Clinical Trial Results:
Electrochemotherapy as a palliative treatment for brain metastases
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2010-023356-90 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
30 Jul 2013
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
29 Aug 2021
|
First version publication date |
29 Aug 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
1020
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01322100 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Herlev Hospital
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Herlev Ringvej 75, Herlev, Denmark, 2730
|
||
Public contact |
Julie Gehl moved to Zealand University Hospital in 2017, Herlev Hospital, 45 93577626, kgeh@regionsjaelland.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Julie Gehl moved to Zealand University Hospital in 2017, Herlev Hospital, 45 93577626, kgeh@regionsjaelland.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
30 Jul 2013
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Jul 2013
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
30 Jul 2013
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Primary endpoint is safety of the trial treatment, electrochemotherapy for brain metastases. This is evaluated by regularly registrations of adverse events (serious adverse events and adverse events) using the CTCAE criteria version 4.0.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Written informed consent was mandatory for inclusion and patients were informed according to guidelines.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
04 Apr 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 1
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
1
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
1
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
1
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Place of recruitment was the Department of Oncology at Herlev Hospital. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Patients with brain metastases from any solid tumor cancer. Patients must have been offered all standard treatments. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
inclusion, treatment and follow-up (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment | ||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
bleomycin
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solvent for solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
15000 IU of bleomying/m2 BSA administered by infusion before delivery of electric pulses. Once only treatment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
inclusion, treatment and follow-up
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Treatment
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Safety [1] | ||||||
End point description |
Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported according to CTCAE 4.0
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
From inclusion through treatment and follow-up period
|
||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Because only one subject was included in the trial statistical analysis can not be performed. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From inclusion through treatment and follow-up
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
CTCAE | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
4.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Treatment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
The patient group to be included in this study were patients with brain metastases who had been offered all standard treatments. It was observed that recruitment was difficult and for this reason the trial was terminated after treatment of just 1 pt. |