Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2010-018383-16
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:C33457/2047
    National Competent Authority:Germany - BfArM
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Completed
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2010-07-16
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedGermany - BfArM
    A.2EudraCT number2010-018383-16
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a 200-mcg Dose of CEP-33457 in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    A clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of a 200mcg dose of CEP-33457 in patients with a chronic autoimmune disease (Lupus).
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    Celestial 47
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberC33457/2047
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorCephalon, Inc.
    B.1.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportCephalon Inc.
    B.4.2CountryUnited States
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationPPD
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointBrian Dove
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street Address929 North Front Street
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityWilmington
    B.5.3.3Post codeNC 28401
    B.5.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.5.4Telephone number+1 910 558 6797
    B.5.5Fax number+1 919 654 9464
    B.5.6E-mailBrian.Dove@ppdi.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameLupuzor
    D.3.2Product code CEP-33457
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Powder for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation Information not present in EudraCT
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPSubcutaneous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNForigerimod
    D.3.9.1CAS number 1160237-55-7
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeCEP-33457
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameIPP-201101, P140
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit µg microgram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number200
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.13.1Other medicinal product typeCEP-33457 is a fully synthetic characterised polypeptide (phosphopeptide of 21 amino acids)
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboPowder for injection
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboSubcutaneous use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    In SLE, the body identifies its own proteins as invaders and attacks itself leading to inflammation. Antibodies are made that recognize normal tissues as foreign resulting in tissue damage.
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Immune System Diseases [C20]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 14.0
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10042945
    E.1.2Term Systemic lupus erythematosus
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10028395 - Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a 200 mcg dose of CEP 33457 compared with placebo in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as assessed by the proportion of patients achieving a combined clinical response using the SLE responder index (SRI) at week 24. An SRI response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2K) score of at least 4 points, no worsening in Physician’s Global Assessment (PhGA) (with worsening defined as an increase in PhGA of more than 0.30 point from baseline), no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group A (BILAG A) body system score, and no more than 1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    •efficacy objectives
    ―SRI response
    ―reduction of at least 4 points in the SLEDAI 2K total score
    ―disease activity (BILAG 2004 disease activity index)
    ―status of disease (PhGA and Patient’s Global Assessment scales)
    ―health related QoL (SF 36 and the Lupus QoL Questionnaires)
    ―arthritis (28 joint count examination for pain and tenderness)
    ―cutaneous manifestations of disease (CLASI)
    ―biologic markers of disease activity (eg serology B [autoantibodies, complement components, immunoglobulins, interleukins]) and immunophenotyping)
    ―incidence of disease flares (ie SELENA Flare Index and SLEDAI 2K score>15)
    ―occurrence of SLE induced organ damage (eg SLICC/ACR Damage Index and AEs)
    ―change in steroid dose
    ―QoL
    •safety objectives
    ―AEs
    ―clinical laboratory (serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis)
    ―vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and body weight)
    ―12 lead ECG
    ―physical examination
    ―concomitant medication
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    Patients are included in the study if all of the following criteria are met:
    (a) The patient is a man or woman between 18 and 70 years of age with an established diagnosis of SLE as defined by ACR Classification Revised Criteria. The diagnosis is fulfilled provided that at least 4 criteria are met.
    (b) The patient has a positive test for ANA at screening (titer must be at least 1:80 [by human epithelial cell tumor line (HEp 2) ANA assay]) and/or a positive test for anti dsDNA Ab at screening (value must be 30 IU/mL or more by ELISA).
    (c) Written informed consent is obtained.
    (d) Women must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or, if of childbearing potential, using a medically accepted method of contraception, and must agree to continued use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after discontinuation of study drug treatment. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method.
    (e) The patient has a clinical SLEDAI 2K score of at least 6 points during screening. A clinical SLEDAI 2K score is the calculated score without inclusion of the points that may be contributed by having a positive titer for anti dsDNA Ab or decreased serum complement levels.
    (f) The patient does not have an “A” score on the BILAG 2004 scale.
    (g) If the patient is using oral corticosteroids, the weekly cumulative dose must not exceed 80 mg of prednisone equivalent; the weekly dose must be stable over the 4 weeks preceding the 1st dose of study drug.
    (h) If the patient is using antimalarials, methotrexate, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine, the start date must be at least 3 months prior to the 1st dose of study drug, and the daily dose must be stable over the 4 weeks preceding the 1st dose of study drug.
    (i) If the patient is not currently using corticosteroids, antimalarials, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine, the last dose (in case of previous use) must be at least 4 weeks prior to the 1st dose of study drug. For leflunomide, the stop date must be at least 8 weeks before the 1st dose of study drug, unless an adequate cholestyramine washout has been completed.
    (j) The patient must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions, to remain at the study center for the required duration during each study visit, and to return to the study center for the final assessment as specified in this protocol.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Patients are excluded from participating in this study if 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
    (a) The patient has been treated with intramuscular or iv pulse steroids (ie, 250 to 1000 mg iv total daily dose of methylprednisolone) within 4 weeks of the 1st dose of study drug. The use of intra articular steroids may be allowed after consultation with the medical expert.
    (b) The patient has received tacrolimus, cyclosporine A, or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) within 3 months of the 1st dose of study drug.
    (c) The patient has received cyclophosphamide within 12 months prior to the 1st dose of study drug.
    (d) The patient has been treated for SLE with agents such as fusion proteins, therapeutic proteins, or monoclonal antibodies or antibody fragments, within 12 months of the 1st dose of study drug.
    (e) The patient has received B cell depleting agents such as rituximab and has not yet normalized the B cell count (ie, CD20+ B cell count is less than 200 and the absolute lymphocyte count [ALC] is less than 1500/µL).
    (f) The patient has New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure.
    (g) The patient has severe active lupus nephritis or cerebritis.
    (h1) The patient has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of
    less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (via Modification of Diet in Renal Disease
    [MDRD] equation).
    (i) The patient has an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or a total bilirubin level greater than 1.5 times the ULN.
    (j) The patient has a planned immunization with a live or live attenuated vaccine within 3 months prior to administration of the 1st dose of study drug and for 3 months after administration of the last dose of study drug.
    (k1) The patient has any clinically significant abnormalities on the 12-
    lead ECG that are not related to SLE, as determined by the investigator.
    Patients with stable ECG changes without evidence of active
    cardiovascular disease may participate at the discretion of the
    investigator and medical monitor.
    (l) The patient has an ongoing active systemic infection requiring treatment or a history of severe infection, such as hepatitis or pneumonia, in the 3 months prior to administration of the 1st dose of study drug. Less severe infections in the 3 months prior to administration of the 1st dose of study drug are permitted at the discretion of the investigator and medical monitor.
    (m1) The patient has any concomitant medical condition unrelated to
    SLE that may
    interfere with his or her safety or with evaluation of the study drug, as
    determined by the investigator.
    (n) The patient has a history of a medical condition other than SLE that
    has required treatment with steroids in excess of 80 mg of prednisone
    equivalent/week within 6 months of the 1st dose of study drug.
    (o) The patient has a positive test result for HBsAg or HCV Ab.
    (p) The patient has a known positive history of antibodies to human
    immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or HIV disease.
    (q) The patient has a history of alcohol or substance dependence or
    abuse (with the exception of nicotine), according to the Diagnostic and
    Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric
    Association, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM IV TR), within 3 months
    of the screening visit or has current substance abuse.
    (r) The patient has a history of severe allergic reactions to or
    hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug or placebo.
    (s2) The patient has undergone or is undergoing treatment with another
    investigational drug for the treatment of lupus within 6 months prior to
    the 1st dose of study drug or has received any other investigational drug
    for any other condition within 30 days prior to the 1st dose of study
    drug.
    (t) The patient has previously participated in a Cephalon or ImmuPharma sponsored clinical study with CEP 33457.
    (u) The patient is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.)
    (v) The patient is unlikely to comply with the study protocol or is unsuitable for any other reason, as judged by the investigator or medical monitor.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    The primary efficacy variable for this study is the proportion of patients achieving a combined clinical response using the SRI at week 24. An SRI response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the SLEDAI 2K score of at least 4 points; no worsening in PhGA (with worsening defined as an increase in PhGA of more than 0.30 point from baseline); no new BILAG A body system score, and no more than 1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline. The combined clinical response is intended to demonstrate an improvement in overall disease activity without worsening of disease in any organ system as determined by the investigator’s quantitative and qualitative assessments.
    The SLEDAI 2K is a validated objective measure that assesses disease activity within the last 28 days before completion of the index. It is a global index and includes 24 weighted clinical and laboratory variables. The total score (sum of all 24 scores) ranges from 0 to 105. A SLEDAI 2K score of 6 to 10 is indicative of moderate disease activity, and improvement is defined as a reduction of greater than 3 points. The SLEDAI 2K was chosen because it is an accepted scale for assessing disease activity, has been shown to be reliable and sensitive to change, and is easy for clinicians to use. The SLEDAI-2K should be administered at each visit throughout the study by the same physician assessor trained and qualified to use this scale.
    The PhGA will be completed by the physician using a 3 inch visual analog scale (VAS) labeled from 0=none to 3=severe. This scale was chosen because it measures a domain of disease activity that may not be fully assessed in the other measures of disease activity. A change of greater than 0.3 point on the VAS indicates worsening. The PhGA should be administered at each visit throughout the study by the same physician assessor trained and qualified to use this scale.
    The BILAG 2004 is a validated objective and subjective global measure of the disease activity of SLE based upon the physician intention to treat and refers to disease activity within the last month prior to completion of the index. It includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems; each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E, as follows: A=very active disease; B=patient needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and the organ system has never been involved. The BILAG 2004 was chosen because it is a reliable scale for evaluating SLE disease activity on the basis of the physician’s intent to treat. The individual organ domain scores are evaluations of disease activity in individual organ systems that may be improving, worsening, or stable, and they provide information that is comparable and complementary to the SLEDAI 2K score. The BILAG 2004 should be administered at each visit throughout the study by the same physician assessor trained and qualified to use this scale. It includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Week 24
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    The secondary efficacy variables and endpoints for this study are as follows:
    • proportion of patients achieving an SRI response at each visit during the treatment period
    • proportion of patients achieving a reduction of at least 4 points in the SLEDAI-2K total score at each visit during the treatment period
    • proportion of patients achieving a clinical SLEDAI-2K response at each visit during the treatment period, where the clinical response is defined as a reduction of at least 4 points in the SLEDAI-2K clinical score
    • proportion of patients achieving a BILAG-2004 response at each visit during the treatment period (no new A body system score and no more than 1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline)
    • proportion of patients achieving a BILAG-2004 clinical response at each visit during the treatment
    period (an improvement in at least 1 category from a B score to a C or D score, with no worsening in any other category)
    • proportion of patients showing no worsening on a global assessment scale at each visit (physician and patient) during the treatment period
    • absolute and relative changes in the SF-36 at week 12 and the final
    assessment (week 24 or early termination)
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    each visit
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic Yes
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic Yes
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others Yes
    E.6.13.1Other scope of the trial description
    Quality of Life
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) Yes
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned6
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA40
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Belgium
    Czech Republic
    France
    Germany
    Hungary
    Poland
    Portugal
    Spain
    Ukraine
    United States
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    Last patient last visit.
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.4.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.5.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.1.6.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 216
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 4
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state35
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 150
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 220
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Patients who complete all study visits will be eligible for participation in a 12-month open-label study (study CEP-33457/3075) to assess the continued effectiveness and safety of CEP-33457 treatment. Patients who are not eligible for participation in study C33457/3075 or choose to not participate will be treated as per their primary physician’s plan of care.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2010-07-26
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2010-09-17
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
    P.Date of the global end of the trial2012-01-31
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 08:00:45 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA