Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43843   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7282   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Phase III randomized, open, controlled study to evaluate the immune response to the hepatitis B antigen of the RTS,S/AS01E candidate vaccine, when administered as primary vaccination integrated into an EPI regimen to infants living in sub-Saharan Africa.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2011-001508-37
    Trial protocol
    Outside EU/EEA  
    Global end of trial date
    09 Feb 2017

    Results information
    Results version number
    v2(current)
    This version publication date
    27 Dec 2019
    First version publication date
    17 Aug 2017
    Other versions
    v1
    Version creation reason
    • New data added to full data set
    New available data added to the full data set.

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    113681
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01345240
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals
    Sponsor organisation address
    Rue de l’Institut 89, Rixensart, Belgium, B-1330
    Public contact
    Clinical Trials Call Center, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, 044 2089-904466, GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Trials Call Center, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, 044 2089-904466, GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    Yes
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    26 Apr 2018
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    09 Feb 2017
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To demonstrate in terms of antibody (ab) response to the HBs antigen, the non-inferiority (noninf) of RTS,S/AS01E (RTSS) to a primary vaccination regimen of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B) integrated into an expanded program on immunization (EPI) regimen.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The vaccinees were observed closely for at least 60 minutes following the administration of all vaccines used in the study, with appropriate medical treatment readily available in case of an anaphylactic reaction.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    17 Nov 2011
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Safety, Efficacy
    Long term follow-up duration
    51 Months
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ghana: 197
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Burkina Faso: 508
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    705
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    705
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    The study was conducted in 4 phases, a Primary Vaccination Phase (up to Month (M) 3), a Safety Follow-Up Phase (M3-8), a First Immunogenicity Follow-Up (FU) Phase (M8-26), and a Second Immunogenicity FU Phase (M26 to study end at M51).

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    RTS,S Regimen A Group
    Arm description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen A Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen A Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen A Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin and Synflorix, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, and 2 doses of Rotarix vaccine, at Weeks 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Candidate Plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    RTS,S/AS02D
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder and suspension for suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Engerix-B Junior
    Investigational medicinal product code
    HBV Paediatric 10
    Other name
    Engerix-B
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Infanrix-Hib
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Polio Sabin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Synflorix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Rotarix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    2-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Measles and yellow fever vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    1-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid

    Arm title
    RTS,S Regimen B Group
    Arm description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen B Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen B Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen B Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 4 and 8, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Candidate Plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    RTS,S/AS02D
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder and suspension for suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Engerix-B Junior
    Investigational medicinal product code
    HBV Paediatric 10
    Other name
    Engerix-B
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Infanrix-Hib
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Polio Sabin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Synflorix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Rotarix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    2-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Measles and yellow fever vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    1-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid

    Arm title
    RTS,S Regimen C Group
    Arm description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen C Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen C Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen C Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 6 and 10, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Candidate Plasmodium falciparum malaria vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    RTS,S/AS02D
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder and suspension for suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Engerix-B Junior
    Investigational medicinal product code
    HBV Paediatric 10
    Other name
    Engerix-B
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Infanrix-Hib
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Polio Sabin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Synflorix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Rotarix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    2-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Measles and yellow fever vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    1-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid

    Arm title
    Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Arm description
    Subjects, healthy male and female infants between 8 and 12 weeks of age inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received the Engerix-B Vaccination Regimen A. This regimen included 3 doses of Engerix B co-administered with Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin and Synflorix at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, and 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 6 and 10. Additionally, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Engerix-B Junior
    Investigational medicinal product code
    HBV Paediatric 10
    Other name
    Engerix-B
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Infanrix-Hib
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Polio Sabin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Synflorix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Rotarix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    2-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Measles and yellow fever vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    1-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid

    Arm title
    Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Arm description
    Subjects, healthy male and female infants between 8 and 12 weeks of age inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received the Engerix-B Vaccination Regimen B. This regimen included 3 doses of Engerix B co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix vaccine, at Weeks 4 and 8, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. Additionally, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Engerix-B Junior
    Investigational medicinal product code
    HBV Paediatric 10
    Other name
    Engerix-B
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Infanrix-Hib
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Polio Sabin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Synflorix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    3-dose intramuscular injection in the thigh.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Rotarix
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    2-dose orally

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Measles and yellow fever vaccine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Suspension for injection
    Routes of administration
    Intramuscular use
    Dosage and administration details
    1-dose intramuscular injection in the deltoid

    Number of subjects in period 1
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Started
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Completed
    131
    128
    123
    132
    129
    Not completed
    11
    14
    18
    9
    10
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    3
    5
    4
    2
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    8
    9
    14
    7
    9

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen A Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen A Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen A Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen A Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin and Synflorix, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, and 2 doses of Rotarix vaccine, at Weeks 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen B Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen B Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen B Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen B Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 4 and 8, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen C Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen C Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen C Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen C Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 6 and 10, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects, healthy male and female infants between 8 and 12 weeks of age inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received the Engerix-B Vaccination Regimen A. This regimen included 3 doses of Engerix B co-administered with Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin and Synflorix at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, and 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 6 and 10. Additionally, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects, healthy male and female infants between 8 and 12 weeks of age inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received the Engerix-B Vaccination Regimen B. This regimen included 3 doses of Engerix B co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix vaccine, at Weeks 4 and 8, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. Additionally, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group Total
    Number of subjects
    142 142 141 141 139 705
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0 0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0 0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0 0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    142 142 141 141 139 705
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0 0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0 0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0 0 0 0 0 0
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0 0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0 0 0 0
    Age continuous
    Units: weeks
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    8.4 ± 0.83 8.3 ± 0.62 8.3 ± 0.69 8.3 ± 0.74 8.3 ± 0.74 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    59 69 67 81 63 339
        Male
    83 73 74 60 76 366
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized
    Units: Subjects
        African Heritage/African American
    142 142 141 141 139 705
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    RTS,S Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the RTS,S Regimen A, RTS,S Regimen B, and RTS,S Regimen C groups who were administered a 3-dose primary vaccination course of the RTS,S vaccine in any of its formulations, Lot 1, 2 or 3, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules depending on the RTS,S vaccination regimen received, doses of Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix, Engerix B and vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    Engerix B Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the Engerix B Regimen A and Engerix B Regimen B groups who were administered Engerix B as a 3-dose primary vaccination course, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, followed by a booster dose, at Month 50. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules, depending on the vaccination regimen they were allocated too in their respective group, doses Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix and of vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    RTS,S Lot 1 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the RTS,S Regimen A, RTS,S Regimen B, and RTS,S Regimen C groups who were administered a 3-dose primary vaccination course of the RTS,S vaccine in its Lot 1 formulation only, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules depending on the RTS,S vaccination regiment received, doses of Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix, Engerix B and vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    RTS,S Lot 2 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the RTS,S Regimen A, RTS,S Regimen B, and RTS,S Regimen C groups who were administered a 3-dose primary vaccination course of the RTS,S vaccine in its Lot 2 formulation only, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules depending on the RTS,S vaccination regiment received, doses of Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix, Engerix B and vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    RTS,S Lot 3 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the RTS,S Regimen A, RTS,S Regimen B, and RTS,S Regimen C groups who were administered a 3-dose primary vaccination course of the RTS,S vaccine in its Lot 3 formulation only, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules depending on the RTS,S vaccination regimen received, doses of Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix, Engerix B and vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis sets values
    RTS,S Group Engerix B Group RTS,S Lot 1 Group RTS,S Lot 2 Group RTS,S Lot 3 Group
    Number of subjects
    425
    280
    141
    142
    142
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    425
    280
    141
    142
    142
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: weeks
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    0 ± 0
    0 ± 0
    0 ± 0
    0 ± 0
    0 ± 0
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    195
    144
    59
    66
    70
        Male
    230
    136
    82
    76
    72
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized
    Units: Subjects
        African Heritage/African American
    425
    280
    141
    142
    142

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen A Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen A Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen A Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen A Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin and Synflorix, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, and 2 doses of Rotarix vaccine, at Weeks 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen B Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen B Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen B Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen B Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 4 and 8, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen C Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen C Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen C Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen C Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 6 and 10, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects, healthy male and female infants between 8 and 12 weeks of age inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received the Engerix-B Vaccination Regimen A. This regimen included 3 doses of Engerix B co-administered with Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin and Synflorix at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, and 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 6 and 10. Additionally, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects, healthy male and female infants between 8 and 12 weeks of age inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received the Engerix-B Vaccination Regimen B. This regimen included 3 doses of Engerix B co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix vaccine, at Weeks 4 and 8, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. Additionally, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    RTS,S Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the RTS,S Regimen A, RTS,S Regimen B, and RTS,S Regimen C groups who were administered a 3-dose primary vaccination course of the RTS,S vaccine in any of its formulations, Lot 1, 2 or 3, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules depending on the RTS,S vaccination regimen received, doses of Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix, Engerix B and vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    Engerix B Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the Engerix B Regimen A and Engerix B Regimen B groups who were administered Engerix B as a 3-dose primary vaccination course, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, followed by a booster dose, at Month 50. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules, depending on the vaccination regimen they were allocated too in their respective group, doses Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix and of vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    RTS,S Lot 1 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the RTS,S Regimen A, RTS,S Regimen B, and RTS,S Regimen C groups who were administered a 3-dose primary vaccination course of the RTS,S vaccine in its Lot 1 formulation only, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules depending on the RTS,S vaccination regiment received, doses of Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix, Engerix B and vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    RTS,S Lot 2 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the RTS,S Regimen A, RTS,S Regimen B, and RTS,S Regimen C groups who were administered a 3-dose primary vaccination course of the RTS,S vaccine in its Lot 2 formulation only, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules depending on the RTS,S vaccination regiment received, doses of Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix, Engerix B and vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Subject analysis set title
    RTS,S Lot 3 Group
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Subjects in this group were subjects from the RTS,S Regimen A, RTS,S Regimen B, and RTS,S Regimen C groups who were administered a 3-dose primary vaccination course of the RTS,S vaccine in its Lot 3 formulation only, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8. Subjects in this group were also administered, according to varied schedules depending on the RTS,S vaccination regimen received, doses of Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin, Rotarix, Synflorix, Rotarix, Engerix B and vaccines against yellow fever and against measles. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Primary: Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations RTS,S Group and Engerix B Group

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations RTS,S Group and Engerix B Group [1]
    End point description
    Concentrations, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and expressed in milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 10 mIU/mL. A decrease in the specificity of the anti-HBs ELISA assay had been observed in some studies for low levels of antibody (10-100 mIU/mL). The table shows updated results following partial or complete retesting/reanalysis, with study groups pooled by primary vaccine administered (RTS,S vs Engerix-B).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B™
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This outcome was descriptive; hence no statistical analyses were required.
    End point values
    RTS,S Group Engerix B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    397
    253
    Units: mIU/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        mIU/mL
    6412.7 (5732.9 to 7173)
    377.4 (310.6 to 458.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations for all study Groups

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations for all study Groups [2]
    End point description
    Concentrations, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and expressed in milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 10 mIU/mL. A decrease in the specificity of the anti-HBs ELISA assay had been observed in some studies for low levels of antibody (10-100 mIU/mL). The table shows updated results following partial or complete retesting/reanalysis, for each RTS,S Regimen A, B, C and each Engerix B Regimen A and B study groups.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    Notes
    [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: This outcome was descriptive; hence no statistical analyses were required.
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    140
    123
    134
    135
    118
    Units: mIU/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        mIU/mL
    5467.6 (4493.8 to 6652.5)
    6989.9 (5747.5 to 8501)
    6998.7 (5779.1 to 8475.7)
    334.4 (253.4 to 441.4)
    433.4 (329.5 to 570.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Percentage of seroprotected subjects against Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antigen

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of seroprotected subjects against Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antigen
    End point description
    A seroprotected subject was defined as a subject with anti-HBs antibody titers greater than or equal to (>=) the cutoff of 10 mili-international units per mililiter (mIU/mL). A decrease in the specificity of the anti-HBs ELISA assay had been observed in some studies for low levels of antibody (10-100 mIU/mL). The table shows updated results following partial or complete retesting/reanalysis, with study groups pooled by primary vaccine administered (RTS,S vs Engerix -B).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Group Engerix B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    397
    253
    Units: Percentage of subjects
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    100 (99.1 to 100)
    96 (92.9 to 98.1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Anti-HBs: difference in seroprotection rate
    Statistical analysis description
    Non-inferiority of the immune response to the hepatitis B antigen induced by RTS,S/AS01E vaccine versus a licensed hepatitis B vaccine.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Group v Engerix B Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    650
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [3]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    Difference in percent seroprotection
    Point estimate
    -3.95
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -7.12
         upper limit
    -2.16
    Notes
    [3] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference in percent seroprotection below 5% between recipients of licensed hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B) and recipients of RTS,S/AS01E vaccine.

    Secondary: Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations at Month 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations at Month 3
    End point description
    Concentrations, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and expressed in milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 10 mIU/mL. A decrease in the specificity of the anti-HBs ELISA assay had been observed in some studies for low levels of antibody (10-100 mIU/mL). The table shows updated results following partial or complete retesting/reanalysis. Results presented are for the study groups receiving the RTS,S vaccine, pooled by vaccine lot, that is, for the RTS,S Lot 1, RTS,S Lot 2, and RTS,S Lot 3 groups, as defined below.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Lot 1 Group RTS,S Lot 2 Group RTS,S Lot 3 Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    132
    134
    131
    Units: mIU/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        mIU/mL
    6214.3 (5115.6 to 7548.9)
    6826.1 (5569.4 to 8366.3)
    6209.2 (5144.2 to 7494.8)
    Statistical analysis title
    Anti-HBs: lot1-to-lot2 consistency
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the lot-to-lot consistency in terms of anti-HBs immunogenicity between three commercial lots of the RTS,S/AS01E candidate malaria vaccine.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Lot 2 Group v RTS,S Lot 1 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    266
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [4]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    0.91
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.69
         upper limit
    1.2
    Notes
    [4] - Criteria for consistency: one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S/AS01E, the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio between all pairs of lots are within [0.5, 2].
    Statistical analysis title
    Anti-HBs: lot1-to-lot3 consistency
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the lot-to-lot consistency in terms of anti-HBs immunogenicity between three commercial lots of the RTS,S/AS01E candidate malaria vaccine.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Lot 1 Group v RTS,S Lot 3 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    263
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [5]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.76
         upper limit
    1.32
    Notes
    [5] - Criteria for consistency: one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S/AS01E, the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio between all pairs of lots are within [0.5, 2].
    Statistical analysis title
    Anti-HBs: lot2-to-lot3 consistency
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the lot-to-lot consistency in terms of anti-HBs immunogenicity between three commercial lots of the RTS,S/AS01E candidate malaria vaccine.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Lot 2 Group v RTS,S Lot 3 Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    265
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence [6]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.84
         upper limit
    1.45
    Notes
    [6] - Criteria for consistency: one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S/AS01E, the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio between all pairs of lots are within [0.5, 2].

    Secondary: Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations at Month 14 and 26

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations at Month 14 and 26
    End point description
    Concentrations, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and expressed in milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 10 mIU/mL. A decrease in the specificity of the anti-HBs ELISA assay had been observed in some studies for low levels of antibody (10-100 mIU/mL). The table shows updated results following partial or complete retesting/reanalysis. Results presented are for each RTS,S Regimen A, B & C, and for each Engerix B Regimen A & B study groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Months 14 and 26, aka at 12 and 24 months post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    133
    118
    129
    127
    114
    Units: mIU/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Anti-HBs – At Month 14
    1530.1 (1259.4 to 1859.1)
    2430.9 (1975.7 to 2991.0)
    2189.1 (1840.3 to 2603.9)
    119.5 (91 to 157)
    137.5 (103.3 to 183.2)
        Anti-HBs – At Month 26
    1092.6 (867.4 to 1376.3)
    1896.0 (1487.2 to 2417.3)
    1849.8 (1478.9 to 2313.6)
    68.8 (50.7 to 93.3)
    71 (51.6 to 97.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Concentrations of antibodies to the Hepatitis B RF1 surface antigen (anti-HBs RF1) at Month 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Concentrations of antibodies to the Hepatitis B RF1 surface antigen (anti-HBs RF1) at Month 3
    End point description
    Anti-HBs RF1 antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) expressed in ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 33 EL.U/mL. The table shows results for each RTS,S Regimen A, B & C, and for each Engerix B Regimen A & B study groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    141
    123
    135
    135
    117
    Units: EL.U/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        EL.U/mL
    268.7 (226.8 to 318.3)
    327.1 (272.2 to 393.1)
    335.5 (283.2 to 397.5)
    25.5 (22.8 to 28.7)
    28.7 (24.6 to 33.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Anti-circumsporozoite protein (anti-CS) antibody concentrations at Month 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-circumsporozoite protein (anti-CS) antibody concentrations at Month 3
    End point description
    Anti-CS antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) expressed in ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 0.5 EL.U/mL. The table shows results for each RTS,S Regimen A, B & C, and for each Engerix B Regimen A & B study groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    141
    123
    136
    135
    118
    Units: EL.U/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        EL.U/mL
    142.2 (116.4 to 173.7)
    188.5 (156.5 to 227)
    205.5 (167.3 to 252.5)
    0.3 (0.3 to 0.3)
    0.3 (0.3 to 0.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Anti-circumsporozoite protein (anti-CS) antibody concentrations at Month 14

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-circumsporozoite protein (anti-CS) antibody concentrations at Month 14
    End point description
    Anti-CS antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) expressed in ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 0.5 EL.U/mL. The table shows results for each RTS,S Regimen A, B & C, and for each Engerix B Regimen A & B study groups. No anti-CS results are available for the time point 24 months post Dose 3 (Month 26) because the quantity of serum available for the anti-CS assay was insufficient for many samples.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 14, aka at 12 months post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    91
    82
    96
    85
    76
    Units: EL.U/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        EL.U/mL
    5.7 (4.2 to 7.7)
    6.8 (5.0 to 9.4)
    7.5 (5.3 to 10.6)
    0.3 (0.3 to 0.3)
    0.3 (0.3 to 0.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Pneumococcal antibody concentrations against Synflorix pneumococcal vaccine serotypes at Month 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pneumococcal antibody concentrations against Synflorix pneumococcal vaccine serotypes at Month 3 [7]
    End point description
    Antibody concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). The pneumococcal vaccine serotypes assessed were the serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F. The cut-off of the assay, by GSK assay, was greater than or equal to (>=) 0.2 μg/mL. This corresponds to the standard ELISA value of 0.35 μg/mL. This outcome concerns the subjects who received the RTS,S or Engerix-B vaccine co-administered with Synflorix. Results presented are for the study groups pooled by co-administration, that is, for the RTS,S Regimen A and Engerix-B Regimen A groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month post Dose 3 of Synflorix
    Notes
    [7] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The results in this study were tabulated by the study groups pooled by co-administration. Hence for each related endpoint, they are presented for only the respective groups in the baseline period, while the results for multiple endpoints account for all baseline groups.
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    141
    135
    Units: µg/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        ANTI-1
    3.1 (2.8 to 3.6)
    3.6 (3.1 to 4.2)
        ANTI-4
    3.5 (3.0 to 4.0)
    4.2 (3.5 to 4.9)
        ANTI-5
    5.1 (4.5 to 5.8)
    6.5 (5.6 to 7.4)
        ANTI-6B
    1.1 (0.8 to 1.3)
    1.2 (1.0 to 1.6)
        ANTI-7F
    4.4 (3.9 to 4.9)
    4.9 (4.3 to 5.7)
        ANTI-9V
    2.8 (2.4 to 3.3)
    3.7 (3.3 to 4.2)
        ANTI-14
    5.8 (5.0 to 6.7)
    5.7 (4.7 to 7.0)
        ANTI-18C
    3.4 (2.8 to 4.1)
    6.2 (5.1 to 7.5)
        ANTI-19F
    4.2 (3.4 to 5.2)
    5.1 (4.1 to 6.4)
        ANTI-23F
    1.3 (1.1 to 1.6)
    1.5 (1.1 to 1.9)
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype 1 response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against serotype 1 responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [8]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.95
         upper limit
    1.39
    Notes
    [8] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype 4 response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against serotype 4 responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    Engerix B Regimen A Group v RTS,S Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [9]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.97
         upper limit
    1.48
    Notes
    [9] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype 5 response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against serotype 5 responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [10]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.27
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.06
         upper limit
    1.52
    Notes
    [10] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype 6B response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against serotype 6B responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [11]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.17
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.83
         upper limit
    1.65
    Notes
    [11] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for Nothing selected the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype 7F response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against serotype 7F responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [12]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.12
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.94
         upper limit
    1.33
    Notes
    [12] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype 9V response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against serotype 9V responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [13]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.32
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.08
         upper limit
    1.63
    Notes
    [13] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype 14 response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against serotype 14 responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [14]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    0.99
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.77
         upper limit
    1.27
    Notes
    [14] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype18C response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against 18C responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [15]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.81
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.38
         upper limit
    2.38
    Notes
    [15] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype19F response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against serotype 19F responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [16]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.21
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.89
         upper limit
    1.65
    Notes
    [16] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Antibody against pneumococcal serotype23F response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody against 23F responses to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Regimen A Group v Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    276
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [17]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.12
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.81
         upper limit
    1.55
    Notes
    [17] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of 10 pneumococcal serotypes titers (measured with an ELISA test), is below a limit of 2 for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.

    Secondary: Pneumococcal antibody concentrations against Synflorix pneumococcal vaccine serotypes at Month 17

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pneumococcal antibody concentrations against Synflorix pneumococcal vaccine serotypes at Month 17 [18]
    End point description
    Antibody concentrations were measured by GSK assay, and expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). The pneumococcal vaccine serotypes assessed were the serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F. The cut-off of the assay, by GSK assay, was greater than or equal to (>=) 0.2 μg/mL. This corresponds to the standard ELISA value of 0.35 μg/mL. This outcome concerns the subjects who received the RTS,S or Engerix -B vaccine co-administered with Synflorix. Results presented are for the study groups pooled by co-administration, that is, for the RTS,S Regimen A and Engerix -B Regimen A groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 17, aka one month post the Month 16 booster dose of Synflorix
    Notes
    [18] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The results in this study were tabulated by the study groups pooled by co-administration. Hence for each related endpoint, they are presented for only the respective groups in the baseline period, while the results for multiple endpoints account for all baseline groups.
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    133
    126
    Units: μg/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        ANTI-1
    4.5 (3.8 to 5.4)
    5.4 (4.5 to 6.4)
        ANTI-4
    6.1 (5.1 to 7.2)
    6.8 (5.7 to 8.0)
        ANTI-5
    6.5 (5.5 to 7.8)
    7.6 (6.4 to 9.1)
        ANTI-6B
    4.7 (4.0 to 5.5)
    4.1 (3.5 to 4.9)
        ANTI-7F
    7.1 (6.2 to 8.2)
    7.2 (6.3 to 8.2)
        ANTI-9V
    6.0 (5.1 to 7.1)
    5.7 (4.9 to 6.6)
        ANTI-14
    9.0 (7.6 to 10.7)
    9.0 (7.4 to 10.8)
        ANTI-18C
    13.7 (11.5 to 16.3)
    14.5 (12.3 to 17.2)
        ANTI-19F
    6.0 (4.9 to 7.4)
    7.2 (5.8 to 8.8)
        ANTI-23F
    4.1 (3.4 to 5.1)
    3.9 (3.2 to 4.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Titers for opsonophagocytic activity against Synflorix pneumococcal vaccine serotypes at Month 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Titers for opsonophagocytic activity against Synflorix pneumococcal vaccine serotypes at Month 3 [19]
    End point description
    The pneumococcal vaccine serotypes assessed were the serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F. Streptococcus pneumoniae opsonophagocytic activity was presented as the dilution of serum (opsonic titer) able to sustain 50 % killing of live pneumococci under the assay conditions, expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs). The cut-off of the assay was an opsonic dilution >= 8. This outcome concerns the subjects who received the RTS,S or Engerix-B vaccine co-administered with Synflorix. Results presented are for the study groups pooled by coadministration, that is, for the RTS,S Regimen A and Engerix-B Regimen A groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month (1M) post Dose 3 of Synflorix
    Notes
    [19] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The results in this study were tabulated by the study groups pooled by co-administration. Hence for each related endpoint, they are presented for only the respective groups in the baseline period, while the results for multiple endpoints account for all baseline groups.
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    133
    124
    Units: Titer
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        ANTI-1
    48.9 (34.6 to 68.9)
    65 (45 to 93.7)
        ANTI-4
    768.3 (617.6 to 955.8)
    810.9 (676.5 to 972)
        ANTI-5
    77.6 (61.9 to 97.3)
    93.8 (73.6 to 119.6)
        ANTI-6B
    444.4 (295 to 669.5)
    389.3 (250.1 to 606.1)
        ANTI-7F
    3774 (3232.7 to 4405.8)
    3947.4 (3338.3 to 4667.7)
        ANTI-9V
    1257.7 (977.3 to 1618.7)
    1469.3 (1180.4 to 1828.8)
        ANTI-14
    1426.3 (1136 to 1790.9)
    1269 (965.1 to 1668.6)
        ANTI-18C
    192.6 (139.2 to 266.4)
    249.7 (185 to 337)
        ANTI-19F
    159.3 (109.9 to 231)
    228.8 (160.4 to 326.3)
        ANTI-23F
    760.9 (476.3 to 1215.5)
    735.6 (456.3 to 1185.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Titers for opsonophagocytic activity against Synflorix pneumococcal vaccine serotypes at Month 17

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Titers for opsonophagocytic activity against Synflorix pneumococcal vaccine serotypes at Month 17 [20]
    End point description
    The pneumococcal vaccine serotypes assessed were the serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F. Streptococcus pneumoniae opsonophagocytic activity was presented as the dilution of serum (opsonic titer) able to sustain 50 % killing of live pneumococci under the assay conditions, expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs). The cut-off of the assay was an opsonic dilution >= 8. This outcome concerns the subjects who received the RTS,S or Engerix -B vaccine co-administered with Synflorix . Results presented are for the study groups pooled by coadministration, that is, for the RTS,S Regimen A and Engerix -B Regimen A groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 17, aka one month post the Month 16 booster dose of Synflorix
    Notes
    [20] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The results in this study were tabulated by the study groups pooled by co-administration. Hence for each related endpoint, they are presented for only the respective groups in the baseline period, while the results for multiple endpoints account for all baseline groups.
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    130
    121
    Units: Titer
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Opsono-1
    649.9 (464.7 to 908.9)
    840.1 (603.4 to 1169.7)
        Opsono-4
    2347.1 (1847.4 to 2982)
    2527.8 (2064.1 to 3095.7)
        Opsono-5
    324.2 (244.1 to 430.5)
    392.8 (291.3 to 529.6)
        Opsono-6B
    955.3 (761.4 to 1198.6)
    828.2 (652.7 to 1050.9)
        Opsono-7F
    9167.3 (7979.2 to 10532.3)
    7794.6 (6577.6 to 9236.8)
        Opsono-9V
    3035.3 (2523.3 to 3651.3)
    3164.6 (2669.8 to 3751.1)
        Opsono-14
    1975.7 (1565.8 to 2493)
    1865 (1463.9 to 2375.9)
        Opsono-18C
    1694.1 (1188.6 to 2414.7)
    1548.7 (1096.3 to 2188)
        Opsono-19F
    344.5 (223 to 532.3)
    469.7 (320 to 689.4)
        Opsono-23F
    3199.8 (2543.7 to 4025.1)
    3198.1 (2526.5 to 4048.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Anti-protein D (PD) antibody concentrations at Month 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-protein D (PD) antibody concentrations at Month 3 [21]
    End point description
    Anti-PD antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), in ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). The cut-off of the assay was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to 100 EL.U/mL. This outcome concerns the subjects who received the RTS,S or Engerix-B vaccine co-administered with Synflorix. Results presented are for the study groups pooled by co-administration, that is, for the RTS,S Regimen A and Engerix-B Regimen A groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka at one month post Dose 3 of Synflorix
    Notes
    [21] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The results in this study were tabulated by the study groups pooled by co-administration. Hence for each related endpoint, they are presented for only the respective groups in the baseline period, while the results for multiple endpoints account for all baseline groups.
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    141
    134
    Units: EL.U/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        EL.U/mL
    2435.3 (2204.3 to 2690.6)
    2956.7 (2647.5 to 3302.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Anti-protein D (PD) antibody concentrations at Month 17

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-protein D (PD) antibody concentrations at Month 17 [22]
    End point description
    Anti-PD antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), in ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). The cut-off of the assay was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to 100 EL.U/mL. This outcome concerns the subjects who received the RTS,S or Engerix -B vaccine co-administered with Synflorix. Results presented are for the study groups pooled by co-administration, that is, for the RTS,S Regimen A and Engerix -B Regimen A groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 17, aka one month post the Month 16 booster dose of Synflorix
    Notes
    [22] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The results in this study were tabulated by the study groups pooled by co-administration. Hence for each related endpoint, they are presented for only the respective groups in the baseline period, while the results for multiple endpoints account for all baseline groups.
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    133
    126
    Units: EL.U/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        EL.U/mL
    2648.3 (2194.2 to 3196.4)
    2819.1 (2391.1 to 3323.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Concentrations of antibodies against acellular B-pertussis (BPT) at Day 0 and at Month 3

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Concentrations of antibodies against acellular B-pertussis (BPT) at Day 0 and at Month 3
    End point description
    The antibodies against BPT assessed were against pertussis toxoid (anti-PT), against filamentous haemagglutinin (anti-FHA), and against pertactin (anti-PRN). Concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), in ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). The cut-off of the assay was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 5 EL.U/mL. The table shows results for study groups pooled by primary vaccine administered (RTS,S vs Engerix -B).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Day 0 and at Month 3 (one month post Dose 3 of Infanrix-Hib)
    End point values
    RTS,S Group Engerix B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    401
    253
    Units: EL.U/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Anti-PT – At Day 0
    3.8 (3.6 to 4.1)
    4.3 (3.9 to 4.8)
        Anti-PT – At Month 3
    105.9 (99.2 to 113.1)
    114.2 (104.8 to 124.5)
        Anti-FHA – At Day 0
    13.9 (12.7 to 15.2)
    15.7 (14.1 to 17.5)
        Anti-FHA – At Month 3
    271.1 (252.8 to 290.8)
    292.9 (268.9 to 319.1)
        Anti-PRN – At Day 0
    3.2 (3 to 3.4)
    3.2 (3 to 3.5)
        Anti-PRN – At Month 3
    164.1 (153.6 to 175.3)
    179.7 (164.4 to 196.5)
    Statistical analysis title
    Anti-PT response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody response to the acellular B pertussis antigen, pertussis toxoid, (PT) of the DTPa/Hib vaccine when co-administered with RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Group v Engerix B Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    654
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [23]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.08
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.97
         upper limit
    1.2
    Notes
    [23] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA, anti-PRN antibody concentrations, is below a limit of 2 for the DTPa/Hib vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Anti-FHA response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody response to the acellular B pertussis antigen, filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), of the DTPa/Hib vaccine when co-administered with RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    Engerix B Group v RTS,S Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    654
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [24]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.08
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.97
         upper limit
    1.21
    Notes
    [24] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA, anti-PRN antibody concentrations, is below a limit of 2 for the DTPa/Hib vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.
    Statistical analysis title
    Anti-PRN response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody response to the acellular B pertussis antigen, pertactin (anti-PRN), of the DTPa/Hib vaccine when co-administered with RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    RTS,S Group v Engerix B Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    654
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [25]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.98
         upper limit
    1.22
    Notes
    [25] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 3, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the GMC ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA, anti-PRN antibody concentrations, is below a limit of 2 for the DTPa/Hib vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.

    Secondary: Anti-Rotavirus (anti-RV) antibody concentrations

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-Rotavirus (anti-RV) antibody concentrations [26]
    End point description
    Anti-Rotavirus (anti-RV) antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)and expre ssed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs). The cut-off of the assay was the seropositive cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 20 units per milliliter (U/mL). This outcome measure was assessed in subjects who were administered Rotarix as part of an EPI regimen, with and without RTS,S vaccine co-administration. This outcome concerns the subjects who received the RTS,S or Engerix-B vaccine co-administered with Rotarix. Results presented are for the study groups pooled by RTS,S or Engerix-B vaccine co-administration, that is, for the RTS,S Regimen B and Engerix-B Regimen B groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 3, aka one month post Dose 2 of Rotarix
    Notes
    [26] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: The results in this study were tabulated by the study groups pooled by co-administration. Hence for each related endpoint, they are presented for only the respective groups in the baseline period, while the results for multiple endpoints account for all baseline groups.
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen B Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    120
    116
    Units: U/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        U/mL
    24.9 (19.3 to 32)
    27.6 (20.8 to 36.5)
    Statistical analysis title
    Anti-RV response
    Statistical analysis description
    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of antibody response to the rotavirus vaccine when co-administered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E as part of an EPI regimen.
    Comparison groups
    Engerix B Regimen B Group v RTS,S Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    236
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority [27]
    Method
    ANOVA
    Parameter type
    GMC ratio
    Point estimate
    1.11
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.76
         upper limit
    1.61
    Notes
    [27] - Criteria for non-inferiority: one month post Dose 2, upper limit (UL) of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the geometric mean concentrations (GMC) ratios of rotavirus antibodies (IgA) concentrations is below 2 for the rotavirus vaccine when coadministered with versus without RTS,S/AS01E.

    Secondary: Number of subjects with solicited local symptoms

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with solicited local symptoms
    End point description
    Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness and swelling at the site of injection. All solicited local symptoms assessed were considered by the investigator as causally related to the study vaccination. Analysis for this outcome was performed solely for the 7-days follow-up periods following the primary vaccination with RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B (at Day 0, and Months 1 and 2). Data presented are those for any occurrence of the assessed solicited local symptoms, that is, the occurrences of these symptoms regardless of their intensity grade.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Within the 7-day follow-up period (Days 0-6) after administration of Dose (D) 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with RTS,S or Engerix-B vaccine
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Pain - Post D1
    41
    28
    31
    29
    15
        Pain – Post D2
    30
    14
    21
    24
    9
        Pain – Post D3
    14
    10
    14
    18
    7
        Redness – Post D1
    1
    0
    2
    5
    1
        Redness – Post D2
    5
    1
    2
    3
    0
        Redness – Post D3
    3
    0
    1
    3
    0
        Swelling – Post D1
    5
    2
    6
    10
    4
        Swelling – Post D2
    8
    3
    4
    9
    4
        Swelling – Post D3
    7
    2
    6
    11
    3
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with solicited general symptoms

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with solicited general symptoms
    End point description
    Assessed solicited general symptoms were fever, irritability/fussiness, drowsiness, and loss of appetite. Fever was defined as axillary temperature higher than (>) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C). Analysis for this outcome was performed solely for the 7-days follow-up periods following the primary vaccination with RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B (at Day 0, and Months 1 and 2). Data presented are those for any occurrence of the assessed solicited general symptoms, that is, the occurrences of these symptoms regardless of their intensity grade or relationship to vaccination.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Within the 7-day follow-up period (Days 0-6) after administration of Dose (D) 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with RTS,S or Engerix-B vaccine
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Fever – D1
    44
    20
    16
    23
    13
        Fever – D2
    30
    14
    18
    20
    5
        Fever – D3
    38
    20
    26
    16
    12
        Irritability – D1
    15
    11
    11
    9
    5
        Irritability – D2
    13
    7
    12
    10
    0
        Irritability – D3
    5
    3
    10
    6
    1
        Drowsiness – D1
    2
    1
    3
    3
    0
        Drowsiness – D2
    5
    1
    1
    3
    0
        Drowsiness – D3
    3
    0
    2
    1
    0
        Loss of appetite – D1
    4
    1
    2
    4
    0
        Loss of appetite – D2
    3
    1
    1
    3
    0
        Loss of appetite – D3
    2
    0
    1
    1
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with potential immune mediated disorders (pIMDs) from Day 0 to Month 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with potential immune mediated disorders (pIMDs) from Day 0 to Month 8
    End point description
    A potential immune mediated disorder (pIMD) was defined as an event about which concerns arose that vaccination may have interfered with immunological self-tolerance of the subjects. IMDs assessed included among others neuroinflammatory disorders (such as optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis, or encephalitis), musculoskeletal disorders (such as cutaneous lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, or psoriatic arthropathy), gastrointestinal disorders (ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis, celiac disease), metabolic diseases (such as autoimmune thyroiditis, or diabetes Mellitus Type 1, Addison’s disease), skin disorders (such as psoriasis or vitiligo), and other disorders such as vasculitis, pernicious anemia, or, sarcoidosis.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Day 0 to Month 8
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Subject
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with potential immune mediated disorders (pIMDs) from Day 0 to Month 26

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with potential immune mediated disorders (pIMDs) from Day 0 to Month 26
    End point description
    A potential immune mediated disorder (pIMD) was defined as an event about which concerns arose that vaccination may have interfered with immunological self-tolerance of the subjects. IMDs assessed included among others neuroinflammatory disorders (such as optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis, or encephalitis), musculoskeletal disorders (such as cutaneous lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, or psoriatic arthropathy), gastrointestinal disorders (ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis, celiac disease), metabolic diseases (such as autoimmune thyroiditis, or diabetes Mellitus Type 1, Addison’s disease), skin disorders (such as psoriasis or vitiligo), and other disorders such as vasculitis, pernicious anemia, or, sarcoidosis.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From study start at Day 0 to Month 26
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Subject
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with unsolicited adverse events (AEs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with unsolicited adverse events (AEs)
    End point description
    An unsolicited AE was defined as an untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product) reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Within the 30-day follow-up periods (Days 0-29) after vaccination with RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Subject
    121
    115
    120
    120
    105
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with any and fatal serious adverse events (SAEs) within the 30-day follow-up periods (Days 0-29)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with any and fatal serious adverse events (SAEs) within the 30-day follow-up periods (Days 0-29)
    End point description
    A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was lifethreatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity or a reported adverse event of specific interest such as seizures occurring within a 30-day period of vaccination, immune-mediated disorders, and specific autoimmune diseases. A fatal SAE was defined as a SAE resulting in the death of the study subject.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Within the 30-day follow-up periods (Days 0-29) after vaccination with RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Subject with SAE(s)
    1
    3
    3
    1
    3
        Subjects with fatal SAE(s)
    1
    0
    1
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with any and fatal serious adverse events (SAEs) from Day 0 to Month 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with any and fatal serious adverse events (SAEs) from Day 0 to Month 8
    End point description
    A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity or a reported adverse event of specific interest such as seizures occurring within a 30-day period of vaccination, immune-mediated disorders, and specific autoimmune diseases. A fatal SAE was defined as a SAE resulting in the death of the study subject.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Day 0 to Month 8
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Subjects with SAE(s)
    1
    7
    7
    3
    5
        Subjects with fatal SAE(s)
    1
    2
    2
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with any and fatal serious adverse events (SAEs) from Day 0 to Month 26

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with any and fatal serious adverse events (SAEs) from Day 0 to Month 26
    End point description
    A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity or a reported adverse event of specific interest such as seizures occurring within a 30-day period of vaccination, immune-mediated disorders, and specific autoimmune diseases. A fatal SAE was defined as a SAE resulting in the death of the study subject.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Day 0 to Month 26
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Any SAEs - At Month 26
    1
    8
    7
    6
    6
        Fatal SAEs - At Month 26
    1
    3
    2
    2
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations at Month 38, 50 and 51

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-Hepatitis B (HBs) antibody concentrations at Month 38, 50 and 51
    End point description
    Concentrations, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and expressed in milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 10 mIU/mL. A decrease in the specificity of the anti-HBs ELISA assay had been observed in some studies for low levels of antibody (10-100 mIU/mL). The table shows updated results following partial or complete retesting/reanalysis. Results presented are for each RTS,S Regimen A, B & C, and for each Engerix B Regimen A & B study groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Months 38, 50 and 51, aka 36 and 48 months post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B and one month post the Month 50 booster dose of Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    131
    111
    122
    127
    106
    Units: mIU/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Month 38
    706.8 (548.0 to 911.6)
    1081.7 (845.3 to 1384.2)
    977.4 (786.7 to 1214.3)
    39.0 (29.0 to 52.4)
    41.2 (29.8 to 57.0)
        Month 50
    499.4 (382.2 to 652.6)
    765.3 (590.5 to 992.0)
    807.3 (649.6 to 1003.4)
    29.2 (22.0 to 38.7)
    32.9 (23.9 to 45.4)
        Month 51
    32345.9 (24758.5 to 42258.4)
    54977.1 (43579.1 to 69356.4)
    59630.0 (48606.1 to 73154.0)
    8995.0 (5935.8 to 13631.0)
    9578.9 (6374.2 to 14395.0)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Concentrations of antibodies to the Hepatitis B RF1 surface antigen (anti- HBs RF1) at Month 51

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Concentrations of antibodies to the Hepatitis B RF1 surface antigen (anti- HBs RF1) at Month 51
    End point description
    Anti-HBs RF1 antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and presented as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) expressed in ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 33 EL.U/mL. The table shows results for each RTS,S Regimen A, B & C, and for each Engerix B Regimen A & B study groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Month 51, aka one month post the Month 50 booster dose of Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    124
    104
    113
    107
    95
    Units: EL.U/mL
        geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
    307.8 (239.0 to 396.4)
    471.6 (372.5 to 597.1)
    514.5 (415.3 to 637.5)
    120.5 (86.6 to 167.6)
    127.9 (94.5 to 173.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Anti-circumsporozoite protein (anti-CS) antibody concentrations at Month 38 and 50

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Anti-circumsporozoite protein (anti-CS) antibody concentrations at Month 38 and 50
    End point description
    Anti-CS antibody concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) expressed in ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). The assay cut-off was the seropositivity cut-off value of greater than or equal to (>=) 1.9 EL.U/mL. The table shows results for each RTS,S Regimen A, B & C, and for each Engerix B Regimen A & B study groups.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At Months 38 and 50, aka 36 and 48 months post Dose 3 of RTS,S vaccine or Engerix-B
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    131
    111
    122
    127
    107
    Units: EL.U/mL
    geometric mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Month 38
    2.6 (2.2 to 3.1)
    2.8 (2.3 to 3.4)
    3.5 (2.9 to 4.2)
    1.0 (1.0 to 1.1)
    1.0 (1.0 to 1.0)
        Month 50
    2.3 (2.0 to 2.7)
    2.4 (2.0 to 2.8)
    2.7 (2.3 to 3.2)
    1.1 (1.0 to 1.1)
    1.1 (1.0 to 1.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with potential immune mediated disorders (pIMDs) from Day 0 up to Study End (Month 51)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with potential immune mediated disorders (pIMDs) from Day 0 up to Study End (Month 51)
    End point description
    A potential immune mediated disorder (pIMD) was defined as an event about which concerns arose that vaccination may have interfered with immunological self-tolerance of the subjects. IMDs assessed included among others neuroinflammatory disorders (such as optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis, or encephalitis), musculoskeletal disorders (such as cutaneous lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, or psoriatic arthropathy), gastrointestinal disorders (ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis, celiac disease), metabolic diseases (such as autoimmune thyroiditis, or diabetes Mellitus Type 1, Addison’s disease), skin disorders (such as psoriasis or vitiligo), and other disorders such as vasculitis, pernicious anemia, or, sarcoidosis.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Day 0 up to Study End (Month 51)
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of subjects with any, fatal and related serious adverse events (SAEs) from Day 0 up to Study End (Month 51)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of subjects with any, fatal and related serious adverse events (SAEs) from Day 0 up to Study End (Month 51)
    End point description
    A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity or a reported adverse event of specific interest such as seizures occurring within a 30-day period of vaccination, immune-mediated disorders, and specific autoimmune diseases. A fatal SAE was defined as a SAE resulting in the death of the study subject. A related SAE was defined as a SAE assessed by the investigator as being causally related to vaccination.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Day 0 up to Study End (Month 51)
    End point values
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Number of subjects analysed
    142
    142
    141
    141
    139
    Units: Subject
        Any SAEs
    3
    10
    9
    6
    6
        Fatal SAEs
    3
    5
    4
    2
    1
        Related SAEs
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Solicited local, general symptoms and unsolicited AEs: within the 30-day periods after primary co-administration vaccination. SAEs: during the entire study period (Month 0 to Month 51).
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    20.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen A Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen A Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen A Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen A Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin and Synflorix, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, and 2 doses of Rotarix vaccine, at Weeks 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen B Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen B Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen B Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen B Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 4 and 8, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    RTS,S Regimen C Group
    Reporting group description
    This group results from the pooling of the RTS,S Regimen C Lot 1, RTS,S Regimen C Lot 2 and RTS,S Regimen C Lot 3 groups. Subjects, healthy male and female infants aged between 8 and 12 weeks inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received 3 doses of RTS,S vaccine, Lot 1, 2 or 3, co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 6 and 10, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. In addition, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. The RTS,S vaccine and Engerix B were administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    Engerix B Regimen A Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects, healthy male and female infants between 8 and 12 weeks of age inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received the Engerix-B Vaccination Regimen A. This regimen included 3 doses of Engerix B co-administered with Infanrix-Hib, Polio Sabin and Synflorix at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, and 2 doses of Rotarix, at Weeks 6 and 10. Additionally, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Reporting group title
    Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Reporting group description
    Subjects, healthy male and female infants between 8 and 12 weeks of age inclusive at the time of first vaccination, received the Engerix-B Vaccination Regimen B. This regimen included 3 doses of Engerix B co-administered with Infanrix-Hib and Polio Sabin, at Weeks 0, 4 and 8, 2 doses of Rotarix vaccine, at Weeks 4 and 8, and 3 doses of Synflorix at Weeks 2, 6 and 10. Additionally, subjects also received one dose of vaccine against yellow fever and against measles, at Week 32, and one booster dose of Infanrix-Hib and Synflorix, at Month 16, and one booster dose of Engerix B vaccine, at Month 50. Engerix B was administered intramuscularly (IM) in the left anterolateral thigh, Infanrix-Hib IM in the right deltoid, Synflorix IM in the right anterolateral thigh, and Rotarix and Polio Sabin orally. The measles and yellow fever vaccines were administered IM in the deltoid.

    Serious adverse events
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 142 (2.11%)
    10 / 142 (7.04%)
    9 / 141 (6.38%)
    6 / 141 (4.26%)
    6 / 139 (4.32%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    3
    5
    4
    2
    1
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
    Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Cardiac failure congestive
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Febrile convulsion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    3 / 141 (2.13%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 3
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    Intravascular haemolysis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Malaria
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    2 / 142 (1.41%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Endocarditis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Escherichia urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fungal infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    2 / 142 (1.41%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Trichomoniasis intestinal
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bacterial sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Bronchiolitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Meningitis bacterial
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Meningitis streptococcal
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Salmonella sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Failure to thrive
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Malnutrition
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    RTS,S Regimen A Group RTS,S Regimen B Group RTS,S Regimen C Group Engerix B Regimen A Group Engerix B Regimen B Group
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    135 / 142 (95.07%)
    129 / 142 (90.85%)
    132 / 141 (93.62%)
    135 / 141 (95.74%)
    119 / 139 (85.61%)
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    55 / 142 (38.73%)
    40 / 142 (28.17%)
    47 / 141 (33.33%)
    48 / 141 (34.04%)
    25 / 139 (17.99%)
         occurrences all number
    85
    52
    66
    71
    32
    Swelling
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 142 (11.97%)
    7 / 142 (4.93%)
    14 / 141 (9.93%)
    23 / 141 (16.31%)
    10 / 139 (7.19%)
         occurrences all number
    20
    7
    16
    30
    11
    Pyrexia
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    81 / 142 (57.04%)
    49 / 142 (34.51%)
    50 / 141 (35.46%)
    55 / 141 (39.01%)
    34 / 139 (24.46%)
         occurrences all number
    116
    56
    66
    65
    37
    Immune system disorders
    Drug hypersensitivity
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    2
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Allergic bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    2 / 142 (1.41%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    2
    0
    0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Irritability
         subjects affected / exposed
    28 / 142 (19.72%)
    18 / 142 (12.68%)
    27 / 141 (19.15%)
    19 / 141 (13.48%)
    5 / 139 (3.60%)
         occurrences all number
    33
    21
    33
    25
    6
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Arthropod bite
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Contusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Foreign body in eye
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Wound
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
    Respiratory tract malformation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Somnolence
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 142 (5.63%)
    2 / 142 (1.41%)
    5 / 141 (3.55%)
    5 / 141 (3.55%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    2
    6
    7
    0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    1
    2
    2
    Iron deficiency anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Excessive cerumen production
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    1
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    1
    2
    2
    Anal fissure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    2
    1
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    1
    2
    0
    Enteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Mouth ulceration
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Stomatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Erythema
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    19 / 142 (13.38%)
    8 / 142 (5.63%)
    20 / 141 (14.18%)
    12 / 141 (8.51%)
    6 / 139 (4.32%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    8
    20
    13
    6
    Dermatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    1
    1
    Dermatitis allergic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Dermatitis atopic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    3 / 142 (2.11%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    0
    1
    0
    Dermatitis diaper
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    0
    2
    1
    Dermatosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    3 / 141 (2.13%)
    4 / 141 (2.84%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    3
    4
    1
    Eczema
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Prurigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    4 / 141 (2.84%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    4
    0
    1
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Dysuria
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Infections and infestations
    Conjunctivitis
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 142 (5.63%)
    10 / 142 (7.04%)
    11 / 141 (7.80%)
    9 / 141 (6.38%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    10
    12
    10
    7
    Malaria
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    44 / 142 (30.99%)
    44 / 142 (30.99%)
    39 / 141 (27.66%)
    49 / 141 (34.75%)
    44 / 139 (31.65%)
         occurrences all number
    50
    54
    46
    52
    53
    Gastroenteritis
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    42 / 142 (29.58%)
    47 / 142 (33.10%)
    51 / 141 (36.17%)
    43 / 141 (30.50%)
    38 / 139 (27.34%)
         occurrences all number
    55
    58
    71
    57
    47
    Rhinitis
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    32 / 142 (22.54%)
    35 / 142 (24.65%)
    33 / 141 (23.40%)
    31 / 141 (21.99%)
    31 / 139 (22.30%)
         occurrences all number
    37
    41
    41
    36
    36
    Bronchitis
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    36 / 142 (25.35%)
    33 / 142 (23.24%)
    28 / 141 (19.86%)
    28 / 141 (19.86%)
    29 / 139 (20.86%)
         occurrences all number
    47
    35
    35
    31
    37
    Pharyngitis
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    23 / 142 (16.20%)
    13 / 142 (9.15%)
    15 / 141 (10.64%)
    15 / 141 (10.64%)
    17 / 139 (12.23%)
         occurrences all number
    24
    15
    19
    18
    18
    Otitis media
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 142 (7.75%)
    12 / 142 (8.45%)
    6 / 141 (4.26%)
    15 / 141 (10.64%)
    10 / 139 (7.19%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    13
    6
    19
    11
    Upper respiratory tract infection
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    16 / 142 (11.27%)
    8 / 142 (5.63%)
    12 / 141 (8.51%)
    8 / 141 (5.67%)
    7 / 139 (5.04%)
         occurrences all number
    18
    9
    15
    9
    10
    Respiratory tract infection
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 142 (7.04%)
    14 / 142 (9.86%)
    15 / 141 (10.64%)
    12 / 141 (8.51%)
    10 / 139 (7.19%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    16
    18
    13
    11
    Fungal skin infection
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    7 / 142 (4.93%)
    6 / 141 (4.26%)
    12 / 141 (8.51%)
    4 / 139 (2.88%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    7
    6
    12
    4
    Bronchiolitis
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 142 (5.63%)
    5 / 142 (3.52%)
    5 / 141 (3.55%)
    4 / 141 (2.84%)
    4 / 139 (2.88%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    5
    5
    4
    4
    Pneumonia
    alternative assessment type: Non-systematic
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 142 (3.52%)
    14 / 142 (9.86%)
    4 / 141 (2.84%)
    11 / 141 (7.80%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    15
    4
    11
    2
    Abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 142 (1.41%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    1
    2
    0
    Acarodermatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Anal fungal infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Bullous impetigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 142 (2.11%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Candida infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    2
    0
    Conjunctivitis bacterial
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    1
    2
    0
    Dysentery
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    2
    0
    Ear infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 142 (1.41%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Folliculitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Fungal infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 142 (2.11%)
    3 / 142 (2.11%)
    5 / 141 (3.55%)
    3 / 141 (2.13%)
    4 / 139 (2.88%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    3
    5
    3
    4
    Furuncle
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    2 / 139 (1.44%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    2
    2
    Gastrointestinal candidiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    1
    0
    Impetigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 142 (2.11%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    4 / 139 (2.88%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    1
    0
    2
    4
    Laryngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    3 / 139 (2.16%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    2
    0
    3
    Oral candidiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 142 (3.52%)
    3 / 142 (2.11%)
    3 / 141 (2.13%)
    4 / 141 (2.84%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    3
    3
    4
    1
    Oral herpes
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Otitis externa
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 142 (2.82%)
    3 / 142 (2.11%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    3
    1
    1
    0
    Otitis media acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Parasitic gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0
    Pyoderma
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 142 (3.52%)
    7 / 142 (4.93%)
    5 / 141 (3.55%)
    6 / 141 (4.26%)
    3 / 139 (2.16%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    7
    5
    7
    3
    Rash pustular
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Skin bacterial infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    1
    1
    0
    Staphylococcal infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Staphylococcal skin infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    0
    Tinea infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    2 / 142 (1.41%)
    2 / 141 (1.42%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    2
    1
    0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    3 / 141 (2.13%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    3
    1
    0
    Viral infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    0
    1
    1
    Viral upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    1
    0
    1
    Visceral larva migrans
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    0 / 142 (0.00%)
    1 / 141 (0.71%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 139 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0
    Wound infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    1 / 142 (0.70%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    0 / 141 (0.00%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    0
    0
    1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 142 (4.93%)
    2 / 142 (1.41%)
    4 / 141 (2.84%)
    5 / 141 (3.55%)
    1 / 139 (0.72%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    2
    4
    8
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 18 08:30:35 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA