Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43873   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7292   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2011-002751-34
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:8050
    National Competent Authority:Denmark - DHMA
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Completed
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2011-09-05
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedDenmark - DHMA
    A.2EudraCT number2011-002751-34
    A.3Full title of the trial
    An Open-Label Phase II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Combination with Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    An Open-Label Phase II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Combination with Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    ACVDL in myeloma
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code number8050
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorVejle Hospital
    B.1.3.4CountryDenmark
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportVejle Hospital
    B.4.2CountryDenmark
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationVejle Hospital
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointLena Bjerre
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressKabbeltoft 25
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityVejle
    B.5.3.3Post code7100
    B.5.3.4CountryDenmark
    B.5.4Telephone number4579406316
    B.5.5Fax number4579406879
    B.5.6E-maillena.bjerre.haarbo@slb.regionsyddanmark.dk
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Adriamycin
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderPfizer
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationDenmark
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product namedoxorubicin
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Concentrate and solvent for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Cyclophosphamide
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationDenmark
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameCyclophosphamide
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Lyophilisate for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 3
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Velcade
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationDenmark
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameBortezomib
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Lyophilisate and solvent for solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 4
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Revlimid
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderCelgene
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationDenmark
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameLenalidomide
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8 Placebo: 2
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma according to the International Myeloma Working Group Diagnostic Criteria (Kyle 2009)
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma according to the International Myeloma Working Group Diagnostic Criteria (Kyle 2009)
    Formålet med denne protokol er at teste effekten af at behandle patienter med nydiagnostiseret myelomatose med 5 forskellige lægemidler, som alle er aktive overfor myelomatose
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Blood and lymphatic diseases [C15]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Efficacy: To determine the clinical efficacy as measured by response rate (sCR plus CR plus VGPR) of the combination of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma at 4-weeks after completion of 8 cycles of ACVDL, and 3 months after 4 cycles of ACVDL followed by high-dose melphalan.
    Safety: To evaluate the safety profile of the combination of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Male or female subjects ³ 18 years at the time of signing informed consent.
    2. Subject is diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma based on the International Myeloma Working Group Diagnostic Criteria (Kyle 2009):
    a. Monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow ≥10% and/or presence of a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma.
    b. Monoclonal protein present in the serum and/or urine. If no monoclonal protein is detected (non-secretory disease), then ≥30% monoclonal bone marrow plasma cells and/or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma is required.
    c. Myeloma-related organ dysfunction (1 or more)*:
    o [C] Calcium elevation in the blood (Ionized serum calcium > 0.25 mmol/l above the upper limit of normal)
    o [R] Renal insufficiency (Serum creatinine > 173 µmol/l)
    o [A] Anemia (Hemoglobin < 6.0 mmol/l)
    o [B] Lytic bone lesions or osteoporosis#
    * A variety of other types of end-organ dysfunctions can occasionally occur and lead to a need for therapy. Such dysfunction is sufficient to support classification as myeloma if proven to be myeloma related.
    # If a solitary (biopsy-proven) plasmacytoma or osteoporosis alone (without fractures) is the sole defining criteria, then ≥30% plasma cells are required in the bone marrow.
    3. The myeloma disease burden must be measurable with at least one of the following criteria (Durie et al. 2006):
    a. Serum M-protein ≥ 10 g/l
    b. Urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg/24 h
    c. Involved FLC ≥ 100 mg/l provided serum FLC ratio is abnormal
    d. Bone marrow plasma cells > 30%
    4. Subject has a Karnofsky performance status of ≥ 60 (Appendix 10).
    5. Voluntary written informed consent before performance of any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the subject at any time without prejudice to future medical care.
    6. Subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol as judged by the investigator.
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1. Any prior systemic therapy for multiple myeloma.
    2. Other therapies such as biologic therapy and chemotherapy less than 3 months prior to screening.
    3. Concurrent or recent (less than 2 weeks prior to Screening) radiotherapy or surgery.
    4. Prior glucocorticoid treatment of multiple myeloma exceeding dexamethasone 20mg/day for a maximum of 7 days. Topical glucocorticosteroid therapy to treat non-malignant comorbid disorders is permitted.
    5. More than or equal to grade 2 peripheral neuropathy according to the NCI-CTC criteria on clinical examination within 14 days before enrollment (Day 1 of Cycle 1).
    6. Evidence of mucosal or internal bleeding and/or platelet counts < 50 x 109/l. Platelet transfusions may not be used to meet PLT eligibility criteria.
    7. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1 x 109/l. Growth factors may not be used to meet ANC eligibility criteria.
    8. Hemoglobin < 5.0 mmol/l. The subject may be included after correction of the hemoglobin level by transfusion or treatment with erythropoietin.
    9. Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) > 2 x ULN.
    10. Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV heart failure (see Appendix 15), uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities. Prior to study entry, any ECG abnormality at screening has to be documented by the investigator as not medically relevant.
    11. Clinically relevant active infection or serious co-morbid medical conditions, such as chronic obstructive or chronic restrictive pulmonary disease, and cirrhosis.
    12. Any condition, including laboratory abnormalities, that in the opinion of the Investigator places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study.
    13. Prior malignancy (within the last 3 years) except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, in situ breast cancer, in situ prostate cancer or other cancer for which the subject has been disease-free for at least 3 years.
    14. Female subject is pregnant or breast-feeding. The first serum pregnancy test to be done within 10-14 days prior to the study treatment start and repeated serum pregnancy test to be done within 24 hours prior to the start of study treatment.
    15. Female subjects who are of childbearing potential (biologically capable of becoming pregnant) or men with partners of childbearing potential, who are unwilling or unable to use effective means of contraception. The means of contraception must either commit to continued abstinence from sexual intercourse or begin TWO acceptable methods of birth control, one highly effective method (hormonal contraceptives pills, injections or implants, tubal ligation, partner’s vasectomy) and one additional effective method (condom, diaphragm, cervical cap) AT THE SAME TIME, at least 28 days before she starts ACVDL and for at least 28 days after the last dose of ACVDL.
    16. Serious medical or psychiatric illness likely to interfere with participation in this clinical study.
    17. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus at the discretion of the investigator.
    18. Hypersensitivity and/or contraindication to any one of the Investigational Medicinal Products (IMP), acyclovir or similar anti-viral drug.
    19. POEMS syndrome (plasma cell dyscrasia with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein (M-protein) and skin changes).
    20. Known HIV infection.
    21. Known active hepatitis B or C viral infection.
    22. Known intolerance to steroid therapy.
    23. Current or recent (within 30 days prior to Screening) treatment with another investigational drug.
    24. Unable to comply with the administration of the study treatment.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Efficacy
    The response rate of stringent complete response (sCR) or complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) at 4-weeks after completion of 8-cycle ACVDL, and 3 months post 4-cycle ACVDL followed by high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation. The response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve either a sCR or CR or VGPR using International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma (Durie et al. 2006).
    Safety
    The following parameters will be used to evaluate the safety of the ACVDL therapy
    1. Vital signs
    2. Physical examination
    3. Peripheral neuropathy assessment
    4. FACT/GOG-Neurotoxicity Questionnaire
    5. ECG & Echocardiography
    6. Serum haematology, biochemistry and immunology
    7. Urinalysis for protein and glucose
    8. Adverse events (NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0)
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    Safety: Patients are evaluable for safety when they have received at least one dose of study treatment.
    Efficacy: The response rate of stringent complete response (sCR) or complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) at 4-weeks after completion of 8-cycle ACVDL, and 3 months post 4-cycle ACVDL followed by high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation. The response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve either a sCR or CR or VGPR using International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma (Durie et al. 2006).
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    1. The percentage of patients who achieve either a sCR or a CR using IMWG Response Criteria 2006 after completion of 4-cycle ACVDL, 4 weeks after completion of the 8-cycle ACVDL (non-SCT patients), and 3 months post 4-cycle ACVDL followed by high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation (SCT patients). The endpoint will also be evaluated by baseline stage of myeloma according to ISS 2005 when allowed by sample size.
    2. The percentage of patients who achieve a VGPR using IMWG Response Criteria 2006 after completion of 4-cycle ACVDL, 4 weeks after completion of the 8-cycle ACVDL (non-SCT patients), and 3 months post 4-cycle ACVDL followed by high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation (SCT patients). The endpoint will also be evaluated by baseline stage of myeloma according to ISS 2005 when allowed by sample size.
    3. Time to progression (TTP) measured from date of first dose of the ACVDL therapy until documentation of disease progression according to IMWG Response Criteria 2006. The TTP will be stratified by the baseline stage of myeloma according to ISS 2005. Death due to cause other than progression will be censored. Patient without an event will be censored at date last known progression-free.
    4. Progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the start of the ACVDL therapy until documentation of disease progression according to IMWG Response Criteria 2006 or death due to any cause. The PFS will be stratified by the baseline stage of myeloma according to ISS 2005. Patients without an event will be censored at date last known progression-free.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    1. The percentage of patients who achieve either a sCR or a CR or a VGPR using IMWG Response Criteria 2006 after completion of 4-cycle ACVDL, 4 weeks after completion of the 8-cycle ACVDL (non-SCT patients), and 3 months post 4-cycle ACVDL followed by high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation (SCT patients).
    2. Time to progression (TTP) measured from date of first dose of the ACVDL therapy until documentation of disease progression (truncated).
    3. Progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the start of the ACVDL therapy until documentation of disease progression (truncated).
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) Yes
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled No
    E.8.1.1Randomised No
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group No
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial1
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    End of trial is with the last visit of the last patient
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years7
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years7
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 30
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 20
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 15
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations No
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state35
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 35
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 35
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    No difference from normal treatment
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2011-09-13
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2011-10-13
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
    P.Date of the global end of the trial2017-09-28
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon May 06 20:47:50 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA