Clinical Trial Results:
Comparison of 2-chloroprocaïne, bupivacaïne and lidocaïne for spinal anesthesia in knee artroscopy in an outpatient setting: a double blind randomised trial
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-003675-11 |
Trial protocol |
BE |
Global end of trial date |
30 May 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Feb 2020
|
First version publication date |
08 Feb 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
AT06/2011
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
UZ Leuven
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Herestraat 9, Leuven, Belgium,
|
||
Public contact |
Research Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, 32 16344270, christel.huygens@uzleuven.be
|
||
Scientific contact |
Research Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, 32 16344270, christel.huygens@uzleuven.be
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
08 Oct 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
30 May 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
We want to investigate the optimal anesthesia for knee arthroscopy in a day-case setting
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
All patients received standard preemptive pain medication with ketorolac and Paracetamol.
In case of insufficient spinal anesthesia, a general anesthesia was performed
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
19 Sep 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 99
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
99
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
99
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
90
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
9
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
In this prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial, 99 patients scheduled for diagnostic knee arthroscopy in an ambulatory setting were included. | ||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||
Screening details |
We included patients aged 18 years and older who were scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia and having an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists’) physical status I-III. Exclusion criteria were patients using anti-depressant drugs and/ or anti-psychotic medication, allergies to local anesthetics and known prostate hype | ||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor | ||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
chloroprocaine group | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
2-Chloroprocaine
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intratracheal use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
40 mg of plain preservative free 2-chloroprocaine 1% was injected intrathecally
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Lidocaine | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Lidocaine
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intrathecal use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
40 mg of plain lidocaine 1% was injected intrathecally
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Bupivacaine | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
bupivacaine
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intrathecal use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
7.5 mg of plain bupivacaine 0.5% was injected intrathecally
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
chloroprocaine group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Lidocaine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Bupivacaine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
chloroprocaine group
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Lidocaine
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
Bupivacaine
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Time until complete recovery of the sensory block | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Time until recovery of sensation to S5
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Recovery of motor block | ||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
chloroprocaine group v Lidocaine v Bupivacaine
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
92
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.01667 | ||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Complete recovery of motor block | ||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Time until a Bromage score of 0 was reached
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Recovery of sensory block | ||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
chloroprocaine group v Lidocaine v Bupivacaine
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
92
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.01667 | ||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Recovery of motor block | ||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
chloroprocaine group v Lidocaine v Bupivacaine
|
||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
92
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.01667 | ||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
All patients were observed for adverse events until 24 hours postoperatively.
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
21.1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Patients were monitored for transient neurological symptoms, but no patients complained postoperatively. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27281722 |