E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
VAP PATIENTS AT RISK FOR GRAM-NEGATIVE MDR PATHOGENS ISOLATION |
PAZIENTI AFFETTI DA POLMONITE DA VENTILATORE A RISCHIO PER L' ISOLAMENTO DI GRAM NEGATIVI MULTIRESISTENTI |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
PATIENTS AFFECTED BY VAP, LIKELY CAUSED BY GERMS THAT ARE RESISTANT TO COMMON ANTIBIOTICS |
PAZIENTI AFFETTI DA POLMONITE DA VENTILATORE, VEROSIMILMENTE CAUSATA DA BATTERI RESISTENTI AI COMUNI ANTIBIOTICI |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Respiratory Tract Diseases [C08] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 14.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10035701 |
E.1.2 | Term | Pneumonia gram-negative bacterial NOS |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10021881 - Infections and infestations |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To demonstrate that colistin iv. is not inferior to meropenen in the
empirical treatment of VAP regarding to the primary end-point: 28-day
all-cause mortality. |
• Dimostrare che la colistina non è inferiore al meropenem per il trattamento empirico delle VAP, per ciò che riguarda l’”end point” primario: la mortalità complessiva (“all cause”) a 28 giorni |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
-To demonstrate that colistin is not inferior to meropenen the empirical
treatment of VAP regarding efficacy:
oClinical treatment response in patients clinically evaluated.
oMicrobiological treatment response.
-To compare the safety profile of colistin vs meropenen in VAP, and
ecological impact.
oTo study the abilities of two different antibiotic regimens, used in the
clinical trial, to select changes in the intestinal microbiome of patients.
-To Describe the pharmacokinetics of colistin in patients affected by VAP |
• Valutazione dell’efficacia clinica al termine del trattamentO
• Valutazione dell’efficacia microbiologica al termine del trattamento
• Valutazione del profilo di sicurezza. Tale valutazione verrà effettuata attraverso la raccolta ed immediata notifica di tutti gli eventi avversi osservati durante lo studio
• Valutazione della selezione di eventuali germi colonizzanti MDR
• Analisi dei meccanismi di resistenza agli antibiotici
• Valutazione del profilo farmacocinetico (AUC, Cmax, Tmax, Cmax/AUC) |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Age ≥ 18 years
-To be included, each patient must fulfill the following criteria:
1.Consecutive adults who had received mechanical ventilation in the ICU
XML File Identifier: UG8/HD9Jw4A2Me3jLilGj3dEcdI=
Page 14/27
for at least 4 days.
2.Clinical and radiological criteria of VAP.
3.Suspicion of multi-resistant gram-negative bacillus as cause of the
VAP.
4.Clinical Pulmonary Infection Store (CPIS) > 6.
5.Respiratory secretion sample obtained from the respiratory tract by
means of bronchoscope with broncoalveolar washing (BAL) or bronchial
aspirates, both quantitatively processed obtained in the 24 h. previous to
the beginning of antimicrobial treatment of the study.
6.The women of childbearing age (not surgically sterilized and in the
period between menarche and 1 year after the menopause) must have a
negative test of pregnancy in urine at the time of recruitment.
7.The patient or his/her legal representative must sign a document of
informed consent approved by the Ethics Review Committee. |
o età>18aa
o ventilazione meccanica in Terapia Intensiva da almeno 96 ore
o diagnosi clinico-radiologica di VAP
o ospedalizzazione >4 gg
o punteggio CPIS>6
o esame microbiologico quantitativo delle secrezioni respiratorie effettuato nelle 24 precedenti l’inizio del trattamento
o sospetto coinvolgimento di GNB-MDR
o acquisizione del consenso informato
o test di gravidanza negativo (per le donne in età fertile). |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
-Renal insufficiency in substitute treatment.
-Corporal weight <40 kg or >150 kg.
-Patients currently included in another clinical trial.
-Refractory shock or another disease that, according to the researcher,
presents a life expectancy inferior to 48 hours, after the recruitment.
-Known allergy or hyper sensibility to meropenem or any excipients
-Known allergy or hyper sensibility to any carbapenem
-Serious hyper sensibility (anaphylactic reaction or serious skin
reaction) to any betalactam (peniciline or cephalosporins)
-Known allergy or hyper sensibility to colistine
-Colistin reduces pre-synaptic release of acetylcholine at the
neuromuscular junction; this is why it should not be administered in
patients with Miastenia Gravis.
- |
o nota allergia o ipersensibilità ad uno dei due antibiotici in studio (inclusi tutti i betalattamici)
o insufficienza renale in trattamento sostitutivo
o peso corporeo<40kg />150Kg
o paziente già arruolato in un altro trial
o aspettativa di vita inferiore alle 48 ore dal momento dell’arruolamento (es. stato di shock non responsivo al trattamento con amine)
o Miastenia gravis |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
mortality |
la mortalità complessiva (“all cause”) a 28 giorni. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Evaluation of clinical treatment response will be classified as, Clinical cure, failure or recurrence at the end of the treatment.
oClinical cure is defined as complete resolution of all signs and
symptoms of pneumonia.
oFailure as persistence or progression of signs and symptoms.
oRecurrence, as recurrence of signs, symptoms and/or new radiographic
evidence of pneumonia after final treatment. (Attached as annex, CRD
with the variables to record in each visit of the trial).
-Evaluation of microbiological response will be classified as eradication,
failure or recurrence by the researcher at the end of the treatment.
oEradication is defined as eradication of the bacterium causing VAP
during the treatment.
oFailure as persistence of the bacterium causing VAP during the
treatment.
oRelapse is defined as the recurrence of signs, symptoms or new
radiographic evidences of pneumonia present in the last evaluation and
isolation of the initial pathogen. |
• Dimostrare che la colistina non è inferiore al meropenem per il trattamento empirico delle VAP, in termini di efficacia:
o Risposta clinica al trattamento
o Risposta microbiologica al trattamento
• Confrontare il profilo di sicurezza dell’utilizzo della colistina vs meropenem e il relativo impatto ecologico:
o Valutazione dell’effetto dell’utilizzo di colistina e meropenem sulla selezione di resistenze nella flora residente intestinale.
• Descrivere il profilo farmacocinetico della colistina nei pazienti con VAP. |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
every visit until end of the trial |
ogni visita fino alla fine del trial |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | Yes |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Yes |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 6 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 28 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 30 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 30 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |