Clinical Trial Results:
Induction of Labour with a Foley catheter or oral Misoprostol at Term
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-000026-30 |
Trial protocol |
NL |
Global end of trial date |
10 Oct 2013
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
09 May 2021
|
First version publication date |
09 May 2021
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ABR35278
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Other trial identifiers |
The Netherlands Trial Register : NTR3466 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
AMC
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105AZ
|
||
Public contact |
Verloskundig consortium, Academic medical centre, b.w.mol@amc.uva.nl
|
||
Scientific contact |
Verloskundig consortium, Academic medical centre, b.w.mol@amc.uva.nl
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
02 Feb 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
10 Oct 2013
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
10 Oct 2013
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess in term pregnant women with an unfavourable cervix (Bischop score <6) the effectiveness of induction of labor with a transcervical Foley catheter or oral misoprostol
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Through insurrance/ IDMC rules - not sure what this question intends
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
18 Jul 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 1859
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
1859
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
1859
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
1859
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
All patients with a reason for induction of labour at term where screened if they where eligible | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
baseline period (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Oral misoprostol | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
See article | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Foley catheter | |||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Foley catheter
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Implant
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Vaginal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
See article
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
misoprostol
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
See article
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Oral misoprostol
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Foley catheter
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Primairy outcome for composite of neonatal asphyxia (arterial umbilical cord pH ≤7·05 or 5-min Apgar score <7) or post-partum haemorrhage (estimated blood loss ≥1000 mL ascertained over 24 h post partum | ||||||||||||
End point description |
See article
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
inclusion period
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - See article [2] - See article |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
See article | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Oral misoprostol v Foley catheter
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1845
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
non-inferiority [3] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.06
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.86 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.31 | ||||||||||||
Notes [3] - See article |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
inclusion period untill 6 weeks after last recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
52 serious adverse events were reported: 27 in the
misoprostol group and 25 in the Foley catheter group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
unknown | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Oral misoprostol
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
52 serious adverse events were reported: 27 in the misoprostol group and 25 in the Foley catheter group (appendix p 2). None were directly related to study procedures. 49 babies were admitted to neonatal intensive care units. Four babies died (one in the misoprostol group vs three in the Foley group): three because of lethal congenital malformations diagnosed after delivery (one vs two), and one because of asphyxia (none vs one). The mother of the child who died by asphyxia was induced because of polyhydramnios and gestational diabetes. After amniotomy, fetal bradycardia occurred, for which an emergency caesarean section was done. There was no hyperstimulation, no use of oxytocinno cord prolapse, and no blood loss. Apgar score was 1 after 1 min, 0 after 5 min, and 1 after 10 min. Arterial umbilical cord pH was 6·99, base excess –16, and venous umbilical cord pH was 7·15, base excess –7·8. The child was admitted to neonatal intensive care for whole-body cooling. MRI 5 days after bbirth | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |