Clinical Trial Results:
Effect of Roflumilast 500 μg Tablets Once Daily at Acute COPD Exacerbations Treated With Standard Therapy of Oral Steroids and Antibiotics. A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-002905-31 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
16 Apr 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v2(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Sep 2016
|
First version publication date |
06 Aug 2015
|
Other versions |
v1 |
Version creation reason |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
RO-2455-405-RD
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01473758 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
U1111-1137-4023 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Takeda
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
One Takeda Parkway, Deerfield, United States, 60015
|
||
Public contact |
Medical Director, Clinical Science, Takeda, 1 877-825-3327, trialdisclosures@takeda.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Medical Director, Clinical Science, Takeda, 1 877-825-3327, trialdisclosures@takeda.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
30 Jun 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
25 Mar 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
16 Apr 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The purpose of this trial is to investigate if roflumilast can reduce the neutrophilic inflammation at acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In addition, the potential benefit of roflumilast on severity and recovery periods of acute COPD exacerbations will be assessed using patient diaries and questionnaires.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
All study participants were required to read and sign an Informed Consent Form.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
16 Feb 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 81
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
81
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
81
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
18
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
57
|
||
85 years and over |
6
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Participants took part in the study at 1 investigative site in the United Kingdom from 16 February 2012 to 25 March 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Participants with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) were enrolled equally in 1 of 2 treatment groups, once a day placebo or roflumilast 500 µg in Cycle 1. Participants were re-randomized in Cycle 2 to once a day placebo or roflumilast 500 µg and are counted as new participants. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Cycle 1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Roflumilast 500 μg | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Eligible participants were rerandomized to receive either roflumilast 500 μg or placebo for 4 weeks in Cycle 2. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Roflumilast
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Eligible participants were rerandomized to receive either roflumilast 500 μg or placebo for 4 weeks in Cycle 2. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Cycle 2
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Roflumilast 500 µg | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Roflumilast
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects starting the period is not consistent with the number completing the preceding period. It is expected the number of subjects starting the subsequent period will be the same as the number completing the preceding period. Justification: With Amendment 5, patients previously enrolled in the trial were allowed to be re-enrolled with a new exacerbation, if they reached a stable disease status since completing the first treatment cycle. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Roflumilast 500 μg
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Eligible participants were rerandomized to receive either roflumilast 500 μg or placebo for 4 weeks in Cycle 2. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Eligible participants were rerandomized to receive either roflumilast 500 μg or placebo for 4 weeks in Cycle 2. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Roflumilast 500 μg
|
||
Reporting group description |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Eligible participants were rerandomized to receive either roflumilast 500 μg or placebo for 4 weeks in Cycle 2. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Eligible participants were rerandomized to receive either roflumilast 500 μg or placebo for 4 weeks in Cycle 2. | ||
Reporting group title |
Roflumilast 500 µg
|
||
Reporting group description |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Roflumilast 500 µg
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast for 4 weeks added
on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. .
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary Endpoint Analysis | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Roflumilast 500 μg
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
66
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.6491 [1] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Mean Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.404
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-4.731 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
7.538 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
3.07
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The model contains neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline in Sputum Neutrophil Counts at Day 14 Post Exacerbation (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary Endpoint Analysis | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Roflumilast 500 µg
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
76
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.8786 [2] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS Mean Difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.412
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-5.766 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.943 | ||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
2.687
|
||||||||||||
Notes [2] - The model contains neutrophil count at Baseline and treatment as independent variables, fixed effects. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants Whose Sputum Neutrophil Counts Returned to Stable State at Day 14 (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) and were determined with a Neubauer hemocytometer.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 14
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Total Cells (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Total cell count (absolute number of nonsquamous cells per gram of the original sputum sample) were determined using a Neubauer hemocytometer. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Neutrophils (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Macrophages (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of macrophages was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Eosinophils (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of eosinophils was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocyte (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Percentage of Lymphocytes (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Aliquots of a cell suspension prepared from the sputum sample were used to prepare cytospin slides that were stained with Diff-Quik for differential cell counts. 100 cells were counted and the percentage of lymphocytes was determined. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-6 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-8 (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker IL-8 was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker MPO was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Sputum Marker Concentration of Neutrophil Elastase (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sputum samples were collected and processed at the investigational site according to their standard procedures. Sputum inflammatory marker Neutrophil Elastase was quantified by commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin (IL)-6 (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-6 was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker IL-1β (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood was collected and serum biomarker IL-1β was quantified using commercial sandwich ELISA. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP) (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP) (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood was collected and serum biomarker CRP was measured using Roche Modular Analytics E 170 Module. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker Fibrinogen (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Biomarker Plasma fibrinogen was determined using the method described by Clauss. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Blood Biomarker Glucose (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Blood was collected and analyzed for serum glucose levels. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Forced vital capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Pulmonary function testing was performed using spirometry. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in FEV1/FVC (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
FEV1/FVC is the percentage of the vital capacity which is expired in the first second of maximal expiration. In healthy patients the FEV1/FVC is usually around 70%. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement. A Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) was used for analysis with Baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients’ health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient’s wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst).
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients’ health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient’s wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst).
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients’ health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient’s wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Stable State in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Assessment Test (CAT) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The CAT is a short, validated, patient-completed questionnaire to assess the impact of COPD on health status. It comprises 8 questions that cover a broad range of effects of COPD on patients' health. Each question is scored in a range between 0 and 5, with the higher end indicating a higher impact of COPD on the patient's wellbeing. The CAT Total score ranges from 0 best) to 40 (Worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Stable State in Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Test (EXACT-PRO) Weekly Averages (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The EXACT-PRO questionnaire is a new, validated, and standardized measure to evaluate the frequency, severity, and duration of COPD exacerbations. It is a 14-item daily diary, and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are baseline value, treatment, time point, treatment by time point and baseline by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Diaries Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Morning post-medication PEF (the best of 3 attempts measured with a mini-Wright peak-flow meter) was recorded in a daily diary. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Diaries Symptom Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Any increase in the following respiratory symptoms: dyspnea, sputum purulence, sputum amount, wheeze, sore throat, cough, fever, symptoms of a common cold, ie, nasal congestion and discharge over the previous 24 hours were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Any changes in the participant’s usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Diaries Treatment Score Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Any changes in the participant’s usual treatment were recorded in a daily diary. Diaries Symptom Score range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Stable State in Diaries Hours Out of the Home Weekly Average (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Estimates of the length of time the participants were out of their own home on the previous day were recorded in a daily diary. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for Mixed Model Repeated Measurement (MMRM) are stable state value, treatment, time point, and treatment by time point interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Exacerbation Length (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Exacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
8 Weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Exacerbation Length (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Exacerbation length is the period from start of increased symptoms to end of increased symptoms; the last day of an exacerbation was to be followed by 2 days without symptom entries in the diary.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
8 Weeks
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Initial Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Initial Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Days 14 and 28
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in a Subset of Participants (Extended Approach) | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) will be measured in a subset of participants to determine changes in arterial stiffness. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Covariates for MMRM are baseline value, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction.
Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, all randomized participants, with data available at the given time-point. Extended Approach Analysis included all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Days 14 and 28
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Signing of informed consent until Follow-up Visit (Up to 56 days)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
AEs were analyzed using an Initial Approach (all patients treated in Cycle 1) and an Extended Approach (all patients treated in Cycle 1 and patients re-randomized and treated in Cycle 2). The data from the 2 approaches are entered in one table. Please note: a result of 0 corresponds to no patients with AEs for the preferred term > the 5% threshold.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Roflumilast 500 μg (Initial Approach)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Initial Approach Arm includes all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo (Initial Approach)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Initial Approach Arm includes all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Roflumilast 500 µg (Extended Approach)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Roflumilast 500 µg tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Extended Approach Arm includes all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and those participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo (Extended Approach)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo matching roflumilast tablet, once daily, orally in the morning after breakfast added on to standard therapy for acute COPD exacerbations. Extended Approach Arm includes all participants who received treatment in Cycle 1 and those participants who were re-randomized and received treatment in Cycle 2. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||||||
Date |
Amendment |
||||||
28 Nov 2011 |
• Oxygen therapy (less than 8 hours daily) was added as allowed concomitant medication in Section 6.8 of the protocol at the request of the Research Ethics Committee. Exclusion criterion E6 ‘Oxygen therapy (more than 8 hours daily)’ remained unchanged, because patients who received home oxygen therapy (more than 8 hours daily) were to be excluded due to possible severe hypoxemia during COPD exacerbation. |
||||||
16 May 2012 |
• A further objective to investigate the effect of roflumilast on changes in arterial stiffness during recovery from an exacerbation was added. Changes in arterial stiffness from Visit V0 to Visit V2 and Visit V3 were to be measured in a subset of 60 patients by aPWV. A separate patient information sheet and IC were to be signed by patients in this subset. Arterial stiffness has been shown to increase in COPD patients from stable state to exacerbation presentation and remain elevated during the recovery period of the acute exacerbation. As arterial stiffness is a validated measure of cardiovascular risk, and roflumilast is associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, the addition of arterial stiffness measurement was intended to enable exploration of a potential anti-inflammatory effect of roflumilast.
• Additional information on standard antibiotic exacerbation treatment was added to include use of antibiotics other than penicillin and clarithromycin in case of allergy or intolerance of these antibiotics.
• Additional laboratory parameters were added for standard clinical hematology, coagulation, blood chemistry, and endocrinology tests (erythrocyte mean cell volume, mean cell hemoglobin, and mean cell hemoglobin concentration, prothrombin time, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, serum urea, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum albumin, adjusted serum calcium, inorganic blood phosphate, total cholesterol:high density lipoprotein ratio, serum C reactive protein, serum troponin T, and NT-proBNP). These were to provide additional information on the health status of each patient. Troponin T and NT-proBNP are biomarkers for cardiovascular disease and were of interest for the added arterial stiffness measurements. |
||||||
16 May 2012 |
• Additional planned statistical analyses were added: aPWV was to be analyzed by MMRM with change from Visit V0 to Visit V2 and Visit V3 as the dependent variable, and the Visit V0 value, treatment indicator, scheduled visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as independent variables; serum troponin T and NT-proBNP were to be analyzed by ANCOVA with change from Visit V0 to Visit V3 as the dependent variable, and the Visit V0 value and the treatment group as independent variables. |
||||||
02 Nov 2012 |
• The potential ADR ‘angioedema’ was added to the description of the IMP based on a cumulative review of post-marketing reports in which rare (≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000) cases of angioedema were noted with roflumilast in COPD studies (Updated in accordance with IB V6e, 05 October 2012)
• The exclusion criterion E6 ‘Oxygen therapy (more than 8 hours daily)’ was removed because new data were available on the tolerability and safety of roflumilast, indicating that roflumilast could be used in patients with more severe COPD, ie, patients who required long-term oxygen therapy. This information was obtained from the 38 patients randomized in the trial to this point: only 2 withdrawals due to tolerability had occurred, and these were related to insomnia and diarrhea. Allowed concomitant medication ‘oxygen therapy (less than 8 hours daily)’ was updated to ‘oxygen therapy’. |
||||||
23 Nov 2012 |
• As a consequence of the merger of Nycomed GmbH with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. on 31 October 2011, the sponsor of the trial changed in name and legal entity to Takeda Pharma A/S (Denmark). |
||||||
28 Aug 2013 |
• The recruitment period was extended to 2 years.
• Exclusion criterion E21 was changed: patients previously enrolled in the trial were allowed to re-enroll with a new exacerbation, provided they had reached a stable disease status since completing the first cycle of trial treatment. Patients with recurrent exacerbations within 8 weeks of a previous exacerbation, and hence unstable disease, could not be re-enrolled.
• A new approach to the statistical analyses was introduced, to reflect the change to exclusion criterion E21: the primary and confirmatory analyses were to be performed as originally planned, using the data from patients’ first cycle of trial treatment only; all analyses were to be repeated in an exploratory manner including data from both the first cycle and, for re-enrolled patients, the second cycle, and treating re-enrolled patients as if they were new patients.
• Storage conditions were specified: IMP was to be stored below 30° |
||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
None reported |