Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43857   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A randomised double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of anti B-cell therapy in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2010-021430-64
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    16 Jan 2015

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    25 Mar 2018
    First version publication date
    25 Mar 2018
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    RR10/9389
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    ISRCTN65360827
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University of Leeds
    Sponsor organisation address
    Hyde Terrace, Leeds, United Kingdom, LS2 9LN
    Public contact
    QA Manager, QA Department, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, ctruq@leeds.ac.uk
    Scientific contact
    QA Manager, QA Department, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, ctruq@leeds.ac.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    10 Mar 2015
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    16 Jan 2015
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    16 Jan 2015
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To assess the extent to which rituximab improves symptoms of fatigue and oral dryness in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Patients were monitored closely throughout the trial and were asked to attend regular outpatient appointments and trial treatment visits. Patients received two doses of trial treatment (Rituximab/placebo) delivered at 2 week intervals. This was repeated 6 months later. During the trial treatment visits, Rituximab/placebo was administered in an environment where full resuscitation facilities were available and under close supervision of an experienced physician. The frequency of the outpatient appointments between the trial treatment visits were more than standard care to monitor disease symptoms and conduct a safety evaluation. CTRU prepared annual safety reports containing annonymised data to the MHRA, main REC, Sponsor. The Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee reviewed un-blinded periodic safety data to determine patterns and trends of events or to identify safety issues which would not be apparent on an individual case basis. Trial data was collected on paper CRFs and was sent to the CTRU where it was entered onto a trial database application - MACRO. The database is stored on a private network protected by a firewall. Access is restricted to trials staff by login and password. The trial data was then filed in locked filling cabinets. CTRU will comply with all aspects of Data Protection Act 1998. All information collected during the trial will be kept strictly confidential. Patient names were collected on the consent form however, for all other data collection forms that were transferred to or from CTRU, the data was coded with a trial number, the patient's initials and date of birth.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    05 Jul 2011
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 133
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    133
    EEA total number of subjects
    133
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    103
    From 65 to 84 years
    30
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Patients were recruited from hospital research centres within the United Kingdom. From July 2011 to January 2014 a total of 133 patients were enrolled into the TRACTISS trial.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    The patients registered on the Medical Research Council funded UK Primary Sjogren's Syndrome Registry (UKPSSR) were sent an invitation letter. Also, patients were approached during standard clinic visits and provided with verbal plus written details about the trial. The patients were given at least 24 hours to consider participation.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    172 [1]
    Number of subjects completed
    133

    Pre-assignment subject non-completion reasons
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Ineligible: 23
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Other Reason: 4
    Reason: Number of subjects
    Consent withdrawn by subject: 12
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects reported to have started the pre-assignment period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: 172 participants gave consent to non-standard trial-specific tests to confirm eligibility, conducted during the pre-assignment period. Following this, 133 patients were confirmed to be eligible and had not withdrawn consent. Thus: 133 participants were randomised to receive rituximab or placebo, and these participants form the basis of the reporting.
    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Baseline (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    The placebo infusion bags were identical in appearance to the Rituximab infusion bags. The Investigator and team were blinded to the treatment allocations however, the pharmacist preparing the infusion bags were un-blinded. Interim reports provided un-blinded to DMEC by the Trial Statistician. Only the Statisticians have access to these reports and they were stored securely with password protection.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Rituximab
    Arm description
    Active treatment arm
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Rituximab (MabThera)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Concentrate and solvent for concentrate for solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received two doses of rituximab (1000 mg) by intravenous infusion given with IV methylprednisolone (100 mg) at 2 week intervals at T=0 (Day 1) and T=2 (Day 15). This was repeated at T=24 weeks (Day 168) and T=26 weeks (Day 182).

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Control arm. Saline IV.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous drip use
    Dosage and administration details
    Patients received two doses of placebo by intravenous infusion given with IV methylprednisolone (100 mg) at 2 week intervals at T=0 (Day 1) and T=2 (Day 15). This was repeated at T=24 weeks (Day 168) and T=26 weeks (Day 182).

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Rituximab Placebo
    Started
    67
    66
    Completed
    63
    58
    Not completed
    4
    8
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    3
    7
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Rituximab
    Reporting group description
    Active treatment arm

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Control arm. Saline IV.

    Reporting group values
    Rituximab Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    67 66 133
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    52 51 103
        From 65-84 years
    15 15 30
        85 years and over
    0 0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (full range (min-max))
    55 (34 to 80) 53.5 (28 to 76) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    63 61 124
        Male
    4 5 9
    Years since diagnosis
    Units: Years
        median (full range (min-max))
    3.8 (0 to 20) 4.8 (0 to 22) -
    Unstimulated Salivary Flow
    Units: mL/15 mins
        median (full range (min-max))
    0.8 (0 to 6.6) 0.74 (0 to 11.8) -
    Total Schirmers
    Lachrymal Flow, defined as the total of Schirmer test results from Left and Right eyes.
    Units: mm/5 min
        median (full range (min-max))
    6 (0 to 80) 8 (0 to 95) -
    Fatigue - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Patient response to Visual Analogue Scale question "Mark on the line to represent the level of fatigue (tiredness) that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." Range: 0=No Fatigue, 100=Severe Fatigue. Two participants (1 RTX, 1PLC) did not complete the VAS at baseline. Hence data is on 65 placebo participants, and 66 rituximab participants.
    Units: mm
        median (full range (min-max))
    74 (29 to 99) 76 (35 to 100) -
    Oral Dryness Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Patient response to Visual Analogue Scale question "Mark on the line to represent the level of oral dryness that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." Range: 0=No oral dryness, 100=Severe oral dryness. Two participants (1 RTX, 1PLC) did not complete the VAS at baseline. Hence data is on 65 placebo participants, and 66 rituximab participants.
    Units: mm
        median (full range (min-max))
    75 (38 to 100) 82 (15 to 100) -
    Ocular Dryness Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Patient response to the visual analogue scale question "Mark on the line to represent the level of ocular dryness that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." Range: 0=No ocular dryness, 100=Severe oral dryness. Three participants (1 RTX, 2 PLC) did not complete the VAS at baseline. Hence data is on 64 placebo participants, and 66 rituximab participants.
    Units: mm
        median (full range (min-max))
    72 (2 to 100) 74.5 (15 to 100) -
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Intention-To-Treat
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intention-to-treat analysis dataset comprised all participants randomised into the trial, included in the group to which they had been assigned, regardless of treatment adherence or attending follow-up. For the primary endpoint analysis, multiple imputation was used to ensure that any patients with incomplete data could be included in the final analysis

    Subject analysis sets values
    Intention-To-Treat
    Number of subjects
    133
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    103
        From 65-84 years
    30
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (full range (min-max))
    54 (28 to 80)
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    124
        Male
    9
    Years since diagnosis
    Units: Years
        median (full range (min-max))
    Unstimulated Salivary Flow
    Units: mL/15 mins
        median (full range (min-max))
    0.76 (0 to 11.8)
    Total Schirmers
    Lachrymal Flow, defined as the total of Schirmer test results from Left and Right eyes.
    Units: mm/5 min
        median (full range (min-max))
    8 (0 to 95)
    Fatigue - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Patient response to Visual Analogue Scale question "Mark on the line to represent the level of fatigue (tiredness) that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." Range: 0=No Fatigue, 100=Severe Fatigue. Two participants (1 RTX, 1PLC) did not complete the VAS at baseline. Hence data is on 65 placebo participants, and 66 rituximab participants.
    Units: mm
        median (full range (min-max))
    74 (29 to 100)
    Oral Dryness Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Patient response to Visual Analogue Scale question "Mark on the line to represent the level of oral dryness that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." Range: 0=No oral dryness, 100=Severe oral dryness. Two participants (1 RTX, 1PLC) did not complete the VAS at baseline. Hence data is on 65 placebo participants, and 66 rituximab participants.
    Units: mm
        median (full range (min-max))
    78 (15 to 100)
    Ocular Dryness Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Patient response to the visual analogue scale question "Mark on the line to represent the level of ocular dryness that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." Range: 0=No ocular dryness, 100=Severe oral dryness. Three participants (1 RTX, 2 PLC) did not complete the VAS at baseline. Hence data is on 64 placebo participants, and 66 rituximab participants.
    Units: mm
        median (full range (min-max))
    73.5 (2 to 100)

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Rituximab
    Reporting group description
    Active treatment arm

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Control arm. Saline IV.

    Subject analysis set title
    Intention-To-Treat
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    The Intention-to-treat analysis dataset comprised all participants randomised into the trial, included in the group to which they had been assigned, regardless of treatment adherence or attending follow-up. For the primary endpoint analysis, multiple imputation was used to ensure that any patients with incomplete data could be included in the final analysis

    Primary: Treatment response

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Treatment response
    End point description
    Treatment response: a patient has responded to treatment if, at Week 48, the patient has reported either: * a relative 30% reduction from baseline in fatigue (VAS); or * a relative 30% reduction from baseline in oral dryness (VAS). For example: a patient whose fatigue changes from 90 at baseline to 62 at week 48 has achieved 31.1% reduction in fatigue, and so has achieved treatment response, regardless of change in oral dryness over the same period. A patient whose fatigue and oral dryness change from 80 to 57 and from 70 to 50 has achieved reductions of 28.8% and 28.6% respectively, and so has not achieved treatment response.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Randomisation to 48 weeks
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo Intention-To-Treat
    Number of subjects analysed
    61 [1]
    56 [2]
    117 [3]
    Units: Patients
        Responded
    24
    21
    45
        No response
    37
    35
    72
    Notes
    [1] - Prior to imputation, 61 patients had complete data to derive the primary endpoint.
    [2] - Prior to imputation, 56 patients had complete data to derive the primary endpoint.
    [3] - Prior to imputation, 117 patients had complete data to derive the primary endpoint.
    Statistical analysis title
    Primary endpoint analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    Missing data: missing fatigue and oral dryness VAS scores imputed using Fully Conditional Specification. 16 fully-imputed datasets analysed individually, and resulting parameter estimates combined. All 133 participants included in this analysis. Adjusted analysis: adjusted for age category (18-64, 65-80), years since diagnosis (0-9, 10+), consent for ultrasound substudy (Yes, No) consent for biopsy substudy (Yes, No) all as fixed effects, and randomising centre as a random effect.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    117
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority [4]
    P-value
    = 0.76
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    1.13
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.5
         upper limit
    2.55
    Notes
    [4] - The primary endpoint analysis was performed on the full trial population of 133 patients, after multiple imputation was used to impute missing fatigue and oral dryness data at baseline and Week 48.

    Secondary: Fatigue VAS score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Fatigue VAS score
    End point description
    Patient response to VAS question "Mark on the line to represent the level of fatigue (tiredness) that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." 0=No fatigue, 100=Severe fatigue.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    VAS Score - Range 0 - 100 mm evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67 [5]
    66 [6]
    Units: mm
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    67.9 (61.3 to 74.4)
    65.8 (59.3 to 72.2)
    Notes
    [5] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    [6] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    Statistical analysis title
    Fatigue VAS at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted Fatigue VAS at Week 48. Result of covariance-pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline fatigue, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.6053
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    2.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -5.9
         upper limit
    10.1

    Secondary: Oral Dryness VAS Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Oral Dryness VAS Score
    End point description
    Patient response to VAS question "Mark on the line to represent the level of oral dryness that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." 0=No oral dryness, 100=Severe oral dryness.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    VAS Score range 0 - 100 mm evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67 [7]
    66 [8]
    Units: mm
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    66.4 (59.2 to 73.7)
    70.5 (64.5 to 76.4)
    Notes
    [7] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    [8] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    Statistical analysis title
    Oral Dryness VAS at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted Oral Dryness VAS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline oral dryness, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.3157
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -4.06
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -12.01
         upper limit
    3.89

    Secondary: Ocular Dryness VAS Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Ocular Dryness VAS Score
    End point description
    Patient response to VAS question "Mark on the line to represent the level of ocular dryness that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks." 0=No ocular dryness, 100=Severe ocular dryness.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    VAS Score - Range 0 - 100 mm evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67 [9]
    66 [10]
    Units: mm
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    61.5 (54.2 to 68.8)
    66.1 (59.1 to 73)
    Notes
    [9] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    [10] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    Statistical analysis title
    Ocular dryness VAS at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted Ocular dryness VAS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline ocular dryness, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.2963
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -4.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -13.1
         upper limit
    4

    Secondary: Patient global assessment VAS Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Patient global assessment VAS Score
    End point description
    Patient response to VAS question "Taking everything into account (pain, fatigue and surface dryness) please mark on the line the level of disease activity that you have experienced on average over the past 2 weeks.." 0=SS inactive, 100=SS very active.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    VAS Score - Range 0 - 100 mm evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67 [11]
    66 [12]
    Units: mm
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    64.9 (58.1 to 71.7)
    64.1 (57.7 to 70.5)
    Notes
    [11] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    [12] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    Statistical analysis title
    Patient Global Assessment VAS at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted pt global assessment VAS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline global assessment, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.8475
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -7.2
         upper limit
    8.7

    Secondary: Physician global assessment: disease activity

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Physician global assessment: disease activity
    End point description
    Physician response to the question Please indicate, according to your clinical experience, the level of disease activity over the past two weeks in this patient. (Range 0=Inactive disease, 10=Very highly active disease
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Disease activity assessment evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    59 [13]
    57 [14]
    Units: mm
        median (full range (min-max))
    2 (0 to 8)
    3 (0 to 7)
    Notes
    [13] - 59 participants attended the Week 48 visit for this question to be answered.
    [14] - 57 patients attended the Week 48 visit for this question to be answered.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Salivary Flow - unstimulated

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Salivary Flow - unstimulated
    End point description
    Total Salivary flow over 15minutes. Values were transformed by y=log[2](x+0.1) for analysis, and the estimates back-transformed for reporting. Accordingly arithmetic means of log-values become geometric means, and differences in log values become ratios.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Performed at screening, 16, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67 [15]
    66 [16]
    Units: mL
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    1 (0.8 to 1.3)
    0.6 (0.4 to 0.8)
    Notes
    [15] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    [16] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    Statistical analysis title
    Unstimulated Salivary Flow at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    (Back-transformed) Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted log-USF at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline log-USF, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0015
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.7
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.2
         upper limit
    2.4

    Secondary: Salivary flow - stimulated

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Salivary flow - stimulated
    End point description
    Total salivary flow (stimulated by citric acid) over 5 minutes. Prior to analysis, data was logarithm transformed by y=log[2](x+0.1) to produce a more normal distribution. Results have been back-transformed, so that arithmetic means of logged variables become geometric means, and differences in means of logged variables become ratios.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Performed at baseline, 16, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67 [17]
    66 [18]
    Units: mL
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    2.5 (1.9 to 3.1)
    2.1 (1.6 to 2.6)
    Notes
    [17] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    [18] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    Statistical analysis title
    Stimulated Salivary Flow at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    (Back-transformed) Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted log-Stimulated Salivary Flow at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline log(SSF), randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.2487
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.9
         upper limit
    1.6

    Secondary: Lachrymal Flow

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Lachrymal Flow
    End point description
    Mean Lachrymal flow from both left and right eyes over 5minutes. Values were transformed by y=log[2](x+1) for analysis, and the estimates back-transformed for reporting. Accordingly arithmetic means of log-values become geometric means, and differences in log values become ratios.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Schirmers I test of ocular function performed at baseline, 16, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67 [19]
    66 [20]
    Units: mm
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    4.5 (3.5 to 5.9)
    3.9 (3 to 5.1)
    Notes
    [19] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    [20] - All participants were included in the mixed model, even if data was not fully complete at all visits
    Statistical analysis title
    Mean Lachrymal Flow at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    (Back-transformed) Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted log-mean-lachrymal-flow at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline log-mean-lachrymal-flow, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.3698
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    1.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.8
         upper limit
    1.6

    Secondary: ESSPRI - EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ESSPRI - EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index
    End point description
    Patient-completed ESSPRI questionnaire.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Quality of Life evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67
    66
    Units: point
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    6.3 (5.7 to 6.9)
    5.7 (5.2 to 6.2)
    Statistical analysis title
    ESSPRI at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted ESSPRI at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline ESSPRI, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.1087
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.54
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.12
         upper limit
    1.2

    Secondary: ESSDAI - EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ESSDAI - EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index
    End point description
    Prior to analysis, data was logarithm transformed by y=log[2](x+1) to produce a more normal distribution. Results have been back transformed, so that arithmetic means of logged variables become geometric means, and differences in means of logged variables become ratios.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Evaluated at baseline and weeks 16, 24, 36 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67
    66
    Units: point
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    3.4 (2.7 to 4.3)
    4.5 (3.5 to 5.8)
    Statistical analysis title
    ESSDAI at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    (Back-transformed) Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted log-ESSDAI at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline log(ESSDAI), randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0721
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.75
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.56
         upper limit
    1.03

    Secondary: SF-36 - Physical Component Summary

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    SF-36 - Physical Component Summary
    End point description
    SF36 v2 (UK version). Range 0=Greatest disability, 100=Least disability.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Evaluated at baseline and weeks 24 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67
    66
    Units: point
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    37.1 (34.9 to 39.3)
    37.9 (35.8 to 40)
    Statistical analysis title
    SF36 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted SF36 PCS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline SF36-PCS, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v Rituximab
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.5246
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -0.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.3
         upper limit
    1.7

    Secondary: SF36 - Mental Component Summary

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    SF36 - Mental Component Summary
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Evaluated at baseline and weeks 24 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    67
    66
    Units: point
        least squares mean (confidence interval 95%)
    41.1 (38.1 to 44.1)
    41 (37.8 to 44.2)
    Statistical analysis title
    SF36-Mental Component Summary at Week 48
    Statistical analysis description
    Differences in Least-Squares Means of baseline-adjusted SF36-MCS at Week 48. Result of covariance pattern type mixed effects model. Fixed effects: baseline SF36-MCS, randomised treatment, timepoint, treat-by-time interaction, age category, disease duration, consent to two substudies. Random effects: patient and patient-by-timepoint. Unstructured covariance pattern used.
    Comparison groups
    Rituximab v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    133
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.9495
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.6
         upper limit
    3.8

    Secondary: Physician global assessment: disease damage

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Physician global assessment: disease damage
    End point description
    Grading the possible disease-related damage in the present patient from 0 (completely absent) to 10 (maximum of possible damage), please score the level of damage/inability by using the scale below.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Disease damage assessment evaluated at baseline and weeks 24 and 48.
    End point values
    Rituximab Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    60 [21]
    57 [22]
    Units: Point
        median (full range (min-max))
    2 (0 to 7)
    2 (0 to 8)
    Notes
    [21] - 60 patients attended Week 48 and had complete data for this endpoint
    [22] - 57 patients attended Week 48 and had complete data for this endpoint
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Randomisation to 30 days following the last administration of rituximab/placebo.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    12.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    All participants randomised to receive placebo. All such participants received at least one placebo infusion.

    Reporting group title
    Rituximab
    Reporting group description
    Among all participants randomised to receive rituximab, 2 withdrew from treatment prior to first infusion, but are counted here as exposed. One of these two experienced an SAE, which is reported here.

    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: Leeds Clinical Trials Research is an academic trials unit where full MedDRA coding of non-serious adverse events is not the standard. It has therefore not been possible for adverse event data to be accurately entered into the full data view within EudraCT as all mandatory categories cannot be completed.
    Serious adverse events
    Placebo Rituximab
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 66 (13.64%)
    9 / 67 (13.43%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Pancreatic carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Anaphylactic reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infusion related reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Echinococciasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Epiglottitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Skin cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Cystoscopy
    Additional description: Cystoscopy and TVT Release
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ankle deformity
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hypotension
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 67 (1.49%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo Rituximab
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    0 / 67 (0.00%)

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    12 Apr 2011
    Protocol v3.0 - 10 March 2011 The eligibility criteria was updated to include the following: Deletion of the word ‘hydroxychloroquine’ and addition of the following text: Patients on corticosteroids, NSAIDS, antidepressants, methotrexate, or pilocarpine*** must have been on a stable dose for 4 weeks prior to receiving the first infusion of study medication and expected to remain on this dose throughout the study. Addition of new inclusion criteria: Patients who are on hydroxychloroquine at screening must have been on a stable dose throughout the preceding six-month period. If they have stopped hydroxychloroquine they should have been off it for at least 3 months prior to receiving study medication. Addition of the following text: Use of DMARDs, immunosuppressant therapies or antidepressants within 4 weeks prior to the first dose administration (except for glucocorticoids, salicylates, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate and analgesics which are acceptable) Addition of the following text: Any malignancies that would normally preclude the use of rituximab within the past 5 years, including solid tumours, haematological malignancies and carcinoma in situ (except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been excised and cured) Addition of the following text: History of moderate to severe congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system (see Appendix C) or other uncontrolled heart disease, or who have a clinically significant abnormal ECG at the time of screening. Change in rituximab stock supply (from commercial to trial stock) Added requirement to monitor all pregnancies, suspected pregnancies and pregnancies occurring in participants of the study or in the female partners of male participants from time of patient randomisation 'until 30 days following the last administration of rituximab/placebo' must be reported immediately to the CTR
    12 Jul 2012
    Protocol version 4.0 dated 29 May 2012. Addition of T-cell sub-study Added new text: T-Cell sub-study Central analysis of local and systemic T-cell abnormalities in PSS and their response to B-cell depletion: • To compare peripheral blood T-cell transcriptional signatures in PSS patients with healthy and disease controls (comparator datasets held in Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge (see Section 12.9)). • To compare peripheral blood T-cell transcriptional signatures in PSS patients pre- and post- B-cell depletion (these analyses will be performed on samples from patients who have received rituximab, once the trial allocations have been unblinded by CTRU at the end of the trial). • To characterise tissue distribution, phenotype, and gene expression of lesional T-cells in PSS patients pre- and post-B-cell depletion (these analyses will be performed on samples from patients who have received rituximab, once the trial allocations have been unblinded by CTRU at the end of the trial). Screening assessment changed from 14 to 28 days from the start of treatment. Eligibility criteria amended to extended list of DMARDs used to include – hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, MMF, leflunomide, ciclosporing etc.and criteria that if patiens have stopped any of these drugs, they should have stopped these for at least 4 weeks prior to receiving the study medication. Any history of other autoimmune diseases or other form of immunodeficiency or neutropaenia <1.5 x 10^9/L – added new text (unless a diagnosis of benign ethnic neutropaenia has been confirmed i.e. neutrophil count 2.4 & 3.0 x 10^9/L for female Jamaican and Afro-Caribbean populations respectively. Added use of Participant Identification Centres (PICs) to help with recruitment.
    06 Mar 2013
    Protocol version 5.0 dated 13 February 2013. Added new safety information to Patient Information Sheet as follows: ‘Rituximab use has been associated with severe blister like skin reactions, known as Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, which have on very rare occasions been fatal.’ Amended eligibility criteria as follows: Use of DMARS, Use of DMARDs, immunosuppressant therapies or antidepressants within 4 weeks prior to the first dose administration (except for glucocorticoids, salicylates, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate and analgesics which are acceptable). Any history of other autoimmune diseases or other form of immunodeficiency or neutropaenia <1.5 x 10^9/L (unless a diagnosis of benign ethnic neutropaenia has been confirmed i.e. neutrophil count 2.4 & 3.0 x 10^9/L for female Jamaican and Afro-Caribbean populations respectively (60) Immunodeficiency or neutropaenia <1.5 x 10^9/L (unless a diagnosis of benign ethnic neutropaenia has been made in which case the neutrophil count must be > 0.9 x 10^9/L at screening for Jamaican and Afro-Caribbean populations).
    24 Jan 2014
    Protocol version 6.0 dated 20 December 2013. Added a more flexible way in which the End of Treatment (Week 48) Patient Questionnaire can be collected for patients who withdraw or are unwilling to return to the local clinics for a final visit. These patients were given the option of completing the questionnaires at home and posting them back to the local clinic. Also, a Patient follow up letter was added to remind patients to return for their End of Treatment Visit.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Wed Apr 24 17:35:40 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA