Clinical Trial Results:
A Phase 2, Open-label, Single-arm, Efficacy and Safety Study of Enzalutamide (MDV3100) in Patients with Hormone-naïve Prostate Cancer
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2010-021287-16 |
Trial protocol |
BE CZ DE DK |
Global end of trial date |
27 Apr 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
22 Apr 2018
|
First version publication date |
22 Apr 2018
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
9785-CL-0321
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Astellas Pharma BV
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Sylviusweg 62, Leiden, Netherlands, 2333
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trial Disclosure, Astellas Pharma BV, astellas.resultsdisclosure@astellas.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trial Disclosure, Astellas Pharma BV, astellas.resultsdisclosure@astellas.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
27 Apr 2017
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
27 Apr 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of enzalutamide on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of enzalutamide in participants who have not previously received hormone treatment for prostate cancer.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This clinical study was written, conducted and reported in accordance with the protocol, International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines, and applicable local regulations, including the European Directive 2001/20/EC, on the protection of human rights, and with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. Astellas ensures that the use and disclosure of protected health information (PHI) obtained during a research study complies with the federal, national and/or regional legislation related to the privacy and protection of personal information.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
06 May 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 25
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Czech Republic: 9
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 26
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 7
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
67
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
67
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
11
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
55
|
||
85 years and over |
1
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
This was a multinational, phase 2, open-label, single-arm, efficacy and safety study of oral enzalutamide in participants with prostate cancer who had noncastrate levels of testosterone at study entry. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Eighty-two participants were assessed for participation in the study, 15 were excluded and 67 were enrolled. Participants who continued to receive clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator and did not meet any treatment discontinuation criteria were eligible to transition to an open-label extension study 9785-CL-0123 (2016-001694-32). | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Enzalutamide | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received oral enzalutamide at 160 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Participants who had clinical benefit at week 25 could continue to receive enzalutamide until disease progression, objective or clinical, or occurrence of an unacceptable toxicity, at the discretion of the investigator. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Enzalutamide
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
MDV3100
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Xtandi
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received 160 mg of enzalutamide orally once a day, at the same time of day.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Enzalutamide
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received oral enzalutamide at 160 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Participants who had clinical benefit at week 25 could continue to receive enzalutamide until disease progression, objective or clinical, or occurrence of an unacceptable toxicity, at the discretion of the investigator. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Enzalutamide
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received oral enzalutamide at 160 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Participants who had clinical benefit at week 25 could continue to receive enzalutamide until disease progression, objective or clinical, or occurrence of an unacceptable toxicity, at the discretion of the investigator. |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With a Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response at Week 25 [1] | ||||||||||
End point description |
A PSA response was defined as a decline from baseline in PSA level of 80% or greater, where blood samples for PSA were collected and analyzed at a central laboratory. Participants with an unknown or missing response or who discontinued prior to week 25 for any reason were treated as non-responders. No statistical comparisons were performed since this was a single-arm study. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF), which consisted of participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 25
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No statistical comparisons were performed since this was a single-arm study. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Each adverse event (AE) was assessed by the investigator for causal relationship to the study drug; those deemed possibly or probably related to study drug are reported as drug regimen related AEs (DRRAEs). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: - Resulted in death - Was life-threatening - Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity - Resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect - Required inpatient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization - Other medically important events. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF).
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to week 169)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in PSA | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25, 49, 97, 169 and End of Study [EoS])
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Androstenedione | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Estradiol | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone (LH) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Prolactin | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Testosterone | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25 and 49
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Plasma Concentration of Enzalutamide at Pre-dose (Ctrough) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was pharmacokinetic analysis set (PKAS), which consisted of participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one pharmacokinetic concentration value. N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Pre-dose at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 21 and 25
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Plasma Concentration of Enzalutamide Metabolite M2 at Pre-dose (Ctrough) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The analysis population was pharmacokinetic analysis set (PKAS). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Pre-dose at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13, 21 and 25
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With a PSA Response at Weeks 49, 97 and 169 | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
A PSA response was defined as a decline from baseline in PSA level of 80% or greater. Blood samples for PSA were collected and analyzed at a central laboratory. Participants with an unknown or missing response or who discontinued prior to week 49, week 97 or week 169 for any reason were treated as non-responders. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF).
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 49, 97 and 169
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With a 90% or Greater Reduction From Baseline in PSA Level | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants with unknown or missing PSA results at week 25 or who discontinued prior to week 25 were considered non-responders at week 25. Participants with unknown or missing PSA results at week 49, week 97 or week 169 were considered non-responders. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). Week 49, 97 and 169 analyses include participants who were on study at each time point.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 25, 49, 97 and 169
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with PSA ≤ 4 ng/ml | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants with unknown or missing PSA results at week 25 or who discontinued prior to Week 25 were considered non-responders at Week 25. Participants with unknown or missing PSA results at week 49, 97 or 169 were considered non-responders. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). Week 49, 97 and 169 analyses include participants who were on study at each time point.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 25, 49, 97 and 169
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants with PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/ml | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants with unknown or missing PSA results at week 25 or who discontinued prior to week 25 were considered non-responders at week 25. Participants with unknown or missing PSA results at week 49, 97 or 169 were considered non-responders. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF). N is the number of participants with available data at each time point.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 25, 49, 97 and 169
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximum Decline From Baseline in PSA | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The maximum decline from Baseline in PSA was calculated as the largest reduction from Baseline in PSA level that occurred at any point after treatment start up to week 25 and up to and including the assessment made at the safety follow-up visit, divided by the PSA Baseline value and multiplied by 100, i.e., the maximum percent change from baseline. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 25 and from Baseline up to the EOS date of 27 Apr 2017; median duration of treatment of 1666.0 days (range of 52-2052)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Time to PSA Response | ||||||||||
End point description |
Time to PSA response (PSA decline ≥ 80% from Baseline) is defined as the time interval from the first study drug dose to the first date a decline from Baseline in PSA level of 80% or greater was recorded. Time to response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF).
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first dose until the EOS date of 27-Apr-2017; median duration of treatment of 1666.0 days (range of 52-2052)
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Time to PSA Decline ≥ 90% | ||||||||||
End point description |
Time to PSA decline ≥ 90% is defined as the time interval from the first study drug dose to the first date a decline from Baseline in PSA level of 90% or greater was recorded. Time to PSA decline ≥ 90% was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF).
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first dose until the EOS date of 27-Apr-2017; median duration of treatment of 1666.0 days (range of 52-2052)
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/ml | ||||||||||
End point description |
Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/ml is defined as the time interval from the first study drug dose to the first date a decline in PSA to a result of 4 ng/ml or below was recorded. Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/ml was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF).
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first dose until the EOS date of 27-Apr-2017; median duration of treatment of 1666.0 days (range of 52-2052)
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Time to PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/ml | ||||||||||
End point description |
Time to PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/ml is defined as the time interval from the first study drug dose to the first date a decline in PSA to a result of 0.1 ng/ml or below was recorded. Time to PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/ml was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF).
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first dose until the EOS date of 27-Apr-2017; median duration of treatment of 1666.0 days (range of 52-2052)
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Time to PSA Progression | ||||||||||
End point description |
Time to PSA progression is defined as the time interval from the first study drug dose to the first date of PSA progression. PSA progression is defined as a ≥ 25% increase in PSA with an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir unless the PSA next measurement(s), if available, does not confirm the PSA progression. "99999" indicates data that could not be estimated due to the low number of events. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF).
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From first dose until the EOS date of 27-Apr-2017; median duration of treatment of 1666.0 days (range of 52-2052)
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
PSA Doubling Time | ||||||||||
End point description |
PSA doubling time was to be calculated from the slope estimated from a linear regression of the natural log of PSA fitted on time, if the slope was positive. Since the slope was negative for all participants, PSA doubling time could not be calculated. The analysis population was safety analysis set (SAF) with a positive PSA versus time slope.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
From Baseline to Week 25
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Notes [2] - No participants had a positive PSA versus time slope |
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug; median duration of treatment of 1666.0 days (range of 52-2052)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
12.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Enzalutamide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received oral enzalutamide at 160 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Participants who had clinical benefit at week 25 could continue to receive enzalutamide until disease progression, objective or clinical, or occurrence of an unacceptable toxicity, at the discretion of the investigator. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
18 Jun 2011 |
The changes include:
Change to study contact details; clarification of requirements for assessment of
metastases; change in timing of first dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan;
change in serious adverse event reporting responsibility; change in dose for an
excluded medication; corrections in laboratory parameters; addition of
instructions for participants withdrawn before week 25; removed reference to
treatment number. |
||
17 Oct 2012 |
The changes include:
Change to study contact details; change in Schedule of Assessments and
adverse event collection; clarification of pharmacokinetic sampling; change to
statistical definition and interim analysis; change to administrative procedures
and drug storage; clarification of central laboratory testing; update of participant
information sheet; changes to protocol authors; update to drug-induced liver
injury requirements; update to drug-drug interaction information; update to
reporting of serious adverse events. |
||
21 Jul 2014 |
The changes include:
Schedule of Assessments updated to include additional assessments performed
at week 169; Schedule of Assessments table, related footnotes, and description
of those assessments in different sections of the protocol were updated, along
with the study period to reflect an overall extension in study duration to 4Q
2016; dosing instructions modified for participants who experienced a grade 3 or
greater toxicity attributed to the study drug and when the study drug was coadministered
with a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 inhibitor; Section 1.3
Summary of Key Safety Information for MDV3100 updated to reflect current
information; protocol updated regarding reporting and management of protocol
deviations, and contact details for Astellas Pharma Europe BV, 24 hour serious
adverse event reporting and the Medical Monitor were updated; Appendix 4
“Events Always Considered to be Serious” was deleted and a new Appendix 3
“Common Serious Adverse Events” was added; new information concerning
“always serious adverse event” was added to Section 5.5.3; study drug storage
conditions updated; for current efficacy and safety information on
enzalutamide, the investigator is referred to the current edition of the
Investigator’s Brochure; Appendix 3 (Subject Insurance) and Appendix 5
(Elements of Informed Consent) deleted; cover page, sponsor’s signature and
investigator’s signatures updated; minor administrative type corrections, e.g.,
typos, spelling, format, renumbering of tables and appendices throughout the
protocol updated as required. |
||
24 Jun 2016 |
The changes include:
The study design was revised so that participants who continue to derive clinical
benefit from treatment with enzalutamide, based on the investigator’s medical
opinion, and who had not met any of the discontinuation criteria were eligible
to continue treatment in Study 9785-CL-0123 upon approval of the protocol
and activation of the study at participating institutions. Minor administrative
revisions were also made to the protocol. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |