Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Repeat-Dose Study of the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamics of Subcutaneously-Administered REGN668 in Adult Patients With Extrinsic Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2011-003836-29
    Trial protocol
    HU   DE   CZ  
    Global end of trial date
    25 Jun 2013

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1
    This version publication date
    07 Jun 2017
    First version publication date
    07 Jun 2017
    Other versions
    v2 , v3

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    R668-AD-1117
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01548404
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Sponsor organisation address
    777 Old Saw Mill River Rd., Tarrytown, United States, 10591
    Public contact
    Clinical Trial Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., clinicaltrials@regeneron.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Trial Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., clinicaltrials@regeneron.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    25 Jun 2013
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    25 Jun 2013
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective was to assess the clinical efficacy of repeated subcutaneous (SC) doses of Dupilumab in adult subjects with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent with the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    15 Mar 2012
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 23
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czech Republic: 11
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 19
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 45
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 11
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    109
    EEA total number of subjects
    109
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    106
    From 65 to 84 years
    3
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    The study was conducted at 25 sites in Europe between 03 April 2012 and 25 June 2013. A total of 153 subjects were screened in the study.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Out of 153 subjects, 109 were randomized and enrolled treated into the study. Out of 153 subjects, 109 were randomized and treated in the study. Subjects were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either Dupilumab 300 mg or placebo.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Period
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Placebo (for Dupilumab) once weekly for 12 weeks.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo (For Dupilumab)
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Single subcutaneous injection altered between back of arms, abdomen and upper thighs.

    Arm title
    Dupilumab 300 mg
    Arm description
    Dupilumab 300 mg once weekly for 12 weeks
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Dupilumab 300 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    REGN668/SAR231893
    Other name
    Dupixent
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Single subcutaneous injection altered between back of arms, abdomen and upper thighs

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Started
    54
    55
    Completed
    24
    41
    Not completed
    30
    14
         Other than specified above
    -
    2
         Physician decision
    2
    1
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    -
    3
         Inadequate response to study treatment
    23
    7
         Adverse event
    3
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    2
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo (for Dupilumab) once weekly for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Dupilumab 300 mg
    Reporting group description
    Dupilumab 300 mg once weekly for 12 weeks

    Reporting group values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg Total
    Number of subjects
    54 55 109
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    39.4 ± 12.29 33.7 ± 10.41 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    27 24 51
        Male
    27 31 58
    Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score
    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD.
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    30.8 ± 13.63 28.4 ± 13.57 -
    Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) Score
    IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
    Units: Units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    4 ± 0.69 3.9 ± 0.67 -
    Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
    SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23–31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).
    Units: Units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    69.1 ± 13.38 66.7 ± 13.82 -
    Body Surface Area (BSA)
    BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined.
    Units: Percentage of BSA
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    50.8 ± 24.13 46.8 ± 24.55 -
    5-D Pruritus Scale
    The 5-D Pruritus was a 5-question tool used in clinical trials to assess 5 dimensions of background itch: degree, duration, direction, disability, and distribution. Each question corresponded to 1 of the 5 dimensions of itch. Subjects rated their symptoms over the preceding 2-week period on a scale of 1 (least affected) to 5 (most affected).
    Units: Units on scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    18.7 ± 3.5 18.4 ± 3.04 -
    Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score
    Pruritus NRS scale is an assessment tool that is used to report the intensity of subject’s pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Subjects were asked the following question: how would a subject rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 – 10 [0= no itch; 10= worst itch imaginable]).
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    5.8 ± 1.93 6.1 ± 1.34 -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo (for Dupilumab) once weekly for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Dupilumab 300 mg
    Reporting group description
    Dupilumab 300 mg once weekly for 12 weeks

    Primary: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12- Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 12- Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) [1]
    End point description
    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. The efficacy data were set to be missing after use of rescue medication and after early termination visit for subjects who prematurely discontinued study treatment. Then, all missing values were imputed by simple LOCF. Full analysis set (FAS) population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 12
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: As the endpoint is descriptive in nature, no statistical analysis is provided.
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    55
    Units: percent change
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -23.3 ± 49.26
    -74 ± 26.94
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Subjects With Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 12- LOCF

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Subjects With Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 12- LOCF
    End point description
    IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). The efficacy data were set to be missing after use of rescue medication and after early termination visit for subjects who prematurely discontinued study treatment. Then, all missing values were imputed by simple LOCF. FAS population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    55
    Units: Percentage of subjects
        number (not applicable)
    7.4
    40
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved at Least a 50% Reduction from Baseline in the EASI Score (EASI 50) at Week 12- LOCF

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved at Least a 50% Reduction from Baseline in the EASI Score (EASI 50) at Week 12- LOCF
    End point description
    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-50 responders were the subjects who achieved ≥50% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 12. Efficacy data were set to be missing after use of rescue medication and after early termination visit for subjects who prematurely discontinued study treatment. Then, all missing values were imputed by simple LOCF. FAS population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    55
    Units: Percentage of subjects
        number (not applicable)
    35.2
    85.5
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 12- LOCF

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 12- LOCF
    End point description
    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measured erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. The efficacy data were set to be missing after use of rescue medication and after early termination visit for subjects who prematurely discontinued study treatment. Then, all missing values were imputed by simple LOCF. FAS population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    55
    Units: Units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -6.4 ± 14.85
    -19.9 ± 11.52
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percent Change From Baseline in IGA Score at Week 12- LOCF

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percent Change From Baseline in IGA Score at Week 12- LOCF
    End point description
    IGA is an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response is an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). The efficacy data were set to be missing after use of rescue medication and after early termination visit for subjects who prematurely discontinued study treatment. Then, all missing values were imputed by simple LOCF. FAS population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    55
    Units: Percent Change
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -14.7 ± 27.37
    -49.5 ± 25.94
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis at Week 12- LOCF

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis at Week 12- LOCF
    End point description
    BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The efficacy data were set to be missing after use of rescue medication and after early termination visit for subjects who prematurely discontinued study treatment. Then, all missing values were imputed by simple LOCF. FAS population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    55
    Units: Percentage of BSA
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -9 ± 21.07
    -27.4 ± 22.81
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 12- LOCF

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 12- LOCF
    End point description
    SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of AD developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index). Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology (Basel) 186 (1): 23–31. 1993. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease). The efficacy data were set to be missing after use of rescue medication and after early termination visit for subjects who prematurely discontinued study treatment.Then, all missing values were imputed by simple LOCF.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    55
    Units: Units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -9.8 ± 20.53
    -35 ± 19.43
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) to Week 12- LOCF

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) to Week 12- LOCF
    End point description
    Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a subject’s pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Subjects were asked the following question: how would a subject rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 – 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). The efficacy data were set to be missing after use of rescue medication and after early termination visit for subjects who prematurely discontinued study treatment. Then, all missing values were imputed by simple LOCF. FAS population. Number of subjects analyzed=subjects with available data for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    52
    54
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.9 ± 2.07
    -3.5 ± 2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in 5-D Pruritus Scale at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in 5-D Pruritus Scale at Week 12
    End point description
    The 5-D Pruritus Scale, was a 5-question tool used in clinical trials to assess 5 dimensions of background itch: degree, duration, direction, disability, and distribution. Each question corresponded to 1 of the 5 dimensions of itch. Subjects rated their symptoms over the preceding 2-week period on a scale of 1 (least affected) to 5 (most affected). FAS population.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline to Week 12
    End point values
    Placebo Dupilumab 300 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    54
    55
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -1.9 ± 4.28
    -7.4 ± 4.33
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Day 197) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Reported adverse events (AEs) are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the ‘on treatment period’ (time from first dose of study drug through the end of study [Day 197]).
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    14.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Dupilumab 300 mg
    Reporting group description
    Dupilumab 300 mg once weekly for 12 weeks by SC injection.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Placebo (for Dupilumab) once weekly for 12 weeks by SC injection.

    Serious adverse events
    Dupilumab 300 mg Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 55 (1.82%)
    7 / 54 (12.96%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Facial bones fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 55 (1.82%)
    0 / 54 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Angina pectoris
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Asthmatic crisis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lung disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dermatitis atopic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    2 / 5
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eczema herpeticum
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin bacterial infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Dupilumab 300 mg Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    38 / 55 (69.09%)
    31 / 54 (57.41%)
    Investigations
    Neutrophil count increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    4
    White blood cell count increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 55 (1.82%)
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    4
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 55 (16.36%)
    7 / 54 (12.96%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    11
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Eosinophilia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    Lymphadenopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 55 (0.00%)
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    4
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 55 (9.09%)
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    5
    Injection site erythema
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 55 (7.27%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    1
    Injection site induration
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 55 (9.09%)
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    3
    Injection site reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 55 (5.45%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    1
    Eye disorders
    Conjunctivitis allergic
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 55 (9.09%)
    0 / 54 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 55 (1.82%)
    4 / 54 (7.41%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    7
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 55 (5.45%)
    0 / 54 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    0
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 55 (5.45%)
    1 / 54 (1.85%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 55 (5.45%)
    0 / 54 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Conjunctivitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 55 (14.55%)
    2 / 54 (3.70%)
         occurrences all number
    11
    2
    Impetigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 55 (1.82%)
    3 / 54 (5.56%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    3
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    22 / 55 (40.00%)
    10 / 54 (18.52%)
         occurrences all number
    33
    15
    Oral herpes
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 55 (5.45%)
    0 / 54 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    0
    Rhinitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 55 (5.45%)
    2 / 54 (3.70%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    3

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    11 Nov 2011
    Removed the SF-36 questionnaire from the protocol; Allowed the study drug to be administered in multiple SC locations, and split into 2 injections; Updated the AE severity grading to conform to the current safety template; Changed the end of study visit from week 18 (day 127) to week 20 (day 141); Added section for AEs of special interest; Added anti-parasitics and anti-protozoals to description of chronic or acute infection requiring treatment within 4 weeks of screening; Clarified that the efficacy analysis at week 12 was to be the primary efficacy analysis, not the final efficacy analysis; Revised pharmacokinetics sampling and analysis
    12 Mar 2012
    Clarified that the study was not limited to subjects with extrinsic AD; Corrected the definition of study drug stopping rules; Increased allowable screening and baseline EASI scores from 12 to 16; Added the collection of a Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) sample at days 8 and 22; Indicated that collection of the RNA sample (part of the research samples collected during the study) might require separate written informed consent, as required by local regulatory authorities; Clarified that each dose could be administered as a single 2 mL injection, or split into two 1 mL injections
    20 Aug 2012
    Increased the number of subjects in the study from 80 to 100; Extended the follow-up period from 8 weeks to 16 weeks (5 follow-up visits were added; overall study duration was extended from 20 weeks to 28 weeks); Increased the required use of adequate birth control measures following the last dose of study drug from 8 to 16 weeks

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25006719
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 27 15:59:42 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA