Clinical Trial Results:
Phase II multicentric study to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of Bendamustine in adjunct to Etoposide, Aracytabin and Melphalan (BeEAM) as a preparative regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in refractory/relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-001246-14 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
22 Feb 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
26 Aug 2022
|
First version publication date |
26 Aug 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
EBMT 2020 abstract Protocol synopsys |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
701
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
AORMN Hospital
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Piazzale Cinelli 4, Pesaro, Italy,
|
||
Public contact |
Hematology Clinical Trial Office, Presidio Ospedaliero“San Salvatore/Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord”, +39 0721364022, alessandro.isidori@ospedalimarchenord.it
|
||
Scientific contact |
Hematology Clinical Trial Office, Presidio Ospedaliero“San Salvatore/Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord”, +39 0721364022, alessandro.isidori@ospedalimarchenord.it
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
30 Jul 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
22 Feb 2021
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
22 Feb 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess the 1-year complete remission (CR) rate.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
No specific measure was put in place to protect trial subjects, in addition to standard of care.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Apr 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 66
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
66
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
66
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
57
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
9
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
According to Amendment 1, sent to the Italian Regulatoy Authority (AIFA)on october 20th, 2020, 66 patients were enrolled in the trial between June 2011 and november 20th, 2018. All patients were enrolled in Italy. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
73 patients were screened. 7/73 patients did not meet one or more of the inclusion or exclusion criteria, and were consequently not enrolled in the trial. 66 patients were finally enrolled. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment arm | ||||||
Arm description |
This was a single arm trial testing the the efficacy and the safety of Bendamustine in adjunct to Etoposide, Aracytabin and Melphalan (BeEAM) as a preparative regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in refractory/relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Bendamustine
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate and solvent for solution for injection/infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Bendamustine was used in adjunct to other drugs in the conditioning regimen for autologosu stem cell transplantation in resistant/refractory non Hodking lymphoma patients, as follows:
• Bendamustine 200 mg/m2
on day -7 and -6
• Aracytin 400 mg/m2 from day -5 to day -2
• Etoposide 200 mg/m2
from day -5 to day -2
• Melphalan 140 mg/m2
on day -1
• Autologous stem cell transplantation on day 0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Treatment arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
This was a single arm trial testing the the efficacy and the safety of Bendamustine in adjunct to Etoposide, Aracytabin and Melphalan (BeEAM) as a preparative regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in refractory/relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Complete remission rate [1] | ||||||
End point description |
The primary endpoint of the study was to evaulate the 1-year complete remission (CR) rate.
|
||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
12 months (1 year).
|
||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: This was a single arm study designed according to the Fleming's Method. OS and EFS was estimated according to Kaplan–Mayer method. The log rank test was used to assess the significance of differences for each prognostic factor in the univariate analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression model and the logistic regression models was used to assess how patients’ characteristics predict EFS and OS. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse event reporting was performed from April 1st, 2011 to February 22nd, 2021. Adverse events were notified to Mundipharma Pharmacovigilance office (producer of Bendamustine), to the following email EUDrugSafety@mundipharma-rd.eu
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Please refer to Mundipharma Pharmacovigilance office for a detailed report on AE and SAE, because we do not have this information available.
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
10.0
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Adverse events were notified to Mundipharma Pharmacovigilance office (producer of Bendamustine), to the following email EUDrugSafety@mundipharma-rd.eu |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
20 Oct 2020 |
Due to a delay in the accrual of patients, related to the advent of CART cell therapies in this patient population, we decided to reduce the number of subjects by lowering the statystical power of the trial, in order to allow patients to receive CART instead of autologous stem cell transplantation, if available. According, we changed the statistycal analysis as follow: "Fixing the lowest acceptable rate as 55% and the successful rate as 70%, with a significance level alpha=0.05 and a power 1-beta =0.80, the sample size was estimated in 64 patients. Considering a possible drop-out rate of 3%, the number of patients entering the protocol is fixed to
66." |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |