E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 14.0 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10015052 |
E.1.2 | Term | Epileptic seizure |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029205 - Nervous system disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the efficacy of USL261 compared with that of IN placebo for the outpatient treatment of seizure clusters based on Treatment Success, which is defined as achieving both of the following: ? Termination of seizure(s) within 10 minutes after study drug administration, and ? No recurrence of seizure(s) within 4 hours after study drug administration
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of USL261 for the treatment of seizure clusters using the following assessments: ? AEs ? Alertness/Sedation Sum Score and Composite Scores at the end of the seizure cluster (within 6 hours after study drug administration) as recorded on the caregiveradministered OAA/S ? Occurrence of respiratory depression after study drug administration (defined as < 8 breaths per minute and/or a sustained decrease in respiratory effort requiring emergency rescue treatment with assisted breathing or intubation) ? Clinical laboratory tests ? Requirement for unscheduled ER or EMS visit |
Evaluar la eficacia de USL261 en comparación con placebo intranasal (IN) para el tratamiento ambulatorio de crisis en racimo en función del éxito del tratamiento
Evaluar la seguridad y la tolerabilidad de USL261 para el tratamiento de crisis en racimo
Pueden encontrar los objetivos principales del estudio en la sección 2 del protocolo |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
To evaluate the efficacy of USL261 compared with that of IN placebo for the outpatient treatment of seizure clusters using the following: ? Occurrence of seizure(s) within 6 hours after study drug administration ? Time to next seizure after study drug administration ? Frequency of seizure(s) within 6 hours after study drug administration |
Evaluar la eficacia de USL261 en comparación con placebo IN para el tratamiento ambulatorio de crisis en racimo mediante lo siguiente: ? Aparición de la(s) crisis en las 6 horas posteriores a la administración del fármaco del estudio ? Tiempo hasta la próxima crisis después de la administración del fármaco del estudio ? Frecuencia de la(s) crisis en las 6 horas posteriores a la administración del fármaco del estudio |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
? Subject has a competent, adult caregiver who can recognize and observe the subject?s seizure cluster episodes ? Subject has an established diagnosis of partial or generalized epilepsy that includes all of the following: o A documented history of seizure clusters lasting > 10 minutes and < 6 hours, with a pattern that is observable, stereotyped, and recognizably different from the subject?s other non-cluster seizure activity, if any; o A seizure cluster pattern composed of multiple (? 2) partial or generalized seizures; o A seizure cluster pattern established > 3 months before Visit 1; o A frequency of ? 4 seizure clusters during the year before Visit 1; o At least 1 seizure cluster occurring ? 3 months before Visit 1; o Seizure cluster pattern is confirmed by a central reviewer ? Currently on a stable dosing regimen of AEDs since Visit 1 and for ? 7 days before Visit 2, with or without intermittent use of benzodiazepines at a constant dose |
? El sujeto tiene un(os) cuidador(es) competente(s) que puede(n) reconocer y observar los episodios de crisis en racimo del sujeto ? El sujeto tiene un diagnóstico establecido de epilepsia parcial o generalizada que incluye todo lo siguiente: -Antecedentes documentados de crisis en racimo que duran >10 minutos y <6 horas, con un patrón que es observable, estereotipado y claramente diferenciable de otro tipo de crisis del sujeto sin ser en racimo, si la hubiera. -Un patrón de crisis en racimo compuesto por crisis múltiples (?2) parciales o generalizadas. -Un patrón de crisis en racimo establecido >3 meses antes de la visita 1 -Una frecuencia de ?4 crisis en racimo durante el año antes de la visita 1 -Al menos 1 crisis en racimo que ocurre ?3 meses antes de la visita 1 -El patrón de crisis en racimo descrito anteriormente está confirmado por un revisor central ? El sujeto está recibiendo un régimen de FAE que ha permanecido estable (es decir, sin cambios en el tipo ni dosis del FAE) desde la visita 1 y durante ?7 días antes de la visita 2, con o sin uso intermitente de benzodiacepinas a una dosis constante |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
? Subject has a neurological disorder that is likely to progress in the next year ? Subject has had psychogenic, non-epileptic seizure(s) within the 5 years before Visit 1 ? Subject has a history of their stereotypical seizure cluster progressing to status epilepticus within the 2 years before Visit 1 or has a history of seizure clusters progressing to status epilepticus despite therapeutic intervention ? Subject has a history of acute narrow-angle glaucoma. ? Subject has had an active suicidal plan/intent or active suicidal thoughts in the 6 months before Visit 1 or any lifetime suicide attempt ? Subject is taking felbamate for less than 18 consecutive months before Visit 1or has discontinued felbamate within 30 days before Visit 1 ? Subject is currently taking or has taken vigabatrin within 1 year before Visit 1 ? Subject has taken vigabatrin in the past and has either no documentation of visual field exam or dcumentation on an abnormal visual field exam ? Subject is currently using a vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) unless the device has been implanted for at least 6 months and the settings have not changed within 4 weeks before Visit 1. |
? El sujeto tiene un trastorno neurológico que es probable que progrese en el próximo año ? El sujeto ha tenido crisis psicógena(s) no epiléptica(s) en los 5 años anteriores a la visita 1 ? El sujeto tiene antecedentes de crisis en racimo estereotípica que progresa a un estatus epiléptico en el plazo de 2 años antes de la visita 1, o tiene antecedentes de crisis en racimo que progresan a un estatus epiléptico a pesar de una intervención terapéutica. ? El sujeto tiene glaucoma de ángulo estrecho agudo ? El sujeto ha tenido un plan/intención suicida activo/a o pensamientos suicidas activos en los 6 meses anteriores a la visita 1 o cualquier intento suicida en su vida ? El sujeto actualmente toma felbamato durante <18 meses consecutivos antes de la visita 1 o ha interrumpido el felbamato en el plazo de 30 días antes de la visita 1 ? El sujeto toma o ha tomado vigabatrina en el plazo de 1 año antes de la visita 1 ? El sujeto ha tomado vigabatrina y no tiene documentación del examen de campo visual o tiene documentación de un examen de campo visual anormal ? El sujeto usa actualmente un estimulador del nervio vago, a menos que el dispositivo lleve implantado como mínimo 6 meses y los ajustes no hayan cambiado en las 4 semanas anteriores a la visita 1 |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects who meet the criteria for Treatment Success. |
El criterio de valoración de eficacia principal es la proporción de sujetos que cumplen los criterios de éxito del tratamiento |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Treatment Success is a composite measure of efficacy that will be assessed based upon the first seizure cluster treated during the Comparative Phase. Treatment Success is defined as achieving the following: ? Termination of seizure(s) within 10 minutes after study drug administration, and ? No recurrence of seizure(s) within 4 hours after study drug administration |
El éxito del tratamiento es una medida compuesta de la eficacia que se evaluará en función de la primera crisis en racimo tratada durante la Fase Comparativa. El éxito del tratamiento se define como lograr lo siguiente: ? finalización de la(s) crisis en el plazo de 10 minutos después de la administración del fármaco del estudio; y ? falta de recurrencia de la(s) crisis en el plazo de 4 horas después de la administración del fármaco del estudio |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
? Proportion of subjects with occurrence of seizure(s) within 6 hours after administration of double-blind study drug ? Time to next seizure after study drug administration ? Frequency of seizure(s) within 6 hours after administration of study drug |
? Proporción de sujetos con aparición de crisis en las 6 horas posteriores a la administración del fármaco del estudio doble ciego ? Tiempo hasta la próxima crisis después de la administración del fármaco del estudio ? Frecuencia de la(s) crisis en las 6 horas posteriores a la administración del fármaco del estudio |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
? Proportion of subjects with occurrence of seizure(s): Within 6 hours after administration of double-blind study drug ? Time to next seizure after study drug administration: At occurrence of next seizure after study drug administration ? Frequency of seizure(s) within 6 hours after administration of study drug: within 6 hours after administration of study drug |
? Proporción de sujetos con aparición de crisis: en las 6 horas posteriores a la administración del fármaco del estudio doble ciego ? Tiempo hasta la próxima crisis después de la administración del fármaco del estudio: en la aparición de la próxima crisis después de la administración del fármaco del estudio ? Frecuencia de la(s) crisis en las 6 horas posteriores a la administración del fármaco del estudio: en las 6 horas posteriores a la administración del fármaco del estudio |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | Yes |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes |
E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |
fase abierta de prueba de dosis, seguida de la fase comparativa doble ciega |
open-label test-dose phase, followed by double-blind comparative phase |
|
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 7 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 32 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | Yes |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.6.3 | If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned |
European Union |
Argentina |
Australia |
Canada |
Israel |
United States |
|
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
Last Visit Last Subject |
Ultima Visita Ultimo Sujeto |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 10 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 1 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 10 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |