Clinical Trial Results:
A randomised double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of anti B-cell therapy in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2010-021430-64 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
16 Jan 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
25 Mar 2018
|
First version publication date |
25 Mar 2018
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
RR10/9389
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
ISRCTN65360827 | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
University of Leeds
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Hyde Terrace, Leeds, United Kingdom, LS2 9LN
|
||
Public contact |
QA Manager, QA Department, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, ctruq@leeds.ac.uk
|
||
Scientific contact |
QA Manager, QA Department, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, ctruq@leeds.ac.uk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
10 Mar 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
16 Jan 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
16 Jan 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess the extent to which rituximab improves symptoms of fatigue and oral dryness in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Patients were monitored closely throughout the trial and were asked to attend regular outpatient appointments and trial treatment visits.
Patients received two doses of trial treatment (Rituximab/placebo) delivered at 2 week intervals. This was repeated 6 months later. During the trial treatment visits, Rituximab/placebo was administered in an environment where full resuscitation facilities were available and under close supervision of an experienced physician. The frequency of the outpatient appointments between the trial treatment visits were more than standard care to monitor disease symptoms and conduct a safety evaluation.
CTRU prepared annual safety reports containing annonymised data to the MHRA, main REC, Sponsor. The Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee reviewed un-blinded periodic safety data to determine patterns and trends of events or to identify safety issues which would not be apparent on an individual case basis.
Trial data was collected on paper CRFs and was sent to the CTRU where it was entered onto a trial database application - MACRO. The database is stored on a private network protected by a firewall. Access is restricted to trials staff by login and password. The trial data was then filed in locked filling cabinets.
CTRU will comply with all aspects of Data Protection Act 1998. All information collected during the trial will be kept strictly confidential. Patient names were collected on the consent form however, for all other data collection forms that were transferred to or from CTRU, the data was coded with a trial number, the patient's initials and date of birth.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
05 Jul 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 133
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
133
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
133
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
103
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
30
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Patients were recruited from hospital research centres within the United Kingdom. From July 2011 to January 2014 a total of 133 patients were enrolled into the TRACTISS trial. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
The patients registered on the Medical Research Council funded UK Primary Sjogren's Syndrome Registry (UKPSSR) were sent an invitation letter. Also, patients were approached during standard clinic visits and provided with verbal plus written details about the trial. The patients were given at least 24 hours to consider participation. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
172 [1] | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
133 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
Ineligible: 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
Other Reason: 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reason: Number of subjects |
Consent withdrawn by subject: 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to have started the pre-assignment period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: 172 participants gave consent to non-standard trial-specific tests to confirm eligibility, conducted during the pre-assignment period. Following this, 133 patients were confirmed to be eligible and had not withdrawn consent. Thus: 133 participants were randomised to receive rituximab or placebo, and these participants form the basis of the reporting. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Baseline (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
The placebo infusion bags were identical in appearance to the Rituximab infusion bags. The Investigator and team were blinded to the treatment allocations however, the pharmacist preparing the infusion bags were un-blinded.
Interim reports provided un-blinded to DMEC by the Trial Statistician. Only the Statisticians have access to these reports and they were stored securely with password protection.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Rituximab | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Active treatment arm | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Rituximab (MabThera)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for concentrate for solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received two doses of rituximab (1000 mg) by intravenous infusion given with IV methylprednisolone (100 mg) at 2 week intervals at T=0 (Day 1) and T=2 (Day 15). This was repeated at T=24 weeks (Day 168) and T=26 weeks (Day 182).
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Control arm. Saline IV. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous drip use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients received two doses of placebo by intravenous infusion given with IV methylprednisolone (100 mg) at 2 week intervals at T=0 (Day 1) and T=2 (Day 15). This was repeated at T=24 weeks (Day 168) and T=26 weeks (Day 182).
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Rituximab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Active treatment arm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Control arm. Saline IV. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Intention-To-Treat
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The Intention-to-treat analysis dataset comprised all participants randomised into the trial, included in the group to which they had been assigned, regardless of treatment adherence or attending follow-up.
For the primary endpoint analysis, multiple imputation was used to ensure that any patients with incomplete data could be included in the final analysis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Rituximab
|
||
Reporting group description |
Active treatment arm | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Control arm. Saline IV. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Intention-To-Treat
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The Intention-to-treat analysis dataset comprised all participants randomised into the trial, included in the group to which they had been assigned, regardless of treatment adherence or attending follow-up.
For the primary endpoint analysis, multiple imputation was used to ensure that any patients with incomplete data could be included in the final analysis
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Treatment response | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Treatment response: a patient has responded to treatment if, at Week 48, the patient has reported either:
* a relative 30% reduction from baseline in fatigue (VAS); or
* a relative 30% reduction from baseline in oral dryness (VAS).
For example: a patient whose fatigue changes from 90 at baseline to 62 at week 48 has achieved 31.1% reduction in fatigue, and so has achieved treatment response, regardless of change in oral dryness over the same period. A patient whose fatigue and oral dryness change from 80 to 57 and from 70 to 50 has achieved reductions of 28.8% and 28.6% respectively, and so has not achieved treatment response.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Randomisation to 48 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Prior to imputation, 61 patients had complete data to derive the primary endpoint. [2] - Prior to imputation, 56 patients had complete data to derive the primary endpoint. [3] - Prior to imputation, 117 patients had complete data to derive the primary endpoint. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary endpoint analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Missing data: missing fatigue and oral dryness VAS scores imputed using Fully Conditional Specification. 16 fully-imputed datasets analysed individually, and resulting parameter estimates combined. All 133 participants included in this analysis.
Adjusted analysis: adjusted for age category (18-64, 65-80), years since diagnosis (0-9, 10+), consent for ultrasound substudy (Yes, No) consent for biopsy substudy (Yes, No) all as fixed effects, and randomising centre as a random effect.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
117
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [4] | ||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.76 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.13
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.55 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - The primary endpoint analysis was performed on the full trial population of 133 patients, after multiple imputation was used to impute missing fatigue and oral dryness data at baseline and Week 48. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Fatigue VAS score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Patient response to VAS question "Mark on the line to represent the level of fatigue (tiredness) that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." 0=No fatigue, 100=Severe fatigue.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
VAS Score - Range 0 - 100 mm evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [5] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits [6] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Fatigue VAS at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted Fatigue VAS at Week 48. Result of covariance-pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline fatigue, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.6053 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.1
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-5.9 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
10.1 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Oral Dryness VAS Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Patient response to VAS question "Mark on the line to represent the level of oral dryness that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." 0=No oral dryness, 100=Severe oral dryness.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
VAS Score range 0 - 100 mm evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [7] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits [8] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Oral Dryness VAS at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted Oral Dryness VAS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline oral dryness, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3157 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-4.06
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-12.01 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.89 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Ocular Dryness VAS Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Patient response to VAS question "Mark on the line to represent the level of ocular dryness that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." 0=No ocular dryness, 100=Severe ocular dryness.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
VAS Score - Range 0 - 100 mm evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [9] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits [10] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Ocular dryness VAS at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted Ocular dryness VAS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline ocular dryness, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.2963 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-4.5
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-13.1 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Patient global assessment VAS Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Patient response to VAS question "Taking everything into account (pain, fatigue and surface dryness) please mark on the line the level of disease activity that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks.." 0=SS inactive, 100=SS very active.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
VAS Score - Range 0 - 100 mm evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [11] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits [12] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Patient Global Assessment VAS at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted pt global assessment VAS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline global assessment, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.8475 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.8
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-7.2 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
8.7 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Physician global assessment: disease activity | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Physician response to the question
Please indicate, according to your clinical experience, the level of disease activity over the past two weeks in this patient. (Range 0=Inactive disease, 10=Very highly active disease
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Disease activity assessment evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [13] - 59 participants attended the Week 48 visit for this question to be answered. [14] - 57 patients attended the Week 48 visit for this question to be answered. |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Salivary Flow - unstimulated | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Total Salivary flow over 15minutes. Values were transformed by y=log[2](x+0.1) for analysis, and the estimates back-transformed for reporting. Accordingly arithmetic means of log-values become geometric means, and differences in log values become ratios.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Performed at screening, 16, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [15] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits [16] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Unstimulated Salivary Flow at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
(Back-transformed) Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted log-USF at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline log-USF, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0015 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.7
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.2 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.4 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Salivary flow - stimulated | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Total salivary flow (stimulated by citric acid) over 5 minutes. Prior to analysis, data was logarithm transformed by y=log[2](x+0.1) to produce a more normal distribution. Results have been back-transformed, so that arithmetic means of logged variables become geometric means, and differences in means of logged variables become ratios.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Performed at baseline, 16, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [17] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits [18] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Stimulated Salivary Flow at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
(Back-transformed) Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted log-Stimulated Salivary Flow at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline log(SSF), randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.2487 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.2
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.9 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.6 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Lachrymal Flow | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Mean Lachrymal flow from both left and right eyes over 5minutes. Values were transformed by y=log[2](x+1) for analysis, and the
estimates back-transformed for reporting. Accordingly arithmetic means of log-values become geometric means, and differences in log values become ratios.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Schirmers I test of ocular function performed at baseline, 16, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [19] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits [20] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mean Lachrymal Flow at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
(Back-transformed) Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted log-mean-lachrymal-flow at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline log-mean-lachrymal-flow, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3698 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.2
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.8 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.6 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
ESSPRI - EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Patient-completed ESSPRI questionnaire.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Quality of Life evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ESSPRI at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted ESSPRI at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline ESSPRI, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1087 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.54
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.12 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.2 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
ESSDAI - EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Prior to analysis, data was logarithm transformed by y=log[2](x+1) to produce a more normal distribution. Results have been back transformed, so that arithmetic means of logged variables become geometric means, and differences in means of logged variables become ratios.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ESSDAI at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
(Back-transformed) Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted log-ESSDAI at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline log(ESSDAI), randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0721 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.75
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.56 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.03 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SF-36 - Physical Component Summary | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SF36 v2 (UK version). Range 0=Greatest disability, 100=Least disability.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Evaluated at baseline and weeks 24 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
SF36 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted SF36 PCS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline SF36-PCS, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Rituximab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.5246 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.8
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.3 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.7 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
SF36 - Mental Component Summary | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Evaluated at baseline and weeks 24 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
SF36-Mental Component Summary at Week 48 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted SF36-MCS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline SF36-MCS, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Rituximab v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
133
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.9495 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.1
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.6 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.8 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Physician global assessment: disease damage | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Grading the possible disease-related damage in the present patient from 0 (completely absent) to 10 (maximum of possible damage), please score the level of damage/inability by using the scale below.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Disease damage assessment evaluated at baseline and weeks 24 and 48.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [21] - 60 patients attended Week 48 and had complete data for this endpoint [22] - 57 patients attended Week 48 and had complete data for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Randomisation to 30 days following the last administration of rituximab/placebo.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
12.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All participants randomised to receive placebo. All such participants received at least one placebo infusion. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Rituximab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Among all participants randomised to receive rituximab, 2 withdrew from treatment prior to first infusion, but are counted here as exposed. One of these two experienced an SAE, which is reported here. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Leeds Clinical Trials Research is an academic trials unit where full MedDRA coding of non-serious adverse events is not the standard. It has therefore not been possible for adverse event data to be accurately entered into the full data view within EudraCT as all mandatory categories cannot be completed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
12 Apr 2011 |
Protocol v3.0 - 10 March 2011
The eligibility criteria was updated to include the following:
Deletion of the word ‘hydroxychloroquine’ and addition of the following text:
Patients on corticosteroids, NSAIDS, antidepressants, methotrexate, or pilocarpine*** must have been on a stable dose for 4 weeks prior to receiving the first infusion of study medication and expected to remain on this dose throughout the study.
Addition of new inclusion criteria:
Patients who are on hydroxychloroquine at screening must have been on a stable dose throughout the preceding six-month period. If they have stopped hydroxychloroquine they should have been off it for at least 3 months prior to receiving study medication.
Addition of the following text:
Use of DMARDs, immunosuppressant therapies or antidepressants within 4 weeks prior to the first dose administration (except for glucocorticoids, salicylates, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate and analgesics which are acceptable)
Addition of the following text:
Any malignancies that would normally preclude the use of rituximab within the past 5 years, including solid tumours, haematological malignancies and carcinoma in situ (except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been excised and cured)
Addition of the following text:
History of moderate to severe congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system (see Appendix C) or other uncontrolled heart disease, or who have a clinically significant abnormal ECG at the time of screening.
Change in rituximab stock supply (from commercial to trial stock)
Added requirement to monitor all pregnancies, suspected pregnancies and pregnancies occurring in participants of the study or in the female partners of male participants from time of patient randomisation 'until 30 days following the last administration of rituximab/placebo' must be reported immediately to the CTR |
||
12 Jul 2012 |
Protocol version 4.0 dated 29 May 2012. Addition of T-cell sub-study
Added new text:
T-Cell sub-study
Central analysis of local and systemic T-cell abnormalities in PSS and their response to B-cell depletion:
• To compare peripheral blood T-cell transcriptional signatures in PSS patients with healthy and disease controls (comparator datasets held in Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge (see Section 12.9)).
• To compare peripheral blood T-cell transcriptional signatures in PSS patients pre- and post- B-cell depletion (these analyses will be performed on samples from patients who have received rituximab, once the trial allocations have been unblinded by CTRU at the end of the trial).
• To characterise tissue distribution, phenotype, and gene expression of lesional T-cells in PSS patients pre- and post-B-cell depletion (these analyses will be performed on samples from patients who have received rituximab, once the trial allocations have been unblinded by CTRU at the end of the trial).
Screening assessment changed from 14 to 28 days from the start of treatment.
Eligibility criteria amended to extended list of DMARDs used to include – hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, MMF, leflunomide, ciclosporing etc.and criteria that if patiens have stopped any of these drugs, they should have stopped these for at least 4 weeks prior to receiving the study medication.
Any history of other autoimmune diseases or other form of immunodeficiency or neutropaenia <1.5 x 10^9/L – added new text (unless a diagnosis of benign ethnic neutropaenia has been confirmed i.e. neutrophil count 2.4 & 3.0 x 10^9/L for female Jamaican and Afro-Caribbean populations respectively.
Added use of Participant Identification Centres (PICs) to help with recruitment. |
||
06 Mar 2013 |
Protocol version 5.0 dated 13 February 2013.
Added new safety information to Patient Information Sheet as follows:
‘Rituximab use has been associated with severe blister like skin reactions, known as Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, which have on very rare occasions been fatal.’
Amended eligibility criteria as follows:
Use of DMARS, Use of DMARDs, immunosuppressant therapies or antidepressants within 4 weeks prior to the first dose administration (except for glucocorticoids, salicylates, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate and analgesics which are acceptable).
Any history of other autoimmune diseases or other form of immunodeficiency or neutropaenia <1.5 x 10^9/L (unless a diagnosis of benign ethnic neutropaenia has been confirmed i.e. neutrophil count 2.4 & 3.0 x 10^9/L for female Jamaican and Afro-Caribbean populations respectively (60)
Immunodeficiency or neutropaenia <1.5 x 10^9/L (unless a diagnosis of benign ethnic neutropaenia has been made in which case the neutrophil count must be > 0.9 x 10^9/L at screening for Jamaican and Afro-Caribbean populations). |
||
24 Jan 2014 |
Protocol version 6.0 dated 20 December 2013. Added a more flexible way in which the End of Treatment (Week 48) Patient Questionnaire can be collected for patients who withdraw or are unwilling to return to the local clinics for a final visit. These patients were given the option of completing the questionnaires at home and posting them back to the local clinic. Also, a Patient follow up letter was added to remind patients to return for their End of Treatment Visit. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |