20% with no more than 2 (not including MMT) worse by ≥ 25%.
|
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.9 | Dose response | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.6.13 | Others | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7.1.3 | Other | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | Yes |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes |
E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |
|
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
|
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 3 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
| |
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 2 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 2 |