Clinical Trial Results:
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Safety Study of Xolair (Omalizumab) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria (CIU) who Remain Symptomatic Despite Treatment With H1 Antihistamines, H2 Blockers, and/or Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2010-022784-35 |
Trial protocol |
GB DE |
Global end of trial date |
22 Nov 2012
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
14 Jul 2016
|
First version publication date |
09 Aug 2015
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
GA00889 (Q4883)
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01264939 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Grenzacherstrasse 124., Basel, Switzerland, CH-4070
|
||
Public contact |
Roche Trial Information Hotline, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, +41 616878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Roche Trial Information Hotline, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, +41 616878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
22 Nov 2012
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
22 Nov 2012
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
This was a global, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omalizumab administered subcutaneously as add on therapy for the treatment of adolescent and adult participants (12-75 years of age) diagnosed with CIU receiving concomitant therapy including H1 antihistamines at increased doses (up to four times the approved dose), H2 blockers, and/or leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRAs).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was conducted in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), Declaration of Helsinki, and applicable local, state, and federal laws, as well as other applicable country laws. The Clinical Study Protocol (CSP) and the Informed Consent Forms (ICFs) were reviewed and approved by an Independent Ethics Committee (IEC).
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
21 Feb 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 10
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 8
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 29
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 270
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Australia: 13
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
New Zealand: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Singapore: 2
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
336
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
47
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
11
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
303
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
22
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Randomized population: All randomized participants regardless of whether they received any study drug. One participant in the placebo group was withdrawn after randomization but before receiving treatment due to an adverse event. This participant is 1 of 18 in this reporting group who did not complete the study. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solvent for cutaneous solution
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Omalizumab | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received omalizumab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Omalizumab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solvent for cutaneous solution
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received 300 mg of omalizumab administered by SC injection every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received omalizumab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period. | ||
Reporting group title |
Omalizumab
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received omalizumab 300 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with serious adverse events and other adverse events is summarized by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms and organ classes in the Reported Adverse Events section below. Safety population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to the end of study (up to 40 weeks)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No statistical analysis was performed because only descriptive statistics were planned as per protocol. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Itch Severity Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The daily itch severity score is the average of the morning and evening scores on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The Baseline weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher itch severity score indicates more severe itching. A negative change score indicates improvement. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. One participant (randomized to placebo) did not receive study drug and was not included in the mITT population.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Severity Score | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
335
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [2] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [3] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least squares mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-4.52
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-5.97 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-3.08 | ||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline weekly itch severity score (less than [<] 13 versus [vs] greater than or equal to [≥] 13) and baseline weight (< 80 kilogram [kg] vs ≥80 kg). [3] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Urticaria Activity Score Over 7 Days (UAS7) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The UAS7 is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 42. The daily urticarial activity score is the average of the morning and evening urticarial activity scores and ranges from 0 to 6. The urticarial activity score is the sum of ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 is equal to (=) none to 3 = intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives) and (2) itch intensity over the previous 12 hours, ranges from 0 to 6, and is measured twice daily (morning and evening). The Baseline score is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher urticarial activity score indicates more urticaria activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the UAS7 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
335
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [4] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [5] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least squares mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-10.02
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-13.17 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-6.86 | ||||||||||||
Notes [4] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline UAS7 (< median vs ≥ median) and baseline weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg). [5] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Number of Hives Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The weekly hives score is the sum of the daily hives scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The number of hives is measured twice daily (morning and evening) on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (greater than [>] 12 hives per 12 hours). The daily hives score is the average of the morning and evening scores. The Baseline score is the sum of the daily hives scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher score indicates more hives. A negative change score indicates improvement. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change From Baseline in Weekly Hives Score | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
335
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [6] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [7] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least squares mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-5.9
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-7.72 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-4.07 | ||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline weekly number of hives score (< median vs ≥ median) and baseline weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg). [7] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to Minimally Important Difference (MID) Response in the Weekly Itch Severity Score by Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The time to the MID response is the number of weeks from the start of treatment (Baseline) until the time point at which the first MID response occurs. The MID response is defined as a reduction ≥ 5 points from Baseline in the weekly itch severity score. The weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The daily itch severity score is the average of the morning and evening scores on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The Baseline weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher itch severity score indicates more severe itching. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Only participants with a MID response were included in the analysis.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Time to MID Response in Weekly Itch Severity Score | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
335
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [8] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [9] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cox proportional hazards model | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Hazard ratio (HR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.99
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.47 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
2.68 | ||||||||||||
Notes [8] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline weekly itch severity score (< 13 vs ≥ 13) and baseline weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg). [9] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With a UAS7 Score Less Than or Equal to (≤) 6 at Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The UAS7 is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 42. The daily urticarial activity score is the average of the morning and evening urticarial activity scores and ranges from 0 to 6. The urticarial activity score is the sum of ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none to 3 = intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives) and (2) itch intensity over the previous 12 hours, ranges from 0 to 6, and is measured twice daily (morning and evening). The Baseline score is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher urticarial activity score indicates more urticaria activity. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
% of Participants With a UAS7 Score ≤6 at Week 12 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
335
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [10] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [11] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [10] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline UAS7 (< median vs ≥ median) and baseline weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg). [11] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Weekly Itch Severity Score MID Responders at Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with an itch severity score at 12 Weeks at least 5 points lower than at Baseline. The weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The daily itch severity score is the average of the morning and evening scores on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The Baseline weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher itch severity score indicates more severe itching. Modified intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
% of Weekly Itch Severity Score MID Responders | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
335
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [12] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [13] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [12] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline weekly itch severity score (< 13 vs ≥ 13) and baseline weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg). [13] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Size of the Largest Hive Score | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The weekly size of the largest hive score is the sum of the daily size of the largest hive scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The daily size of the largest hive score is assessed twice daily (morning and evening) on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (> 2.5 cm). The daily size of the largest hive score is the average of the morning and evening scores. The Baseline weekly size of the largest hive score is calculated over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher score indicates larger hives. A negative change score indicates a reduction in hive size. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change From Baseline in Largest Hive Score | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
335
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [14] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [15] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least squares mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-5.61
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-7.25 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-3.96 | ||||||||||||
Notes [14] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline weekly size of largest hive score (< median vs ≥ median) and baseline weight (< 80 kg vs ≥ 80 kg). [15] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in the Overall Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The DLQI is a 10-item dermatology-specific health-related quality of life measure. Participants rated their dermatology symptoms as well as the impact of their skin condition on various aspects of their lives on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The overall DLQI is the sum of the responses to the 10 items and ranges from 0 to 30. A lower score indicates a better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had a DLQI score at Week 12.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change From Baseline in the Overall DLQI Score | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
280
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [16] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [17] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Least squares mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-4.67
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-6.28 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-3.06 | ||||||||||||
Notes [16] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline overall DLQI score (< median vs ≥ median) and baseline weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg). [17] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Angioedema-free Days From Week 4 to Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of angioedema-free days from Weeks 4 to 12 was defined as the number of days for which a participant responded “No” to the angioedema question in the daily diary divided by the total number of days with a non-missing diary entry, starting at the Week 4 visit and ending the day prior to the Week 12 visit. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants who withdrew before the Week 4 visit or who had missing responses for more than 40% of the daily diary entries between the Week 4 visit and the Week 12 visit were not included in the analysis.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 4 to Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
% of Angioedema-free Days From Week 4 to Week 12 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
292
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [18] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0006 [19] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Stratified Wilcoxon | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [18] - Stratification variables included in the analysis were presence of angioedema at baseline (yes vs no) and baseline weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg). [19] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
A complete responder was defined as a participant with a UAS7 score = 0 at Week 12. The UAS7 is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 42. The daily urticarial activity score is the average of the morning and evening urticarial activity scores and ranges from 0 to 6. The urticarial activity score is the sum of ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none to 3 = intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives) and (2) itch intensity over the previous 12 hours, ranges from 0 to 6, and is measured twice daily (morning and evening). The Baseline score is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher urticarial activity score indicates more urticaria activity. mITT Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
% of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12 | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the placebo and the omalizumab 300 mg groups.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
335
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [20] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 [21] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [20] - Covariates included in the analysis were baseline UAS7 (< median vs ≥ median) and baseline weight (<80 kg vs ≥80 kg). [21] - Multiplicity plan applied to the efficacy endpoints provided strong control of the type I error rate at 0.05 level by pre-specifying the hierarchical order of the efficacy endpoint tests. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse events were reported that started on or after the first treatment date through the end of the study (up to 40 weeks).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Safety population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Multiple occurrences of a specific adverse event for a patient were counted once in the frequency for the adverse event.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
15.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received omalizumab 300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 24-week double-blind treatment period . | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 24 week treatment period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
11 Jan 2011 |
There were two region-specific changes in protocol which are summarized below:
North America/Asia-Pacific protocol (Version 1.0):
• The study entry criterion regarding women of childbearing potential was modified, i.e., women of child-bearing potential were excluded from enrollment in the study.
• Nursing women were excluded from enrollment into the study.
• The prescribed washout period after regular doxepin use prior to enrollment was reduced from 6 weeks to 14 days.
European Union protocol (Version 1.1):
• Nursing women were excluded from enrollment into the study.
• The prescribed washout period after regular doxepin use prior to enrollment was reduced from 6 weeks to 14 days.
• Additional minor changes were made for clarity and consistency.
|
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |