Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    An Evaluation of the Tolerability and Feasibility of combining 5-Amino-Levulinic Acid (5-ALA) with Carmustine Wafers (Gliadel) in the Surgical Management of Primary Glioblastoma (GALA-5 Trial)

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2010-022496-66
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    07 Mar 2014

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    26 Oct 2016
    First version publication date
    26 Oct 2016
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    End of trial report submitted to REC. Publication is being drafted at the time of EMA submission

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    UCL/09/0398
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    ISRCTN77105850
    US NCT number
    NCT01310868
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University College London
    Sponsor organisation address
    Joint Research Office, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom, WC1E6BT
    Public contact
    Public contact, CRUK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, ctc.sponsor@ucl.ac.uk
    Scientific contact
    Scientific contact, CRUK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, ctc.sponsor@ucl.ac.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    19 Jan 2015
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    07 Mar 2014
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    Treatments for patients with glioblastoma are limited. It accounts for around 60% of brain tumours and life expectancy in optimally managed patients is 12-14 months. Treatment options for patients with glioblastoma represents a major unmet need. To establish that the combined use of 5-ALA and Carmustine wafers is safe and does not compromise a patient from receiving or completing standard chemo-radiotherapy.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Patients were closely monitored for site effects following surgery/treatment so they could be treated quickly. There was a chance patients may have died after surgery following 5-ALA administration and therefore all surgeons using 5-ALA in this trial had to receive training by Medac to minimise this risk. Treatment for cancer is inherently toxic and like all medication can cause side effects. Many of the anticipated side effects of the two trial drugs were no different to those of other chemotherapy drugs that might be offered to patients off-trial but patients were closely monitored for side effects (including monitoring blood pressure, blood results etc.). Because 5-ALA should be used in caution in patients with low blood pressure/ cardiac/renal impairment patients with active liver disease, or significant comorbidity precluding radical aggressive therapy were not eligible for the trial. Patients were kept away from UV light sources (e.g windows) for 24 hours after surgery to prevent photosensitivity reactions. Stopping criteria were in place so that the trial would be recommended to stop if >5% patients failed to start chemoRT due to surgical complications.
    Background therapy
    Treatment with temozolomide and RT was to continue as normal based on standard clinical protocols determined by the neuro-oncologist. For patients which the neuro-oncologists judged to be fit enough, the standard Stupp chemoRT regimen was followed: • Radiotherapy: 60Gy in 30 fractions (2Gy per fraction given once daily, five days per week (Monday-Friday) over 6 weeks. Radiotherapy delivered to gross tumour volume with 2-3cm margin • Concomitant chemotherapy: temozolomide given alongside the radiotherapy at 75mg/m2 daily from the first day of radiotherapy, until the last day of radiotherapy, but for no longer than 49 days • 4 week break • Adjuvant chemotherapy: temozolomide given 150-200mg/m2 TMZ 5/28* days for 6 cycles (dosage increase to 200mg/m2 on second and subsequent cycles dependent on haematological toxicity. Sites should follow local guidelines if different.). *TMZ to be given on 5 consecutive days followed by 23 days with no TMZ, per cycle.
    Evidence for comparator
    not applicable - no comparitor used
    Actual start date of recruitment
    07 Jul 2011
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 72
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    72
    EEA total number of subjects
    72
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    54
    From 65 to 84 years
    18
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Date first site open: 22/06/2011 Date first patient entered: 08/07/2011 Date final patient entered: 05/05/2013 72 patients were recruited across 10 sites in the UK.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Screening was performed to confirm eligibility - see reporting group description

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Not applicable
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Single arm trial. Blinding not required.

    Arms
    Arm title
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Arm description
    Patients drank up to 20mg/kg of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride 3-5 hours prior to the beginning of anesthesia. Carmustine wafers (Gliadel implants) are small discs containing carmustine 7.7mgs (a cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent) and an inactive ingredient, proliferosan 20. Carmustine implants were inserted (as a single episode) into the cavity left on completion of brain tumour resection. During surgery up to eight discs may have been used to line the resection cavity.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Carmustine Wafers
    Investigational medicinal product code
    L01AD0I
    Other name
    Gliadel
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Implant
    Routes of administration
    Intracerebral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Max 61.6 mg carmustine - i.e. max 8 wafers each containing 7.7mg carmustine plus 192.3mg polifeprosan 20 (exipient) may have been placed in the resection cavity. The number of wafers dispensed depended on clinical judgement. Oxidised regenerated cellulose (Surgicel) may have been placed over the implants to secure them to the cavity surface. After placement of the implants, the resection cavity should have been irrigated and the dura closed in a water-tight fashion.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    5-ALA
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride or Gliolan
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for oral solution
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    The patient drank up to 20mg/kg* of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride 3-5 hours prior to the beginning of anesthesia - with 5% dose rounding permitted.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Started
    72
    Completed
    59
    Not completed
    13
         Glioblastoma not diagnosed post-operatively
    4
         simultaneous diagnosis of unrelated carcinoma
    1
         Carmustine wafers not inserted
    8

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Overall trial
    Reporting group description
    Inclusion criteria Patient reviewed by MDT and judged fit for treatment Stealth MRI (neuronavigation) prior to surgery and judged to have typical appearances of a primary GBM WHO performance status 0 or 1 Age ≥18 Exclusion criteria GBM thought to be transformed low grade or secondary disease There is uncertainty about the radiological diagnosis 5-ALA or Carmustine wafers is contra-indicated Pregnant or lactating women Known or suspected HIV or other significant infection or comorbidity that would preclude radical aggressive therapy for GBM Active liver disease (ALT or AST ≥5 x ULRR) Concomitant anti-cancer therapy except steroids History of other malignancies (except for adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ) within 5 years Previous brain surgery (including biopsy) or cranial radiotherapy Platelets <100 x109/L Mini mental status score <15

    Reporting group values
    Overall trial Total
    Number of subjects
    72 72
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    54 54
        From 65-84 years
    18 18
        85 years and over
    0 0
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    23 23
        Male
    49 49

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Reporting group description
    Patients drank up to 20mg/kg of 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride 3-5 hours prior to the beginning of anesthesia. Carmustine wafers (Gliadel implants) are small discs containing carmustine 7.7mgs (a cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent) and an inactive ingredient, proliferosan 20. Carmustine implants were inserted (as a single episode) into the cavity left on completion of brain tumour resection. During surgery up to eight discs may have been used to line the resection cavity.

    Primary: Proportion of 5-ALA resected patients receiving Carmustine wafers

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of 5-ALA resected patients receiving Carmustine wafers [1]
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    % 5-ALA resected patients receiving Carmustine wafers
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This is a single arm descriptive study. As advised by chersoni raffaella on 23/06/2016 for another study, we cannot post the results without entering the details of the statistical analysis as the system cannot accommodate one arm studies.
    End point values
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Number of subjects analysed
    72 [2]
    Units: Patients
        5-ALA resected patients receiving Carmustine wafer
    62
    Notes
    [2] - 59 patients eligible (glioblastoma confirmed peri/post-op, received 5-ALA and carmustine wafers)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Number of patients with post operative complication

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients with post operative complication [3]
    End point description
    Number of patients with a new post-operative deficit or surgical complication (wound infection, CSF leakage, intracranial hypertension)
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    post-surgery
    Notes
    [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This is a single arm descriptive study. As advised by chersoni raffaella on 23/06/2016 for another study, we cannot post the results without entering the details of the statistical analysis as the system cannot accommodate one arm studies.
    End point values
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Number of subjects analysed
    59 [4]
    Units: patients
        wound infections
    5
        cerebrospinal fluid leakage
    4
    Notes
    [4] - 59 patients eligible (glioblastoma confirmed peri/post-op, received 5-ALA and carmustine wafers)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Number of patients with chemoRT delay

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients with chemoRT delay [5]
    End point description
    Number of patients with chemoRT delay (i.e number who do not begin chemoRT 6 weeks after surgery) due to surgical complications. Standard chemoRT refers to the Stupp regimen as described earlier.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Following surgery until the beginning of chemoRT
    Notes
    [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This is a single arm descriptive study. As advised by chersoni raffaella on 23/06/2016 for another study, we cannot post the results without entering the details of the statistical analysis as the system cannot accommodate one arm studies.
    End point values
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Number of subjects analysed
    59 [6]
    Units: patients
        wound infections (did not begin chemoRT)
    1
        cerebrospinal fluid leakage (did not begin chemoRT
    1
        cerebrospinal fluid leakage (6 week+ delay)
    1
        wound infections (6week+ delay)
    3
    Notes
    [6] - 59 patients eligible (glioblastoma confirmed peri/post-op, received 5-ALA and carmustine wafers)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Number of patients failing to complete chemoRT without interruption

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients failing to complete chemoRT without interruption [7]
    End point description
    Number of patients failing to complete chemoRT without interruption (RT with concomitant chemotherapy, and RT with concomitant plus adjuvant chemotherapy) Standard chemoRT refers to the Stupp regimen as described earlier.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Duration of chemoRT
    Notes
    [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This is a single arm descriptive study. As advised by chersoni raffaella on 23/06/2016 for another study, we cannot post the results without entering the details of the statistical analysis as the system cannot accommodate one arm studies.
    End point values
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Number of subjects analysed
    59 [8]
    Units: patients
        concomitant chemo interrupted - toxicity
    13
        concomitant RT interrupted - logistical
    9
        concomitant RT interrupted - toxicity
    4
        adjuvant chemo interrupted - toxicity
    11
        adjuvant chemo interrupted - progression
    5
        adjuvant chemo interrupted - admin failure
    2
        adjuvant chemo interrupted - unknown
    1
    Notes
    [8] - 59 patients eligible (glioblastoma confirmed peri/post-op, received 5-ALA and carmustine wafers)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Proportion of patients with a lower WHO performance status after surgery with Carmustine wafers

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Proportion of patients with a lower WHO performance status after surgery with Carmustine wafers [9]
    End point description
    Proportion of patients with a lower WHO performance status after surgery with Carmustine wafers (at first post-operative clinic visit)
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Measured at first post-operative clinic visit
    Notes
    [9] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This is a single arm descriptive study. As advised by chersoni raffaella on 23/06/2016 for another study, we cannot post the results without entering the details of the statistical analysis as the system cannot accommodate one arm studies.
    End point values
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Number of subjects analysed
    59 [10]
    Units: patients
        same or improved WHO performance status category
    31
        lower WHO status post-surgery - 1 category
    21
        lower WHO status post-surgery- at least 1 category
    6
        not known
    2
    Notes
    [10] - 59 patients eligible (glioblastoma confirmed peri/post-op, received 5-ALA and carmustine wafers)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Number of patients failing to start chemoRT due to surgical complications

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of patients failing to start chemoRT due to surgical complications [11]
    End point description
    Number of patients failing to start chemoRT due to surgical complications. Standard chemoRT refers to the Stupp regimen as described earlier.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Post-surgery until decision to not administer chemoRT
    Notes
    [11] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This is a single arm descriptive study. As advised by chersoni raffaella on 23/06/2016 for another study, we cannot post the results without entering the details of the statistical analysis as the system cannot accommodate one arm studies.
    End point values
    5-ALA and Carmustine wafers
    Number of subjects analysed
    59 [12]
    Units: patients
        cerebrospinal fluid leakage
    1
        wound infection
    1
    Notes
    [12] - 59 patients eligible (glioblastoma confirmed peri/post-op, received 5-ALA and carmustine wafers)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    All AEs that occurred between informed consent and 8 weeks post surgery or the end of all radiotherapy and concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy, whichever is later (or after this date if the site investigator felt the event was trial treatment related)
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    As per publication, AEs have only been reported for the 59 eligible patients. SAEs are listed in full. Non-serious adverse events includes all events (including SAEs) of grade 3 or higher with a 5% threshold frequency.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    CTCAE
    Dictionary version
    4.03
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    All eligible patients (59)
    Reporting group description
    Patients received up to 20mg/kg 5-ALA prior to surgery and up to 8 carmustine wafers inserted into the resected cavity.

    Serious adverse events
    All eligible patients (59)
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    26 / 59 (44.07%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    49
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    1
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Wound dehiscence
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Hematoma
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Thromboembolic event
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 59 (5.08%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerbrospinal Fluid Leak
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 59 (3.39%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Headache
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Seizure
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 59 (13.56%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    9 / 9
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Stroke
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Vasovagal Reaction
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fever
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    Retinal detachment
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Colonic Perforation
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    other - bowel perforation
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Intra-abdominal hemorrhage
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Nausea
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Vomiting
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Pulmonary Edema
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Psychiatric Disorders- other
    Additional description: steroid induced aggression
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Muscle weakness left sided
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Infection - Cerebral Abscess
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Infections - other
    Additional description: not otherwise specified
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 59 (3.39%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 59 (3.39%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    Urinary tract infection
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 59 (1.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Wound infection
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 59 (3.39%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    All eligible patients (59)
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 59 (38.98%)
    Investigations
    Neutrophil Count Decreased
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 59 (6.78%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Platelet count decreased
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 59 (6.78%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    White blood cell decreased
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 59 (5.08%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Wound infection
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 59 (5.08%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Vascular disorders
    Thrombolytic event
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 59 (6.78%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Nervous system disorders
    Seizure
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 59 (8.47%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    Lethargy
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 59 (5.08%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 59 (6.78%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    Vomiting
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 59 (5.08%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Muscle weakness
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 59 (8.47%)
         occurrences all number
    5

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    10 Feb 2011
    Response to REC comments: Protocol v2.0 with minor amendments & statistics section updated, Amended PIS v2.0 and consent form v2.0 as per RECs comments, IRAS form questions regarding loss of capacity answered
    22 Feb 2011
    Amendment to site IMP labelling requirements to meet Annex 13 clause 32
    25 May 2011
    Change to IRAS filter question 7 (capacity to consent) in response to change to the IRAS wording.
    24 Jun 2011
    Protocol v3.0. Amendment to Pregnant Partner Information Sheet & ICF. New document: Pregnant Patient Information Sheet & ICF.
    14 Feb 2012
    5.1 MRI no longer ideally to be conducted on either no or stable steroids 5.1. MRI registration assessment date extended from 2 to 4 weeks. The MRI scan date given must correspond to the scan discussed at a recent MDT meeting from which a provisional diagnosis has been made. 5.3.1. Clarification that Stealth MRI (neuronavigation) will be performed prior to surgery.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    -non-serious AEs: 'occurrences all number' cannot be provided as only highest grade experienced by patients collected on CRF; subjects affected number is entered instead -serious AEs & non-serious AEs are listed under non-serious adverse event.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 00:32:00 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA