Clinical Trial Results:
International, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase II Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of IMAB362 in Patients With Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or the Lower Esophagus
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2009-017365-36 |
Trial protocol |
DE LV CZ LT AT BG |
Global end of trial date |
13 Aug 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
10 Apr 2019
|
First version publication date |
10 Apr 2019
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
8951-CL-0201
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01197885 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Other trial identifiers |
Protocol Number: GM-IMAB-001-02, Acronym: MONO | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Astellas Pharma Global Development
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
1 Astellas Way, Northbrook, IL, United States, 60062
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trial Disclosure, Astellas Pharma Global Development, astellas.resultsdisclosure@astellas.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trial Disclosure, Astellas Pharma Global Development, astellas.resultsdisclosure@astellas.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
13 Aug 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
13 Aug 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study was to determine antitumoral activity of zolbetuximab as monotherapy in patients with metastatic, refractory or recurrent disease of advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or the lower esophagus proven by histology.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This clinical study was written, conducted and reported in accordance with the protocol, International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines, and applicable local regulations, including the European Directive 2001/20/EC, on the protection of human rights, and with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. Astellas ensures that the use and disclosure of protected health information (PHI) obtained during a research study complies with the federal, national and/or regional legislation related to the privacy and protection of personal information.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
03 Sep 2010
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Latvia: 10
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 39
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Switzerland: 5
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
54
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
49
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
38
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
16
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
This multinational, multicenter study was conducted at 21 contracted sites in 5 countries including Germany (13 sites), Bulgaria (3 sites), Latvia (3 sites), Lithuania (1 site) and Switzerland (1 site). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Prior to any screening procedures, all participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study. Screening evaluations were performed from 15 days to 1 day before (day -15 to day -1) administration of the study drug on visit 2. Eligible participants who met inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Cohort 1: Zolbetuximab 300 mg/m^2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab at a lower dose level (300 mg/m^2 Body Surface Area (BSA)) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Zolbetuximab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
IMAB362
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Zolbetuximab was administered to cohorts 1, 2 and 3 with the applicable dosage (antibody/body surface area) and in a sequential manner, i.e, the last participant in a prior cohort had to complete the 5 infusions before starting the infusion of the first participant in the next cohort. Zolbetuximab was administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, using an infusion system.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Cohorts 2+3: Zolbetuximab 600 mg/m^2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Cohort 2 participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab at a higher dose level (600 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Cohort 3 participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab (600 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Zolbetuximab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
IMAB362
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Zolbetuximab was administered to cohorts 1, 2 and 3 with the applicable dosage (antibody/body surface area) and in a sequential manner, i.e, the last participant in a prior cohort had to complete the 5 infusions before starting the infusion of the first participant in the next cohort. Zolbetuximab was administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, using an infusion system.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Cohort 1: Zolbetuximab 300 mg/m^2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab at a lower dose level (300 mg/m^2 Body Surface Area (BSA)) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Cohorts 2+3: Zolbetuximab 600 mg/m^2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Cohort 2 participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab at a higher dose level (600 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Cohort 3 participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab (600 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Cohort 1: Zolbetuximab 300 mg/m^2
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab at a lower dose level (300 mg/m^2 Body Surface Area (BSA)) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. | ||
Reporting group title |
Cohorts 2+3: Zolbetuximab 600 mg/m^2
|
||
Reporting group description |
Cohort 2 participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab at a higher dose level (600 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Cohort 3 participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab (600 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Cohort 1: KI 80 at baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with a KI of 80% at baseline, defined as normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Cohort 2+3: KI 70 at baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with a KI of 70% at baseline, defined as cares for self; unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Cohort 2+3: KI 80 at baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with a KI of 80% at baseline, defined as normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Cohort 2+3: KI 90 at baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with a KI of 90% at baseline, defined as able to carry on normal activity; minor signs or symptoms of disease.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Cohort 2+3: KI 100 at baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with a KI of 100% at baseline, defined as normal, no complaints; no evidence of disease.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Cohort 1: ECOG Grade 1 at baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with a score of grade 1 at baseline, defined as restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Cohort 2+3: ECOG Grade 0 at baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with a score of grade 0 at baseline, defined as fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Cohort 2+3: ECOG Grade 1 at baseline
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants with a score of grade 1 at baseline, defined as restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with at Least 30% Decrease in Size of Lesions [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Decrease of 30% size of lesions was defined as a 30% decrease from baseline of one-dimensional measure of tumor size without significant increasing of nontarget lesion and no new lesion, based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria determined by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), i.e., the sum of the 5 longest tumor diameters at the target lesions. The sum of the longest diameters at visit 9 was used if available, if not available, the sum at visit 10 was used. Nontarget lesions with status “unequivocal progression” or “unknown” were regarded to be significant increasing. RECIST version 1.0 was used [Eisenhauer et al, 2000] and new version 1.1 [Eisenhauer et al, 2009] was accepted, if used for all examinations for a single participant. The analysis population consisted of the full analysis set (FAS), comprised of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and for whom efficacy data upon treatment was available.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first infusion until the end of study, maximum time on study was 36.4 months.
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis is not applicable for this endpoint. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment, and includes an abnormal laboratory finding or test. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event with a start date on or after the date of the first infusion and until 28 days after the last infusion. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that: ●Resulted in death ●Was life-threatening ●Required hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization ●Resulted in disability/incapacity or ●Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant ●Was another medically important condition. The analysis population consisted of the APT.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From start of first infusion up to until 28 days after the last infusion; Up to 35.71 months.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
PFS was defined as the time between start of first infusion and date of first observed disease progression according to the overall response or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated and plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimation with 95% confidence interval (CI). Participants with no baseline and postbaseline tumor assessments, no progression or death reported, discontinued study other than death or progressive disease and progression or death after 2 or more consecutive missed CT scans were censored. The analysis population consisted of the FAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first infusion until the end of study, maximum time on study was 36.4 months.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with Anti-Zolbetuximab (IMAB362) Antibodies | |||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the APT.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first infusion until the end of study, maximum time on study was 36.4 months.
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) per European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. It is supplemented by a disease-specific module (QLQ-STO22). EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3) was analyzed according to the scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100 by applying a linear transformation to standardize the raw score. A high scale score represents a higher response level: A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/QoL scale represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. The analysis population consisted of the FAS with data available at baseline and visit 10. N is the number of participants with available data. Data not available/applicable is denoted as "99999."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and X (where X is a time point 7-9 weeks after last treatment)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in QoL per Quality of Life Questionnaire Gastric Cancer Module (QLQ-STO22) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The QLQ-STO22 is a disease-specific module. All of the scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100 by applying a linear transformation to standardize the raw score. A high scale score represents a higher response level: A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. The analysis population consisted of the FAS with data available at baseline and visit 10. N is the number of participants with available data. Data not available/applicable is denoted as "99999."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and X (where X is a time point 7-9 weeks after last treatment)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Change from Baseline in Karnofsky Index (KI) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Karnofsky Index: 100 Normal, no complaints; no evidence of disease. 90 Able to carry on normal activity; minor signs or symptoms of disease. 80 Normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease. 70 Cares for self; unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work. 60 Requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of his personal needs. 50 Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care. 40 Disabled; requires special care and assistance. 30 Severely disabled; hospital admission is indicated although death not imminent. 20 Very sick; hospital admission necessary; active supportive treatment necessary. 10 Moribund; fatal processes progressing rapidly. 0 Dead. The analysis population consisted of the FAS participants with KI of 80% at baseline for cohort 1 and 70-100% at baseline for cohort 2 and 3.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and X (where X is a time point 7-9 weeks after last treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with Change from Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
ECOG Performance Status Grades: 0 Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1 Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work. 2 Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3 Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4 Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5 Dead. The analysis population consisted of the FAS participants with a score of 1 at baseline for cohort 1 and a score of 0 or 1 at baseline for cohort 2 and 3.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and X (where X is a time point 7-9 weeks after last treatment)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Overall Clinical Benefit According to RECIST | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical benefit was defined as a participant's response of complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), and stable disease (SD) according to RECIST. Clinical benefit was determined at visit 9. The analysis population consisted of the FAS. Data not calculated is denoted as "99999." There were no participants for cohort 1 who achieved CR, PR or SD and is also denoted as "99999."
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first infusion until the end of study, maximum time on study was 36.4 months.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Best Overall Response According to RECIST | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Best overall response was determined as PR, SD and progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST. Best overall response was determined based on visit 9 and/or end-of study visit 10. The analysis population consisted of the FAS.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first infusion until the end of study, maximum time on study was 36.4 months.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Overall Objective Response According to RECIST | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Objective response was defined as a participant's response of CR or PR according to RECIST. Objective response was determined at visit 9. The analysis population consisted of the FAS. Data not calculated is denoted as "99999." There were no participants for cohort 1 who achieved CR or PR, and is also denoted as "99999."
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first infusion until the end of study, maximum time on study was 36.4 months.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from the Time of Dosing to Day 14 After End of Infusion (AUC0-14day) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the pharmacokinetic analysis set (PKAS; comprised of all participants who received study drug at least once and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic measurement upon treatment was available) with participants who had available data.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from the Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from the Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Time Infinity (AUCinf) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS with participants who had available data.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve from the Time of Dosing to Time Infinity Due to Extrapolation from the Last Measurable Concentration to Time Infinity (AUCinf_%Extrap) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS with participants who had available data.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Last Measurable Concentration (Clast) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Concentration Immediately Prior to Dosing at Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS. N is the number of participants with available data.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Days 15, 29, 43, 57, and 71
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time of the Maximum Concentration (Tmax) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (T1/2) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS with participants who had available data.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Total Clearance After Intravenous Dosing (CL) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS with participants who had available data.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population consisted of the PKAS with participants who had available data.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From start of first infusion up to until 28 days after the last infusion; Up to 35.71 months.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
The total number of deaths (all causes) includes deaths reported after the time frame above.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
20.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Cohorts 2+3: Zolbetuximab 600 mg/m^2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Cohort 2 participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab at a higher dose level (600 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Cohort 3 participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab (600 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Cohort 1: Zolbetuximab 300 mg/m^2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received repeated doses of zolbetuximab at a lower dose level (300 mg/m^2 BSA) every 2 weeks on visits 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
24 May 2010 |
Amendment 1 (Protocol version 2.0) was issued to implement the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) Working Procedure. The infusion interval was changed from once weekly to once every 2 weeks due to the availability of new human pharmacokinetic data. The study duration was increased as a consequence, with infusions taking place on days 1, 15, 29, 43 and 57 as opposed to the previously proposed days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29. |
||
02 Mar 2011 |
Amendment 2 (Protocol version 3.0) was issued to add language to the introduction section as per the recommendations of German Competent Authority (Paul-Ehrlich-Institute) after the sponsor presented results from a mouse study, which showed acute severe allergic reactions in some animals following administration of a murinized variant of chimeric zolbetuximab, obtained by a different purification process with different pharmacokinetic properties. Changes were also made to update screening
procedures, blood sample collection and to analyze more laboratory parameters for better patient monitoring. |
||
09 Jun 2011 |
Amendment 3 (Protocol version 4.0) was issued to provide continued access to treatment after a patient showed no tumor remission but showed stable disease conditions. The preconditions for continued treatment were changed to enable patients with stable disease to enter the continued treatment phase. |
||
27 Jul 2011 |
Amendment 4 (Protocol version 5.0) was issued since new batches of study drug were manufactured using a different manufacturing process to meet the increased demand from the high rate of patient drop-out and continued treatment of patients with stable disease. Furthermore, the first 3 patients dosed with the newly produced study drug in cohort 3 were to be monitored after receiving all 5 infusions, followed by DSMB review and pharmacokinetic analysis, and a decision was to be made for continuation of treatment. |
||
13 Sep 2011 |
Amendment 5 (Protocol version 6.0) was issued to improve the observation of tumor status and quality of life (QoL) of patients included in the continued treatment phase by measuring body weight, conducting computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), requesting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires and taking blood samples for analysis of tumor markers. Additional blood sampling was added before and after each infusion during the continued treatment phase for pharmacokinetic analysis. |
||
08 Nov 2011 |
Amendment 6 (Protocol version 7.0) was issued to obtain more pharmacokinetic data. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was to be performed for all patients during the study treatment phase to account for inter-individual differences. |
||
11 Jan 2012 |
Amendment 7 (Protocol version 8.0) was issued to clarify that safety of the study drug manufactured by the new process was considered assessable after the first 3 patients of cohort 3 received at least 4 infusions (as opposed to all 5 infusions as previously
proposed), before more patients could be treated in cohort 3. |
||
12 Nov 2012 |
Amendment 8 (Protocol version 9.0) was issued to change the duration of treatment for responders in the continued treatment phase from about 6 months (12 further infusions) to more than 6 months, until the time of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. |
||
30 Oct 2013 |
Amendment 9 (Protocol version 10.0) was issued to introduce additional antidrug antibody (ADA) measurements on samples initially collected for pharmacokinetic analysis in order to increase patient safety. Administrative changes were also made (contract research organization [CRO] was changed and safety reporting was to be covered by the sponsor), and 20R size vials were introduced as drug product containers in addition to the previously used 6R vials. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
This study was conducted by Ganymed AG, a company that was acquired by Astellas in December of 2016. |