Clinical Trial Results:
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Once-weekly Oral Aripiprazole in Children and Adolescents with Tourette’s Disorder
|
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-000469-11 |
Trial protocol |
DE BG RO HU |
Global end of trial date |
13 Mar 2014
|
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v2(current) |
This version publication date |
18 Mar 2016
|
First version publication date |
16 Aug 2015
|
Other versions |
v1 |
Version creation reason |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
|
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
31-10-274
|
||
|
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01416441 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
|
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
2440 Research Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20850
|
||
Public contact |
Eva Kohegyi, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., +1 609 524 6790, Eva.Kohegyi@otsuka-us.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Eva Kohegyi, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., +1 609 524 6790, Eva.Kohegyi@otsuka-us.com
|
||
|
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
|
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
02 Jul 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
13 Mar 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
13 Mar 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
|
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of the trial was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of aripiprazole once-weekly treatment with oral tablets in children and adolescents (7 to 17 years) with a diagnosis of Tourette’s Disorder.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The trial was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Consolidated Guideline, and the applicable local laws and regulatory requirements of the countries in which the trial was conducted, copies of the protocol, amendments, informed consent form (ICF), and informed assent form (IAF) were reviewed and approved by the governing institutional review board (IRB) or independent ethics committee (IEC).
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
19 Oct 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
|
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Taiwan: 21
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Ukraine: 21
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 50
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Bulgaria: 5
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Canada: 19
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 3
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Hungary: 14
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of: 15
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Mexico: 14
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Romania: 8
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
170
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
30
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
66
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
99
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
5
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
This trial was conducted in 170 participants at 79 trial sites in 10 countries. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Participants who had successfully completed either of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of once-weekly aripiprazole (studies 2011-000467-27 and 2011-000468-83) were eligible to enter this 52-week open-label extension trial as judged by the study physician and there had been no significant protocol violations or adverse events | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Not applicable as this was an open-label trial.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
Aripiprazole | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
All participants were administered oral aripiprazole tablets once weekly (QW) with a titrated dose starting from 52.5 milligram (mg), on Day 1 and increasing to 77.5 mg and 110 mg for the remainder of the trial, the dose could be adjusted between these 3 dose levels as determined by investigator discretion. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Aripiprazole
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Aripiprazole enteric-coated extended-release (ECER) Tablets, Abilify, OPC-14597
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Prolonged-release tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Once-weekly formulation of aripiprazole as a flexible-dose regimen
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Aripiprazole
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All participants were administered oral aripiprazole tablets once weekly (QW) with a titrated dose starting from 52.5 milligram (mg), on Day 1 and increasing to 77.5 mg and 110 mg for the remainder of the trial, the dose could be adjusted between these 3 dose levels as determined by investigator discretion. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Aripiprazole
|
||
Reporting group description |
All participants were administered oral aripiprazole tablets once weekly (QW) with a titrated dose starting from 52.5 milligram (mg), on Day 1 and increasing to 77.5 mg and 110 mg for the remainder of the trial, the dose could be adjusted between these 3 dose levels as determined by investigator discretion. | ||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal laboratory test results [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The laboratory values were one of the parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Participants with potentially clinically significant lab values in serum chemistry, hematology, urinalyses and prolactin tests that were identified based on pre-defined criteria. Any value outside the normal range was flagged for the attention of the investigator who must indicate whether or not a flagged value is of clinical significance.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with clinically significant vital signs [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Vital signs assessments included orthostatic (supine and standing) blood pressure (BP) measured as millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), heart rate, (measured in beats per minute [bpm]), boy weight (measured in kilograms [kg]) and body temperature. Incidence of clinically relevant abnormal values in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and weight were identified based on pre-defined criteria. Orthostatic assessments of blood pressure and heart rate were made after the participant has been supine for at least 5 minutes and again after the participant has been standing for approximately 2 minutes, but not more than 3 minutes.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) [3] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The ECG was one of the parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of clinically relevant abnormal ECG values in were identified based on pre-defined criteria. Twelve (12)-lead ECGs were recorded at Baseline Visit, Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. At each required visit, 3 ECG recordings were performed. Each ECG was obtained approximately 5 minutes apart and the average of all assessments.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of participants with suicidality and suicidal ideation as measured by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [4] | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
Suicidality was defined as reporting at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any type of suicidal behaviors (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior). Suicidal ideation was defined as reporting any type of suicidal ideation. The suicidal ideation intensity total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) which leads to the range of the total score from 0 to 25. A missing score of any item resulted in a missing total score. If no suicidal ideation was reported, a score of 0 was given to the intensity scale.
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||
| Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) [5] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The AIMS Scale is an extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) rating scale. The AIMS is a 12 item scale. The first 10 items e.g. facial and oral movements (items 1-4), extremity movements (items 5 and 6), trunk movements (item 7), investigators global assessment of dyskinesia (items 8 to 10) are rated from 0 to 4 (0=best, 4=worst). Items 11 and 12, related to dental status, have dichotomous responses, 0=no and 1=yes. The AIMS Total Score is the sum of the ratings for the first seven items. The possible total scores are from 0 to 28.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) [6] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The SAS is a rating scale used to measure EPS. The SAS scale consists of a list of 10 symptoms of parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia), with each item rated from 0 to 4, with 0 being normal and 4 being the worst. The SAS Total score is sum of ratings for all 10 items, with possible Total scores from 0 to 40.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [6] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The BARS was an EPS rating scale. The BARS was used to assess the presence and severity of akathisia. This scale consists of 4 items. Only the 4th item, the Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia, was evaluated in this trial. This item is rated on a 6 point scale, with 0 being best (absent) and 5 being worst (severe akathisia).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in average score of Attention-deficit disorder/attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD) sub-scale of the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-IV (SNAP-IV) [8] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The SNAP-IV Rating Scale includes items to assess inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity of ADD/ADHD and also items to assess Oppositional Defiant disorder. Each SNAP-IV item is rated on a 0 to 3 scale: Not at All = 0, Just A Little = 1, Quite A Bit = 2, and Very Much = 3. Subscale average scores on the SNAP-IV are calculated by summing the scores on the items in the subset and dividing by the number of items in the subset. The ADD/ADHD subscale includes items 1 to 19 (items 1 to 9 measure inattention, items 11 to 19 measure hyperactivity/impulsivity, and item 10 for inattention domain), items 4, 8, 11, 31, and 32 measuring inattention/overactivity, and items 21, 23, 29, 34, and 35 measuring aggression/defiance. Items 4, 8, 11, 21, 32, 33, 36, 37, 38, and 39 form the Conners Index. If there are missing values for the item scales, the average score will be computed using the rest of the non-missing item scales in the subset.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [8] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CYBOCS) total score [9] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The CY-BOCS is used to assess characteristics of obsession and compulsion for the week prior to the interview. Nineteen items are rated in the CY-BOCS, but the total score is the sum of only items 1 to 10 (excluding items 1b and 6b). The obsession and compulsion subtotals are the sums of items 1 to 5 (excluding 1b) and 6 to 10 (excluding 6b), respectively. A missing value for any CY-BOCS item scale could result in a missing total score or obsession and compulsion subtotals of which the item scale is a component. At baseline, the full CY-BOCS interview is conducted. At all post-baseline time points, the “Questions on Obsessions” (items 1 to 5) and “Questions on Compulsions” (items 6 to 10) are reviewed and the target symptoms identified at baseline are the primary focus for rating severity.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [9] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Children's Depression Rating Scale Revised (CDRS-R) [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The CDRS-R is composed of 17 interviewer-rated symptom areas: impaired schoolwork, difficulty having fun, social withdrawal, appetite disturbance, sleep disturbance, excessive fatigue, physical complaints, irritability, excessive guilt, low self-esteem, depressed feelings, morbid ideas, suicidal ideas, excessive weeping, depressed facial affect, listless speech, and hypoactivity. The CDRS-R total score is the sum of scores for the 17 symptom areas. A missing value for any CDRS-R item scale or a not rated item scale (indicated by the value of 0) could result in a missing total score.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [10] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) total severity score [11] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The PARS has 2 sections: the symptom checklist and the severity items. The symptom checklist is used to determine the child’s repertoire of symptoms during the past week. Information is elicited from the child and parent(s) and the rater then combines information from all informants using his/her best judgment. The 7-item severity list is used to determine severity of symptoms and the PARS total score. The time frame for the PARS rating is the past week. Only those symptoms endorsed for the past week are included in the symptom checklist and rated on the severity items. The PARS total severity score is the sum of items 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. The total severity score ranges from 0 to 25. Codes “8” (Not applicable) and “9” (Does not know) are not included in the summation (ie, equivalent to a score of 0 in the summation).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes [11] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in body weight [12] | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Body weight was measured at, Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24, and the end-of-treatment visit.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [12] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in body mass index (BMI) [13] | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The BMI (kg/m2) was calculated from the Baseline height and the weight at the current visit using one of the following formulae, as appropriate: Weight (kg) divided by [Height (meters)]2.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [13] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from baseline in waist circumference [14] | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Waist circumference was measured at Baseline, Visit 1, and the end-of-treatment visit. Waist circumference was recorded before a participant's meal and at approximately the same time at each visit. Measurement was accomplished by locating the upper hip bone and the top of the right iliac crest and placing the measuring tape in a horizontal plane around the abdomen at the level of the crest. Before reading the tape measure, the assessor assured that the tape was snug, but did not compress the skin, and is parallel to the floor. The measurement was made at the end of a normal exhalation
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [14] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of participants with adverse events (AEs) [15] | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant enrolled in a clinical trial and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study medication. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered to have a causal relationship with the study medication. A serious-AE or reaction was any
untoward occurrence that, at any dose, was fatal, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was any other medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
AEs were reported from the signing of the informed consent until 30 days after the end of treatment
|
||||||||||||||||
| Notes [15] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Statistical analysis was not performed for this endpoint |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) total tic score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The YGTSS is a semi-structured clinical interview designed to measure current tic severity. This scale consists of a tic inventory, with 5 separate rating scales to rate the severity of symptoms, and an impairment ranking. Ratings are made along 5 different dimensions on a scale of 0 to 5 for motor and vocal tics, each including number, frequency, intensity, complexity, and interference. Summation of these scores (ie, 0 to 50) provides a TTS that will be the primary outcome measure. The YGTSS ranking of impairment, with a maximum of 50 points, is based on the impact of the tic disorder on areas of self-esteem, family life, social acceptance, and school scores. This is a fully validated scale in adults and has become a standard instrument for the evaluation of the severity of Tourette’s Disorder in children.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Clinical Global Impression for Tourette's Syndrome (CGI-TS) severity of illness score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The severity of illness and efficacy of study drug for each participant was rated using the CGI-TS scale. To assess CGI-TS severity, the rater or investigator will answer the following question: “Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?” However, the evaluation of illness will be limited to manifestations of Tourette’s Disorder only. Response choices include: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill patients.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in Gilles de la Tourette Quality of Life (GTS-QOL) overall score | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The GTS-QOL is a disease-specific patient-reported scale for the measurement of health-related quality of life in patients with Tourette’s Disorder, taking into account the complexity of the clinical picture of the disease. The questionnaire consists of a 27-item Tourette’s Disorder-specific scale with 4 subscales (psychological, physical, obsessional, and cognitive).
|
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change from Baseline in total YGTSS score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The YGTSS consists of a tic inventory, with 5 separate rating scales to rate the severity of symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 5 for 5 different dimensions, including number, frequency, intensity, complexity, and interference) of motor and vocal tics, and an impairment ranking. The Total YGTSS score is the summation of the severity scores of motor and vocal tics and also the ranking of impairment (range of 0 to 100). A missing value of a YGTSS item scale could result in a missing Total YGTSS score. A reduction
in Total YGTSS score from baseline represents an improvement in symptoms.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Response rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Response rates (clinical response was defined as number of participants >25% improvement from Baseline to endpoint in YGTSS TTS OR a CGI-TS change score of 1 [very much improved] or 2 [much improved] at endpoint).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Treatment discontinuation rate | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Treatment discontinuation rate was calculated as the number of participants who discontinued (i.e., those who were withdrawn from the study without completing the Week 53 visit).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Last Visit
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| No statistical analyses for this end point | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
AEs were reported from the signing of the informed consent until the follow-up visit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Participants with AEs in multiple system organ classes were counted only once towards the total.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
16.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Aripiprazole
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All participants were administered oral aripiprazole tablets once weekly (QW) with a titrated dose starting from 52.5 milligram (mg), 77.5 mg and 110 mg for a duration of 52-weeks beginning on the first day of the extension trial. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
| Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||||||
Date |
Amendment |
||||||
24 Oct 2011 |
The primary reason for Protocol Amendment 1 was to include a participant treatment duration of 52 weeks to allow for a one-year exposure requirement for the safety evaluation. One additional study visit was incorporated for this purpose, and study visits were translated from "months" to "weeks" to assist sites with scheduling of participants visits. A clarification statement was added to allow participants turning 18 during the pivotal trial to be permitted to enter this open-label extension protocol. Other minor changes were made, including the correction of formatting issues. |
||||||
14 Feb 2013 |
The protocol was modified to remove the option to allow participants who discontinued due to lack of efficacy to enter this open-label extension trial. Because more participants than anticipated were projected to this trial, the number of anticipated participants and the duration of the conduct of the study were increased. To clarify the protocol, new text was added describing exclusion of participants for QTc values > 450 msec. Inconsistencies within the protocol, such as the specification that the duration of follow-up was 30 (±3) days, were corrected to eliminate confusion. |
||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
| Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
| Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
| None reported | |||||||
