Clinical Trial Results:
Denosumab in enhancement of bone bonding of hip prosthesis in postmenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-000628-14 |
Trial protocol |
FI |
Global end of trial date |
17 Oct 2018
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
19 Oct 2024
|
First version publication date |
19 Oct 2024
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Publication JBMR_Plus |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ISS20109714
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01926158 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Amgen AB
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Keilaranta 16, Espoo, Finland, 02150
|
||
Public contact |
Sivuliike Suomessa , Amgen AB, 358 954900500, paivi.lakkakorpi@amgen.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Sivuliike Suomessa , Amgen AB, 358 954900500, paivi.lakkakorpi@amgen.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
17 Oct 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
17 Oct 2018
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
17 Oct 2018
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary hypothesis for this trial is that denosumab compared with placebo is effective in preventing periprosthetic bone loss in the proximal femur of female patients after total hip replacement
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
No need of specific methods of protection
|
||
Background therapy |
No background therapy | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Comparison with placebo | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Sep 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Safety | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
2 Years | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Finland: 67
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
67
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
67
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
15
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
52
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Recruitment between November 2013 and June 2015 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Postmenopausal women between 60 and 85 years of age with primary hip osteoarthritis as the indicaction for the need of hip replacement. 205 subjects assessed for eligibility. 140 excluded for the following reasons: not meeting inclusion criteria (n=63), declined to participate (n=35) and other reasons (n=42). | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
67 | |||||||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
67 | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Allocation (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst | |||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Allocated to denosumab treatment | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Denosumab treatment (60 mg every 6 months) for one year | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Prolia
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Epicutaneous use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60 mg every 6 months
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Allocated to placebo | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Placebo injection every 6 moths for one year | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Subcutaneous injection every 6 months for one year
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Allocated to denosumab treatment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Denosumab treatment (60 mg every 6 months) for one year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Allocated to placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo injection every 6 moths for one year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Allocated to denosumab treatment
|
||
Reporting group description |
Denosumab treatment (60 mg every 6 months) for one year | ||
Reporting group title |
Allocated to placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Placebo injection every 6 moths for one year |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage change of periprosthetic calcar BMD (Gruen 7) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Periprosthetic BMD measured by DXA immediately after fracture and at 48 weeks
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During the first 48 weeks after surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
Periprosthetic BMD after surgery |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistical analysis | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The primary and secondary endpoints (the outcome measured at week 48) were analyzed using linear mixed‐effects models for repeated measures. The method was also applied to evaluate intergroup differences at each time point (12, 22, and 48 weeks) as the exploratory endpoints of the different outcome parameters. No data were excluded.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Allocated to denosumab treatment v Allocated to placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
65
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Implant 3D-migration | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Baseline RSA measurements at day 3. Measurement of 3D-translation and 3D-rotation at 12, 22 and 48 weeks.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0, 12, 22, 48 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
Implant migration |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistical analysis | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The primary and secondary endpoints (the outcome measured at week 48) were analyzed using linear mixed‐effects models for repeated measures. The method was also applied to evaluate intergroup differences at each time point (12, 22, and 48 weeks) as the exploratory endpoints of the different outcome parameters. No data were excluded.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Allocated to denosumab treatment v Allocated to placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
65
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Patient-reported outcome measures | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Harris hip score, WOMAC score, Rand-36 score, BPI-pain score
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
0, 12, 22, 48 weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
Untitled (Filename: Patient-reported outcome measures.pdf) |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistical analysis | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The primary and secondary endpoints (the outcome measured at week 48) were analyzed using linear mixed‐effects models for repeated measures. The method was also applied to evaluate intergroup differences at each time point (12, 22, and 48 weeks) as the exploratory endpoints of the different outcome parameters. No data were excluded.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Allocated to denosumab treatment v Allocated to placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
65
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Walking speed and walking activity | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Walking speed and walking activity measured repeatedly during the first year after hip replacement
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Walking speed at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks. Walking activity measured at 3, 6, and 12 months.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
Walking speed and walking activity |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistical analysis | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The primary and secondary endpoints (the outcome measured at week 48) were analyzed using linear mixed‐effects models for repeated measures. The method was also applied to evaluate intergroup differences at each time point (12, 22, and 48 weeks) as the exploratory endpoints of the different outcome parameters. No data were excluded.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Allocated to denosumab treatment v Allocated to placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
65
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
The first year after hip replacement
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedVED | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
AEs and SAEs
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The incidence of AEs and SAEs during the 1-year trial period was balanced between the two groups. The most common AE was low back pain. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687650 |