Clinical Trial Results:
A randomised phase II screening trial with functional imaging and patient reported toxicity sub-studies comparing LApatiNib plus capecitabine versus continued Trastuzumab plus capecitabine after local therapy in patients with ERb B2 positive metastatic breast cancer developing braiN metastasis /es
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2010-022737-28 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
13 May 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Jul 2016
|
First version publication date |
29 Jul 2015
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
End of trial report |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CO10/9344
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
ISRCTN58771616 | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Beckett Street Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF
|
||
Public contact |
QA department, Leeds Institute of Clinical Research, ctruq@leeds.ac.uk
|
||
Scientific contact |
QA department, Leeds Institute of Clinical Research, ctruq@leeds.ac.uk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
28 May 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
13 May 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
13 May 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To investigate the effect of lapatinib plus capecitabine compared with trastuzumab plus capecitabine on time to progression of central nervous system (CNS) metastases as measured by RECIST.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Inclusion/Exclusion:
Eligibility criteria were designed with patient safety as a primary concern and therefore no one is unfairly excluded from
or included in the trial.
Consent:
Patients will be provided with written information about the trial and verbal information from a member of the local research team. Informed consent will be taken by an authorised clinically and GCP trained member of staff who will ensure that the person understands the purpose and nature of the study and what it involves, the benefits, risks and burdens and the alternative treatments available. They will also ensure the patient is able to retain the information long enough to make an effective decision with free choice.
Risk burdens and benefits:
Patients will be exposed to some additional risks. Patients have a risk of drug toxicity with both treatment arms.
Patients will also undergo MRI scans. Additional hospital visits for treatment, clinical review and investigations could
inconvenience patients. Benefit of inclusion include potential clinical response with either treatment arm. The
LANTERN trial will add to the evidence base for treatment options in this group and may lead to a phase III trial.
Confidentiality:
All information collected during the course of the trial will be kept strictly confidential. Information will be held securely
on paper and electronically at the Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU). The CTRU will comply with all aspects of the
1998 Data Protection Act.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
22 Sep 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 30
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
30
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
30
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
27
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
3
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
109 patients were screened. 34 were registered and 75 excluded due to: ineligibility (57), patient declined (7), patient too ill to consent (1), lapatinib given off trial (3), and other reason (7). The 4 registered patients were not randomised due to: ineligibility (2), patient choice (1), clinician choice (1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Lapatinib + Capecitabine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Lapatinib
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Lapatinib 1250mg daily
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Capecitabine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1000 mg/m2 twice daily days 1-14
21 day cycle
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Trastuzumab + Capecitabine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Trastuzumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for concentrate for solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
6mg/kg 3-weekly
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Capecitabine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
1250 mg/m2 twice daily. Day 1-14
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Lapatinib + Capecitabine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Trastuzumab + Capecitabine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Final
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Analyses was conducted on the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, where participants were included according to the treatment arm they were randomised to regardless of whether they prematurely discontinued the treatment or did not comply with the regimen. The intention-to-treat (ITT) population therefore included all 30 randomised participants, and was the same as the Safety population as all participants received at least one dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Lapatinib + Capecitabine
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Trastuzumab + Capecitabine
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Final
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Analyses was conducted on the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, where participants were included according to the treatment arm they were randomised to regardless of whether they prematurely discontinued the treatment or did not comply with the regimen. The intention-to-treat (ITT) population therefore included all 30 randomised participants, and was the same as the Safety population as all participants received at least one dose of study drug.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
CNS progression-free survival | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Time to progression of CNS metastases was defined as time from randomisation to the date of progression confirmed by:
• Cranial MRI scans (RECIST v1.1)
• Local standard clinical practice where an MRI scans was not performed (i.e. clinical/other radiological evidence)
Participants missing follow-up data, or alive and CNS progression free at the time of analysis, were censored at the date last known to be alive and progression-free. Participants with disease progression confirmed during their 24 week follow up assessment whose assessment fell outside of the 2 week window were included as having disease progression on their assessment date. Participants still receiving treatment following the final 24 week assessment, for whom it was subsequently reported that they discontinued treatment due to CNS disease progression (after the 24 week assessment) were censored at the last date they were known to be alive and CNS progression-free (date of 24 week assessment).
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
24 week trial follow up period.
Participants with disease progression confirmed during their 24 week follow up assessment whose assessment fell outside of the 2 week window were included as having disease progression on their assessment date.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CNS progression-free survival | ||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Analyses, unless otherwise stated, were based upon summary and descriptive statistics only.
Survival curves for CNS progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method and an unadjusted analysis was conducted using a two-sided log-rank test to assess the difference between the treatment arms.
|
||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Lapatinib + Capecitabine v Trastuzumab + Capecitabine
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
30
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [1] | ||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.8093 [2] | ||||||||||||||||
Method |
Log-rank | ||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - CNS disease progression was reported in 14 (46.7%) participants during their 24 week trial follow up period: 8 (50%) lapatinib plus capecitabine participants and 6 (42.9%) trastuzumab plus capecitabine participants. Accounting for participants censored before and after 24 weeks, the Kaplan Meier estimate of CNS progression-free survival at 24 weeks was 58.2% (95% CI: 32.5%, 83.9%) in the lapatinib plus capecitabine arm and 58.8% (95% CI: 30.4%, 87.2%) in the trastuzumab plus capecitabine arm. [2] - The number of randomised participants was insufficient to detect any meaningful differences in time to disease progression between participants in the arms. |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
All AEs, evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0m were collected 3 weekly during trial treatment up to 24weeks.
SAEs were reported from randomisation to 30 days after the 24 week clinical review visit.
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
The SAE active monitoring period is from randomised to 30 days after the 24 week clinical review visit. If a participant continues to receive trial treatment after the 24 week clinical review visit, SARS and SUSARs are reported until the end of trial.
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
body system coding | ||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: See attached End of Trial Report submitted to the MHRA in April 2015 for details of adverse events. Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research is an academic trials unit where full MedDRA coding is not the standard. It has therefore not been possible for adverse event data to be accurately entered into the full data view within EudraCT as all mandatory categories cannot be completed. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
15 Mar 2011 |
Change of timing of QoL & Patient self-reported symptoms and side effects assessment.
Clarification to eligibility criteria for previous treatment with trastuzumab
Addition of option of MUGA scans
Addition of potential interactions between capecitabibe and other medication
Amendment to haematological toxicities for clarification of inconsistencies and unnecessary information within the protocol
Amendment to advice on trastuzumab delay of over 2 weeks for clarification of inconsistencies within protocol
Update to timing of protocol defined schedule of events
Update to assessments required prior to each treatment cycle (3 weekly)
Addition of alternative location for patient interviews as clinic visits may not always be suitable for the patient. |
||
19 Apr 2011 |
Addition of PK sampling sub-study
Correction to consent form statements |
||
19 May 2011 |
Addition of PK sampling sub-study
Amendment to eligibility criteria to include amiodarone as an inclusion criteria and removal of this drug from concomitant therapy section.
Update to exclusion criteria to clarify prior treatment with capecitabine in the metastaic setting is an exclusion criteria
Update to permitted dose modifications of lapatinin cececitabine following discussions with LANTERN investigators
Removal of requirement for as assessment of disease progression at 3 weekly treatment visits to clarify this is only necessary at 12 & 24 weeks post randomisation follow up visits. |
||
16 Aug 2011 |
Amendment to eligibility criteria to amend the definition of normal organ and bone marrow function and to remove this from the exclusion criteria.
Clarification of pre-treatment investigations, concomitant therapy and dosing and frequency of treatment in section 9 of the protocol.
Amendment to instructions for lapatinib and capecitabine dose modifications following adverse events
Update to schedule of events to remove laboratory investigations. |
||
08 Feb 2012 |
Update to PIS/protocol to include a statement that if informed consent is obtained from the participant and the participant subsequently becomes unable to provide on-going informed consent by virtue of physical or mental incapacity, the consent previously given when capable remains legally valid.
Participants who lose capacity after informed consent has been obtained will continue with protocol treatment and assessments in consultation with the Principal Investigator and participants care/ family with the participants best interests foremost in the decision making process.
On going collection of safety and follow up data will continue via clinical care team for inclusion in the trial analysis in order to preserve the integrity of the trials intention to treat analysis and fulfil regulatory requirements specifically for pharmacovigilance purposes. |
||
28 Mar 2013 |
The timeframe for trastuzumab treatment was expanded from current only, to current, or prior (in the adjuvant or metastatic setting) treatment. The requirement for patients to have developed brain metastases whilst on trastuzumab treatment was also been removed.
Eligibility criteria was expanded to include not only newly diagnosed brain metastases, but also progression of CNS metastases within the last 12 months.
Clarified SARs / SUSARs will continue to be reported after 24 weeks for patients still on trial treatment. SAE collection to start from randomisation not registration. Pregnancies will be followed up until outcome is known.
A number of new stratification factors added such as:
•Type of local therapy (this has been expanded to include both types of therapy)
•Timeframe of trastuzumab treatment and which setting (metastatic / adjuvant or both)
•Timeframe of diagnosis of brain metastases / progression of brain metastases
Treatment allocation section updated to reflect change of randomisation from stratified permuted block randomisation to minimisation.
Update to Trastuzumab preparation & IMP Formulation and Storage. Some trial sites store reconstituted trastuzmab out of line with the SPC.
Trastuzumab dose section updated to state that dose banding is permitted.
Clarified guidance to be followed if a loading dose is required. Updated to state that in the case of a treatment delay future treatment is at the investigation of the investigator
Trastuzumab dose section updated to state that dose banding is permitted.
Clarified guidance to be followed if a loading dose is required. Updated to state that in the case of a treatment delay future treatment is at the investigation of the investigator.
Redefined end of trial as 30 days after 24 week clinical rereview or 30 days after last lapatinib trial treatment administered (whichever date is later) |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |