Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43873   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7293   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A study to determine regional lung function in patients with Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undegoing radiotherapy using hyperpolarised xenon gas MR imaging

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2011-002028-41
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    31 Dec 2019

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    09 Oct 2021
    First version publication date
    09 Oct 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    HPX-2011-003
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02151604
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    Ethics Ref: 13/SC/0473, Sponsor's Protocol Code Number: HPX-2011-003
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Sponsor organisation address
    Garsington Road, Oxford, United Kingdom, OX4 2PG
    Public contact
    Katie Flight Deputy Head of R&D Governance, Joint Research Office Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 44 01865 572973, ouh.sponsorship@ouh.nhs.uk
    Scientific contact
    Katie Flight Deputy Head of R&D Governance, Joint Research Office Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 44 01865 572973, ouh.sponsorship@ouh.nhs.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    17 Sep 2021
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    31 Dec 2019
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    31 Dec 2019
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    • To demonstrate that hyperpolarized Xe-129 is sensitive to change at midpoint, end of treatment and 3 months following radiotherapy, and thus may be developed as an objective and quantifiable method of functional lung assessment in patients with NSCLC undergoing radiotherapy.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Safety reporting protocol in place throughout the trial. All adverse events observed by the investigator or reported by the patient during and for 24 hours after Xe-129 lung MRI are reported on the case report forms. A member of the research team will contact the participant by telephone 24 hours after completion of hyperpolarized Xe-129 MR imaging to record any AEs that may have occurred after leaving the hospital. These will be clearly documented on the patient CRFs. Thereafter only adverse events where there is a reasonable possibility of a relationship to inhaled xenon (adverse reactions) as judged by the chief investigator, and any adverse event considered by the chief investigator to be of medical interest/ importance are reported. These events will be reported on the case report forms. It will be left to the investigator’s clinical judgment whether or not an AE/ AR is of sufficient severity to require the patient’s removal from Xe-129 MRI scanning. A patient may also voluntarily withdraw from study procedures if they tolerate it poorly. All SAEs (other than those defined in the protocol as not requiring reporting) following Xe-129 lung MRI scanning must be reported on the SAE reporting form to R&D within 24 hours of the Site Study Team becoming aware of the event. R&D will perform an initial check of the report, request any additional information, and ensure it is reviewed by the Medical Monitor on a weekly basis. It will also be reviewed at the next Trial Safety Group meeting. All SAE information must be recorded on an SAE form and faxed, or scanned and emailed, to R&D. Additional and further requested information (follow-up or corrections to the original case) will be detailed on a new SAE Report Form and faxed/emailed to R&D. The Oxford University Hospitals Trust / University of Oxford Trials Safety Group (TSG) will conduct a review of all SAEs for the trial reported during the quarter and cumulatively.
    Background therapy
    No treatment involved in this study
    Evidence for comparator
    Results compared to patients' clinical data, lung function test and chest CT, as in keeping with the standard clincal evaluation of patients receiving radiotherapy therapy to their thorax, and to monitor for the development of radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    08 Apr 2014
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 22
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    22
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    6
    From 65 to 84 years
    15
    85 years and over
    1

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Patients (n=3) were recruited between 08/04/2014 to 20/05/2014 (first recruitment period), then a substantial amendment was made to the study to adjust the study objectives. More patients (n = 19) were recruited between 06/02/2018 to 19/08/2019 (second recruitment period). All patients were recruited at the Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Patients were screend by the team amongst those referred to the lung cancer radiation oncology clinic, checking against inclusion and exclusion criteria as specified in the study protocol.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Second recruitment period (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Not applicable
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    N/A

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Single arm
    Arm description
    All patients in this arm were included in the analysis
    Arm type
    Imaging

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Hyperpolarised 129-Xenon
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation vapour
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Inhalation gas

    Arm title
    Pre-amendment arm
    Arm description
    Before substantial amendment
    Arm type
    Imaging

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Hyperpolarised 129-Xenon
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation vapour
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Inhalation gas

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Single arm Pre-amendment arm
    Started
    19
    3
    Completed
    14
    0
    Not completed
    5
    3
         Physician decision
    -
    3
         Lost to follow-up
    5
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Second recruitment period
    Reporting group description
    19 from the second recruitment period

    Reporting group values
    Second recruitment period Total
    Number of subjects
    22 22
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    72.10 (12.81)
    Units: years
        median (standard deviation)
    72.10 ± 12.81 -
    Gender categorical
    Two males, one female
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    10 10
        Male
    12 12
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Ventilation Change
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Eighteen patients undergoing radiotherapy with expected pulmonary irradiation were recruited for the trial. All patients were previously radiotherapy-naïve. Ten (age: 65.0±15.9, 3:7 = male:female, four with lung, three breast, two oesophageal cancers and one lymphoma) underwent pulmonary function tests (PFTs), chest computed tomography (CT) and HPX-MRI ventilation at 1.5-Tesla, before and on at least one follow-up post-treatment. Images were independently reviewed by two radiologists of 29 and 3 years of specialist experience. Ventilation information was acquired as a summation of the temporal HPX-MRI ventilation signal in the irradiated lung, normalised to the signal in the trachea. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed on the measured ventilation, with CT-derived measurements including airway radius and thickness, and mean attenuation in the irradiated lung, and PFT measurements. A statistical significance level of 5% was used.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Ventilation Change
    Number of subjects
    10
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
        Newborns (0-27 days)
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
        Children (2-11 years)
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
        Adults (18-64 years)
        From 65-84 years
        85 years and over
    Age continuous
    72.10 (12.81)
    Units: years
        median (standard deviation)
    ±
    Gender categorical
    Two males, one female
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    7
        Male
    3

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Single arm
    Reporting group description
    All patients in this arm were included in the analysis

    Reporting group title
    Pre-amendment arm
    Reporting group description
    Before substantial amendment

    Subject analysis set title
    Ventilation Change
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Eighteen patients undergoing radiotherapy with expected pulmonary irradiation were recruited for the trial. All patients were previously radiotherapy-naïve. Ten (age: 65.0±15.9, 3:7 = male:female, four with lung, three breast, two oesophageal cancers and one lymphoma) underwent pulmonary function tests (PFTs), chest computed tomography (CT) and HPX-MRI ventilation at 1.5-Tesla, before and on at least one follow-up post-treatment. Images were independently reviewed by two radiologists of 29 and 3 years of specialist experience. Ventilation information was acquired as a summation of the temporal HPX-MRI ventilation signal in the irradiated lung, normalised to the signal in the trachea. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed on the measured ventilation, with CT-derived measurements including airway radius and thickness, and mean attenuation in the irradiated lung, and PFT measurements. A statistical significance level of 5% was used.

    Primary: Ventilation change of hyperpolarised xenon MRI

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Ventilation change of hyperpolarised xenon MRI
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Midpoint, end of treatment and 3 months post-treatment completion
    End point values
    Single arm Pre-amendment arm Ventilation Change
    Number of subjects analysed
    10 [1]
    3 [2]
    10 [3]
    Units: Number
        Ventilation change
    4
    0
    4
        Correlation with CT
    4
    0
    4
        Correlation with lung function tests
    4
    0
    4
    Attachments
    Result figure
    Notes
    [1] - 10 with complete lung function test results (4 - lung ca, 3 breast, 2 oesophagueal, and 1 lymphoma)
    [2] - Not analysed
    [3] - 10 with complete lung function test results (4 - lung ca, 3 breast, 2 oesophagueal, and 1 lymphoma)
    Statistical analysis title
    Pearson's correlation with CT
    Statistical analysis description
    measured ventilation and the ratio of airway thickness to radius (derived from CT)
    Comparison groups
    Single arm v Ventilation Change
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other [4]
    P-value
    = 0.041 [5]
    Method
    Pearson's correlation analysis
    Parameter type
    Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Point estimate
    -0.57
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.62
         upper limit
    -0.43
    Notes
    [4] - Pearson's correlation analysis was performed on the measured ventilation, with CT-derived measurements - including airway radius and thickness.
    [5] - A statistical significance level of 5% was used.
    Statistical analysis title
    Pearson's correlation with lung function tests
    Statistical analysis description
    alveolar volume/VA (R = 0.60, p = 0.037), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide/TLCO (R = 0.70, p = 0.012), residual volume/RV (R = -0.85, p = 0.032), functional residual capacity/FRC (R = -0.95, p = 0.004) and inspiratory capacity/IC (R = 0.88, p = 0.012).
    Comparison groups
    Single arm v Ventilation Change
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    20
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    other
    P-value
    ≤ 0.05
    Method
    Pearson's correlation analysis
    Parameter type
    Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Point estimate
    0.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.52
         upper limit
    0.67

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    from the first scan to 24 hours after the last scan.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    All observed adverse events or reported by the patient during and for 24 hours after Xe-129 lung MRI are reported on the case report forms. A member of the research team will contact the participant by telephone 24 hours after completion of hyperpolarized Xe-129 MR imaging to record any AEs that may have occurred after leaving the hospital
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    17.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Study cohort
    Reporting group description
    All patients receiving xenon inhalation

    Serious adverse events
    Study cohort
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 22 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Study cohort
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    14 / 22 (63.64%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Palpitations
    Additional description: Mild, brief and transient
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Nervous system disorders
    Dysgeusia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 22 (40.91%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    Euphoric mood
    Additional description: Mild, brief and transient
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 22 (9.09%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    Paraesthesia oral
    Additional description: Lip, brief and self-limiting
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dysphonia
    Additional description: Voice alteration - minor, transient and brief
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 22 (31.82%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    Throat irritation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Chest discomfort
    Additional description: Chest tightness - mild, brief and transient
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    Endocrine disorders
    Saliva altered
    Additional description: Hypersalivation - brief and transient
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 22 (4.55%)
         occurrences all number
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    11 Aug 2017
    The number of participants has been reduced to 30 in total. The number of study visits have been reduced to a maximum of five: - Visit 1 – enrolment (compulsory) Visit 2 – Baseline (compulsory) Visit 3 – Half-way through radiotherapy schedule Visit 4 - Final day of radiotherapy treatment Visit 5 – 3-months post-radiotherapy. Participants will be required to complete at least one follow-up visit, the others are optional. Study measures have been reduced: - Ventilation/perfusion nuclear medicine scan is only to be completed at baseline and is optional Exercise tests have been removed from the protocol Clarification of study measures to be completed by patients with and without a diagnosis of lung cancer The study duration has been reduced to nine months to account for the reduced follow-up period The planned trial period has been increased to 5 years The primary objective has been amended to account for the reduced number of study visits/follow-up period. The change in hyperpolarised Xe-129 MRI will now be determined between baseline and time points post-radiotherapy initiation. The inclusion criteria have been amended to include any patient considered for radiotherapy or chemotherapy affecting the lung. The name of the xenon hyperpolariser model and manufacturer (Polarean) has been amended. Clarification that thoracic CT will be performed at the Churchill hospital The maximum total number of xenon inhalations has been reduced to 24 to account for the reduced number of study visits. Clarification of type of Xe-129 MR sequences to be acquired.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    Two patients were unable to tolerate xenon at baseline and thus withdrawn. Five more patients withdrew before the the first follow-up, thus were deemed not ot have completed the trial Two further patients tolerated xenon at baseline but not at F/U
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Tue May 07 12:41:29 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA